Skip to content

The Role of Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound in Appendicitis

The Role of Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound in The Diagnosis of Children With Appendicitis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03687502
Enrollment
37
Registered
2018-09-27
Start date
2019-01-04
Completion date
2022-07-05
Last updated
2023-09-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Appendicitis

Brief summary

This study seeks to determine the efficacy of Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) in improving the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in children, when compared to the standard grey-scale ultrasound.

Detailed description

This will be a single-center, non-randomized trial that will add to our institution's current diagnostic algorithm using Contrast Enhanced Ultra Sound (CEUS) in subjects who are clinically suspicious for acute appendicitis. For those who consent to study participation, we propose obtaining a CEUS after the initial gray-scale ultrasound. Once the initial ultrasound is complete, the contrast Lumason® (sulfur hexafluoride lipid type-A microspheres) will be administered through an already existing IV catheter and an abdominal scan will be completed. The patient will then continue with standard of care treatment per his treating physician. The CEUS image will be read at a future time by a Children's Mercy Hospital radiologist blinded to the results of the gray scale ultrasound and computed tomography (CT) scan if one was obtained; these will be used for comparison.

Interventions

Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound of the appendix

Sponsors

Children's Mercy Hospital Kansas City
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Masking description

The CEUS image will be read at a future time by a Children's Mercy Hospital radiologist blinded to the results of the gray scale ultrasound and computed tomography (CT) scan if one was obtained; these will be used for comparison.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
8 Years to 17 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Present to Children's Mercy Adele Hall campus with a clinical concern for acute appendicitis * Age 8 through 17 years * seen between Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval date and 12/31/2019 * Seen Monday- Friday between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 4:00 pm * Has had an IV catheter placed as part of their standard of care

Exclusion criteria

* Known cardiac abnormality * Pulmonary hypertension * Known sensitivity to sulfur hexafluoride, polyethylene glycol 4000, distearoylphosphatidylcholine (DSPC), dipalmitoylphosphatidylglycerol sodium (DPPG-Na), or palmitic acid * Does not had an IV catheter placed * Unable to roll over * Unable to assent * Pregnant * Lactating * Received an ultrasound image from a referring facility

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Children With an Accurate Diagnosis of Appendicitis.1 weekNumber of children with an accurate diagnosis of appendicitis when compared to the standard grey scale ultrasound and/ or CT scan based on the following categories: Category 1: Normal appendix Category 2: Appendix not fully visualized without secondary signs Category 3: Appendix not fully visualized with secondary signs Category 4: Appendicitis

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Definitive Diagnosis1 weekProportion of children with definitive diagnosis of appendicitis with use of CEUS.
Number of Participants Who Required Additional CT Scan30 daysNumber of Participants who Required Additional CT Scan
Percentage of Negative Appendectomies1 weekPercentage of negative appendectomies
Total Cost Difference Compared to Traditional Ultrasound60 daysCosts in comparison to traditional ultrasound
Total Cost Difference Between Traditional Ultrasound in Comparison to Costs in CT Scan.60 daysComparing total costs difference between traditional ultrasound in comparison to costs in CT scan. Total CT Scan Costs - Total Ultrasound Costs = Cost Difference.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound Group
IV sulfur hexafluoride lipid-type A microspheres, 0.03 mL/kg, up to 2 doses per examination, total dose not to exceed 4.8 mL. Single examination per patient. Sulfur hexafluoride lipid-type A microspheres: Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound of the appendix
35
Total35

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyIV was removed prior to radiology visit for ultrasound1
Overall StudyLumason not available1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicContrast Enhanced Ultrasound Group
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
35 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
0 Participants
Age, Continuous11.4 years
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black
2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic
3 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Multiracial
3 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
26 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
35 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
20 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
15 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 35
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 35
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 35

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Children With an Accurate Diagnosis of Appendicitis.

Number of children with an accurate diagnosis of appendicitis when compared to the standard grey scale ultrasound and/ or CT scan based on the following categories: Category 1: Normal appendix Category 2: Appendix not fully visualized without secondary signs Category 3: Appendix not fully visualized with secondary signs Category 4: Appendicitis

Time frame: 1 week

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound GroupNumber of Children With an Accurate Diagnosis of Appendicitis.Category 16 Participants
Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound GroupNumber of Children With an Accurate Diagnosis of Appendicitis.Category 215 Participants
Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound GroupNumber of Children With an Accurate Diagnosis of Appendicitis.Category 31 Participants
Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound GroupNumber of Children With an Accurate Diagnosis of Appendicitis.Category 413 Participants
Secondary

Definitive Diagnosis

Proportion of children with definitive diagnosis of appendicitis with use of CEUS.

Time frame: 1 week

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound GroupDefinitive Diagnosis13 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Required Additional CT Scan

Number of Participants who Required Additional CT Scan

Time frame: 30 days

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound GroupNumber of Participants Who Required Additional CT Scan0 Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Negative Appendectomies

Percentage of negative appendectomies

Time frame: 1 week

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound GroupPercentage of Negative Appendectomies1 Participants
Secondary

Total Cost Difference Between Traditional Ultrasound in Comparison to Costs in CT Scan.

Comparing total costs difference between traditional ultrasound in comparison to costs in CT scan. Total CT Scan Costs - Total Ultrasound Costs = Cost Difference.

Time frame: 60 days

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound GroupTotal Cost Difference Between Traditional Ultrasound in Comparison to Costs in CT Scan.6198 Dollars
Secondary

Total Cost Difference Compared to Traditional Ultrasound

Costs in comparison to traditional ultrasound

Time frame: 60 days

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound GroupTotal Cost Difference Compared to Traditional Ultrasound16 Dollars

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026