Skip to content

PreColo Practice Variation

Practice Variation in Colon Cancer Surgery Care in Older Patients

Status
Terminated
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03682133
Enrollment
20
Registered
2018-09-24
Start date
2018-06-27
Completion date
2019-07-01
Last updated
2019-09-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Aging, Colon Cancer, Postoperative Complications

Keywords

Prehabilitation, Preoperative care

Brief summary

This study will answer the question what the practice variation is (in terms of efficiency) in primary colon surgery on patients of 75 years and above related to the application of different modalities of prehabilitation across the Netherlands.

Detailed description

Rationale: Prehabilitation has shown promising results in orthopedic, cardiothoracic and abdominal surgery. However, there is still a lack of data supporting cost-effectiveness of prehabilitation in colon cancer surgery in older patients. Therefore the Dutch guidelines still restrict prehabilitation for research settings. Objective: This study will answer the question what the practice variation is (in terms of efficiency) in primary colon surgery on patients of 75 years and above related to the application of different modalities of prehabilitation across the Netherlands. Besides, it will show what service factors (including prehabilitation) determine the technical efficiency of primary colon surgery for these patients of 75 years and above. Study design: This study is a multicenter observational study based on questionnaires and existing data sources, aimed at including 24 different hospitals, of which structural, process and outcome data related to prehabilitation and colon cancer surgery will be registered. Study population: Patients aged 75 years and above, 10 per participating hospital, who underwent colon cancer surgery in one of the participating hospitals, where prehabilitation is or is not applied. All patients will be followed with questionnaires focusing on process and outcome measures for the hospital period and three months after discharge. Intervention: Whether or not the intervention (prehabilitation) is judged as part of daily practice in a participating hospital is based on a predefined definition of oncological surgical prehabilitation. The care as given in a participating hospital is according to the local guideline and will not be changed for this study. According to our definition prehabilitation consists at least of a minimum of 2 weeks exercise therapy and a review of the patients nutritional status at least 2 weeks before surgery. Usual care: Guideline based colon cancer surgery, without prehabilitation. Main study endpoints: Technical efficiency and service factors that determine this technical efficiency of primary colon cancer surgery. The results will be presented anonymously both for patients and hospitals (so there will not be carried out benchmark analyses per center). Statistical analysis: Data Envelopment Analysis will be carried out. Factors that might explain variability in technical efficiency will be regressed on bias corrected DEA scores (via truncated regression). Ethical considerations: There will be no change in standard procedures in everyday care. The burden for participants is minimal.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Leading the Change; Zorgverzekaars Nederland
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Radboud University Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
75 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients aged 75 years and above * Scheduled for colon cancer surgery

Exclusion criteria

* Not receiving surgery * Hematogenous metastasis * Pretreatment; chemotherapy or radiotherapy * Rectal cancer

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Technical efficiency measured using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA)up to 4 monthsMultiple measurements will be aggregated to arrive at one reported value; technical efficiency. Measurements will be invested care, length of stay, mortality, complication rate and PROMs.
Truncated logistic regression analysisup to 4 monthsTruncated regression analysis will be performed to identify which explanatory variable(s) predict technical efficiency. Possible explanatory variables will be casemix, yes/ no availability of shared care with geriatrics, yes/no availability of prehabilitation in unimodal or multimodal version, mean volume of older colon cancer patients per practice, propensity score for the frailty of the case mix based on age/sex/disabilities, yes/no availability of laparoscopic colon cancer surgery.

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026