Skip to content

The Effect of Electrical Stimulation on Impairment of the Painful Post-Stroke Shoulder

The Effect of Electrical Stimulation on Impairment of the Painful Post-Stroke Shoulder

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03683901
Enrollment
10
Registered
2018-09-25
Start date
2010-12-27
Completion date
2011-05-01
Last updated
2019-09-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stroke

Keywords

Electrical stimulation therapy, TENS, t-NMES, Stroke

Brief summary

Examination of the effects of short-term use of TENS and t-NMES on passive pain-free ROM of the painful post-stroke shoulder. Treatments are compared with no stimulation.

Detailed description

Single cohort, cross-over study. Subjects undergo passive pain-free ROM of the painful post-stroke shoulder under 3 stimulation conditions. The stimulation was delivered by a trained occupational therapist under three conditions: 10 seconds of TENS, 10 seconds of t-NMES, and 10 seconds of no stimulation. Each subject was exposed to each of the three stimulation conditions three times in a computer-generated random sequence for each outcome measure with a 5-minute wash-out period between each stimulation. This protocol is repeated for each of the two passive movements tested, shoulder abduction and shoulder external rotation.

Interventions

No stimulation

DEVICETENS

Electrical Stimulation

DEVICEt-NMES

Electrical Stimulation

Sponsors

MetroHealth Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Masking description

Participant, Investigator, and Outcomes Assessor were masked to the particular stimulation during each range of motion assessment

Intervention model description

Cohort study; single group but with random serial allocation of treatment type

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to 89 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* at least 3 months post-stroke * worst shoulder pain in the last week at least 4 on the 0-10 numerical rating scale, * adequate cognitive ability to be able to rate their pain in the past week

Exclusion criteria

* history of tachyarrhythmia with decreased blood pressure * uncontrolled seizures (defined as more than one per month) * an implanted electrical device * uncompensated hemi-neglect

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Passive Range of Motion of Shoulder in Shoulder External Rotation10 secondspassive range of motion of shoulder in shoulder external rotation as measured with hand-held goniometer
Passive Range of Motion of Shoulder in Shoulder Abduction10 secondspassive range of motion of shoulder in shoulder abduction as measured with hand-held goniometer

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Single group cohort study with random serial allocation of treatment type. All participants underwent each of the three stimulation conditions (TENS, t-NMES, no stimulation) three times in a computer-generated random sequence for each outcome measure with a 5-minute wash-out period between each stimulation.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
TENS/t-NMES/No Stimulation
Electrical Stimulation-TENS: TENS stimulation parameters were of a symmetric waveform, a frequency of 100 Hz, and a pulse duration of 300 microseconds (EMPI 300PVTM program PPR #7) applied for 10 seconds. Electrical Stimulation-t-NMES: t-NMES parameters were a symmetric waveform with 2 second ramp-up and 2 second ramp-down, a frequency of 35Hz, and a pulse duration of 300 microseconds (EMPI 300PVTM program PPR #3). The t-NMES current intensity was set by adjusting the amplitude to yield the strongest contraction of the underlying muscles without initiating pain. No stimulation: Device and electrodes remained in place but no stimulation was delivered over the 10 second interval. Exposed to each stimulation 3 times for each shoulder ROM.
10
Total10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTENS/t-NMES/No Stimulation
Age, Continuous59.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.3
Months since stroke46.8 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 42.1
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected— Participants
Right sided stroke6 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
6 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
4 Participants
Worst shoulder pain in the last week (0 min-10 max)7.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.5

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 10
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 10
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 10

Outcome results

Primary

Passive Range of Motion of Shoulder in Shoulder Abduction

passive range of motion of shoulder in shoulder abduction as measured with hand-held goniometer

Time frame: 10 seconds

Population: Cross-over design. All participants underwent all interventions

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
TENSPassive Range of Motion of Shoulder in Shoulder Abduction87.8 degrees
t-NMESPassive Range of Motion of Shoulder in Shoulder Abduction87.5 degrees
No StimulationPassive Range of Motion of Shoulder in Shoulder Abduction89.6 degrees
Primary

Passive Range of Motion of Shoulder in Shoulder External Rotation

passive range of motion of shoulder in shoulder external rotation as measured with hand-held goniometer

Time frame: 10 seconds

Population: Cross-over design. All participants underwent all interventions

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
TENSPassive Range of Motion of Shoulder in Shoulder External Rotation66.9 degrees
t-NMESPassive Range of Motion of Shoulder in Shoulder External Rotation67.4 degrees
No StimulationPassive Range of Motion of Shoulder in Shoulder External Rotation69.1 degrees

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026