Effect Of PRF Versus Xenograft In Closed Sinus Lift.

Prf Controlled, Randamized Clinical Trial of THE EFFECT OF PLATELET RICH FIBRIN( PRF ) VERSUS XENOGRAFT IN CLOSED SINUS LIFT AND IMLANT PLACEMENT ON IMPLANT STABILITY IN PATIENTS WITH MISSING MAXILLARY PREMOLAR.

Status

UNKNOWN

Phases

Study type

Interventional

Source

ClinicalTrials.gov

Registry ID

NCT03684954

Enrollment

Registered

2018-09-26

Start date

2018-10-01

Completion date

2019-08-30

Last updated

2018-09-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Implant or Graft; Rejection

Brief summary

Indirect sinus lift with used PRF as a graft material versus xenograft

Detailed description

Crestal incision and reflect the tissue until exposure of the bone, then use drilling to make osteotomy. Then use sutable osteotomes to elevate the sinus floor, then pack of Prf or bone graft in the osteotomy and implant placement . Then closed the flap and suturing.

Interventions

OTHERPrf

Take 10 cc blood from patient and gain prf

Study design

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Intervention model

PARALLEL

Primary purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

SINGLE (Investigator)

Masking description

Single investigator

Intervention model description

Patallel Assignment

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

ALL

Age

25 Years to 45 Years

Healthy volunteers

Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Edentulous area and bone high at least 5-6 mm below the maxillary sinus at maxillary premolar. * Good oral hygiene.

Exclusion criteria

* bad oral hygiene. * patient with systemic disease that may affect normal healing * pregnant patients. * patients with bone diseases and presence of periapical pathology affecting the neighboring teeth. * Heavy smoker more than 20 cigarettes per day

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame	Description
Primary stability by ostell device	up to 3 months	Implant stability will be mesured by ostell device, implant stability will be mesured intra operative at 0 ( time of implant placement ) and 2, 4, 6, 10 and 12 weeks after surgery

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026