Skip to content

A Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Luspatercept (ACE-536) Versus Epoetin Alfa for the Treatment of Anemia Due to IPSS-R Very Low, Low, or Intermediate Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) Participants Who Require Red Blood Cell Transfusions and Are ESA Naïve

A Phase 3, Open-label, Randomized Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Luspatercept (ACE-536) Versus Epoetin Alpha for the Treatment of Anemia Due to IPSS-R Very Low, Low or Intermediate Risk Due to Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) in ESA Naïve Subjects Who Require Red Blood Cell Transfusions

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03682536
Acronym
COMMANDS
Enrollment
363
Registered
2018-09-24
Start date
2019-01-02
Completion date
2027-09-28
Last updated
2024-11-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Myelodysplastic Syndromes

Keywords

Luspatercept, ACE-536, Anemia, Myelodysplastic Syndromes, Blood Transfusion, RBC Transfusion, Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents, Erythropoietin, Myelodysplasia, Epoetin alpha

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of luspatercept (ACE-536) compared to epoetin alfa on red blood cell (RBC) transfusion independence (for at least 12 weeks) with a concurrent hemoglobin increase of at least 1.5 g/dL in participants with anemia due to revised international prognostic scoring system (IPSS-R) very low, low, or intermediate risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) who require RBC transfusions and have never been exposed to erythropoiesis stimulating agent (ESA).

Interventions

DRUGLuspatercept

Specified dose on specified days

DRUGEpoetin alfa

Specified dose on specified days

Sponsors

Acceleron Pharma, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ USA
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Celgene
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Documented diagnosis of Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) according to WHO 2016 classification that meets revised international prognostic scoring system (IPSS-R) classification of very low, low, or intermediate risk disease, and have \< 5% blasts in bone marrow * Endogenous serum erythropoietin (sEPO) level of \< 500 U/L * Requires Red blood cell (RBC) transfusions, as documented by the criteria: Average transfusion requirement of 2 - 6 units/8 weeks of packed red blood cells (pRBCs) confirmed for a minimum of 8 weeks immediately preceding randomization * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score of 0, 1, or 2

Exclusion criteria

* Clinically significant anemia due to iron, vitamin B12, or folate deficiencies, or autoimmune or hereditary hemolytic anemia, or hypothyroidism, or any type of known clinically significant bleeding or sequestration or drug induced anemia * Known history of diagnosis of Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) * Uncontrolled hypertension, defined as repeated elevations of systolic blood pressure (SBP) of ≥ 150 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) ≥ 100 mmHg despite adequate treatment Other protocol-defined inclusion/

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Red Blood Cell Transfusion Independence (RBC-TI) for 12 Weeks (84 Days) With a Mean Hemoglobin Increase ≥ 1.5 g/dLWeek 1 through Week 24Percentage of participants who are RBC transfusion-free for any 12-week period associated with a concurrent mean hemoglobin (Hgb) increase ≥ 1.5 g/dL compared to baseline. After applying below 14/3-day rule, the baseline Hgb value is defined as the lowest Hgb value from the central, local laboratory, or pre transfusion Hgb from transfusion records that is within 56 days on or prior to the first dose of treatment, or randomization date if participants were not treated. 4/3-day rule: only Hgb values that are at least 14 days after a transfusion may be used unless there is another transfusion within 3 days after the Hgb assessment. If this occurs, that Hgb value will be used despite being \< 14 days after the previous transfusion.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Hemoglobin Change Over 24 WeeksWeek 1 through Week 24Mean hemoglobin (Hgb) change over the 24-week period of Week 1 through Week 24 compared to baseline. After applying below 14/3-day rule, the baseline Hgb value is defined as the lowest Hgb value from the central, local laboratory, or pre transfusion Hgb from transfusion records that is within 56 days on or prior to the first dose of treatment, or randomization date if participants were not treated. 4/3-day rule: only Hgb values that are at least 14 days after a transfusion may be used unless there is another transfusion within 3 days after the Hgb assessment. If this occurs, that Hgb value will be used despite being \< 14 days after the previous transfusion.
Percentage of Participants Achieving Hematologic Improvement - Erythroid Response (HI-E) Per IWGWeek 1 through Week 24The percentage of participants meeting the modified HI-E criteria per the International Working Group (IWG) sustained over any consecutive 56-day period in Week 1-24: For participants with baseline red blood cell (RBC) transfusion burden of \>= 4 units/8 weeks, a reduction of at least 4 units RBC transfusion; for participants with baseline RBC transfusion burden of \< 4 units/8 weeks, mean increase of hemoglobin of at least 1.5 g/dL in the absence of transfusions.
Time to Hematologic Improvement - Erythroid Response (HI-E)Week 1 through Week 24Time from first dose to first onset of achieving modified HI-E. The modified HI-E criteria per the International Working Group (IWG) sustained over any consecutive 56-day period in Week 1-24: For participants with baseline red blood cell (RBC) transfusion burden of \>= 4 units/8 weeks, a reduction of at least 4 units RBC transfusion; for participants with baseline RBC transfusion burden of \< 4 units/8 weeks, mean increase of hemoglobin of at least 1.5 g/dL in the absence of transfusions.
Percentage of Participants Achieving Red Blood Cell Transfusion Independence (RBC-TI) for ≥ 12 Weeks (84 Days)Week 1 through Week 24Percentage of participants who are RBC transfusion-free over a consecutive 84-day period.
Duration of Red Blood Cell Transfusion Independence (RBC-TI) ≥ 12 Weeks (84 Days)Week 1 through End of Treatment (Up to approximately an average of 66 weeks and a maximum of 202 weeks)Maximum duration of RBC transfusion independence for participants who achieve RBC-TI ≥ 84 days.
Time to Red Blood Cell Transfusion Independence (RBC-TI) ≥ 12 Weeks (84 Days)Week 1 through Week 24Time from first dose to first onset of transfusion independence ≥ 84 days.
Time to First Red Blood Cell (RBC) TransfusionWeek 1 through End of Treatment (Up to approximately an average of 66 weeks and a maximum of 202 weeks)Time to first RBC transfusion is defined as time from Week 1 to first RBC transfusion on treatment. Participants who maintain RBC-TI through the end of the Treatment Period or time of analysis will be censored at EOT visit date, subsequent MDS therapy start date, study discontinuation date, analysis cutoff date or death, whichever occurs first. Median is from un-stratified Kaplan-Meier method.
The Number of Red Blood Cell (RBC) Units Transfused Within the First 24 Weeks of TreatmentWeek 1 through Week 24RBC transfusion burden on treatment is defined as total number of packed red blood cell (pRBC) units transfused within the first 24 weeks of treatment since Week 1.
Percentage of Participants Achieving Red Blood Cell Transfusion Independence (RBC-TI) for ≥ 56 Days (8 Weeks)Week 1 through Week 24Defined as percentage of participants achieving RBC-TI for \>= 56 days during any consecutive 56-day period from Week 1 through Week 24.
Percentage of Participants With Red Blood Cell Transfusion Independence (RBC-TI) for 24 WeeksWeek 1 through Week 24Red blood cell transfusion independence (RBC-TI) for 24 weeks is defined as the percentage of participants who did not receive RBC transfusions from Week 1 through Week 24.
The Number of Participants With Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) ProgressionFrom randomization to 5 years from first dose or 3 years from last dose (whichever occurs later), unless the participant withdraws consent from the study, dies or is lost to follow-up. (Up to approximately 221 weeks)Progression to AML is defined as a diagnosis of AML as per WHO classification of ≥ 20% blasts in peripheral blood or bone marrow.
Median Time to Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) ProgressionFrom randomization to first diagnosis of AML up to 5 years from first dose or 3 years from last dose (whichever occurs later), unless the participant withdraws consent from the study, dies or is lost to follow-up. (Up to approximately 221 weeks)Time to AML progression is defined as the time between randomization and first diagnosis of AML as per WHO classification of ≥ 20% blasts in peripheral blood or bone marrow. Participants with diagnosis of AML will be considered to have had an event. Participants who have not progressed to AML at the time of analysis will be censored at the last assessment date which does not indicate progression to AML estimated by Kaplan-Meier method.
Overall Survival (OS)Randomization to death due to any cause up to 5 years from first dose or 3 years from last dose (whichever occurs later), unless the participant withdraws consent from the study, dies or is lost to follow-up. (Up to approximately 221 weeks)Time from date of randomization to death due to any cause
The Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)From first dose to 42 days post last dose (Up to approximately an average of 72 weeks and a maximum of 208 weeks)Treatment-emergent adverse events include adverse events that started on or after the first dose of treatment until 42 days after the last dose of treatment, as well as those serious adverse events (SAEs) made known to the investigator at any time thereafter that are suspected of being related to treatment. The severity/intensity of AEs were graded according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE, Version 4.0). Grade 3 = Severe, Grade 4 = Life-threatening, and Grade 5 = Death.
Number of Participants With a Positive Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) TestDay 1 on week 4, 10, 16, 22, and every 12 weeks (±14 days) from the 24-Week MDS Assessment visit for up to one year from the first doseNumber of participants under each ADA positive category. A participant is counted as 'Treatment-Emergent' if there is a positive post-baseline sample while the baseline sample is ADA negative, or there is a positive post-baseline sample with a titer \>= 4-fold of the baseline titer while the baseline sample is ADA positive. A participant is counted as 'Preexisting' if the baseline sample is ADA positive and the participant is not qualified for 'Treatment-Emergent'. If the participant was discontinued from study treatment earlier than one year from the first dose, additional samples will be collected if last ADA is positive. Baseline is defined as the last value on or before the first dose of study drug.
Change From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Baseline and week 24.The EORTC QLQ-C30 is composed of 30 items that includes a global health status score ranging from: 1-7 as well as scores for 5 functional scales (physical, role, emotional, cognitive and social), 3 symptom scales (fatigue, nausea/vomiting, and pain) and 6 single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties) all ranging from 1-4. Subscale scores are transformed to a 0 to 100 scale. A high score for a functional scale represents a high or healthy level of functioning; a high score for the global health status/health related quality of life (HRQoL) represents a high overall HRQoL; but a high score for a symptom scale represents a high level of symptomatology or problems. Baseline is defined as the last value on or before the first dose of study drug.
Change From Baseline in the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Anemia Version 4 (FACT-An)Baseline, Day 1 on weeks 7,13,19, and 24.The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Anemia (FACT-An) questionnaire includes 47 items rating on a 5-point Likert scale from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much) (so that 0 is considered worse quality of life and 4 is good response) on five primary subscales: * Physical well-being (sum of 7 items, score range from 0-28) * Social/Family well-being (sum of 7 items, score range from 0-28) * Emotional well-being (sum of 6 items, score range from 0-24) * Functional well-being (sum of 7 items, score range from 0-28) * Anemia-related symptoms (sum of 20 items, score range from 0-80) A total score for the FACT-An can be calculated by summing the five primary subscales with a score range from 0-188. Higher scores representing better quality of life. Baseline is defined as the last value on or before the first dose of study drug.
Area Under the Concentration-time Curve [AUC]Day 1 on week 4, 10, 16, 22, and every 12 weeks (±14 days) from the 24-Week MDS Assessment visit for up to one year from the first dose
Maximum Plasma Concentration of Drug [Cmax]Day 1 on week 4, 10, 16, 22, and every 12 weeks (±14 days) from the 24-Week MDS Assessment visit for up to one year from the first dose
Percentage of Participants Achieving Red Blood Cell Transfusion Independence (RBC-TI) for a Consecutive 24-week PeriodWeek 1 through Week 48Defined as percentage of participants achieving RBC-TI for \>= 168 days during any consecutive 168-day period from Week 1 through Week 48.

Countries

Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Czechia, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Israel, Italy, Japan, Lithuania, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Russia, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Taiwan, Turkey (Türkiye), Ukraine, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Luspatercept
Starting dose of 1.0 mg/kg subcutaneous injection every 3 weeks (21 days; Q3W). Dose levels can be increased in a stepwise manner beyond the starting dose to 1.33 mg/kg, and up to a maximum of 1.75 mg/kg.
182
Epoetin Alfa
Starting dose of 450 IU/kg (maximum total starting dose is 40,000 IU) subcutaneous injection once every week (7 days; QW). Dose levels can be increased in a stepwise manner beyond the starting dose to 787.5 IU/kg, and up to a maximum of 1,050 IU/kg (with a maximum total dose of 80,000 IU).
181
Total363

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
RandomizationWithdrawal by Subject02
TreatmentAdverse Event95
TreatmentDeath1413
TreatmentDisease Progression97
TreatmentLack of Efficacy4168
TreatmentLost to Follow-up01
TreatmentOther Reasons87
TreatmentPhysician Decision55
TreatmentProtocol Violation10
TreatmentStudy Terminated by Sponsor12
TreatmentWithdrawal by Subject1618

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicEpoetin AlfaTotalLuspatercept
Age, Continuous73.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.66
73.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.28
73.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.92
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
12 Participants23 Participants11 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
156 Participants311 Participants155 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
13 Participants29 Participants16 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
25 Participants44 Participants19 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
13 Participants28 Participants15 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
143 Participants289 Participants146 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
89 Participants162 Participants73 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
92 Participants201 Participants109 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
39 / 18238 / 181
other
Total, other adverse events
153 / 182134 / 179
serious
Total, serious adverse events
82 / 18271 / 179

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants With Red Blood Cell Transfusion Independence (RBC-TI) for 12 Weeks (84 Days) With a Mean Hemoglobin Increase ≥ 1.5 g/dL

Percentage of participants who are RBC transfusion-free for any 12-week period associated with a concurrent mean hemoglobin (Hgb) increase ≥ 1.5 g/dL compared to baseline. After applying below 14/3-day rule, the baseline Hgb value is defined as the lowest Hgb value from the central, local laboratory, or pre transfusion Hgb from transfusion records that is within 56 days on or prior to the first dose of treatment, or randomization date if participants were not treated. 4/3-day rule: only Hgb values that are at least 14 days after a transfusion may be used unless there is another transfusion within 3 days after the Hgb assessment. If this occurs, that Hgb value will be used despite being \< 14 days after the previous transfusion.

Time frame: Week 1 through Week 24

Population: ITT Population - all randomized participants regardless of whether or not the participant received treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
LuspaterceptPercentage of Participants With Red Blood Cell Transfusion Independence (RBC-TI) for 12 Weeks (84 Days) With a Mean Hemoglobin Increase ≥ 1.5 g/dL60.4 Percent of participants
Epoetin AlfaPercentage of Participants With Red Blood Cell Transfusion Independence (RBC-TI) for 12 Weeks (84 Days) With a Mean Hemoglobin Increase ≥ 1.5 g/dL34.8 Percent of participants
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [2, 4.8]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Area Under the Concentration-time Curve [AUC]

Time frame: Day 1 on week 4, 10, 16, 22, and every 12 weeks (±14 days) from the 24-Week MDS Assessment visit for up to one year from the first dose

Secondary

Change From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)

The EORTC QLQ-C30 is composed of 30 items that includes a global health status score ranging from: 1-7 as well as scores for 5 functional scales (physical, role, emotional, cognitive and social), 3 symptom scales (fatigue, nausea/vomiting, and pain) and 6 single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties) all ranging from 1-4. Subscale scores are transformed to a 0 to 100 scale. A high score for a functional scale represents a high or healthy level of functioning; a high score for the global health status/health related quality of life (HRQoL) represents a high overall HRQoL; but a high score for a symptom scale represents a high level of symptomatology or problems. Baseline is defined as the last value on or before the first dose of study drug.

Time frame: Baseline and week 24.

Population: All randomized participants who completed the EORTC QLQ-C30 assessment at baseline and post-baseline assessment at the respective visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LuspaterceptChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cognitive Functioning2.0 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.79
LuspaterceptChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Pain-2.1 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.4
LuspaterceptChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Physical Functioning0.1 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.32
LuspaterceptChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Dyspnea-1.6 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.34
LuspaterceptChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Social Functioning-2.9 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.64
LuspaterceptChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Insomnia-4.0 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.3
LuspaterceptChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Emotional Functioning2.5 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.17
LuspaterceptChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Appetite Loss-1.1 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.55
LuspaterceptChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Fatigue-1.9 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.84
LuspaterceptChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Constipation-0.8 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.36
LuspaterceptChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Role Functioning-1.9 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.59
LuspaterceptChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Diarrhea1.6 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.58
LuspaterceptChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Nausea and Vomiting2.1 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.34
LuspaterceptChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Financial difficulties-0.8 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.15
LuspaterceptChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Global Health Status / QoL1.7 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.7
Epoetin AlfaChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Financial difficulties-1.5 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.75
Epoetin AlfaChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Global Health Status / QoL2.7 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.99
Epoetin AlfaChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Physical Functioning4.4 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.3
Epoetin AlfaChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Role Functioning-2.6 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.92
Epoetin AlfaChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Emotional Functioning3.4 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.32
Epoetin AlfaChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Cognitive Functioning0.2 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.75
Epoetin AlfaChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Social Functioning-0.9 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.09
Epoetin AlfaChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Fatigue-9.0 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.77
Epoetin AlfaChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Nausea and Vomiting-1.2 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.11
Epoetin AlfaChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Pain-1.7 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.77
Epoetin AlfaChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Dyspnea-8.8 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.59
Epoetin AlfaChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Insomnia-3.0 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 33.95
Epoetin AlfaChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Appetite Loss-0.0 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.14
Epoetin AlfaChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Constipation0.9 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.23
Epoetin AlfaChange From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)Diarrhea1.2 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.58
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Anemia Version 4 (FACT-An)

The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Anemia (FACT-An) questionnaire includes 47 items rating on a 5-point Likert scale from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much) (so that 0 is considered worse quality of life and 4 is good response) on five primary subscales: * Physical well-being (sum of 7 items, score range from 0-28) * Social/Family well-being (sum of 7 items, score range from 0-28) * Emotional well-being (sum of 6 items, score range from 0-24) * Functional well-being (sum of 7 items, score range from 0-28) * Anemia-related symptoms (sum of 20 items, score range from 0-80) A total score for the FACT-An can be calculated by summing the five primary subscales with a score range from 0-188. Higher scores representing better quality of life. Baseline is defined as the last value on or before the first dose of study drug.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 1 on weeks 7,13,19, and 24.

Population: All randomized participants who completed the Fact-An assessment at baseline and post-baseline assessment at the respective visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LuspaterceptChange From Baseline in the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Anemia Version 4 (FACT-An)W7D12.1 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.41
LuspaterceptChange From Baseline in the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Anemia Version 4 (FACT-An)W13D11.8 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.58
LuspaterceptChange From Baseline in the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Anemia Version 4 (FACT-An)W19D1-0.2 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.3
LuspaterceptChange From Baseline in the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Anemia Version 4 (FACT-An)Week 24 (D169)1.5 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.39
Epoetin AlfaChange From Baseline in the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Anemia Version 4 (FACT-An)Week 24 (D169)2.8 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.18
Epoetin AlfaChange From Baseline in the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Anemia Version 4 (FACT-An)W7D13.7 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.43
Epoetin AlfaChange From Baseline in the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Anemia Version 4 (FACT-An)W19D13.1 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.07
Epoetin AlfaChange From Baseline in the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Anemia Version 4 (FACT-An)W13D14.5 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.36
Secondary

Duration of Red Blood Cell Transfusion Independence (RBC-TI) ≥ 12 Weeks (84 Days)

Maximum duration of RBC transfusion independence for participants who achieve RBC-TI ≥ 84 days.

Time frame: Week 1 through End of Treatment (Up to approximately an average of 66 weeks and a maximum of 202 weeks)

Population: ITT Population (all randomized participants regardless of whether or not the participant received treatment) who were RBC-TI \>= 12 Weeks (Week 1-24) responders

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
LuspaterceptDuration of Red Blood Cell Transfusion Independence (RBC-TI) ≥ 12 Weeks (84 Days)128.1 Weeks
Epoetin AlfaDuration of Red Blood Cell Transfusion Independence (RBC-TI) ≥ 12 Weeks (84 Days)89.7 Weeks
p-value: 0.009695% CI: [0.33, 0.864]Log Rank
Secondary

Maximum Plasma Concentration of Drug [Cmax]

Time frame: Day 1 on week 4, 10, 16, 22, and every 12 weeks (±14 days) from the 24-Week MDS Assessment visit for up to one year from the first dose

Secondary

Mean Hemoglobin Change Over 24 Weeks

Mean hemoglobin (Hgb) change over the 24-week period of Week 1 through Week 24 compared to baseline. After applying below 14/3-day rule, the baseline Hgb value is defined as the lowest Hgb value from the central, local laboratory, or pre transfusion Hgb from transfusion records that is within 56 days on or prior to the first dose of treatment, or randomization date if participants were not treated. 4/3-day rule: only Hgb values that are at least 14 days after a transfusion may be used unless there is another transfusion within 3 days after the Hgb assessment. If this occurs, that Hgb value will be used despite being \< 14 days after the previous transfusion.

Time frame: Week 1 through Week 24

Population: ITT Population (all randomized participants regardless of whether or not the participant received treatment) with baseline measurements.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LuspaterceptMean Hemoglobin Change Over 24 Weeks2.0 g/dLStandard Deviation 1.14
Epoetin AlfaMean Hemoglobin Change Over 24 Weeks1.5 g/dLStandard Deviation 1.12
Secondary

Median Time to Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Progression

Time to AML progression is defined as the time between randomization and first diagnosis of AML as per WHO classification of ≥ 20% blasts in peripheral blood or bone marrow. Participants with diagnosis of AML will be considered to have had an event. Participants who have not progressed to AML at the time of analysis will be censored at the last assessment date which does not indicate progression to AML estimated by Kaplan-Meier method.

Time frame: From randomization to first diagnosis of AML up to 5 years from first dose or 3 years from last dose (whichever occurs later), unless the participant withdraws consent from the study, dies or is lost to follow-up. (Up to approximately 221 weeks)

Population: ITT Population: all randomized participants regardless of whether or not the participant received treatment

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
LuspaterceptMedian Time to Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) ProgressionNA Months
Epoetin AlfaMedian Time to Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) ProgressionNA Months
Secondary

Number of Participants With a Positive Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) Test

Number of participants under each ADA positive category. A participant is counted as 'Treatment-Emergent' if there is a positive post-baseline sample while the baseline sample is ADA negative, or there is a positive post-baseline sample with a titer \>= 4-fold of the baseline titer while the baseline sample is ADA positive. A participant is counted as 'Preexisting' if the baseline sample is ADA positive and the participant is not qualified for 'Treatment-Emergent'. If the participant was discontinued from study treatment earlier than one year from the first dose, additional samples will be collected if last ADA is positive. Baseline is defined as the last value on or before the first dose of study drug.

Time frame: Day 1 on week 4, 10, 16, 22, and every 12 weeks (±14 days) from the 24-Week MDS Assessment visit for up to one year from the first dose

Population: Safety Population (all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of treatment) with baseline and at least one post-baseline immunogenicity assessment result. - Luspatercept Arm Only.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
LuspaterceptNumber of Participants With a Positive Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) TestPreexisting4 Participants
LuspaterceptNumber of Participants With a Positive Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) TestTreatment-emergent11 Participants
Secondary

Overall Survival (OS)

Time from date of randomization to death due to any cause

Time frame: Randomization to death due to any cause up to 5 years from first dose or 3 years from last dose (whichever occurs later), unless the participant withdraws consent from the study, dies or is lost to follow-up. (Up to approximately 221 weeks)

Population: ITT Population - all randomized participants regardless of whether or not the participant received treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
LuspaterceptOverall Survival (OS)NA Months
Epoetin AlfaOverall Survival (OS)42.8 Months
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving Hematologic Improvement - Erythroid Response (HI-E) Per IWG

The percentage of participants meeting the modified HI-E criteria per the International Working Group (IWG) sustained over any consecutive 56-day period in Week 1-24: For participants with baseline red blood cell (RBC) transfusion burden of \>= 4 units/8 weeks, a reduction of at least 4 units RBC transfusion; for participants with baseline RBC transfusion burden of \< 4 units/8 weeks, mean increase of hemoglobin of at least 1.5 g/dL in the absence of transfusions.

Time frame: Week 1 through Week 24

Population: ITT Population - all randomized participants regardless of whether or not the participant received treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
LuspaterceptPercentage of Participants Achieving Hematologic Improvement - Erythroid Response (HI-E) Per IWG74.2 Percentage of participants
Epoetin AlfaPercentage of Participants Achieving Hematologic Improvement - Erythroid Response (HI-E) Per IWG53.0 Percentage of participants
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [1.8, 4.5]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving Red Blood Cell Transfusion Independence (RBC-TI) for ≥ 12 Weeks (84 Days)

Percentage of participants who are RBC transfusion-free over a consecutive 84-day period.

Time frame: Week 1 through Week 24

Population: ITT Population - all randomized participants regardless of whether or not the participant received treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
LuspaterceptPercentage of Participants Achieving Red Blood Cell Transfusion Independence (RBC-TI) for ≥ 12 Weeks (84 Days)68.1 Percent of participants
Epoetin AlfaPercentage of Participants Achieving Red Blood Cell Transfusion Independence (RBC-TI) for ≥ 12 Weeks (84 Days)48.6 Percent of participants
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [1.6, 4]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving Red Blood Cell Transfusion Independence (RBC-TI) for ≥ 56 Days (8 Weeks)

Defined as percentage of participants achieving RBC-TI for \>= 56 days during any consecutive 56-day period from Week 1 through Week 24.

Time frame: Week 1 through Week 24

Population: ITT Population - all randomized participants regardless of whether or not the participant received treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
LuspaterceptPercentage of Participants Achieving Red Blood Cell Transfusion Independence (RBC-TI) for ≥ 56 Days (8 Weeks)79.1 Percent of Participants
Epoetin AlfaPercentage of Participants Achieving Red Blood Cell Transfusion Independence (RBC-TI) for ≥ 56 Days (8 Weeks)64.6 Percent of Participants
p-value: 0.000795% CI: [1.4, 3.8]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving Red Blood Cell Transfusion Independence (RBC-TI) for a Consecutive 24-week Period

Defined as percentage of participants achieving RBC-TI for \>= 168 days during any consecutive 168-day period from Week 1 through Week 48.

Time frame: Week 1 through Week 48

Population: ITT Population (all randomized participants regardless of whether or not the participant received treatment) whose first dose date is at least 337 days from the cutoff date or discontinued early are included in this analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
LuspaterceptPercentage of Participants Achieving Red Blood Cell Transfusion Independence (RBC-TI) for a Consecutive 24-week Period60.7 Percent of participants
Epoetin AlfaPercentage of Participants Achieving Red Blood Cell Transfusion Independence (RBC-TI) for a Consecutive 24-week Period39.5 Percent of participants
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [1.6, 4.3]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Red Blood Cell Transfusion Independence (RBC-TI) for 24 Weeks

Red blood cell transfusion independence (RBC-TI) for 24 weeks is defined as the percentage of participants who did not receive RBC transfusions from Week 1 through Week 24.

Time frame: Week 1 through Week 24

Population: ITT Population - all randomized participants regardless of whether or not the participant received treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
LuspaterceptPercentage of Participants With Red Blood Cell Transfusion Independence (RBC-TI) for 24 Weeks47.8 Percentage of participants
Epoetin AlfaPercentage of Participants With Red Blood Cell Transfusion Independence (RBC-TI) for 24 Weeks30.9 Percentage of participants
p-value: 0.000395% CI: [1.4, 3.7]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

The Number of Participants With Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Progression

Progression to AML is defined as a diagnosis of AML as per WHO classification of ≥ 20% blasts in peripheral blood or bone marrow.

Time frame: From randomization to 5 years from first dose or 3 years from last dose (whichever occurs later), unless the participant withdraws consent from the study, dies or is lost to follow-up. (Up to approximately 221 weeks)

Population: ITT Population - all randomized participants regardless of whether or not the participant received treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
LuspaterceptThe Number of Participants With Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Progression5 Participants
Epoetin AlfaThe Number of Participants With Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Progression6 Participants
Secondary

The Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)

Treatment-emergent adverse events include adverse events that started on or after the first dose of treatment until 42 days after the last dose of treatment, as well as those serious adverse events (SAEs) made known to the investigator at any time thereafter that are suspected of being related to treatment. The severity/intensity of AEs were graded according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE, Version 4.0). Grade 3 = Severe, Grade 4 = Life-threatening, and Grade 5 = Death.

Time frame: From first dose to 42 days post last dose (Up to approximately an average of 72 weeks and a maximum of 208 weeks)

Population: Safety Population - all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
LuspaterceptThe Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)One Suspected Related Serious TEAE1 Participants
LuspaterceptThe Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)NCI CTCAE Grade 5 TEAE15 Participants
LuspaterceptThe Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)One Serious TEAE82 Participants
LuspaterceptThe Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Suspected Related NCI CTCAE Grade 5 TEAE1 Participants
LuspaterceptThe Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)NCI CTCAE Grade 3 or 4 TEAEs107 Participants
LuspaterceptThe Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)One TEAE Leading to Dose Interruption61 Participants
LuspaterceptThe Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)One Suspected Related TEAE61 Participants
LuspaterceptThe Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)One TEAE Leading to Dose Reduction7 Participants
LuspaterceptThe Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Suspected Related NCI CTCAE Grade 3 or 4 TEAEs14 Participants
LuspaterceptThe Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)One TEAE Leading to Dose Withdrawn21 Participants
LuspaterceptThe Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)One TEAE178 Participants
Epoetin AlfaThe Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)One TEAE Leading to Dose Withdrawn13 Participants
Epoetin AlfaThe Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)One TEAE165 Participants
Epoetin AlfaThe Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)One Suspected Related TEAE36 Participants
Epoetin AlfaThe Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)One Serious TEAE71 Participants
Epoetin AlfaThe Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)One Suspected Related Serious TEAE3 Participants
Epoetin AlfaThe Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)NCI CTCAE Grade 3 or 4 TEAEs88 Participants
Epoetin AlfaThe Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Suspected Related NCI CTCAE Grade 3 or 4 TEAEs4 Participants
Epoetin AlfaThe Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)NCI CTCAE Grade 5 TEAE14 Participants
Epoetin AlfaThe Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Suspected Related NCI CTCAE Grade 5 TEAE0 Participants
Epoetin AlfaThe Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)One TEAE Leading to Dose Interruption51 Participants
Epoetin AlfaThe Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)One TEAE Leading to Dose Reduction6 Participants
Secondary

The Number of Red Blood Cell (RBC) Units Transfused Within the First 24 Weeks of Treatment

RBC transfusion burden on treatment is defined as total number of packed red blood cell (pRBC) units transfused within the first 24 weeks of treatment since Week 1.

Time frame: Week 1 through Week 24

Population: All participants who were randomized and received at least one dose.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LuspaterceptThe Number of Red Blood Cell (RBC) Units Transfused Within the First 24 Weeks of Treatment3.8 RBC unitsStandard Deviation 5.9
Epoetin AlfaThe Number of Red Blood Cell (RBC) Units Transfused Within the First 24 Weeks of Treatment5.2 RBC unitsStandard Deviation 6.36
Secondary

Time to First Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusion

Time to first RBC transfusion is defined as time from Week 1 to first RBC transfusion on treatment. Participants who maintain RBC-TI through the end of the Treatment Period or time of analysis will be censored at EOT visit date, subsequent MDS therapy start date, study discontinuation date, analysis cutoff date or death, whichever occurs first. Median is from un-stratified Kaplan-Meier method.

Time frame: Week 1 through End of Treatment (Up to approximately an average of 66 weeks and a maximum of 202 weeks)

Population: ITT Population - all randomized participants regardless of whether or not the participant received treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
LuspaterceptTime to First Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusion155.0 Days
Epoetin AlfaTime to First Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusion42.0 Days
Secondary

Time to Hematologic Improvement - Erythroid Response (HI-E)

Time from first dose to first onset of achieving modified HI-E. The modified HI-E criteria per the International Working Group (IWG) sustained over any consecutive 56-day period in Week 1-24: For participants with baseline red blood cell (RBC) transfusion burden of \>= 4 units/8 weeks, a reduction of at least 4 units RBC transfusion; for participants with baseline RBC transfusion burden of \< 4 units/8 weeks, mean increase of hemoglobin of at least 1.5 g/dL in the absence of transfusions.

Time frame: Week 1 through Week 24

Population: ITT Population (all randomized participants regardless of whether or not the participant received treatment) who achieve HI-E response (Week 1-24)

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
LuspaterceptTime to Hematologic Improvement - Erythroid Response (HI-E)1.0 Days
Epoetin AlfaTime to Hematologic Improvement - Erythroid Response (HI-E)6.0 Days
Secondary

Time to Red Blood Cell Transfusion Independence (RBC-TI) ≥ 12 Weeks (84 Days)

Time from first dose to first onset of transfusion independence ≥ 84 days.

Time frame: Week 1 through Week 24

Population: ITT Population (all randomized participants regardless of whether or not the participant received treatment) who were RBC-TI \>= 12 Weeks (Week 1-24) responders

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
LuspaterceptTime to Red Blood Cell Transfusion Independence (RBC-TI) ≥ 12 Weeks (84 Days)1.0 Days
Epoetin AlfaTime to Red Blood Cell Transfusion Independence (RBC-TI) ≥ 12 Weeks (84 Days)1.0 Days

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 29, 2026