Avascular Necrosis of Hip, Inflammatory Arthritis, Osteoarthritis, Hip, Post-traumatic; Arthrosis, Rheumatoid Arthritis
Conditions
Keywords
Hip resurfacing, Medical Device, Safety, Hip prosthesis
Brief summary
The Zimmer Hip Resurfacing System Post-Market Clinical Follow-up study will examine the safety and efficacy of this device in the young and/or active patient with advanced hip disease.
Detailed description
This is a multi-center, prospective, non-controlled post market surveillance study. The objective of this study is to obtain survival and outcome data on the Zimmer Hip Resurfacing System. This will be assessed by analysis of standard scoring systems, radiographs and adverse event records. Data will be used to monitor pain, mobility and survivorship, and to confirm the safety and efficacy of the Zimmer Hip Resurfacing System. Serum metal ion levels (cobalt and chromium) will also be collected pre-operatively and again at 6 months, 1 year, 2 years and 5 years. This procedure will offer an option to these patients who would otherwise require and likely outlive a conventional total hip replacement.
Interventions
DIAGNOSTIC_TESTSerum Metal ion levels determined to monitor changes in chromium and cobalt levels
Analyses was performed pre-operatively, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years and 5 years post-operatively for all study subjects enrolled in this study, as well as, all revision study subjects receiving the Metasul LDH™ total hip system. To prevent intra-observer variation the metal ion concentrations was analysed by an approved Central Laboratory. The Central Laboratory provided specimen collection kits for the transfer of blood specimens to the Laboratory for analysis. The Laboratory provided the results to the Investigators. The cobalt and chromium was measured by induced coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). BUN, creatinine and GFR will be determined locally.
Sponsors
Zimmer Biomet
Study design
Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
1. Patient selection without bias to race or gender. 2. Patient is ≥ 18 and ≤ 65 years of age. 3. Female patients only, if 1. Actively practicing a contraceptive method, or 2. Surgically sterilized, or 3. Post-menopausal 4. Pre-operative Harris Hip Score ≤ 70. 5. Primary surgical hip candidate, suffering from hip pain and/or disability due to degenerative joint disease (inflammatory or non-inflammatory), based on physical examination and history, which may include the following diagnosis: 1. Non-inflammatory degenerative joint disease (NIDJD), e.g. avascular necrosis or osteoarthritis 2. Inflammatory joint disease (IJD), e.g., rheumatoid arthritis 6. Patient is willing and able to cooperate in prescribed post-operative therapy. 7. Patient is willing and able to complete scheduled follow-up evaluations as described in the Informed Consent. 8. Patient has participated in the Informed Consent process and has signed an Ethics Committee approved Informed Consent.
Exclusion criteria
1. Patient has an acute, chronic, local or systemic infection. 2. Patient is skeletally immature. 3. Patient is known to be pregnant. 4. Patient has a severe muscular, neural or vascular disease that endangers the involved extremity. 5. Patient has an insufficient acetabular or femoral bone stock in which good anchorage of the implants are unlikely or impossible, including, but not limited to: 1. patient with severe osteopenia, 2. patients with a family history of severe osteoporosis or osteopenia, 3. patients with osteonecrosis or avascular necrosis (AVN) with \>50% involvement of the femoral head (regardless of FICAT grade), or 4. patients with local bone tumors and/or cysts of the femoral head \> 1 cm 6. Patient has a total or partial absence of the muscular or ligamentous apparatus. 7. Patient has known moderate to severe renal insufficiency. 8. Patient has a known clinical condition which may interfere with the patient's outcome, including but not limited to: 1. immunocompromised conditions (AIDS), 2. organ transplant, 3. high doses of corticosteroids etc 9. Patient is severely overweight (BMI \> 40) 10. Patient is scheduled for simultaneous bilateral total hip replacement. 11. OPERATIVE (IPSILATERAL) HIP: Patient has a total prosthetic hip replacement device, surface arthroplasty, endoprosthesis or femoral and/or acetabular osteosynthesis. 12. CONTRALATERAL HIP: Patient has had a hip replacement, surface arthroplasty or endoprosthesis, within the past 12 months, unless previously enrolled in this clinical study. 13. Patient is: 1. a prisoner, 2. mentally incompetent, 3. a known alcohol or drug abuser, 4. anticipated to be non-compliant 14. Patient has participated in a study of any other investigational device (drug, device or biologic) within the past 12 months. Exception: previous enrollment in the Zimmer Hip Resurfacing clinical study. 15. Patient has a known allergy to one of the constituents of the implant, e.g. cobalt, chromium, nickel, etc.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Implant Survival | 10 years post-surgery | The primary endpoint for this study is implant survival at 10 years which is assessed by revision of the Metasul Monoblock Component Cup calculated using the Kaplan-Meier Survival Estimation. The survivorship with Kaplan-Meier (K-M) was calculated at 10 year for endpoint revision of any component. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Subject Quality-of-life Determined by the SF-12 Questionnaire (Mental Health and Physical Health) | Preop, 6 months, 1 year, 2 year, 3 year, 5 year, 7 year and 10 years post-surgery | The SF-12 is a multi-purpose short-form (SF) generic measure of health status. It consists of twelve questions that measure eight health domains to assess physical and mental health. Physical health-related domains include General Health (GH), Physical Functioning (PF), Role Physical (RP), and Body Pain (BP). Mental health-related scales include Vitality (VT), Social Functioning (SF), Role Emotional (RE), and Mental Health (MH). Scores ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better physical and mental health functioning. |
| Patient's Activity Level Determined by UCLA Score | Preop, 6 months, 1 year, 2 year, 3 year, 5 year, 7 year and 10 years post-surgery | The UCLA score was a part of the Patient Activity Questionnaire which ascertains the patient's activity level from 1 (low) to 10 (high) in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. |
| Radiographic Evaluation | Pre-op, 6 weeks, 1,2,3,5,7 and 10 years post operatively 2, 3, 5, 7 and 10 years post-operatively. 2, 3, 5, 7 and 10 years post-operatively. | Radiographic parameters evaluated were radiolucencies, osteolysis, hypertrophy, subsidence, cup migration, change in cup angle and change in femoral shaft angle. The radiographs related to any significant radiographic findings reported by an Investigator were also be assessed by an Independent Radiographic Reviewer. The data presented in the outcome measure data table represent the Number of Participants with Abnormal or Significant Findings during the course of the study. |
| Harris Hip Score | Preop, 6 months, 1 year, 2 year, 3 year, 5 year, 7 year and 10 years post-surgery | The Harris Hip Score (HHS) is an outcome measure that includes a series of questions answered by the patient and physical examinations recorded by a qualified health care professional. The HHS covers four domains: pain, function and functional activities, absence of deformity and range of motion. The total score vary from a range of 0 - 100. The outcome score can be categorized as Excellent: 90-100; Good: 80-90; Fair: 70-80; Poor: \< 70. |
| Oxford Hip Score | Preop, 6 months, 1 year, 2 year, 3 year, 5 year, 7 year and 10 years post-surgery | The Oxford Hip Score (OHS) is a patient-reported outcome measure that was developed to specifically assess the patient's perspective of outcome following THA. The OHS consists of twelve questions covering function and pain associated with the hip. To calculate the total score, each response is scored from 0 (worst outcome) to 4 (best outcome) and the sum of all 12 items is reported with a maximum of 48, representing the best score possible. Scores ranges from 0 to 100 and the outcome score can be categorized as Excellent: \> 41; Good: 34 - 41; Fair: 27 - 33; Poor: \< 27. |
| Pain and Functional Performance Based on the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) | Preop, 6 months, 1 year, 2 year, 3 year, 5 year, 7 year and 10 years post-surgery | The WOMAC Score is a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip. These set of standardized questions are used by doctors to evaluate the condition of osteoarthritis patients. The WOMAC score was an optional form reported for pain and physical function. The test questions are scored on a scale of 0-4, which correspond to: No pain (0), Mild pain (1), Moderate pain (2), Severe pain (3), and Extreme pain (4). The scores for each subscale are summed up, with a possible score range of 0-20 for Pain (with higher values representing worse outcomes and lower values representing better outcomes) and 0-68 for Physical Function (with higher values representing better outcomes and lower values representing worse outcomes). |
| EuroQol 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) | Preop, 6 months, 1 year, 2 year, 3 year, 5 year, 7 year and 10 years post-surgery | The EuroQol 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) is a standardized Instrument widely used to measure health status. It is a self reported assessment about the patient's quality of life composed of two parts: a questionnaire and a visual analogue scale (VAS). The questionnaire includes 5 questions referring to mobility, selfcare, daily activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each question can be answered in five ways, indicating no, slight, moderate, severe problems or inability to complete the task. The EQ-5D-5L score ranges from -0.59 to 1, where 1 is the best possible health state. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) is a vertical scale ranges from 100 ('The best health you can imagine') to 0 ('The worst health you can imagine') where the patient reports his/her self-rated health. For this study, the VAS score was not calculated. |
Countries
Germany
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Patients Who Received the Zimmer Hip Resurfacing System The Zimmer Hip Resurfacing System is designed for the treatment of degenerative diseases or trauma of the hip. The system is intended to reduce pain and increase hip mobility.
The Zimmer Hip Resurfacing System may be used for the following indications:
* Non inflammatory degenerative joint disease (NIDJD), e.g. avascular necrosis, primary osteoarthritis and post traumatic arthritis
* Inflammatory joint disease (IJD), e.g. rheumatoid arthritis. | 45 |
| Total | 45 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 2 |
| Overall Study | Death | 4 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 2 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 1 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Patients Who Received the Zimmer Hip Resurfacing System | — |
|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous Age | 50.9 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.7 | — |
| Body Mass Index (BMI) | 28.6 kg/m^2 STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.9 | — |
| Height | 178.2 Cm STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.2 | — |
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected | — | — Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Germany | 45 Participants | — |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 1 Participants | — |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 44 Participants | — |
| Weight | 90.7 Kg STANDARD_DEVIATION 13 | — |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk |
|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 4 / 45 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 17 / 45 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 3 / 45 |
Outcome results
Primary
Implant Survival
The primary endpoint for this study is implant survival at 10 years which is assessed by revision of the Metasul Monoblock Component Cup calculated using the Kaplan-Meier Survival Estimation. The survivorship with Kaplan-Meier (K-M) was calculated at 10 year for endpoint revision of any component.
Time frame: 10 years post-surgery
Population: All study patients involved in the study.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Patients Who Received Metasul Monoblock in Hip Resurfacing | Implant Survival | 95.39 percentage of participants |
Secondary
EuroQol 5 Dimension (EQ-5D)
The EuroQol 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) is a standardized Instrument widely used to measure health status. It is a self reported assessment about the patient's quality of life composed of two parts: a questionnaire and a visual analogue scale (VAS). The questionnaire includes 5 questions referring to mobility, selfcare, daily activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each question can be answered in five ways, indicating no, slight, moderate, severe problems or inability to complete the task. The EQ-5D-5L score ranges from -0.59 to 1, where 1 is the best possible health state. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) is a vertical scale ranges from 100 ('The best health you can imagine') to 0 ('The worst health you can imagine') where the patient reports his/her self-rated health. For this study, the VAS score was not calculated.
Time frame: Preop, 6 months, 1 year, 2 year, 3 year, 5 year, 7 year and 10 years post-surgery
Population: The mean and standard deviation for EQ-5D is presented in the results section below for all follow up time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patients Who Received Metasul Monoblock in Hip Resurfacing | EuroQol 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) | 10 Year | 0.8 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.3 |
| Patients Who Received Metasul Monoblock in Hip Resurfacing | EuroQol 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) | PreOp | 0.5 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.2 |
| Patients Who Received Metasul Monoblock in Hip Resurfacing | EuroQol 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) | 6 Month | 0.8 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.2 |
| Patients Who Received Metasul Monoblock in Hip Resurfacing | EuroQol 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) | 1 Year | 0.9 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.1 |
| Patients Who Received Metasul Monoblock in Hip Resurfacing | EuroQol 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) | 2 Year | 0.9 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.2 |
| Patients Who Received Metasul Monoblock in Hip Resurfacing | EuroQol 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) | 3 Year | 0.9 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.2 |
| Patients Who Received Metasul Monoblock in Hip Resurfacing | EuroQol 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) | 5 Year | 0.9 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.1 |
| Patients Who Received Metasul Monoblock in Hip Resurfacing | EuroQol 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) | 7 Year | 0.9 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.2 |
Secondary
Harris Hip Score
The Harris Hip Score (HHS) is an outcome measure that includes a series of questions answered by the patient and physical examinations recorded by a qualified health care professional. The HHS covers four domains: pain, function and functional activities, absence of deformity and range of motion. The total score vary from a range of 0 - 100. The outcome score can be categorized as Excellent: 90-100; Good: 80-90; Fair: 70-80; Poor: \< 70.
Time frame: Preop, 6 months, 1 year, 2 year, 3 year, 5 year, 7 year and 10 years post-surgery
Population: The mean Harris Hip Score and standard deviation for all study patients is presented in the results section below for all follow up time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patients Who Received Metasul Monoblock in Hip Resurfacing | Harris Hip Score | Preop | 55.1 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.2 |
| Patients Who Received Metasul Monoblock in Hip Resurfacing | Harris Hip Score | 6 Months | 93.9 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.4 |
| Patients Who Received Metasul Monoblock in Hip Resurfacing | Harris Hip Score | 1 Year | 95.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.3 |
| Patients Who Received Metasul Monoblock in Hip Resurfacing | Harris Hip Score | 2 Year | 97.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.3 |
| Patients Who Received Metasul Monoblock in Hip Resurfacing | Harris Hip Score | 3 Year | 96.6 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.5 |
| Patients Who Received Metasul Monoblock in Hip Resurfacing | Harris Hip Score | 5 Year | 98.6 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.2 |
| Patients Who Received Metasul Monoblock in Hip Resurfacing | Harris Hip Score | 7 Year | 98.1 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.1 |
| Patients Who Received Metasul Monoblock in Hip Resurfacing | Harris Hip Score | 10 Year | 97.2 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.2 |
Secondary
Oxford Hip Score
The Oxford Hip Score (OHS) is a patient-reported outcome measure that was developed to specifically assess the patient's perspective of outcome following THA. The OHS consists of twelve questions covering function and pain associated with the hip. To calculate the total score, each response is scored from 0 (worst outcome) to 4 (best outcome) and the sum of all 12 items is reported with a maximum of 48, representing the best score possible. Scores ranges from 0 to 100 and the outcome score can be categorized as Excellent: \> 41; Good: 34 - 41; Fair: 27 - 33; Poor: \< 27.
Time frame: Preop, 6 months, 1 year, 2 year, 3 year, 5 year, 7 year and 10 years post-surgery
Population: The mean and standard deviation for Oxford Hip Score is presented in the results section below for all follow up time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patients Who Received Metasul Monoblock in Hip Resurfacing | Oxford Hip Score | 1 Year | 39.1 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.8 |
| Patients Who Received Metasul Monoblock in Hip Resurfacing | Oxford Hip Score | Preop | 21.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.8 |
| Patients Who Received Metasul Monoblock in Hip Resurfacing | Oxford Hip Score | 6 Month | 35.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.3 |
| Patients Who Received Metasul Monoblock in Hip Resurfacing | Oxford Hip Score | 2 Year | 44.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.2 |
| Patients Who Received Metasul Monoblock in Hip Resurfacing | Oxford Hip Score | 3 Year | 44.6 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.5 |
| Patients Who Received Metasul Monoblock in Hip Resurfacing | Oxford Hip Score | 5 Year | 44.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.6 |
| Patients Who Received Metasul Monoblock in Hip Resurfacing | Oxford Hip Score | 7 Year | 45.8 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.6 |
| Patients Who Received Metasul Monoblock in Hip Resurfacing | Oxford Hip Score | 10 Year | 44.9 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.8 |
Secondary
Pain and Functional Performance Based on the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC)
The WOMAC Score is a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip. These set of standardized questions are used by doctors to evaluate the condition of osteoarthritis patients. The WOMAC score was an optional form reported for pain and physical function. The test questions are scored on a scale of 0-4, which correspond to: No pain (0), Mild pain (1), Moderate pain (2), Severe pain (3), and Extreme pain (4). The scores for each subscale are summed up, with a possible score range of 0-20 for Pain (with higher values representing worse outcomes and lower values representing better outcomes) and 0-68 for Physical Function (with higher values representing better outcomes and lower values representing worse outcomes).
Time frame: Preop, 6 months, 1 year, 2 year, 3 year, 5 year, 7 year and 10 years post-surgery
Population: The mean and standard deviation for the WOMAC pain and physical function score is presented in the results section below for all follow up time points. The number of participants analyzed is not consistent with the numbers in the participant flow module because the numbers reported in the participant flow module represents the number of patients with these form completed at the subsequent follow up time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patients Who Received Metasul Monoblock in Hip Resurfacing | Pain and Functional Performance Based on the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) | 1 Year WOMAC Pain Score | 1.4 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.5 |
| Patients Who Received Metasul Monoblock in Hip Resurfacing | Pain and Functional Performance Based on the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) | Preop WOMAC Pain Score | 9.8 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.8 |
| Patients Who Received Metasul Monoblock in Hip Resurfacing | Pain and Functional Performance Based on the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) | 6 Month WOMAC Pain Score | 1.8 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.8 |
| Patients Who Received Metasul Monoblock in Hip Resurfacing | Pain and Functional Performance Based on the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) | 2 Year WOMAC Pain Score | 1.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.1 |
| Patients Who Received Metasul Monoblock in Hip Resurfacing | Pain and Functional Performance Based on the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) | 3 Year WOMAC Pain Score | 1.1 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.2 |
| Patients Who Received Metasul Monoblock in Hip Resurfacing | Pain and Functional Performance Based on the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) | 5 Year WOMAC Pain Score | 1.1 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.3 |
| Patients Who Received Metasul Monoblock in Hip Resurfacing | Pain and Functional Performance Based on the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) | 7 Year WOMAC Pain Score | 0.6 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.1 |
| Patients Who Received Metasul Monoblock in Hip Resurfacing | Pain and Functional Performance Based on the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) | 10 Year WOMAC Pain Score | 1.1 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.1 |
| Patients Who Received Metasul Monoblock in Hip Resurfacing | Pain and Functional Performance Based on the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) | Preop WOMAC Physical Function Score | 33.4 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.1 |
| Patients Who Received Metasul Monoblock in Hip Resurfacing | Pain and Functional Performance Based on the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) | 6 Month WOMAC Physical Function Score | 8.2 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.7 |
| Patients Who Received Metasul Monoblock in Hip Resurfacing | Pain and Functional Performance Based on the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) | 1 Year WOMAC Physical Function Score | 5.9 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.7 |
| Patients Who Received Metasul Monoblock in Hip Resurfacing | Pain and Functional Performance Based on the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) | 2 Year WOMAC Physical Function Score | 3.8 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.2 |
| Patients Who Received Metasul Monoblock in Hip Resurfacing | Pain and Functional Performance Based on the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) | 3 Year WOMAC Physical Function Score | 5.1 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.3 |
| Patients Who Received Metasul Monoblock in Hip Resurfacing | Pain and Functional Performance Based on the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) | 5 Year WOMAC Physical Function Score | 4.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.3 |
| Patients Who Received Metasul Monoblock in Hip Resurfacing | Pain and Functional Performance Based on the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) | 7 Year WOMAC Physical Function Score | 4.1 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.3 |
| Patients Who Received Metasul Monoblock in Hip Resurfacing | Pain and Functional Performance Based on the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) | 10 Year WOMAC Physical Function Score | 5.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.1 |
Secondary
Patient's Activity Level Determined by UCLA Score
The UCLA score was a part of the Patient Activity Questionnaire which ascertains the patient's activity level from 1 (low) to 10 (high) in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty.
Time frame: Preop, 6 months, 1 year, 2 year, 3 year, 5 year, 7 year and 10 years post-surgery
Population: The mean and standard deviation for UCLA activity score is presented in the results section below for all follow up time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patients Who Received Metasul Monoblock in Hip Resurfacing | Patient's Activity Level Determined by UCLA Score | 5 Year | 7.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.7 |
| Patients Who Received Metasul Monoblock in Hip Resurfacing | Patient's Activity Level Determined by UCLA Score | Preop | 4.9 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.1 |
| Patients Who Received Metasul Monoblock in Hip Resurfacing | Patient's Activity Level Determined by UCLA Score | 6 Month | 6.5 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.7 |
| Patients Who Received Metasul Monoblock in Hip Resurfacing | Patient's Activity Level Determined by UCLA Score | 1 Year | 6.4 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.9 |
| Patients Who Received Metasul Monoblock in Hip Resurfacing | Patient's Activity Level Determined by UCLA Score | 2 Year | 6.8 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.9 |
| Patients Who Received Metasul Monoblock in Hip Resurfacing | Patient's Activity Level Determined by UCLA Score | 3 Year | 6.9 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.1 |
| Patients Who Received Metasul Monoblock in Hip Resurfacing | Patient's Activity Level Determined by UCLA Score | 7 Year | 6.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2 |
| Patients Who Received Metasul Monoblock in Hip Resurfacing | Patient's Activity Level Determined by UCLA Score | 10 Year | 6.6 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.9 |
Secondary
Radiographic Evaluation
Radiographic parameters evaluated were radiolucencies, osteolysis, hypertrophy, subsidence, cup migration, change in cup angle and change in femoral shaft angle. The radiographs related to any significant radiographic findings reported by an Investigator were also be assessed by an Independent Radiographic Reviewer. The data presented in the outcome measure data table represent the Number of Participants with Abnormal or Significant Findings during the course of the study.
Time frame: Pre-op, 6 weeks, 1,2,3,5,7 and 10 years post operatively 2, 3, 5, 7 and 10 years post-operatively. 2, 3, 5, 7 and 10 years post-operatively.
Population: The significant radiographic findings reported for all patients during the course of the study is presented in the results section below for all follow up time points of occurrence.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patients Who Received Metasul Monoblock in Hip Resurfacing | Radiographic Evaluation | 6 Month Stem Radiolucency | 1 participants |
| Patients Who Received Metasul Monoblock in Hip Resurfacing | Radiographic Evaluation | 7 Years Osteolysis | 1 participants |
Secondary
Subject Quality-of-life Determined by the SF-12 Questionnaire (Mental Health and Physical Health)
The SF-12 is a multi-purpose short-form (SF) generic measure of health status. It consists of twelve questions that measure eight health domains to assess physical and mental health. Physical health-related domains include General Health (GH), Physical Functioning (PF), Role Physical (RP), and Body Pain (BP). Mental health-related scales include Vitality (VT), Social Functioning (SF), Role Emotional (RE), and Mental Health (MH). Scores ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better physical and mental health functioning.
Time frame: Preop, 6 months, 1 year, 2 year, 3 year, 5 year, 7 year and 10 years post-surgery
Population: The mean and standard deviation for SF-12 physical and mental is presented in the results section below for all follow up time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patients Who Received Metasul Monoblock in Hip Resurfacing | Subject Quality-of-life Determined by the SF-12 Questionnaire (Mental Health and Physical Health) | Preop Mental Health SF12 Score | 49.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.7 |
| Patients Who Received Metasul Monoblock in Hip Resurfacing | Subject Quality-of-life Determined by the SF-12 Questionnaire (Mental Health and Physical Health) | 6 Months Mental Health SF12 Score | 54.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.9 |
| Patients Who Received Metasul Monoblock in Hip Resurfacing | Subject Quality-of-life Determined by the SF-12 Questionnaire (Mental Health and Physical Health) | 1 Year Mental Health SF12 Score | 55.1 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.1 |
| Patients Who Received Metasul Monoblock in Hip Resurfacing | Subject Quality-of-life Determined by the SF-12 Questionnaire (Mental Health and Physical Health) | 2 Year Mental Health SF12 Score | 55.1 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.8 |
| Patients Who Received Metasul Monoblock in Hip Resurfacing | Subject Quality-of-life Determined by the SF-12 Questionnaire (Mental Health and Physical Health) | 3 Year Mental Health SF12 Score | 53.9 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.8 |
| Patients Who Received Metasul Monoblock in Hip Resurfacing | Subject Quality-of-life Determined by the SF-12 Questionnaire (Mental Health and Physical Health) | 5 Year Mental Health SF12 Score | 56.1 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.5 |
| Patients Who Received Metasul Monoblock in Hip Resurfacing | Subject Quality-of-life Determined by the SF-12 Questionnaire (Mental Health and Physical Health) | 7 Year Mental Health SF12 Score | 55.5 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.6 |
| Patients Who Received Metasul Monoblock in Hip Resurfacing | Subject Quality-of-life Determined by the SF-12 Questionnaire (Mental Health and Physical Health) | 10 Year Mental Health SF12 Score SF12 Score | 54.6 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.7 |
| Patients Who Received Metasul Monoblock in Hip Resurfacing | Subject Quality-of-life Determined by the SF-12 Questionnaire (Mental Health and Physical Health) | Preop Physical Health SF12 Score SF12 Score | 30.5 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.8 |
| Patients Who Received Metasul Monoblock in Hip Resurfacing | Subject Quality-of-life Determined by the SF-12 Questionnaire (Mental Health and Physical Health) | 6 Month Physical Health SF12 Score | 47.8 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.7 |
| Patients Who Received Metasul Monoblock in Hip Resurfacing | Subject Quality-of-life Determined by the SF-12 Questionnaire (Mental Health and Physical Health) | 1 Year Physical Health SF12 Score | 49.1 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.7 |
| Patients Who Received Metasul Monoblock in Hip Resurfacing | Subject Quality-of-life Determined by the SF-12 Questionnaire (Mental Health and Physical Health) | 2 Year Physical Health SF12 Score | 50.2 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.2 |
| Patients Who Received Metasul Monoblock in Hip Resurfacing | Subject Quality-of-life Determined by the SF-12 Questionnaire (Mental Health and Physical Health) | 3 Year Physical Health SF12 Score | 49.2 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 10 |
| Patients Who Received Metasul Monoblock in Hip Resurfacing | Subject Quality-of-life Determined by the SF-12 Questionnaire (Mental Health and Physical Health) | 5 Year Physical Health SF12 Score | 50.6 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.7 |
| Patients Who Received Metasul Monoblock in Hip Resurfacing | Subject Quality-of-life Determined by the SF-12 Questionnaire (Mental Health and Physical Health) | 7 Year Physical Health SF12 Score | 50.8 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.8 |
| Patients Who Received Metasul Monoblock in Hip Resurfacing | Subject Quality-of-life Determined by the SF-12 Questionnaire (Mental Health and Physical Health) | 10 Year Physical Health SF12 Score | 48.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 9 |