Skip to content

Long-duration EPBD vs EST for Removal of Biliary Stones

Long-duration (3 Minutes) Endoscopic Papillary Balloon Dilation Versus Endoscopic Sphincterotomy in Patients With a Naive Major Papilla and Small- to Medium Sized Biliary Stones: Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03683485
Enrollment
358
Registered
2018-09-25
Start date
2018-04-01
Completion date
2021-08-01
Last updated
2018-10-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde

Keywords

Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde

Brief summary

Although EPBD has a lower risk of post-ERCP bleeding and long-term complications than EST and is easier to perform in altered/difficult anatomy, EPBD is reserved for patients with bleeding diathesis by current consensus because some studies reported a higher risk of pancreatitis. However, recent meta-analyses indicate that short EPBD duration increases the risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis, and EPBD with adequate duration has a similar pancreatitis risk and a lower overall complication rate compared with EST for choledocholithiasis. Therefore, this study aim to compare long-duration EPBD vs EST in the treatment of extrahepatic biliary stones.

Detailed description

Gallstones occur in 10%-15% of adults in the United States and are the most common and costly digestive disorder. Concomitant bile duct stones occur in up to 15% of persons with symptomatic gallstones. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with sphincterotomy is the standard treatment for removal choledocholithiasis. The biliary sphincter is permanently ablated by sphincterotomy. Enteric-biliary reflux occurs with bacterial colonization, increased bile lithogenicity, contamination with cytotoxins, and chronic inflammation of the biliary system. Endoscopic papillary balloon dilation (EPBD) has become an option for removal of stones 1 cm or smaller in size. Advantages of EPBD over EST include a decreased risk of post-ERCP bleeding as well as a decreased risk of stone recurrence and cholangitis. Although a short dilation duration (≤1 minute) was previously advocated, a study that performed EPBD for 1 minute observed a 15.4% risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis with 2 cases of mortality. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guideline recommends that the duration of EPBD should exceed 2 minutes because long-duration EPBD (\>1 minute) is preferred over short-duration EPBD (≤1 minute) with better outcomes. A meta-analysis of RCTs showed that the duration of EPBD is inversely associated with the risk of PEP. Previous RCTs comparing outcome between EPBD and EST used short EPBD duration between 25 seconds and 1 minute, and there has been no comparison of outcome between EST and long-duration EPBD. The aim of this study was to compare the early and long term outcomes of patients treated with long duration balloon dilation or sphincterotomy for extraction of bile duct stones in a randomized, multicenter fashion involving a broad spectrum of practices.

Interventions

PROCEDURElong duration EPBD

An 8-mm dilatation balloon was used for EPBD. Balloons were gradually inflated to maximum pressure for 3 minute, and complete inflation was verified by fluoroscopy.

PROCEDUREEST

After deep cannulation was achieved, a complete sphincterotomy was performed with a 25-mm pull-type sphincterotome (Clever Cut 3; KD-V411M, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) and the sphincter was divided up to the transverse duodenal fold.

Sponsors

Inje University
CollaboratorOTHER
The Catholic University of Korea
CollaboratorOTHER
Wonkwang University
CollaboratorOTHER
Dankook University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Consecutive patients were invited to participate by the investigators or research staff if they were at least 18 years old, * patients who had known or suspected choledocholithiasis

Exclusion criteria

* active acute pancreatitis * septic shock, * coagulopathy (international normalized ratio \>1.2, partial thromboplastic time greater than twice that of control), * platelet count \<50,000 x 103/uL, * anticoagulation therapy within 48 hours of the procedure, * stone diameter \> 8 mm, * bile duct diameter \>15 mm, prior sphincterotomy, * need for precut sphincterotomy for biliary access, * biliary stricture, * Billroth II or Roux-en-Y anatomy, * periampullary malignancies, * primary sclerosing cholangitis, pregnancy, * and inability to give informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
rate of adverse eventup to 1 month after ERCPNumber of participants with treatment-related adverse events

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
direct costwithin 30 day after ERCPThe direct cost included the total cost for the entire admission, which comprised costs of hospital stay, performed procedures, and management of complications
recurrence of choledocholithiasismore than 3 year follow-uprecurrent choledocholithiasis or acute cholangitis either with or without bile duct stones, and overall hepatobiliary complications
the stone clearance rate at the index ERCPduring ERCPcomplete extraction of choledocholithiasis of all stones, fragments, and sludge at the initial procedure
adverse event (bleeding)up to 1 month after ERCPrate of bleeding
adverse event (cholangitis)up to 1 month after ERCPrate of cholangitis
adverse event (pancreatitis)up to 1 month after ERCPrate of pancreatitis

Countries

South Korea

Contacts

Primary ContactJun Ho Choi, MD, PhD
mdcjh78@gmail.com82-41-550-7631
Backup ContactSe Weon Kim, MD
intern41@dkuh.co.kr82-41-550-7630

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026