Skip to content

Creative Writing for Type 2 Diabetes Management

Close Reading and Creative Writing - CrewD Program. An Alternative Educational Method for Group Care Intervention in Type 2 Diabetes Management. A Randomized Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03678896
Acronym
CrewD
Enrollment
49
Registered
2018-09-20
Start date
2017-01-05
Completion date
2017-09-30
Last updated
2018-09-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetes

Keywords

Type II Diabetes, Educational methods, Disease self-management

Brief summary

This study is related to the development of a new model of Group Care for patients with Diabetes - the CrewD Program, incorporating close reading and creative writing in group education. A randomized trial was designed to evaluate this intervention.

Detailed description

A structured educational model for type 2 diabetic patients using Group Care is currently being used in several institutions for help managing diabetes in these patients. In this study, this model was adjusted by introducing literary texts and using narrative skills. A randomized trial was designed to determine whether group dynamic strategies using narrative and reading produce the same positive outcomes as a conventional group approach. A total of 49 patients with type 2 Diabetes were randomized to two different Group Care dynamics, one control group, with a classical structured educational approach and another, intervention group, with close reading and creative writing. Evaluation included anthropometrical measures, A1c and questionnaires for psychological evaluation.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALCrewD Program

The CrewD Program - Creative reading and writing in Diabetes Program - is a Diabetes self-management education and support program to help people with Diabetes coping with the disease.

BEHAVIORALClassical structured education

The Classical educational approach consists in an educational method based on the presentation of relevant theoretical information to help people with Diabetes coping with the disease.

Sponsors

Associacao Protectora dos Diabeticos de Portugal
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Only patients with type 2 diabetes of \>1 year known duration, aged \< 85 years were included in the intervention.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients that did not complete the four assessments.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change from baseline in hemoglobin A1c levels at 6 monthsUp to 6 monthsHemoglobin A1c is measured in mmol/mol units.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change from baseline in weight at 6 monthsUp to 6 monthsWeight is measured in Kg.
Change from baseline in fat mass at 6 monthsUp to 6 monthsFat mass is measured in Kg/m2
Change from baseline in waist circumference at 6 monthsUp to 6 monthsWaist circumference is measured in cm
Change from baseline in self-reported quality of life at 6 monthsUp to 6 monthsThe Diabetes Quality of Life Questionnaire (DQOL) is a self-report scale to assess quality of life. This scale comprises 13 items that are grouped in 4 subscales: 1) satisfaction with treatment, 2) impact of treatment, 3) worry about the future effects of diabetes, and 4) worry about social/vocational issues. A total score may be also computed from the sum of the 13 items. Higher scores indicate poorer quality of life, ranging from 13 to 65.
Change from baseline in self-reported locus of control at 6 monthsUp to 6 monthsLocus of control is measured using the Diabetes Specific Locus of Control Scale (DLOC), which is a self-report scale directed to diabetes patients. This scale comprises 13 items that are grouped in 3 subscales: 1) internal locus of control; 2) external locus of control; and 3) powerful other locus of control. Higher scores reflect higher locus of control in each of these dimensions.
Change from baseline in self-reported empathy at 6 monthsUp to 6 monthsEmpathy is measured using a questionnaire - Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy (JSPE-R), which comprises 9 items. Self-reported empathy levels are measured through a total score that is derived from the sum of the 9 items. The total score range from 9 to 63, in which higher scores depict higher empathy levels.
Change from baseline in self-reported group satisfaction at 6 monthsUp to 6 monthsGroup satisfaction is measured using a questionnaire - Group Satisfaction Scale (GSS). The GSS assess 2 dimensions: 1) satisfaction with therapist subscale and 2) content/group process subscale. A total score may be also computed from the sum of the 12 items that comprise this scale. The scores range from 12 to 60, in which higher scores reflect higher satisfaction levels.
Change from baseline in self-reported healthUp to 6 monthsThe 36-Item Short Form Survey is used to assess health perception. This scale comprises 36 items that are divided in 8 dimensions: 1) vitality; 2) physical functioning; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) physical role functioning; 6) emotional role functioning; 7) social role functioning; and 8) mental health. These subscales are transformed into a scale range from 0-100, in which lower scores indicate worse health perception.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026