Skip to content

Evaluation of Systane Complete for the Treatment of Contact Lens Discomfort

Evaluation of Systane Complete for the Treatment of Contact Lens Discomfort

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03682809
Enrollment
46
Registered
2018-09-25
Start date
2018-11-19
Completion date
2019-03-23
Last updated
2020-04-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Contact Lens Discomfort, Dry Eye

Keywords

Artificial Tears, Systane Complete, Contact Lens Discomfort, Dry Eye, Daily Disposable Contact Lenses

Brief summary

Clinicians commonly use artificial tears off label for treating contact lens (CL) discomfort and the dry eye associated with CLs because new artificial tear formulations have the potential to outperform the available CL rewetting drops. While off-label, McDonald et al. have previously shown that using a common artificial tear, Systane Ultra, before and after CL use is an effective means for treating daily disposable CL wears who have CL discomfort. Recently, a new formulation of artificial tears, Systane Complete, was released to the market. Systane Complete is a unique formulation that has combined elements from both Systane Ultra (indicated for aqueous deficient dry eye) and Systane Balance (indicated for evaporative dry eye) to create an artificial tear with an indication for aqueous deficient, evaporative, and mixed (both aqueous deficient and evaporative) dry eye. Thus, the goal of this study is to determine in a randomized clinical trial if Systane Complete is able to effectively improve the symptoms of patients who have CL discomfort.

Detailed description

Soft contact lenses (CL) are the most common CL modality with over 140 million users world. Despite many improvements in CL materials and solutions, the advent of daily disposable CLs, and the addition of rewetting drops to improve CL comfort, research has shown that between 21% to 64% of CL wearers permanently discontinue CL use because of eye discomfort. Contact Lens Discomfort (CLD) as defined by the Tear Film and Ocular Surface Society (TFOS) is a condition characterized by episodic or persistent adverse ocular sensations related to lens wear, either with or without visual disturbance, resulting from reduced compatibility between the CL and the eye's environment, which can lead to decreased wearing time and discontinuation of CL wear. TFOS further states that CLD is a multifactorial condition that stems from both CL (e.g., material design, fit, care system) and environmental factors (patient factors, medication compliance, external environmental factors, ocular environment). While environmental factors related to the patient such as age and sex are inherent, rewetting drops or artificial tears can be used to treat tear film deficiencies associated with CLD. The U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) defines rewetting/lubricating drops as an in-eye solution for use with CLs that contains one or more active ingredients (e.g., ophthalmic demulcents) in sufficient concentration to alleviate symptoms of discomfort from CL wear by physical means. Clinicians also commonly use artificial tears off label for treating CLD and the dry eye associated with CLs because artificial tear formulations have the potential to outperform CL rewetting drops. The FDA separately classifies artificial tears as topical drops that contain specific types of demulcents or emollients. While off-label, McDonald et al. have previously shown that using a common artificial tear, Systane Ultra, before and after CL use is an effective means for treating daily disposable CL wears who have CLD. Recently, a new formulation of artificial tears, Systane Complete, was released to the market. Systane Complete is a unique formulation that has combined elements from both Systane Ultra (indicated for aqueous deficient dry eye) and Systane Balance (indicated for evaporative dry eye) to create an artificial tear with an indication for aqueous deficient, evaporative, and mixed (both aqueous deficient and evaporative) dry eye. Thus, the Research Goal of this study is to determine in a randomized clinical trial if Systane Complete is able to effectively improve the symptoms of CLD suffers.

Interventions

Systane Complete is an artificial tear indicated for patients who have evaporative, aqueous deficient, or mixed dry eye.

Sponsors

Southern College of Optometry
CollaboratorOTHER
Lindenhurst Eye Physicians & Surgeons, PC
CollaboratorOTHER
Alcon Research
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Masking description

The patients who are randomized to Systane Complete will be masked to the brand of the artificial tears. There will be a masked examiner who does not know the subject's study group.

Intervention model description

One group will be randomized Systane Complete, and one group will be randomized to no treatment.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Self-reported contact lens discomfort * Contact Lens Dry Eye Questionnaire (CLDEQ)-8 scores ≥ 12 * Daily disposable contact lens wearer * Best-corrected visual acuity of 20/30 or better

Exclusion criteria

* All other contact lens types (e.g., currently wearing two week or monthly replacement contact lenses or hard contact lenses) * Non-compliant daily disposable contact lens wearers (must regularly replace contact lenses daily) * Systemic health conditions known to alter tear film physiology * History of ocular surgery within the past 12 months * History of severe ocular trauma, active ocular infection, or inflammation * Currently using Accutane or eye medications * Pregnant or breast feeding

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Contact Lens SymptomsBaseline through 2 WeeksImprovement in contact lens symptoms as measured with the Contact Lens Dry Eye Questionnaire-8 (CLDEQ-8) and CLDEQ-4 at 2 weeks compared to baseline. The CLDEQ-8 score range is 0 to 37 with 0 being the best score. Subjects were required to have a CLDEQ-8 of at least 12 in order to participate. The CLDEQ-4 is a subset of the CLDEQ-8, and it was also reported because it is a unidimensional measure of ocular discomfort in contact lens wearers. The CLDEQ-4 has a score range of 0 to 18 with 0 being the best score.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
End of Day Eye ComfortBaseline through 2 WeeksImprovement in eye symptoms as measured with the Standardized Patient Evaluation of Eye Dryness (SPEED) at 2 weeks compared to baseline. The scale range is 0 to 28 with 0 being the best score.
Corneal StainingBaseline through 2 WeeksImprovement in conjuctivial staining at two weeks compared to baseline using the Brien Holden Vision Institute (BHVI) scale, which measures five regions of the eye on a (0-4) scale (max of 20 per metric). A score 0 is the best possible score.
Schirmer's I Test Without AnestheticBaseline through 2 WeeksImprovement in tear volume as measured in mm of wetting with a Schirmer's strip at 5 mins at 2 weeks compared to baseline. The score ranges is 0 mm to 35 mm with 35 mm being the best score.
Tear Break-Up Time (TBUT)Baseline through 2 WeeksImprovement in tear break up time as measured with a slit-lamp biomicroscope and sodium fluorescein in seconds at 2 weeks compared to baseline. Scores range for 0 to 60 seconds with 60 seconds being the best score.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Systane Complete
Subjects randomized to this group will be asked to use Systane Complete once before and after contact lens use. Systane Complete: Systane Complete is an artificial tear indicated for patients who have evaporative, aqueous deficient, or mixed dry eye.
22
No Treatment
Subjects randomized to this group will not receive a treatment.
24
Total46

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicNo TreatmentTotalSystane Complete
Age, Continuous28.8 Years30.75 Years32.7 Years
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
24 participants46 participants22 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
19 Participants39 Participants20 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
5 Participants7 Participants2 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 220 / 24
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 220 / 24
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 220 / 24

Outcome results

Primary

Contact Lens Symptoms

Improvement in contact lens symptoms as measured with the Contact Lens Dry Eye Questionnaire-8 (CLDEQ-8) and CLDEQ-4 at 2 weeks compared to baseline. The CLDEQ-8 score range is 0 to 37 with 0 being the best score. Subjects were required to have a CLDEQ-8 of at least 12 in order to participate. The CLDEQ-4 is a subset of the CLDEQ-8, and it was also reported because it is a unidimensional measure of ocular discomfort in contact lens wearers. The CLDEQ-4 has a score range of 0 to 18 with 0 being the best score.

Time frame: Baseline through 2 Weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Systane CompleteContact Lens SymptomsBaseline cldeq-8 (worse eye)20.41 Score on a ScaleStandard Deviation 5.4
Systane CompleteContact Lens Symptoms2 week cldeq-8 (worse eye)12.86 Score on a ScaleStandard Deviation 6.4
Systane CompleteContact Lens SymptomsBaseline cldeq-4 (worse eye)10.91 Score on a ScaleStandard Deviation 3.28
Systane CompleteContact Lens Symptoms2 week cldeq-4 (worse eye)7.14 Score on a ScaleStandard Deviation 3.5
No TreatmentContact Lens Symptoms2 week cldeq-4 (worse eye)10.13 Score on a ScaleStandard Deviation 2.83
No TreatmentContact Lens SymptomsBaseline cldeq-8 (worse eye)18.92 Score on a ScaleStandard Deviation 4.92
No TreatmentContact Lens SymptomsBaseline cldeq-4 (worse eye)10.38 Score on a ScaleStandard Deviation 2.41
No TreatmentContact Lens Symptoms2 week cldeq-8 (worse eye)17.92 Score on a ScaleStandard Deviation 5.3
Secondary

Corneal Staining

Improvement in conjuctivial staining at two weeks compared to baseline using the Brien Holden Vision Institute (BHVI) scale, which measures five regions of the eye on a (0-4) scale (max of 20 per metric). A score 0 is the best possible score.

Time frame: Baseline through 2 Weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Systane CompleteCorneal StainingCorneal Staining Extent (baseline)1.73 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.45
Systane CompleteCorneal StainingCorneal Staining Depth (baseline)1.22 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.54
Systane CompleteCorneal StainingCorneal Staining Type (baseline)1.18 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.56
Systane CompleteCorneal StainingCorneal Staining Extent (2 weeks)1.41 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.42
Systane CompleteCorneal StainingCorneal Staining Depth (2 weeks)0.91 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.38
Systane CompleteCorneal StainingCorneal Staining Type (2 weeks)0.86 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.36
No TreatmentCorneal StainingCorneal Staining Depth (2 weeks)1.04 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
No TreatmentCorneal StainingCorneal Staining Extent (baseline)1.63 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5
No TreatmentCorneal StainingCorneal Staining Extent (2 weeks)1.75 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.98
No TreatmentCorneal StainingCorneal Staining Depth (baseline)0.92 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.32
No TreatmentCorneal StainingCorneal Staining Type (2 weeks)0.92 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.06
No TreatmentCorneal StainingCorneal Staining Type (baseline)0.92 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.32
Secondary

End of Day Eye Comfort

Improvement in eye symptoms as measured with the Standardized Patient Evaluation of Eye Dryness (SPEED) at 2 weeks compared to baseline. The scale range is 0 to 28 with 0 being the best score.

Time frame: Baseline through 2 Weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Systane CompleteEnd of Day Eye ComfortSpeed Score Baseline (worse eye)10.27 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.6
Systane CompleteEnd of Day Eye ComfortSpeed Score 2 weeks (worse eye)7.55 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.31
No TreatmentEnd of Day Eye ComfortSpeed Score Baseline (worse eye)9.67 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.93
No TreatmentEnd of Day Eye ComfortSpeed Score 2 weeks (worse eye)9.29 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.14
Secondary

Schirmer's I Test Without Anesthetic

Improvement in tear volume as measured in mm of wetting with a Schirmer's strip at 5 mins at 2 weeks compared to baseline. The score ranges is 0 mm to 35 mm with 35 mm being the best score.

Time frame: Baseline through 2 Weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Systane CompleteSchirmer's I Test Without AnestheticSchirmers Strip Baseline15.68 mmStandard Deviation 9.7
Systane CompleteSchirmer's I Test Without AnestheticSchirmers Strip (2 weeks)15.41 mmStandard Deviation 9.29
No TreatmentSchirmer's I Test Without AnestheticSchirmers Strip Baseline20.88 mmStandard Deviation 10.65
No TreatmentSchirmer's I Test Without AnestheticSchirmers Strip (2 weeks)18.30 mmStandard Deviation 10.69
Secondary

Tear Break-Up Time (TBUT)

Improvement in tear break up time as measured with a slit-lamp biomicroscope and sodium fluorescein in seconds at 2 weeks compared to baseline. Scores range for 0 to 60 seconds with 60 seconds being the best score.

Time frame: Baseline through 2 Weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Systane CompleteTear Break-Up Time (TBUT)Tear Break Up Time (seconds) (baseline)7.70 SecondsStandard Deviation 5.2
Systane CompleteTear Break-Up Time (TBUT)Tear Break Up Time (seconds) (2 weeks)8.57 SecondsStandard Deviation 4.73
No TreatmentTear Break-Up Time (TBUT)Tear Break Up Time (seconds) (baseline)8.50 SecondsStandard Deviation 5.1
No TreatmentTear Break-Up Time (TBUT)Tear Break Up Time (seconds) (2 weeks)8.80 SecondsStandard Deviation 5.08

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026