Skip to content

Comparative Analysis of PCM With ROTEM in the Measurement of Viscoelastic Coagulation Parameters

Comparative Analysis of the Entegrion Point of Care Coagulation Monitor (PCM) With ROTEM in the Measurement of Viscoelastic Coagulation Parameters

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03679286
Enrollment
120
Registered
2018-09-20
Start date
2018-08-20
Completion date
2021-03-31
Last updated
2020-04-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hemostasis Monitoring

Keywords

Coagulation

Brief summary

To determine if PMC viscoelastic coagulation parameters correlate with those generated by a marketed device in adult patients who require hemostasis monitoring or who are at risk of bleeding or thrombotic indications

Detailed description

The primary aim of this study is a performance evaluation of the PCM coagulation monitor in comparison to the ROTEM thromboelastometry system. To include a measurement of the entire range of the test system, subjects with a medical management need that requires the measurement of their hemostasis status (such as PT/PTT, INR) or are at risk for being hypo-coagulable or hyper-coagulable will be included in this study.

Interventions

DEVICEPCM and ROTEM

Test of blood sample by both PCM and ROTEM

Sponsors

Entegrion, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age 18 years or older * In opinion of investigator, absence of anything that precludes subject from being good study candidate * Informed consent * Order for measurement of hemostasis status of patients who are at risk for being hyper-coagulable or hypo-coagulable due to clinical diagnosis or medical need

Exclusion criteria

* Previous enrollment in study * Incarcerated * Heparin infusion in prior 24 hours

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Method comparison: Deming regression analysis (PCM and ROTEM NATEM)Parameter differences assessed at time of blood samplingDeming regression will be used to compare the PCM and the ROTEM NATEM assay (which reports clotting time, speed of clot formation, maximal clot firmness and clot lysis)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Method comparison: Deming regression analysis (PCM and ROTEM INTEM, EXTEM)Parameter differences assessed at time of blood samplingDeming regression will be used to compare the PCM and the ROTEM INTEM and EXTEM assays (which both report clotting time, speed of clot formation, maximal clot firmness and clot lysis)
Correlation between abnormalitiesParameter differences assessed at time of blood samplingCorrelation between abnormalities as assessed by conventional coagulation assays (such as fibrinogen concentration, CBC, PT, PTT, INR), vital signs, demographics or trauma (if any)

Countries

United States

Contacts

Primary ContactChris Lindsell, PhD
chris.lindsell@vumc.org919.536.1500
Backup ContactEntegrion
shammonds@entegrion.com919.536.1500

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026