Skip to content

Measuring Nutrition Literacy in Clinical Practice: Evaluating Effects Upon Providers and Patients

The Effects of Nutrition Literacy Assessment on Patient-Centered Nutrition Education Provided by Dietitians

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03681925
Enrollment
95
Registered
2018-09-24
Start date
2019-01-15
Completion date
2020-03-06
Last updated
2020-03-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice

Keywords

Patient-centered care, Dietitian, Nutrition literacy

Brief summary

This study evaluates the effects of assessing patient nutrition literacy prior to an initial session with an outpatient dietitian on the patient-centeredness of the session. We will randomize 6 dietitians, 4 of whom will have access to their participating patients' nutrition literacy scores. These dietitians will use this information to better inform their interventions, and hopefully improve their patients' nutrition literacy as a result.

Detailed description

Nutrition Literacy Assessment Tool (NLit): a validated, 64-question survey that assesses nutrition literacy across 6 subscales: * Nutrition and Health * Energy Sources in Food * Household Food Measurement * Food Label and Numeracy * Food Groups * Consumer Skills Dietitians who work within 6 different outpatient clinics (1 dietitian per clinic) will be recruited to the study; each dietitian will recruit 19 patients from their clinic. All patient participants will take the NLit survey prior to an initial visit with their dietitian. Dietitians randomized to the intervention arm (n=4) will have access to their participating patients' NLit results, and tailor their intervention to the patient's nutrition literacy weaknesses. Dietitians randomized to the control group (n=2) will not have access to their participating patients' NLit scores, and will provide the same standard-of-care intervention usually provided. All participating patients will then re-take the NLit a month after their initial session with their dietitian, and we will examine the results to see if a) nutrition literacy improved within groups, and b) if the patients of the intervention dietitians showed more improvement in nutrition literacy than their counterparts being treated by the control dietitians. We will also collect dietary pattern information from participating patients before their initial session with their dietitian, and again one month after their initial session with their dietitian. We will examine the results to see if a) dietary patterns improve with increased nutrition literacy, and b) if the dietary patterns of patients in the intervention group improve more than patients in the control group. Finally, we will collect survey information from patients pertaining to the perceived patient-centeredness of the session with their dietitian. We will also collect audio recordings of the sessions between patients and dietitians, which will be analyzed for patient-centeredness. We will also analyze readability and clearness of printed materials used by dietitians during their interventions with patients.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTNutrition Literacy Assessment Instrument (NLit)

The NLit is a 64-question survey broken into 6 subscales. each subscale examines a different aspect of nutrition literacy (Nutrition and Health, Energy Sources in Food, Household Food Measurement, Food Label and Numeracy, Food Groups, and Consumer Skills). Global and subscale NLit scores will be generated for each participating patient.

Sponsors

University of Kansas Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SCREENING
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Masking description

Patient participants will be unaware of which arm their dietitian has been randomized to.

Intervention model description

6 dietitians will be randomized in a 2:1 intervention:control fashion. Each dietitian will recruit 19 patient participants, for 114 total patient participants.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* subjects must be at least 18 years old * subjects must be able to read English * subjects must be scheduled with a participating dietitian

Exclusion criteria

* subjects with cognitive disabilities or overt mental illnesses * subjects with vision issues severe enough to disrupt reading of the NLit.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Nutrition Literacy Assessment Instrument (NLit) score from baseline to post-session.Nutrition literacy will be measured prior to the patients' initial session with a dietitian, then again one month after the session.Nutrition literacy will be assessed with the Nutrition Literacy Assessment Instrument (NLit)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Rapid Eating Assessment for Patients (REAP) score from baseline to one month post-sessionBRFSS 2011 Fruit and Vegetable Module scores will be measured prior to the patients' initial session with a dietitian, then again one month after the session.Dietary patterns will be assessed using the Rapid Eating Assessment for Patients (REAP)
Patient view of patient-centeredness of the session with a dietitianPatients will complete the survey up to two months after they complete their session with a dietitian.Patient view of patient-centeredness of the session will be assessed using a modified version of the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems-Clinician and Group Survey (CAHPS), v.3.0
Change in BRFSS 2011 Fruit and Vegetable Module scores from baseline to one month post-session.BRFSS 2011 Fruit and Vegetable Module scores will be measured prior to the patients' initial session with a dietitian, then again one month after the session.Dietary patterns will be assessed using the BRFSS 2011 Fruit and Vegetable Module.
Readability of printed materials used by dietitians during interventionsOne month prior to first patient session with a dietitianReading level of all printed materials will be assessed using the Flesch-Kincaid Readability score.
Clearness of printed materials used by dietitians during interventionsOne month prior to first patient session with a dietitianClearness of printed materials will be assessed using the Center for Disease Control Clear Communications Index
Patient-centeredness of the session between patient and dietitianOne month post-sessionPatient-centeredness of the session between patient and dietitian will be assessed using the Teach back Loop Score, a validated tool used to examine the use of teach back, an essential part of patient-centered care.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026