Skip to content

Effect of Early Posroperative Feeding on Gastrointestinal Function After Cesarean Section

Effect of Early Posroperative Feeding on Gastrointestinal Function After Cesarean Section

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03680391
Enrollment
200
Registered
2018-09-21
Start date
2018-09-30
Completion date
2019-10-31
Last updated
2018-09-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Post Operative Recovery

Brief summary

Two hundred women were recruited, with 103 randomized to traditional feeding and 97 to early feeding and compare women satisfaction during discharge from hospital

Detailed description

7\. Study Methods Population of study & disease condition : Two hundred women were recruited, with 103 randomized to traditional feeding and 97 to early feeding and compare women satisfaction during discharge from hospital. Inclusion criteria: * Maternal age from 20 to 40 * Primigravida and previous one or two cesarean section * Elective cesarean section * regional anesthesia .singleton pregnancy. Exclusion criteria: * age below 20 years old or above 40 years old * medical disorders as (hypertension, diabetes , liver or kidney diseases) * complication during surgery as( bleeding, intestinal injury or urinary bladder injury ) .Emergency cesarean section . * general anesthesia * multiple pregnancy Methodology in details: 1. all Women included in the study have undergo history taking and general examination 2. All patient in the study are randomized in two groups: Group A: 103 patients will have early postoperative oral fluids and semisolid food after 6 hours of cesarean section irrespective to intestinal sounds ,flatus or stool passage Group B: 97 patient will start oral fluids 6 hours with no solid or semi solid until after passage of flatus or stool 3\_Both groups cesarean section will be held with the same technique: * spinal anethesia * pfennenstiel imcision * lower segment cesarean section * suturing uterus in two layers while exterionezed * gentle manibulation * no towels in gutters will be used 4\_ comparison will be held between both groups according: * postoperative intestinal sounds. * postoperative nausea and vomiting * postoprative abdominal distension * postoperative pain * postoperative ambulation * postoperative ileus * postoperative discharge time from hospital

Interventions

PROCEDURECesarean section

Both groups cesarean section will be held with the same technique: * spinal anethesia * pfennenstiel imcision * lower segment cesarean section * suturing uterus in two layers while exterionezed * gentle manibulation * no towels in gutters will be used

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
20 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Maternal age from 20 to 40 * Primigravida and previous one or two cesarean section * Elective cesarean section * regional anesthesia .singleton pregnancy.

Exclusion criteria

age below 20 years old or above 40 years old * medical disorders as (hypertension, diabetes , liver or kidney diseases) * complication during surgery as( bleeding, intestinal injury or urinary bladder injury ) .Emergency cesarean section . * general anesthesia * multiple pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient satisfaction before discharge from hospital2 days after the operationsatisfaction score from 1 to 10 where 1 is totally non satisfied and 10 fully satisfied

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Primary ContactAhmed maged, MD
prof.ahmedmaged@gmail.com+2001005227404
Backup ContactMohamed Shalaby, MD
mohamed_shalaby85@hotmail.com

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026