Breast Cancer
Conditions
Keywords
breast cancer surgery, lumpectomy
Brief summary
This is a multi-center, two-arm randomized, blinded pivotal study to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of the LUM Imaging System (LUM015 imaging agent in conjunction with the LUM Imaging Device and decision software), in identifying residual cancer in the lumpectomy bed of female breast cancer patients undergoing breast surgery in order to assist surgeons in reducing the rates of positive margins. All enrolled subjects will be injected with LUM015 prior to surgery. Surgeons are blinded to whether a participant will be randomized into the device arm until after the standard of care lumpectomy is complete. Participants will then be randomized to receiving the device. Therapeutic (LUM guided) shaves will be removed based on the guidance of the LUM Imaging System. Patients will be followed until their first standard of care post-operative follow-up visit.
Detailed description
All subjects will be injected with LUM015. The injection of the study drug will occur 2-6 hours prior to surgery at a dose of 1.0 mg/kg. Surgeons will complete the standard of care lumpectomy. Prior to removing any shaves as part of the standard of care, the surgeon will use the LUM Imaging System to scan and image the cavity where shaves will be obtained. The system will not provide guidance. The intent of the standard of care lumpectomy procedure is to achieve negative margins. Randomization of whether the patient will receive the device will be revealed after the completion of the standard of care lumpectomy. If the patient is randomized to the non-device arm, then the surgeon will complete the surgery per their standard practice. If the patient is randomized to the device arm, the surgeon will use the LUM Imaging Device to scan inside the lumpectomy cavity to indicate areas that may contain residual tumor. If the imaging system identifies that there may be cancer cells remaining in the lumpectomy cavity, the surgeon will remove an additional piece of tissue. This process will be continued until a negative reading from the device is obtained or a maximum of 2 shaves of additional tissue has been removed in each orientation. Study treatment ends when the surgery is completed. All patients will continue their enrollment in the study until their first follow-up visit and they will continue to be followed until the medical team determines no further surgical intervention is required. Patients who have consented to completing Quality of Life Questionnaires will be in the study until the schedule of questionnaires is complete. Patients with adverse events that are determined to be possibly related to the LUM Imaging System will be followed until resolution or stabilization of the adverse event.
Interventions
LUM015 will be administered 2 to 6 hours prior to surgery. The LUM Imaging device will be used to assist in the removal of additional tumor tissue.
Sponsors
Study design
Masking description
Masking will only be applied until the standard of care surgery is complete. At time of randomization, the study arm will be revealed to the study team. The pathologist will be masked to the type of tissue obtained from the patient.
Intervention model description
Subjects will be randomized to receive the device intervention. All subjects will receive the study drug.
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Subjects must have histologically or cytologically confirmed primary invasive breast cancer, ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) or primary invasive breast cancer with a DCIS component. * Female, age of 18 years or older. * Subjects must be scheduled for a lumpectomy for a breast malignancy. * Subjects must be able and willing to follow study procedures and instructions. * Subjects must have received and signed an informed consent form. * Subjects must have no uncontrolled serious medical problems except for the diagnosis of breast cancer, as per the
Exclusion criteria
listed below. * Subjects must have organ and marrow function within limits as defined below: * Leukocytes \> 3,000/microlitre (mcL). * Platelets \> 75,000/mcL * total bilirubin within normal institutional limits * Aspartate aminotransferase (AST (SGOT))/alanine transaminase (ALT (SGPT)) \< 2.5 X institutional upper limit of normal * Creatinine ≤ 1.5 mg/dL or creatinine clearance \> 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 for subjects with creatinine levels above institutional normal. * Subjects with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Patients Who Had Residual Cancer Found in at Least One LUM Imaging System Guided Shave Among All Patients. | Day 1, during surgery | Residual cancer was defined as tumor found by pathology in a therapeutic shave after the SOC surgical procedure was completed; that is, tumor that current Standard of Care (SOC) surgery failed to remove. LUM Imaging System was used during the surgery, but the assessment of the outcomes was unknown until the pathology report was available. |
| Sensitivity of LUM Imaging System on Cancer in the Lumpectomy Cavity | Day 1, during surgery | Sensitivity of LUM Imaging System on cancer was calculated as percentage of tissues with cancer that was removed from lumpectomy cavity due to positive detection by LUM Imaging System. The estimates of the instrument diagnostic sensitivity used Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) approach. This method was used to analyze correlated data which was modeled with generalized linear model having binomial link function and including correlation cluster and matrix information (here within each subject). LUM Imaging System was used during the surgery, but the assessment of the outcomes was unknown until the pathology report was available. |
| Specificity of LUM Imaging System Detection on Cancer in the Lumpectomy Cavity | Day 1, during surgery | Specificity of LUM Imaging System Detection on Cancer in the Lumpectomy Cavity was measured as percentage of the negative margins without cancer, that were tested negative by LUM Imaging System. The estimate of the instrument diagnostic specificity used Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) approach with random effects from intraclass correlation within subjects. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Volume of Therapeutic Shaves Removed During Lumpectomy. | Day 1, during surgery | The median volumes of Lumicell Imaging System - guided shaves (therapeutic shaves) were measured and the median total volume removed during lumpectomy was presented as well. The system was used during the surgery, but the assessment of the outcomes was unknown until the pathology report was available. |
| Detection and Conversion of Positive Margins. | Day 1, during surgery | Detection of positive margins: Percentage of patients with positive margins after standard of care breast-conserving surgery, all had LUM Imaging System signals above the threshold in the cavity as defined by the tumor detection algorithm. Conversion of positive margins: Percentage of patients with positive margins after standard of care breast-conserving surgery resulted in the negative margin after LUM Imaging System was used. The system was used during the surgery, but the assessment of the outcomes was unknown until the pathology report was available. |
| Contribution of Therapeutic Shaves to Total Volume Removed During Lumpectomy. | Day 1, during surgery | Median of the percentages of the volumes of Lumicell Imaging System - guided shaves (therapeutic shaves) out of total volume removed during lumpectomy for each participant were measured. The system was used during the surgery, but the assessment of the outcomes was unknown until the pathology report was available. |
| Removal of Residual Cancer Guided by the LUM Imaging System in Participants With Negative Margins After Standard-of-Care Surgery | Day 1, during surgery | Percentage of participants having residual tumor removed within subpopulation of having negative margins after Standard of Care surgery. The system was used during the surgery, but the assessment of the outcomes was unknown until the pathology report was available. |
| Removal of Residual Cancer Guided by the LUM Imaging System in Subjects With Positive Margins After Standard-of-Care Surgery | Day 1, during surgery | Percentage of participants having residual tumor removed within subpopulation of having positive margins after Standard of Care surgery. The system was used during the surgery, but the assessment of the outcomes was unknown until the pathology report was available. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
406 injected with LUM015 (LUMISIGHT), 14 withdrawn before randomization.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Device Intervention: LUM Imaging System Used During Surgery The LUM Imaging Device was used to examine inside the lumpectomy cavity to determine if the dye indicated any areas that might contain residual tumor. If the imaging tested positive for the cancer cells remaining in the lumpectomy cavity, the surgeon would remove an additional piece of tissue. This process was continued until a negative reading from the device was obtained or a maximum of 2 shaves of additional tissue had been removed. Patients in this arm received the study drug, LUM015.
Study Device Arm: LUM015 was administered 2 to 6 hours prior to surgery. The LUM Imaging device was used to assist in the removal of additional tumor tissue. | 357 |
| Standard of Care Arm The LUM Imaging Device was not used to guide additional tissue removal. Patients in this arm received the study drug, LUM015. | 35 |
| Withdrawn Before Randomization All the patients injected with LUM015 but withdrawn before randomization. | 14 |
| Total | 406 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 | FG002 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| Overall Study | Device issue | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Overall Study | Physician Decision | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Protocol Violation | 0 | 0 | 4 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Withdrawn Before Randomization | Total | Standard of Care Arm | Device Intervention: LUM Imaging System Used During Surgery |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical <=18 years | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical >=65 years | 6 Participants | 195 Participants | 16 Participants | 173 Participants |
| Age, Categorical Between 18 and 65 years | 8 Participants | 211 Participants | 19 Participants | 184 Participants |
| Age, Continuous | 61.6 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.6 | 62.3 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.7 | 61.6 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.9 | 62.4 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.6 |
| Body Mass Index | 29.8 kg/m^2 STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.8 | 29.9 kg/m^2 STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.6 | 31.0 kg/m^2 STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.9 | 29.8 kg/m^2 STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.7 |
| Estrogen Receptor (ER) (+) Genetic Marker from Biopsy ER (-) | 1 Participants | 25 Participants | 5 Participants | 19 Participants |
| Estrogen Receptor (ER) (+) Genetic Marker from Biopsy ER (+) | 13 Participants | 378 Participants | 30 Participants | 335 Participants |
| Estrogen Receptor (ER) (+) Genetic Marker from Biopsy Not available | 0 Participants | 3 Participants | 0 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 0 Participants | 12 Participants | 1 Participants | 11 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 13 Participants | 383 Participants | 34 Participants | 336 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 1 Participants | 11 Participants | 0 Participants | 10 Participants |
| Human Epidermal growth factor Receptor 2 (HER2) (+) Genetic Marker from Biopsy HER2 (-) | 13 Participants | 319 Participants | 26 Participants | 280 Participants |
| Human Epidermal growth factor Receptor 2 (HER2) (+) Genetic Marker from Biopsy HER2 (+) | 0 Participants | 23 Participants | 3 Participants | 20 Participants |
| Human Epidermal growth factor Receptor 2 (HER2) (+) Genetic Marker from Biopsy Unknown | 1 Participants | 64 Participants | 6 Participants | 57 Participants |
| Lymph Nodes Biopsy Lymph Node (-) | 2 Participants | 60 Participants | 7 Participants | 51 Participants |
| Lymph Nodes Biopsy Lymph Node (+) | 0 Participants | 10 Participants | 1 Participants | 9 Participants |
| Lymph Nodes Biopsy No Lymph Node Biopsy | 12 Participants | 336 Participants | 27 Participants | 297 Participants |
| Mammographic breast density Almost Entirely Fatty | 0 Participants | 5 Participants | 0 Participants | 5 Participants |
| Mammographic breast density Extremely Dense | 0 Participants | 13 Participants | 2 Participants | 11 Participants |
| Mammographic breast density Heterogeneously Dense | 10 Participants | 163 Participants | 13 Participants | 140 Participants |
| Mammographic breast density Scattered Areas of Fibroglandular Density | 4 Participants | 220 Participants | 20 Participants | 196 Participants |
| Mammographic breast density Unknown | 0 Participants | 5 Participants | 0 Participants | 5 Participants |
| Menopausal Status Post | 12 Participants | 339 Participants | 28 Participants | 299 Participants |
| Menopausal Status Pre/Peri | 2 Participants | 67 Participants | 7 Participants | 58 Participants |
| Palpability Not palpable Mass | 10 Participants | 306 Participants | 24 Participants | 272 Participants |
| Palpability Palpable Mass | 4 Participants | 100 Participants | 11 Participants | 85 Participants |
| Progesterone Receptor (PR) (+) Genetic Marker from Biopsy PR (-) | 1 Participants | 54 Participants | 5 Participants | 48 Participants |
| Progesterone Receptor (PR) (+) Genetic Marker from Biopsy PR (+) | 11 Participants | 311 Participants | 28 Participants | 272 Participants |
| Progesterone Receptor (PR) (+) Genetic Marker from Biopsy Unknown | 2 Participants | 41 Participants | 2 Participants | 37 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 0 Participants | 22 Participants | 1 Participants | 21 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 0 Participants | 26 Participants | 4 Participants | 22 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 0 Participants | 4 Participants | 0 Participants | 4 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 1 Participants | 15 Participants | 2 Participants | 12 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 13 Participants | 337 Participants | 27 Participants | 297 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 14 participants | 406 participants | 35 participants | 357 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 14 Participants | 406 Participants | 35 Participants | 357 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Triple Negatives Genetic Marker from Biopsy Triple Negatives - No | 13 Participants | 391 Participants | 32 Participants | 346 Participants |
| Triple Negatives Genetic Marker from Biopsy Triple Negatives - Yes | 1 Participants | 15 Participants | 3 Participants | 11 Participants |
| Tumor Histology From Biopsy DCIS only | 2 Participants | 78 Participants | 6 Participants | 70 Participants |
| Tumor Histology From Biopsy IDC +/- DCIS | 10 Participants | 284 Participants | 25 Participants | 249 Participants |
| Tumor Histology From Biopsy IDC + ILC | 0 Participants | 3 Participants | 0 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Tumor Histology From Biopsy ILC +/- DCIS | 2 Participants | 41 Participants | 4 Participants | 35 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 357 | 0 / 35 | 0 / 14 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 334 / 357 | 32 / 35 | 13 / 14 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 3 / 357 | 0 / 35 | 2 / 14 |
Outcome results
Percentage of Patients Who Had Residual Cancer Found in at Least One LUM Imaging System Guided Shave Among All Patients.
Residual cancer was defined as tumor found by pathology in a therapeutic shave after the SOC surgical procedure was completed; that is, tumor that current Standard of Care (SOC) surgery failed to remove. LUM Imaging System was used during the surgery, but the assessment of the outcomes was unknown until the pathology report was available.
Time frame: Day 1, during surgery
Population: modified intent to treat population (mITT) includes subjects injected with LUM015 and LUM Imaging was performed
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Device Intervention: LUM Imaging System Used | Percentage of Patients Who Had Residual Cancer Found in at Least One LUM Imaging System Guided Shave Among All Patients. | 7.6 percentage of participants |
Sensitivity of LUM Imaging System on Cancer in the Lumpectomy Cavity
Sensitivity of LUM Imaging System on cancer was calculated as percentage of tissues with cancer that was removed from lumpectomy cavity due to positive detection by LUM Imaging System. The estimates of the instrument diagnostic sensitivity used Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) approach. This method was used to analyze correlated data which was modeled with generalized linear model having binomial link function and including correlation cluster and matrix information (here within each subject). LUM Imaging System was used during the surgery, but the assessment of the outcomes was unknown until the pathology report was available.
Time frame: Day 1, during surgery
Population: modified intent to treat population (mITT) includes subjects injected with LUM015 and LUM Imaging was performed
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Device Intervention: LUM Imaging System Used | Sensitivity of LUM Imaging System on Cancer in the Lumpectomy Cavity | 49.1 percentage of tissues with cancer |
Specificity of LUM Imaging System Detection on Cancer in the Lumpectomy Cavity
Specificity of LUM Imaging System Detection on Cancer in the Lumpectomy Cavity was measured as percentage of the negative margins without cancer, that were tested negative by LUM Imaging System. The estimate of the instrument diagnostic specificity used Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) approach with random effects from intraclass correlation within subjects.
Time frame: Day 1, during surgery
Population: modified intent to treat population (mITT) includes subjects injected with LUM015 and LUM Imaging was performed
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Device Intervention: LUM Imaging System Used | Specificity of LUM Imaging System Detection on Cancer in the Lumpectomy Cavity | 86.5 percentage of negative margins w/o ca |
Contribution of Therapeutic Shaves to Total Volume Removed During Lumpectomy.
Median of the percentages of the volumes of Lumicell Imaging System - guided shaves (therapeutic shaves) out of total volume removed during lumpectomy for each participant were measured. The system was used during the surgery, but the assessment of the outcomes was unknown until the pathology report was available.
Time frame: Day 1, during surgery
Population: mITT and Control arm populations
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Device Intervention: LUM Imaging System Used | Contribution of Therapeutic Shaves to Total Volume Removed During Lumpectomy. | 0 Percent |
| Standard of Care Arm | Contribution of Therapeutic Shaves to Total Volume Removed During Lumpectomy. | 0 Percent |
Detection and Conversion of Positive Margins.
Detection of positive margins: Percentage of patients with positive margins after standard of care breast-conserving surgery, all had LUM Imaging System signals above the threshold in the cavity as defined by the tumor detection algorithm. Conversion of positive margins: Percentage of patients with positive margins after standard of care breast-conserving surgery resulted in the negative margin after LUM Imaging System was used. The system was used during the surgery, but the assessment of the outcomes was unknown until the pathology report was available.
Time frame: Day 1, during surgery
Population: modified intent to treat population (mITT) includes subjects injected with LUM015 and LUM Imaging was performed
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Device Intervention: LUM Imaging System Used | Detection and Conversion of Positive Margins. | Percentage among participants having positive margins after SoC all detected by LUM Imaging System | 16.1 percentage of participants |
| Device Intervention: LUM Imaging System Used | Detection and Conversion of Positive Margins. | Percentage of participants with positive SOC margins converted to negative with LUM Imaging System | 14.5 percentage of participants |
Removal of Residual Cancer Guided by the LUM Imaging System in Participants With Negative Margins After Standard-of-Care Surgery
Percentage of participants having residual tumor removed within subpopulation of having negative margins after Standard of Care surgery. The system was used during the surgery, but the assessment of the outcomes was unknown until the pathology report was available.
Time frame: Day 1, during surgery
Population: Participants having negative margin after standard of care procedure of lumpectomy.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Device Intervention: LUM Imaging System Used | Removal of Residual Cancer Guided by the LUM Imaging System in Participants With Negative Margins After Standard-of-Care Surgery | 6.4 percentage of participants |
Removal of Residual Cancer Guided by the LUM Imaging System in Subjects With Positive Margins After Standard-of-Care Surgery
Percentage of participants having residual tumor removed within subpopulation of having positive margins after Standard of Care surgery. The system was used during the surgery, but the assessment of the outcomes was unknown until the pathology report was available.
Time frame: Day 1, during surgery
Population: Participants with positive margins after standard of care procedure of lumpectomy.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Device Intervention: LUM Imaging System Used | Removal of Residual Cancer Guided by the LUM Imaging System in Subjects With Positive Margins After Standard-of-Care Surgery | 12.9 percentage of participants |
Volume of Therapeutic Shaves Removed During Lumpectomy.
The median volumes of Lumicell Imaging System - guided shaves (therapeutic shaves) were measured and the median total volume removed during lumpectomy was presented as well. The system was used during the surgery, but the assessment of the outcomes was unknown until the pathology report was available.
Time frame: Day 1, during surgery
Population: mITT and control populations
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Device Intervention: LUM Imaging System Used | Volume of Therapeutic Shaves Removed During Lumpectomy. | SOC shave volume | 7.5 cm^3 |
| Device Intervention: LUM Imaging System Used | Volume of Therapeutic Shaves Removed During Lumpectomy. | Therapeutic shave volume | 0 cm^3 |
| Device Intervention: LUM Imaging System Used | Volume of Therapeutic Shaves Removed During Lumpectomy. | SOC total volume | 66.4 cm^3 |
| Device Intervention: LUM Imaging System Used | Volume of Therapeutic Shaves Removed During Lumpectomy. | Total volume | 77.5 cm^3 |
| Device Intervention: LUM Imaging System Used | Volume of Therapeutic Shaves Removed During Lumpectomy. | Lumpectomy volume | 54 cm^3 |
| Standard of Care Arm | Volume of Therapeutic Shaves Removed During Lumpectomy. | Total volume | 76.7 cm^3 |
| Standard of Care Arm | Volume of Therapeutic Shaves Removed During Lumpectomy. | Lumpectomy volume | 66.8 cm^3 |
| Standard of Care Arm | Volume of Therapeutic Shaves Removed During Lumpectomy. | SOC shave volume | 7.7 cm^3 |
| Standard of Care Arm | Volume of Therapeutic Shaves Removed During Lumpectomy. | SOC total volume | 76.7 cm^3 |
| Standard of Care Arm | Volume of Therapeutic Shaves Removed During Lumpectomy. | Therapeutic shave volume | 0 cm^3 |