Skip to content

Feasibility and Reliability of Multimodal Evoked Potentials

Feasibility and Reliability of Multimodal Evoked Potentials

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03686826
Acronym
EP-B
Enrollment
40
Registered
2018-09-27
Start date
2016-09-06
Completion date
2018-12-31
Last updated
2019-01-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Multiple Sclerosis

Keywords

evoked potentials (EP), motor evoked potentials (MEP), Somato-sensory evoked potentials (SSEP), multimodal evoked potentials (mmEP)

Brief summary

Multimodal Evoked potentials (mmEP) reflect disease course of multiple sclerosis (MS) and are potentially suited as a biomarker for disease progression. The acquisition of evoked potentials (EP) in this observatory trial is to evaluate the feasibility and test-retest reliability of motor and somato-sensory EP (MEP and SSEP) in an international multicenter setting in healthy subjects and subjects with multiple sclerosis (MS).

Detailed description

Multimodal EP (mmEP) is being developed as a predictive biomarker to determine the clinical response to therapy. MEP and SSEP contributes significantly to the predictive value of mmEP. The variability of MEP and SSEP has limited its use in multicenter clinical trials. Recent technological advances and standardization of procedures has decreased the variability. The objective of this study is to evaluate the reliability of MEP and SSEP and feasibility of performing MEP and SSEP in an international, multicenter setting. Establishment of the reliability and feasibility of MEP and SSEP will allow for further development of this predictive biomarker in future clinical trials.

Interventions

PROCEDUREAcquisition of MEP und SSEP

Acquisition of MEP und SSEP at two different time points within 1 to 30 days

Sponsors

University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 58 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

(Healthy controls): * Ability to understand the purpose and risks of the study and provide signed and dated informed consent and authorization to use protected health information (PHI) in accordance with national and local subject privacy regulations. * Have no significant health issues, ie neuropathy or other demyelinating disorder that can affect testing. Inclusion Criteria (Patients with MS): * Ability to understand the purpose and risks of the study and provide signed and dated informed consent and authorization to use protected health information (PHI) in accordance with national and local subject privacy regulations * Diagnosis of MS (all types) with an expanded disability status scale (EDSS) 0.0 to 6.5 * Have measurable responses on both MEP and SSEP in at least one upper and one lower limb on visit 2. The MEP and SSEP responses do not need to be in the same limb * Have no comorbid condition (ie neuropathy) that could affect testing

Exclusion criteria

* Inability to comply with study requirements * Unspecified reasons that, in the opinion of the Investigator, make the subject unsuitable for enrollment * Any diseases (e.g., non-MS demyelinating diseases), with the exception of diagnosis MS for the MS Cohort, that in the opinion of the Investigator, could influence evoked potential results (including but not limited to medullary trauma, morbid obesity, limb amputation, diabetes, other polyneuropathy) * Conditions interfering with magnetic stimulation (including but not limited to epilepsy, movable metal implants in the body such as pacemakers or stents) * MS relapse within 3 months of either sessions * Initiation of treatment or dose adjustment within 1 month of either sessions with 4-Aminopyridin, Carbamazepine, Baclofen, Tizianid * Febrile illness within 3 days of either sessions.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of MEP and SSEPtime between Visit 1 (= Baseline = Day 0) and Visit 2 (= 1 day to 30 days after Visit 1)The primary analysis will be a descriptive statistical summary of MEP and SSEP results at the first session, the second session and overall. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) will be calculated to assess the test-retest reliability between consecutive measurements and the interrater reliability between raters.

Countries

Switzerland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026