Skip to content

Electrostimulation PROTOCOL Incontinence

EFFECT OF A PROTOCOL Electrostimulation for Urinary Incontinence and Its Influence on WOMEN 'S QUALITY OF LIFE

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03682926
Enrollment
20
Registered
2018-09-25
Start date
2014-10-31
Completion date
2015-12-31
Last updated
2018-10-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Female Stress Incontinence

Brief summary

To verify the effect of an adapted electrostimulation (EE) protocol for stress and mixed urinary incontinence (SUI / M) and its impact on quality of life (QoL)

Detailed description

Controlled and randomized clinical trial performed at the Physiotherapy Outpatient Clinic at the Magalhães Neto Pavilion of ComHUPES / UFBA. Women aged between 30 and 65 years and diagnosis of SUI / IUM. The patients were allocated to two groups (GA) submitted to selective electrostimulation for tonic fiber, phasic fibers IIa / IIb and different times of electrical stimulation; (GB) used 50hz for all fibers by 20mm, both answered the questionnaire King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ).

Interventions

Intracavitary electrostimulation with Quark medical vaginal electrode for perineal muscle strengthening protocol.

Sponsors

Hospital Universitário Professor Edgard Santos
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
30 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* women between the ages of 30 and 65 * With diagnosis of stress urinary incontinence and / or mixed * Perineal muscle weakness * Accepted to sign the TCLE

Exclusion criteria

* Women with neurological changes * Pregnant women * IUD use * Pacemaker * Genitourinary tract infection * Cancer * Refuse to sign the TCLE

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
contractile function of the perineal musculature3 monthsPerineal muscle function evaluated subjectively by vaginal touch using the PERFECT system to measure strength (graded from 0 to 5), strength (holding capacity of contraction recorded in seconds) and number of contractions of tonic and phasic fibers (ability to repeat muscle contractions perineal). Objectively, the vaginal cones were used to determine which load the patient was able to support (kit with 5 cones with weights ranging from 20 to 70g)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
King's Health Questionnaire3 monthsIt allows qualitative evaluation of the impact of urinary incontinence on the quality of life of women, it is responsible for 20 questions, divided into 8 domains, in addition to these domains, there are two other independent scales: the first evaluates the severity of UI (severity measures) and the second, the presence and intensity of urinary symptoms through the scale of urinary symptoms (VAS) where there is a graduation from 0 to 10, where the higher the score, the higher the severity

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026