Skip to content

Comparison of HF10 Therapy Combined With CMM to CMM Alone in the Treatment of Non-Surgical Refractory Back Pain

A Multi-Center, Prospective, Pragmatic, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial to Compare HF10 Therapy to Conventional Medical Management in the Treatment of Non-Surgical Refractory Back Pain

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03680846
Acronym
NSRBP
Enrollment
211
Registered
2018-09-21
Start date
2018-09-05
Completion date
2022-05-09
Last updated
2026-06-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Back Pain

Brief summary

This study is being conducted to document the safety, clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of high-frequency SCS at 10 kHz (HF10™ Therapy) delivered through the Senza system in subjects with chronic refractory back pain (with or without leg pain) who are not considered candidates for spine surgery. This study is a multi-center, prospective, randomized study to compare the two treatment groups.

Interventions

DEVICEHF10 Therapy

Senza 10 kHz Spinal Cord Stimulation

OTHERCMM

Conventional Medical Management

Sponsors

Nevro Corp
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria: 1. Have been diagnosed with chronic, refractory axial low back pain with a neuropathic component and are not eligible for spine surgery 2. Have not had any surgery for back or leg pain, or any surgery resulting in back or leg pain 3. Qualifying pain score 4. Be on stable pain medications, as determined by the Investigator 5. Be willing and capable of giving informed consent 6. Be willing and able to comply with study-related requirements, procedures, and visits 7. Be capable of subjective evaluation, able to read and understand written questionnaires in the local language and are able to read, understand and sign the written inform consent Key

Exclusion criteria

1. Have a diagnosed back condition with inflammatory causes of back pain, serious spinal pathology and/or neurological disorders 2. Have a medical condition or pain in other area(s), not intended to be treated in this study 3. Any diagnosis or known condition that can impact reporting of study outcomes as determined by the Investigator 4. Be benefitting within 30 days prior to enrollment from an interventional procedure to treat back and/or leg pain 5. Have any addictions as determined by the Investigator 6. Have an existing drug pump and/or SCS system or another active implantable device such as a pacemaker 7. Have prior experience with neuromodulation devices 8. Other general exclusions applicable for SCS devices 9. Be involved in an injury claim under current litigation 10. Have a pending or approved worker's compensation claim

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Difference between treatment groups in responder rates.3 MonthsResponder is defined as a subject who has at least 50% reduction in pain from Baseline as assessed by a 10 cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Disability as Measured by Oswestry Disability Index6 monthsPercentage of subjects with at least 10 point decrease from Baseline in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score
Percentage change from baseline in back pain intensity (as assessed by VAS)6 months
Changes in Quality of Life (QOL) as measured by EuroQol EQ-5D-5L questionnaire6 monthsIt measures the subject's health state as assessed in 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) each with 5 levels. In addition there is an EQ VAS which records the patient's self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale. The scores on these five dimensions can be presented as a health profile or can be converted to a single number summary called the "index value".
Global impression of change6 monthsProportion of subjects reporting "better" or "great deal better" on the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) questionnaire
Change from baseline in opioid equivalent medication usage in each group6 months
Neurological assessment3, 6 and 12 monthsAssessment of motor, sensory and reflex functions. Clinicians shall characterize the findings as improved, maintained, or a deficit as compared with baseline status.
Incidences of adverse events3, 6 and 12 months

Countries

United States

Contacts

STUDY_DIRECTORDavid Caraway, MD

Nevro Corp

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 27, 2026