Skip to content

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes POD L GF vs POD F GF in Asian Eyes

Clinical Study to Compare Clinical Outcomes of Trifocal IOLs FineVision POD L GF and FineVision POD F GF After Bilateral Implantation in Asian Eyes

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03688425
Acronym
PHY1802
Enrollment
58
Registered
2018-09-28
Start date
2018-10-09
Completion date
2021-09-30
Last updated
2022-01-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cataract, Lens Opacities, Presbyopia

Keywords

Intraocular Lens, trifocal, hydrophobic

Brief summary

Prospective, randomised, controlled, single-surgeon, single-center clinical study to compare the clinical outcomes of two trifocal IOLs differing in the dominance of additional power. The investigational device POD L GF shows dominance for the intermediate addition (+1.75 D), whereas the control device POD F GF shows dominance for the near addition (+3.5 D). Implantation of the IOLs is bilaterally.

Detailed description

This is a prospective, randomised, controlled, single-surgeon, single-center clinical study whereby patients undergoing routine cataract surgery will have bilateral implantation of trifocal intraocular lenses. The patients will either be implanted with the hydrophobic IOL FineVision POD L GF or the hydrophobic IOL FineVision POD F GF (both lenses: (PhysIOL, Liège, Belgium). The devices under investigation (FineVision POD L GF and POD F GF) are trifocal glistening-free acrylic intraocular lenses (IOLs) manufactured by the sponsor of this study PhysIOL sa/nv. Both consist of the same hydrophobic material. The main difference between the lenses is the dominance of additional power. The investigational device POD L GF shows dominance for the intermediate addition (+1.75 D), whereas the control device POD F GF shows dominance for the near addition (+3.5 D). The IOLs will be implanted as part of the routine cataract surgery on patients suffering from cataract development. Subjects participating in the trial will attend a total of 10 study visits (1 preoperative, 2 operative and 7 postoperative) over a period of 6 months. Subjects would have the option for unscheduled visits if required medically. Primary and secondary endpoint data will be collected at the 6 months follow up visit. Data analyses will be done after the last patient finished the final examination to support the study publication plan.

Interventions

Implantation of trifocal IOL POD F GF consisting of light distribution order: far \> intermediate \> near

Implantation of trifocal IOL POD F GF consisting of light distribution order: far \> near \> intermediate

Sponsors

Beaver-Visitec International, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Cataractous eyes with no comorbidity * Availability, willingness and sufficient cognitive awareness to comply with examination procedures * Signed informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Age of patient \<40 years * Irregular astigmatism * Regular corneal astigmatism \>0.75 dioptres by an automatic keratometer or biometer or \>1.0 dioptres if the steep axis of cylinder is between 90° and 120° * Difficulty for cooperation (distance from their home, general health condition) * Acute or chronic disease or illness that would increase risk or confound study results (e.g. diabetes mellitus (with retinopathy), immunocompromised, glaucoma etc…) * Any ocular comorbidity * History of ocular trauma or prior ocular surgery including refractive procedures * Capsule or zonular abnormalities that may affect postoperative centration or tilt of the lens (e.g. pseudoexfoliation syndrome, chronic Uveitis, Marfan's syndrome) * Pupil abnormalities (non-reactive, tonic pupils, abnormally shaped pupils or pupils that do not dilate under mesopic/scotopic conditions) * AMD suspicious eyes (determined by OCT)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
monocular Best Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (CDVA) under photopic light conditions.3 months postoperativeNo statistically significant difference between the two study groups on monocular CDVA at 3 months follow up visit. A significance level of 0.05 or lower (p \< 0.05) will be considered statistically significant. CDVA is measured with ETDRS charts placed in 4m distance with best aided corrective glasses according to ISO 11979-7:2014.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Uncorrected Distance Visual Acuity (UDVA) under photopic light conditions3 months postoperativeUDVA is measured with ETDRS charts placed in 4m distance according to ISO 11979-7:2014. This assessment is done monocularly and binocularly under photopic light conditions.
Uncorrected Distance Visual Acuity (UDVA) under mesopic light conditions6 months postoperativeUDVA is measured with ETDRS charts placed in 4m distance according to ISO 11979-7:2014. This assessment is done monocularly under mesopic light conditions.
Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (CDVA) under photopic light conditions3 months postoperativeCDVA is measured with ETDRS charts placed in 4m distance with best aided corrective glasses according to ISO 11979-7:2014. This assessment is done binocularly under photopic light conditions.
Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (CDVA) under mesopic light conditions6 months postoperativeCDVA is measured with ETDRS charts placed in 4m distance with best aided corrective glasses according to ISO 11979-7:2014. This assessment is done monocularly under mesopic light conditions.
Distance Corrected Intermediate Visual Acuity at 70cm (DCIVA) under photopic light conditions3 months postoperativeDCIVA is measured with ETDRS charts placed in 70cm distance with corrective glasses for far distance according to ISO 11979-7:2014. This assessment is done monocularly and binocularly under photopic light conditions.
Distance Corrected Intermediate Visual Acuity at 70cm (DCIVA) under mesopic light conditions6 months postoperativeDCIVA is measured with ETDRS charts placed in 70cm distance with corrective glasses for far distance according to ISO 11979-7:2014. This assessment is done monocularly under mesopic light conditions.
Uncorrected Intermediate Visual Acuity at 70cm (UIVA) under photopic light conditions3 months postoperativeUIVA is measured with ETDRS charts placed in 70cm distance. The examination is done without corrective glasses and according to ISO 11979-7:2014. This assessment is done monocularly and binocularly under photopic light conditions.
Uncorrected Intermediate Visual Acuity at 70cm (UIVA) under mesopic light conditions6 months postoperativeUIVA is measured with ETDRS charts placed in 70cm distance. The examination is done without corrective glasses and according to ISO 11979-7:2014. This assessment is done monocularly under mesopic light conditions.
Distance Corrected Near Visual Acuity at 35cm (DCNVA) under photopic light conditions3 months postoperativeDCNVA is measured with ETDRS charts placed in 35cm distance with corrective glasses for far distance according to ISO 11979-7:2014. This assessment is done monocularly and binocularly under photopic light conditions.
Manifested refraction3 months postoperativeThe manifested refraction is measured by means of a phoropter. The data contains values for sphere, cylinder and axis of cylinder according to ISO 11979-7:2014. This data will also be used to calculate the manifested refractive spherical equivalent (MRSE)
Uncorrected Near Visual Acuity at 35cm (UNVA) under photopic light conditions3 months postoperativeUNVA is measured with ETDRS charts placed in 35cm distance. The examination is done without corrective glasses and according to ISO 11979-7:2014. This assessment is done monocularly and binocularly under photopic light conditions.
Uncorrected Near Visual Acuity at 35cm (UNVA) under mesopic light conditions6 months postoperativeUNVA is measured with ETDRS charts placed in 35cm distance. The examination is done without corrective glasses and according to ISO 11979-7:2014. This assessment is done monocularly under mesopic light conditions.
Contrast Sensitivity3 months postoperativeContrast Sensitivity under photopic and mesopic light conditions
Aberrometry3 months postoperativeAberrometry outcomes are measured with a standard aberrometer. The following values will be evaluated in this study: Spherical aberrations, high order aberrations, lens tilt.
AcuTarget diagnostic device3 months postoperativeMeasurement of Ocular Scatter Index (OSI) score to evaluate and compare the scattering of the implanted lenses.
Questionnaire VFQ-25 (National Eye Institute)3 months postoperativeOutcomes measures of a questionnaire to address the general patient satisfaction and possible side effects of the treatment. For this study, the validated and verified questionnaire VFQ-25 (National Eye Institute) will be used. The maximum score for each question is 100.
Defocus Curve monocular1 month postoperativeTo assess the visual acuity for different distances, defocus curves under photopic light conditions are measured. This test is performed with best distance corrected refraction and spherical additions ranging from -5.0 D to +1.5 D. This examination is performed monocularly.
Defocus Curve binocular3 months postoperativeTo assess the visual acuity for different distances, defocus curves under photopic light conditions are measured. This test is performed with best distance corrected refraction and spherical additions ranging from -5.0 D to +1.5 D. This examination is performed binocularly.
Distance Corrected Near Visual Acuity at 35cm (DCNVA) under mesopic light conditions6 months postoperativeDCNVA is measured with ETDRS charts placed in 35cm distance with corrective glasses for far distance according to ISO 11979-7:2014. This assessment is done monocularly under mesopic light conditions.

Countries

Philippines

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026