Breast Tumor
Conditions
Brief summary
The purpose of the project is to compare Radiofrequency identification device (RFID) localization technique with the current clinical standard wire localization technique. The Investigator's hypotheses is that the RFID localization technique is non-inferior to wire localization for breast lesions (tumors). The study will be conducted in two parts. The purpose of Part A is for physician training with the RFID device. Nine subjects will undergo RFID and wire localization prior to breast lesion excision. This will allow the breast radiologists and surgeons to become comfortable with RFID device placement and retrieval. Additionally, the investigators will pilot the data collection surveys and chart review methodology to be used in Part B. The purpose of Part B is to conduct a randomized clinical trial to assess whether RFID localization is non-inferior to wire localization for breast lesions. For this part, sixty subjects will be randomized to RFID (N=30) or wire localization (N=30) at time of enrollment. Surveys will be used to gather data from participants, radiologists, surgeons, and technologists/mammography nurses. A variety of data will be collected including, but not limited to, information on tumor size, location, depth; subject demographics; adequacy of tumor margins, re-excision rates, accuracy of wire or chip placement, and surgical complications.
Detailed description
As part of standard of care, participants will receive: an ultrasound (US) or mammographic guided localization; excisional breast surgery; and a follow-up visit in breast surgery clinic. As part of the research protocol, participants will receive a RFID chip for the localization procedure and complete surveys. Part A of this project is for physician training to master the technique of RFID placement and retrieval. On the day of surgery prior to going to the operating room, all participants will have the RFID placed first to allow radiologists to become familiar with placement of the RFID localizer. Participants will then immediately undergo wire localization. Either ultrasound or mammogram guidance will be used for the localization at the discretion of the performing radiologist. Surgeons will use a reader to locate the RFID chip during surgery. The wire will be present in the event the area of concern cannot be adequately located with the reader. Participants, radiologists, surgeons, breast surgery and radiology staff will complete surveys. Part B of this project is a prospective trial to examine safety, efficacy, operating room utilization patterns, and satisfaction with RFID versus wire localization. Participants will be stratified based on technique of localization (either US guidance or mammographic guidance). Participants will then be randomized to receive either the wire or RFID localization. There will be four visits: one pre-op breast surgery visit in which enrollment will occur, one radiology procedure visit for localization, one surgical visit, and one post-operative visit. This is the same number of visits as standard of care. Participants, radiologists, surgeons, breast surgery and radiology staff will complete surveys.
Interventions
Both RFID and the standard of care wire localization will be performed for physician training.
The RFID and wire localization devices used in this study are FDA approved for the image guided localization of breast tumors prior to surgical excision. The two techniques for localization will be compared in this trial.
The RFID and wire localization devices used in this study are FDA approved for the image guided localization of breast tumors prior to surgical excision. The two techniques for localization will be compared in this trial.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Women requiring image guided pre-operative breast tumor localization
Exclusion criteria
* Tumors deeper than 6 cm from the skin surface * More than one tumor requiring localization * Tumors requiring bracketing * Tumors requiring Magnetic Resonance Imaging localization * Inability to complete survey * Pregnancy
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With Successful Localization | From the date of localization through the date of surgery up to 4 weeks; data collected during Visit 3 at time of surgery | Whether the surgeon was able to identify and remove the tumor |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Surveys of Satisfaction: Participant | Data collected during date of localization at Visit 2, up to approximately one month from baseline visit | Survey Question: Compared to expected, how uncomfortable was the localization? Scored on a scale of 1 to 5 with the best being 5 |
| Surveys of Satisfaction | Data collected at baseline during Visit 1 | Surveys of Radiology Nurse ease of scheduling the localization procedure. Scored on a scale of 1 to 5 with the best being 5 |
| Number of Participants With Tumor Incompletely Excised | Surgical resection specimen collected during Visit 3, at time of surgery | Number of participants with positive margin on pathology |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| RFID and Wire Localization Part A of this project is for physician training to master the technique of RFID placement and retrieval. On the day of surgery prior to going to the operating room, all participants will have the RFID placed first to allow radiologists to become familiar with placement of the RFID localizer. Participants will then immediately undergo wire localization. Either ultrasound or mammogram guidance will be used for the localization at the discretion of the performing radiologist. Surgeons will use a reader to locate the RFID chip during surgery. The wire will be present in the event the area of concern cannot be adequately located with the reader.
RFID and Wire Localization: Both RFID and the standard of care wire localization will be performed for physician training. | 9 |
| RFID Localization Participants will be stratified based on technique of localization (either US guidance or mammographic guidance). They will then be randomized to receive either the wire or RFID localization. There will be four visits: one pre-op breast surgery visit in which enrollment will occur, one radiology procedure visit for localization, one surgical visit, and one post-operative visit. This is the same number of visits as standard of care.
RFID Localization: The RFID and wire localization devices used in this study are FDA approved for the image guided localization of breast tumors prior to surgical excision. The two techniques for localization will be compared in this trial. | 15 |
| Wire Localization Participants will be stratified based on technique of localization (either US guidance or mammographic guidance). They will then be randomized to receive either the wire or RFID localization. There will be four visits: one pre-op breast surgery visit in which enrollment will occur, one radiology procedure visit for localization, one surgical visit, and one post-operative visit. This is the same number of visits as standard of care.
Wire Localization: The RFID and wire localization devices used in this study are FDA approved for the image guided localization of breast tumors prior to surgical excision. The two techniques for localization will be compared in this trial. | 12 |
| Total | 36 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | RFID and Wire Localization | RFID Localization | Wire Localization | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical <=18 years | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical >=65 years | 2 Participants | 3 Participants | 5 Participants | 10 Participants |
| Age, Categorical Between 18 and 65 years | 7 Participants | 12 Participants | 7 Participants | 26 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 9 Participants | 14 Participants | 12 Participants | 35 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 9 Participants | 15 Participants | 12 Participants | 36 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 9 | 0 / 15 | 0 / 12 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 9 | 0 / 15 | 0 / 12 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 9 | 0 / 15 | 0 / 12 |
Outcome results
Number of Participants With Successful Localization
Whether the surgeon was able to identify and remove the tumor
Time frame: From the date of localization through the date of surgery up to 4 weeks; data collected during Visit 3 at time of surgery
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| RFID and Wire Localization | Number of Participants With Successful Localization | 9 Participants |
| RFID Localization | Number of Participants With Successful Localization | 15 Participants |
| Wire Localization | Number of Participants With Successful Localization | 12 Participants |
Number of Participants With Tumor Incompletely Excised
Number of participants with positive margin on pathology
Time frame: Surgical resection specimen collected during Visit 3, at time of surgery
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| RFID and Wire Localization | Number of Participants With Tumor Incompletely Excised | 0 Participants |
| RFID Localization | Number of Participants With Tumor Incompletely Excised | 0 Participants |
| Wire Localization | Number of Participants With Tumor Incompletely Excised | 0 Participants |
Surveys of Satisfaction
Surveys of Radiology Nurse ease of scheduling the localization procedure. Scored on a scale of 1 to 5 with the best being 5
Time frame: Data collected at baseline during Visit 1
Population: Not relevant for Part A. Since our breast surgeons were not experienced with using the RFID device, Part A consisted of performing the procedure with the RFID device prior to starting data collection for this outcome. This was done so that the surgeons would have completed their learning curve on a new device before data collection for this outcome began.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| RFID Localization | Surveys of Satisfaction | 4 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.51 |
| Wire Localization | Surveys of Satisfaction | 4 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.22 |
Surveys of Satisfaction
Surveys of radiologist satisfaction with the localization procedure. Scored on a scale of 1 to 5 with the best being 5
Time frame: Data collected during date of localization at Visit 2, up to approximately one month from baseline visit
Population: Not applicable to part A. Since our breast surgeons were not experienced with using the RFID device, Part A consisted of performing the procedure with the RFID device prior to starting data collection for this outcome. This was done so that the surgeons would have completed their learning curve on a new device before data collection for this outcome began.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| RFID Localization | Surveys of Satisfaction | 4 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.28 |
| Wire Localization | Surveys of Satisfaction | 5 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.21 |
Surveys of Satisfaction: Participant
Survey Question: Compared to expected, how uncomfortable was the localization? Scored on a scale of 1 to 5 with the best being 5
Time frame: Data collected during date of localization at Visit 2, up to approximately one month from baseline visit
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| RFID and Wire Localization | Surveys of Satisfaction: Participant | 3.4 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.72 |
| RFID Localization | Surveys of Satisfaction: Participant | 3.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.85 |
| Wire Localization | Surveys of Satisfaction: Participant | 4.4 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.81 |