Skip to content

Texan Allergy & Sinus Center Mountain Cedar Intra-Lymphatic Immunotherapy Study

Texan Allergy & Sinus Center Mountain Cedar Intra-Lymphatic Immunotherapy Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03682965
Acronym
TX-SMILE
Enrollment
21
Registered
2018-09-25
Start date
2018-09-28
Completion date
2019-04-29
Last updated
2021-04-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Allergic Conjunctivitis, Allergic Rhinitis Due to Tree Pollen, Allergic Rhinoconjunctivitis

Keywords

Mountain Cedar, Juniperus Ashei, Pollinosis, Intra-lymphatic

Brief summary

TX-SMILE is an investigator-initiated, multi-center, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of intra-lymphatic administration of an approved allergenic extract for the immunotherapy treatment of allergic rhinitis and conjunctivitis due to pollen from the conifer Mountain Cedar.

Detailed description

TX-SMILE is an investigator-initiated, multi-center, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of an alternative injection site and associated adjustments to dosing and treatment regimen for allergen immunotherapy with a commercially-available, FDA-approved allergenic extract for the immunotherapy treatment of allergic rhinitis and conjunctivitis due to pollen from the conifer Mountain Cedar (Juniperus ashei). The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of a three-dose treatment series of ultrasonography-guided, intra-lymphatic immunotherapy injections over a two-month period prior to the start of the 2018-2019 Mountain Cedar allergy season in central Texas. Patients will be evaluated for safety and tolerability during the treatment period and for efficacy during the 2018-2019 Texas Mountain Cedar pollen season.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALIntra-lymphatic allergenic extract

Mountain Cedar pollen allergenic extract is an FDA-approved, commercially available product for diagnosis and hypo-sensitization treatment of allergies. The labeled use is deep subcutaneous or percutaneous injection. Hyposensitization treatment is typically a series of 30 - 70 injections over 3 - 5 years into the upper aspect of the arm. This investigation is a proof-of-concept study to evaluate an alternative hyposensitization regimen of 3 injections directly into an inguinal lymph node.

BIOLOGICALIntra-lymphatic placebo

The control group will receive a regimen of 3 injections of diluent (placebo) directly into an inguinal lymph node on the same schedule as the active treatment group.

Sponsors

Christopher Thompson, MD
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Both male and female adult patients with a history of Season Allergic Rhinitis (SAR) with bothersome symptoms due to Mountain Cedar pollinosis confirmed using the Modified Quantitate Test (MQT; defined as a wheal greater than or equal to 3 millimeters larger than the diluent control) 2. Patients must be willing to provide written, informed consent 3. Patients must be willing and able to comply with study procedures 4. Women of childbearing potential must agree to use an acceptable form of contraception during the trial

Exclusion criteria

1. Patients less than 18 years of age 2. Clinically-significant chronic sinusitis, as determined by the investigator 3. History of anaphylaxis during Mountain Cedar skin prick testing 4. Participation in another clinical trial or use of an experimental medication within 30 days of enrollment 5. Medically significant co-morbidities that, in the opinion of the investigator, place the subject at increased risk during the study, including but not limited to: 1. Autoimmune diseases, other than allergic rhinitis (AR), stable allergic asthma, eczema and food sensitivities 2. Pulmonary or respiratory diseases other than stable asthma 3. Cancer other than basal cell carcinoma 4. Coronary artery disease or hypertension treated with beta-blockers 5. Clinically significant impairment of renal or hepatic function 6. Use of concomitant medications that, in the opinion of the investigator, may reduce the effectiveness of rescue treatments for anaphylaxis (e.g. beta-blockers) or alter the immune response to allergen immunotherapy (e.g., immunosuppressants, systemic corticosteroids) 7. Previously completed immunotherapy for Mountain Cedar pollinosis, that in the opinion of the investigator would interfere with the assessment or treatment of the patient 8. Inability to access suitable lymph nodes for intralympahtic injections 9. Plans to leave the area for a significant period of the upcoming Mountain Cedar pollen season 10. Pregnant or lactating females

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Average Daily Total Combined Score (TCS)Up to 4 monthsThe TCS is the preferred endpoint for rhinoconjunctivitis as recommended by the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. Scoring of the TCS is from 0 to 38 on each day that it is assessed. The TCS is the sum of the symptom scores for runny nose, stuff nose, sneezing, itchy nose, gritty/itchy eyes, and watery eyes rated from no symptoms = 0 to severe symptoms = 3 plus the score for use of rescue medications for allergy symptoms 6 points for oral antihistamine, 6 points for eye drops, and 8 points for a nasal corticosteroid. Thus, a lower score represents fewer symptoms and associated need for allergy medication, while a higher score reflects more severe symptoms and the use of medication to treat symptoms. The TCS will be measured during the 2018-2019 Mountain Cedar pollen se

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Peak Pollen Season Days With a Lower Group Average Total Combined ScoreAssessed up to 4 months, number of actual peak pollen season days was 27Evaluated during the 2018-2019 Texas Mountain Cedar allergy season. The number of days with a lower group average Total Combined Score, comparatively, in each Arm/Group are reported. Scoring of the TCS is from 0 to 38 on each day that it is assessed.The TCS is the sum of the symptom scores for runny nose, stuff nose, sneezing, itchy nose, gritty/itchy eyes, and watery eyes rated from no symptoms = 0 to severe symptoms = 3 plus the score for use of rescue medications for allergy symptoms 6 points for oral antihistamine, 6 points for eye drops, and 8 points for a nasal corticosteroid. Thus, a lower score represents fewer symptoms and associated need for allergy medication, while a higher score reflects more severe symptoms and the use of medication to treat symptoms.
Patient Reported Pain or Discomfort Following Intra-lymphatic InjectionsImmediately after the ILIT procedurePatient reported pain will be measured immediately after ILIT procedure using the Numeric Rating Scale 11 (NRS-11 rating scale). The NRS-11 asks patients to rate their pain on a scale from 0 (no pain or discomfort) to 11 (worst possible pain).
Patient-reported Treatment Satisfaction at the End of StudyUp to 4 monthsPercentage of patients reporting satisfaction with their treatment
Total Safety Score (TSS) for Active and Placebo Treatment Groups8 weeksThe total safety score is a is based on World Allergy Organization grading for allergic reactions. Following allergen or placebo exposure via intra-lymphatic injection, patients are monitored for local and systemic allergic reactions for up to 60 minutes post-procedure. At each exposure, a score is rated on a scale from none = 0, local reactions only = 1, mild systemic reactions (WAO Grade 1/2) = 2, moderate systemic reaction (WAO Grade 3) = 3, and severe systemic reaction (WAO grade 4) = 4. The total safety score for each group is the sum of the individual scores of each patient across all three treatments (exposures). Thus, the subject may have a score from 0 to 12 with 0 reflecting no allergic reaction to the allergen and 12 reflecting severe allergic reactions, and the TSS for a group is the sum for all patients in the group. The TSS is used to elicit and grade adverse events of interest rather than for statistical analysis.
Number of Subjects Who: Experienced Anaphylaxis, Were Treated With Epinephrine, or Experienced Any Other Treatment-emergent SAE Within 60 Minutes of Any of Three Planned ILIT Procedures8 weeksTo evaluate the safety of ILIT for Mountain Cedar pollinosis relative to placebo control based on the proportion of subjects receiving allergenic extract versus the proportion of subjects receiving placebo that: 1. experience anaphylaxis, or 2. are treated with epinephrine, or 3. experience any other treatment-emergent, serious adverse event (SAE) within 60 minutes of any of the three planned ILIT procedures.
Percentage Change in Allergen-specific Serum IgEAssessed prior to the first injection and to 4-8 weeks after the end of the 2018-2019 pollen seasonPercentage change in allergen-specific serum IgE from baseline to the end-of-study visit between active ILIT and placebo.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Total Number of Rescue Inhaler Uses by Patients With AsthmaUp to 4 monthRelative use of rescue inhalers by patients with comorbid asthma between active and placebo groups during the 2018-2019 Mountain Cedar pollen season.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Intra-lymphatic Allergenic Extract
A series of three injections of 0.1 mL (about 2 drops) of the allergenic extract of Mountain Cedar Pollen given every four weeks into a superficial inguinal lymph node through guidance via ultrasonography using a 1-mL hypodermic syringe with a 25-gauge or smaller needle. Intra-lymphatic allergenic extract: Mountain Cedar pollen allergenic extract is an FDA-approved, commercially available product for diagnosis and hypo-sensitization treatment of allergies. The labeled use is deep subcutaneous or percutaneous injection. Hyposensitization treatment is typically a series of 30 - 70 injections over 3 - 5 years into the upper aspect of the arm. This investigation is a proof-of-concept study to evaluate an alternative hyposensitization regimen of 3 injections directly into an inguinal lymph node.
11
Intra-lymphatic Placebo
Diluent as placebo control (sterile saline solution containing 0.4% phenol as a preservative and matched concentration of glycerin) given as a series of three injections of 0.1 mL (about 2 drops) every four weeks into a superficial inguinal lymph node through guidance via ultrasonography using a 1-mL hypodermic syringe with a 25-gauge or smaller needle. Intra-lymphatic placebo: The control group will receive a regimen of 3 injections of diluent (placebo) directly into an inguinal lymph node on the same schedule as the active treatment group.
10
Total21

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicIntra-lymphatic Allergenic ExtractIntra-lymphatic PlaceboTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
11 Participants10 Participants21 Participants
Age, Continuous34 years32 years33 years
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
10 Participants9 Participants19 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
8 Participants7 Participants15 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
3 Participants3 Participants6 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
11 participants10 participants21 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
7 Participants5 Participants12 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
4 Participants5 Participants9 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 110 / 10
other
Total, other adverse events
5 / 111 / 10
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 110 / 10

Outcome results

Primary

Average Daily Total Combined Score (TCS)

The TCS is the preferred endpoint for rhinoconjunctivitis as recommended by the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. Scoring of the TCS is from 0 to 38 on each day that it is assessed. The TCS is the sum of the symptom scores for runny nose, stuff nose, sneezing, itchy nose, gritty/itchy eyes, and watery eyes rated from no symptoms = 0 to severe symptoms = 3 plus the score for use of rescue medications for allergy symptoms 6 points for oral antihistamine, 6 points for eye drops, and 8 points for a nasal corticosteroid. Thus, a lower score represents fewer symptoms and associated need for allergy medication, while a higher score reflects more severe symptoms and the use of medication to treat symptoms. The TCS will be measured during the 2018-2019 Mountain Cedar pollen se

Time frame: Up to 4 months

Population: Safety analysis included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Efficacy analyses were on the per protocol dataset, which included participants who received three study treatment injections and completed at least 50% of expected electronic diary responses during the allergy season, with no major protocol violations. aLL enrolled patients met the criteria for inclusion in both the safety and per protocol analysis populations

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Intra-lymphatic Allergenic ExtractAverage Daily Total Combined Score (TCS)10.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.3
Intra-lymphatic PlaceboAverage Daily Total Combined Score (TCS)13.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.8
p-value: 0.004Kruskal-Wallis
Secondary

Number of Peak Pollen Season Days With a Lower Group Average Total Combined Score

Evaluated during the 2018-2019 Texas Mountain Cedar allergy season. The number of days with a lower group average Total Combined Score, comparatively, in each Arm/Group are reported. Scoring of the TCS is from 0 to 38 on each day that it is assessed.The TCS is the sum of the symptom scores for runny nose, stuff nose, sneezing, itchy nose, gritty/itchy eyes, and watery eyes rated from no symptoms = 0 to severe symptoms = 3 plus the score for use of rescue medications for allergy symptoms 6 points for oral antihistamine, 6 points for eye drops, and 8 points for a nasal corticosteroid. Thus, a lower score represents fewer symptoms and associated need for allergy medication, while a higher score reflects more severe symptoms and the use of medication to treat symptoms.

Time frame: Assessed up to 4 months, number of actual peak pollen season days was 27

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Intra-lymphatic Allergenic ExtractNumber of Peak Pollen Season Days With a Lower Group Average Total Combined Score20 days
Intra-lymphatic PlaceboNumber of Peak Pollen Season Days With a Lower Group Average Total Combined Score7 days
Comparison: The secondary efficacy endpoint was the percentage of days during peak pollen season for which the average total combined score was lower in the immunotherapy group than in the placebo group.p-value: <0.05Clopper-Pearson binomial exact test
Secondary

Number of Subjects Who: Experienced Anaphylaxis, Were Treated With Epinephrine, or Experienced Any Other Treatment-emergent SAE Within 60 Minutes of Any of Three Planned ILIT Procedures

To evaluate the safety of ILIT for Mountain Cedar pollinosis relative to placebo control based on the proportion of subjects receiving allergenic extract versus the proportion of subjects receiving placebo that: 1. experience anaphylaxis, or 2. are treated with epinephrine, or 3. experience any other treatment-emergent, serious adverse event (SAE) within 60 minutes of any of the three planned ILIT procedures.

Time frame: 8 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Intra-lymphatic Allergenic ExtractNumber of Subjects Who: Experienced Anaphylaxis, Were Treated With Epinephrine, or Experienced Any Other Treatment-emergent SAE Within 60 Minutes of Any of Three Planned ILIT Procedures0 Participants
Intra-lymphatic PlaceboNumber of Subjects Who: Experienced Anaphylaxis, Were Treated With Epinephrine, or Experienced Any Other Treatment-emergent SAE Within 60 Minutes of Any of Three Planned ILIT Procedures0 Participants
Secondary

Patient Reported Pain or Discomfort Following Intra-lymphatic Injections

Patient reported pain will be measured immediately after ILIT procedure using the Numeric Rating Scale 11 (NRS-11 rating scale). The NRS-11 asks patients to rate their pain on a scale from 0 (no pain or discomfort) to 11 (worst possible pain).

Time frame: Immediately after the ILIT procedure

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Intra-lymphatic Allergenic ExtractPatient Reported Pain or Discomfort Following Intra-lymphatic Injections0.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
Intra-lymphatic PlaceboPatient Reported Pain or Discomfort Following Intra-lymphatic Injections0.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
Secondary

Patient-reported Treatment Satisfaction at the End of Study

Percentage of patients reporting satisfaction with their treatment

Time frame: Up to 4 months

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Intra-lymphatic Allergenic ExtractPatient-reported Treatment Satisfaction at the End of Study91 percentage of participants
Intra-lymphatic PlaceboPatient-reported Treatment Satisfaction at the End of Study90 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.23Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Percentage Change in Allergen-specific Serum IgE

Percentage change in allergen-specific serum IgE from baseline to the end-of-study visit between active ILIT and placebo.

Time frame: Assessed prior to the first injection and to 4-8 weeks after the end of the 2018-2019 pollen season

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Intra-lymphatic Allergenic ExtractPercentage Change in Allergen-specific Serum IgE148 percentage change in serum IgEStandard Deviation 214
Intra-lymphatic PlaceboPercentage Change in Allergen-specific Serum IgE201 percentage change in serum IgEStandard Deviation 231
Secondary

Total Safety Score (TSS) for Active and Placebo Treatment Groups

The total safety score is a is based on World Allergy Organization grading for allergic reactions. Following allergen or placebo exposure via intra-lymphatic injection, patients are monitored for local and systemic allergic reactions for up to 60 minutes post-procedure. At each exposure, a score is rated on a scale from none = 0, local reactions only = 1, mild systemic reactions (WAO Grade 1/2) = 2, moderate systemic reaction (WAO Grade 3) = 3, and severe systemic reaction (WAO grade 4) = 4. The total safety score for each group is the sum of the individual scores of each patient across all three treatments (exposures). Thus, the subject may have a score from 0 to 12 with 0 reflecting no allergic reaction to the allergen and 12 reflecting severe allergic reactions, and the TSS for a group is the sum for all patients in the group. The TSS is used to elicit and grade adverse events of interest rather than for statistical analysis.

Time frame: 8 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Intra-lymphatic Allergenic ExtractTotal Safety Score (TSS) for Active and Placebo Treatment Groups3 score on a scale
Intra-lymphatic PlaceboTotal Safety Score (TSS) for Active and Placebo Treatment Groups1 score on a scale
Other Pre-specified

Total Number of Rescue Inhaler Uses by Patients With Asthma

Relative use of rescue inhalers by patients with comorbid asthma between active and placebo groups during the 2018-2019 Mountain Cedar pollen season.

Time frame: Up to 4 month

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Intra-lymphatic Allergenic ExtractTotal Number of Rescue Inhaler Uses by Patients With Asthma0 Rescue Inhaler Uses
Intra-lymphatic PlaceboTotal Number of Rescue Inhaler Uses by Patients With Asthma0 Rescue Inhaler Uses

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 27, 2026