Skip to content

Feasibility Study of Neurofeedback Training for Older Adults With Mild Cognitive Impairment

Importance of Exploring Feasibility and Acceptability in Application of EEG Neurofeedback in Older Adults With Mild Cognitive Impairment

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03686839
Acronym
Neurofeedel
Enrollment
22
Registered
2018-09-27
Start date
2017-03-03
Completion date
2018-07-20
Last updated
2018-09-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Mild Cognitive Impairment, So Stated

Keywords

Neurofeedback, Acceptance technology, Electroencephalography, MCI

Brief summary

This is a non-pharmacological study evaluating the feasibility of a neurofeedback training program in elderly with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) according to recruitment, retention, attendance, acceptability data.

Detailed description

Neurofeedback (NF) can be counted amongst promising techniques to improve cognitive functioning if the principles of application are seriously respected, whilst recognizing the necessary adaptation to the conditions of patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI). This study examined the feasibility and acceptability of an electroencephalography neurofeedback training protocol in a sample group of older adults with MCI in order to identify the necessary conditions for an improved neurofeedback application. Participants performed an electroencephalography recording, a battery of neuropsychological tests before the neurofeedback training program (T0), following the neurofeedback training program (T2) and 1-month follow-up (T3). A questionnaire about motivation, opinions of technical aspects of NF and feeling of cognitive improvement was administered at T0 and T2.

Interventions

SMR neurofeedback training consisted to increase the synaptic strengths and sensitivity within this network. Electroencephalography signals for SMR/theta ratio training was recorded at channel Cz according to the International 10-20 system. Theta rhythm was also recorded and, in this case, SMR was stimulated while theta waves were suppressed. A 32 channels system (EEGDigitrack Biofeedback plus module, Inc Elmiko Medical) was used for SMR/theta neurofeedback training.

Sponsors

Fabienne Marlats
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

no randomized, no controlled.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
60 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Clinical diagnosis of Mild Cognitive Impairment * Absence of history of alcohol or other substance consumption

Exclusion criteria

* Psychiatric and neurological disorders * sensory and/or motor deficit. * involving in another cognitive intervention

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Neurofeedback Technology Acceptation QuestionnaireAssessment was at 2 months immediately after the Neurofeedback interventionNeurofeedback Technology Acceptation Questionnaire assessed the participants' opinions face to the electroencephalography neurofeedback intervention with 33 questions. The mode of administration was a personal interview with the investigator, the type of questions was closed-ended (for binary variable yes or no). Answers were analyzed with the Multiple Correspondence Analysis to visualize associations and similarities among participants and answers to Questionnaire. An unsupervised hierarchical clustering was performed using the Euclidean distance and Ward's method. Clusters were defined graphically using dendrogram.

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026