Skip to content

Non-Contact Air Tonometry (Topcon CT-1®) Versus Goldmann

Non-Contact Air Tonometry (Topcon CT-1®) Versus Goldmann Applanation Tonometry: a Device Comparison Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03684174
Enrollment
58
Registered
2018-09-25
Start date
2017-04-01
Completion date
2017-10-31
Last updated
2018-09-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Glaucoma

Keywords

Tonometry

Brief summary

In this prospective device comparison study with 58 healthy eyes, the Topcon CT-1® showed statistically significant elevated intraocular pressure measurements compared to the gold standard Goldmann application tonometry.

Detailed description

Introduction: Intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement is crucial in glaucoma diagnosis and treatment. We compared a non-contact air tonometer (Topcon CT-1®) with the gold standard Goldmann Applikation tonometer (GAT). Methods: In this prospective, mono centric device comparison study, only healthy eyes were enrolled. IOP was measured three times with the Topcon CT-1® followed by three times GAT. Mean IOP was calculated and compared with a paired t-test, a linear regression and a Bland-Altman analysis.

Interventions

Pressure tip or air puff is applied on eye

Sponsors

University of Zurich
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 99 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Healthy volunteers who agreed to be included in the study and were able to comply with the measurement procedures

Exclusion criteria

were cor-neal abnormalities (such as oedema, scars or dystrophies, astigmatism,hyperopia or myopia \> 3 dioptres), a history of ocular surgery or recent(\<47 weeks) ocular disorder.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Comparison of GAT with air tonometry Topcon CT17 monthsDifference in mmHg between these two devices

Countries

Switzerland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026