Skip to content

A Phase III Study to Evaluate the Port Delivery System With Ranibizumab Compared With Monthly Ranibizumab Injections in Participants With Wet Age-Related Macular Degeneration

Phase III, Multicenter, Randomized, Visual Assessor-Masked, Active-Comparator Study of the Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacokinetics of the Port Delivery System With Ranibizumab in Patients With Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03677934
Acronym
Archway
Enrollment
415
Registered
2018-09-19
Start date
2018-09-12
Completion date
2021-06-09
Last updated
2022-10-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration

Brief summary

Study GR40548 is a Phase III, randomized, multicenter, open-label (visual assessor \[VA\]-masked), active-comparator study designed to assess the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of 100mg/ml delivered via the Port Delivery System with ranibizumab (PDS) compared with ranibizumab intravitreal injections at 0.5 mg (10 mg/mL) in participants with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD).

Interventions

DRUGPDS Implant filled with 100 mg/mL Ranibizumab

Will be administered as per the schedule described in individual arm.

DRUGIntravitreal Injections of 10 mg/mL Ranibizumab

Will be administered as per the schedule described in individual arm.

Sponsors

Hoffmann-La Roche
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≥50 years, at time of signing Informed Consent Form * Initial diagnosis of exudative neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) within 9 months prior to the screening visit * Previous treatment with at least three anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) intravitreal injections for nAMD per standard of care within 6 months prior to the screening visit * Demonstrated response to prior anti-VEGF intravitreal treatment since diagnosis * Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 34 letters or better

Exclusion criteria

* Subfoveal fibrosis or subfoveal atrophy in study eye * Subretinal hemorrhage that involves the center of the fovea in study eye * History of vitrectomy surgery, submacular surgery, or other surgical intervention for AMD in study eye * Prior treatment with Visudyne®, external-beam radiation therapy, or transpupillary thermotherapy in study eye * Previous intraocular device implantation in study eye * Previous laser (any type) used for AMD treatment in study eye * Treatment with anti-VEGF agents other than ranibizumab within 1 month prior to the randomization visit in either eye * Prior participation in a clinical trial involving anti-VEGF drugs within 6 months prior to the randomization visit, other than ranibizumab in either eye * CNV due to other causes, such as ocular histoplasmosis, trauma, or pathologic myopia in either eye * Uncontrolled blood pressure * History of stroke within the last 3 months prior to informed consent * Uncontrolled atrial fibrillation within 3 months of informed consent * History of myocardial infarction within the last 3 months prior to informed consent * History of other disease, metabolic dysfunction, or clinical laboratory finding giving reasonable suspicion of a disease or condition that contraindicates the use of ranibizumab or placement of the Implant and that might affect interpretation of the results of the study or renders the participant at high risk of treatment complications in the opinion of the investigator * Current systemic treatment for a confirmed active systemic infection * Chronic use of oral corticosteroids * Active cancer within 12 months of randomization * Previous participation in any non-ocular (systemic) disease studies of investigational drugs within 1 month preceding the informed consent (excluding vitamins and minerals)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score at the Average of Week 36 and Week 40, as Assessed Using the ETDRS Visual Acuity Chart at a Starting Distance of 4 MetersBaseline, and the average of Week 36 and Week 40The primary efficacy endpoint is the change in BCVA score from baseline averaged over Weeks 36 and 40 with BCVA assessed using the ETDRS chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. ETDRS = Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study. The primary objective is to determine the NI and equivalence between the two treatment groups, as measured by the primary efficacy endpoint with a NI margin of 4.5 letters and equivalence margins of ± 4.5 letters. A vision score of 20/20 vision is considered normal. A score of 20/200 is considered being legally blind.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in BCVA Score Over TimeBaseline up to Week 96
Percentage of Participants With BCVA Score of 38 Letters (20/200 Approximate Snellen Equivalent) or Worse at the Average Over Week 36 and Week 40Baseline, and the average of Week 36 and Week 40
Percentage of Participants With BCVA Score of 38 Letters (20/200 Approximate Snellen Equivalent) or Worse Over TimeBaseline up to Week 96
Percentage of Participants With BCVA Score of 69 Letters (20/40 Approximate Snellen Equivalent) or Better at the Average Over Week 36 and Week 40Baseline, and the average of Week 36 and Week 40
Percentage of Participants With BCVA Score of 69 Letters (20/40 Approximate Snellen Equivalent) or Better Over TimeBaseline up to Week 96
Percentage of Participants Who Lose <10 or <5 Letters in BCVA Score From Baseline to the Average Over Week 36 and Week 40Baseline, and the average of Week 36 and Week 40
Percentage of Participants Who Lose <10 or <5 Letters in BCVA Score From Baseline Over TimeBaseline up to Week 96
Percentage of Participants Who Gain ≥0 Letters in BCVA Score From Baseline to the Average Over Week 36 and Week 40Baseline up to Week 40
Percentage of Participants Who Gain ≥0 Letters in BCVA Score From Baseline Over TimeBaseline up to Week 96
Change From Baseline in Center Point Thickness (CPT) at Week 36Baseline to Week 36
Change From Baseline in BCVA Score Averaged Over Week 60 and Week 64Baseline, Week60, Week 64
Percentage of Participants in the PDS Implant Arm Who Undergo Supplemental Treatment With Intravitreal Ranibizumab 0.5 mg Before the First, Second, Third, and Fourth Fixed Refill-Exchange IntervalsDay 1 to Week 24, Week 25 to Week 48, Week 49 to Week 72, Week73 to Week 96
Percentage of Participants in the PDS Implant Arm Who Undergo a Supplemental Treatment That Requires Subsequent Additional Supplemental Treatments During the StudyWeek 16 to Week 92
Percentage of Participants With Ocular and Systemic (Non-Ocular) AEsRandomization to Week 96
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events of Special InterestRandomization to Week 96Percentage of Participants with Adverse Events of Special Interest
Observed Serum Ranibizumab Concentrations at Specified TimepointsRandomization to Week 96
Estimated PK Parameter Values AUC0-6MRandomization to Week 96AUC0-6M = Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve From 0 to 6 Months
Estimated PK Parameter Value t1/2 After PDS Implant InsertionRandomization to Week 96Apparent terminal half-life
Estimated PK Parameter Value CminRandomization to Week 96Cmin = Minimum Serum Concentration
Estimated PK Parameter Value CmaxRandomization to Week 96Cmax = Maximum Serum Concentration
Baseline Prevalence and Incidence of Treatment-Emergent ADARandomization to Week 96
Change From Baseline in CPT Over TimeBaseline up to Week 96

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
PDS Implant Arm
Participants will receive ranibizumab delivered through the PDS implant with 100 mg/mL in the study eye on Day 1 and receive refill-exchanges at fixed 24-week intervals
248
Intravitreal Arm
Participants will receive ranibizumab 0.5 mg monthly intravitreal injections of 10 mg/mL formulation at Day 1 and every month thereafter.
167
Total415

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event11
Overall StudyDeath84
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up30
Overall StudyNon-Compliance With Study Drug10
Overall StudyPhysician Decision01
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject17

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPDS Implant ArmIntravitreal ArmTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
222 Participants150 Participants372 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
26 Participants17 Participants43 Participants
Age, Continuous75.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.11
74.8 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.63
75.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.91
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
7 Participants8 Participants15 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
240 Participants159 Participants399 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
3 Participants1 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants3 Participants5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
240 Participants161 Participants401 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
145 Participants100 Participants245 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
103 Participants67 Participants170 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
5 / 1678 / 248
other
Total, other adverse events
58 / 167225 / 248
serious
Total, serious adverse events
39 / 16778 / 248

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score at the Average of Week 36 and Week 40, as Assessed Using the ETDRS Visual Acuity Chart at a Starting Distance of 4 Meters

The primary efficacy endpoint is the change in BCVA score from baseline averaged over Weeks 36 and 40 with BCVA assessed using the ETDRS chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. ETDRS = Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study. The primary objective is to determine the NI and equivalence between the two treatment groups, as measured by the primary efficacy endpoint with a NI margin of 4.5 letters and equivalence margins of ± 4.5 letters. A vision score of 20/20 vision is considered normal. A score of 20/200 is considered being legally blind.

Time frame: Baseline, and the average of Week 36 and Week 40

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
PDS Implant ArmChange From Baseline in Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score at the Average of Week 36 and Week 40, as Assessed Using the ETDRS Visual Acuity Chart at a Starting Distance of 4 Meters0.2 letters
Intravitreal ArmChange From Baseline in Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score at the Average of Week 36 and Week 40, as Assessed Using the ETDRS Visual Acuity Chart at a Starting Distance of 4 Meters0.5 letters
Secondary

Baseline Prevalence and Incidence of Treatment-Emergent ADA

Time frame: Randomization to Week 96

Population: The Biomarker Analysis Population consists of patients who are in the Safety Population and have sufficient data to enable assessment of potential changes in biomarkers in response to treatment during the conduct of this study. The analysis will group patients according to treatment actually received

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PDS Implant ArmBaseline Prevalence and Incidence of Treatment-Emergent ADAPatients with a positive sample at time of entry into the study5 Participants
PDS Implant ArmBaseline Prevalence and Incidence of Treatment-Emergent ADAPatients with no positive samples at time of entry into the study238 Participants
PDS Implant ArmBaseline Prevalence and Incidence of Treatment-Emergent ADAPost-baseline Patients Positive for ADA38 Participants
PDS Implant ArmBaseline Prevalence and Incidence of Treatment-Emergent ADATreatment-induced ADA33 Participants
PDS Implant ArmBaseline Prevalence and Incidence of Treatment-Emergent ADATreatment-enhanced ADA0 Participants
PDS Implant ArmBaseline Prevalence and Incidence of Treatment-Emergent ADATreatment unaffected or reduced5 Participants
PDS Implant ArmBaseline Prevalence and Incidence of Treatment-Emergent ADAPatients negative for ADA at all times in the study209 Participants
Intravitreal ArmBaseline Prevalence and Incidence of Treatment-Emergent ADAPatients with a positive sample at time of entry into the study8 Participants
Intravitreal ArmBaseline Prevalence and Incidence of Treatment-Emergent ADATreatment-enhanced ADA2 Participants
Intravitreal ArmBaseline Prevalence and Incidence of Treatment-Emergent ADAPatients with no positive samples at time of entry into the study154 Participants
Intravitreal ArmBaseline Prevalence and Incidence of Treatment-Emergent ADAPatients negative for ADA at all times in the study144 Participants
Intravitreal ArmBaseline Prevalence and Incidence of Treatment-Emergent ADAPost-baseline Patients Positive for ADA21 Participants
Intravitreal ArmBaseline Prevalence and Incidence of Treatment-Emergent ADATreatment unaffected or reduced6 Participants
Intravitreal ArmBaseline Prevalence and Incidence of Treatment-Emergent ADATreatment-induced ADA15 Participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline in BCVA Score Averaged Over Week 60 and Week 64

Time frame: Baseline, Week60, Week 64

Population: Efficacy Population comprising all patients who are randomized and receive the study treatment, with patients grouped according to treatment actually received

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
PDS Implant ArmChange From Baseline in BCVA Score Averaged Over Week 60 and Week 64-0.4 letters
Intravitreal ArmChange From Baseline in BCVA Score Averaged Over Week 60 and Week 64-0.8 letters
Secondary

Change From Baseline in BCVA Score Over Time

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 96

Population: Efficacy Population comprising all patients who are randomized and receive the study treatment, with patients grouped according to treatment actually received

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PDS Implant ArmChange From Baseline in BCVA Score Over TimeWeek 72-0.3 lettersStandard Deviation 0.64
PDS Implant ArmChange From Baseline in BCVA Score Over TimeWeek 8-1.7 lettersStandard Deviation 0.41
PDS Implant ArmChange From Baseline in BCVA Score Over TimeWeek 12-0.4 lettersStandard Deviation 0.39
PDS Implant ArmChange From Baseline in BCVA Score Over TimeWeek 16-0.6 lettersStandard Deviation 0.41
PDS Implant ArmChange From Baseline in BCVA Score Over TimeWeek 20-0.3 lettersStandard Deviation 0.42
PDS Implant ArmChange From Baseline in BCVA Score Over TimeWeek 24-0.6 lettersStandard Deviation 0.47
PDS Implant ArmChange From Baseline in BCVA Score Over TimeWeek 28-0.1 lettersStandard Deviation 0.47
PDS Implant ArmChange From Baseline in BCVA Score Over TimeWeek 320.2 lettersStandard Deviation 0.49
PDS Implant ArmChange From Baseline in BCVA Score Over TimeWeek 360.2 lettersStandard Deviation 0.47
PDS Implant ArmChange From Baseline in BCVA Score Over TimeWeek 400.2 lettersStandard Deviation 0.51
PDS Implant ArmChange From Baseline in BCVA Score Over TimeWeek 44-0.1 lettersStandard Deviation 0.53
PDS Implant ArmChange From Baseline in BCVA Score Over TimeWeek 480.0 lettersStandard Deviation 0.53
PDS Implant ArmChange From Baseline in BCVA Score Over TimeWeek 520.1 lettersStandard Deviation 0.54
PDS Implant ArmChange From Baseline in BCVA Score Over TimeWeek 560.1 lettersStandard Deviation 0.56
PDS Implant ArmChange From Baseline in BCVA Score Over TimeWeek 60-0.5 lettersStandard Deviation 0.58
PDS Implant ArmChange From Baseline in BCVA Score Over TimeWeek 64-0.3 lettersStandard Deviation 0.59
PDS Implant ArmChange From Baseline in BCVA Score Over TimeWeek 68-0.5 lettersStandard Deviation 0.64
PDS Implant ArmChange From Baseline in BCVA Score Over TimeWeek 76-1.0 lettersStandard Deviation 0.68
PDS Implant ArmChange From Baseline in BCVA Score Over TimeWeek 80-0.7 lettersStandard Deviation 0.64
PDS Implant ArmChange From Baseline in BCVA Score Over TimeWeek 84-0.8 lettersStandard Deviation 0.62
PDS Implant ArmChange From Baseline in BCVA Score Over TimeWeek 88-1.3 lettersStandard Deviation 0.62
PDS Implant ArmChange From Baseline in BCVA Score Over TimeWeek 92-0.9 lettersStandard Deviation 0.63
PDS Implant ArmChange From Baseline in BCVA Score Over TimeWeek 96-1.1 lettersStandard Deviation 0.68
PDS Implant ArmChange From Baseline in BCVA Score Over TimeWeek 4-4.3 lettersStandard Deviation 0.47
Intravitreal ArmChange From Baseline in BCVA Score Over TimeWeek 760.2 lettersStandard Deviation 0.83
Intravitreal ArmChange From Baseline in BCVA Score Over TimeWeek 4-0.4 lettersStandard Deviation 0.58
Intravitreal ArmChange From Baseline in BCVA Score Over TimeWeek 52-0.8 lettersStandard Deviation 0.67
Intravitreal ArmChange From Baseline in BCVA Score Over TimeWeek 80.1 lettersStandard Deviation 0.51
Intravitreal ArmChange From Baseline in BCVA Score Over TimeWeek 880.0 lettersStandard Deviation 0.76
Intravitreal ArmChange From Baseline in BCVA Score Over TimeWeek 120.6 lettersStandard Deviation 0.48
Intravitreal ArmChange From Baseline in BCVA Score Over TimeWeek 56-0.5 lettersStandard Deviation 0.67
Intravitreal ArmChange From Baseline in BCVA Score Over TimeWeek 160.2 lettersStandard Deviation 0.5
Intravitreal ArmChange From Baseline in BCVA Score Over TimeWeek 80-0.2 lettersStandard Deviation 0.79
Intravitreal ArmChange From Baseline in BCVA Score Over TimeWeek 200.1 lettersStandard Deviation 0.52
Intravitreal ArmChange From Baseline in BCVA Score Over TimeWeek 60-0.8 lettersStandard Deviation 0.71
Intravitreal ArmChange From Baseline in BCVA Score Over TimeWeek 240.8 lettersStandard Deviation 0.57
Intravitreal ArmChange From Baseline in BCVA Score Over TimeWeek 96-1.3 lettersStandard Deviation 0.84
Intravitreal ArmChange From Baseline in BCVA Score Over TimeWeek 280.5 lettersStandard Deviation 0.57
Intravitreal ArmChange From Baseline in BCVA Score Over TimeWeek 64-0.7 lettersStandard Deviation 0.72
Intravitreal ArmChange From Baseline in BCVA Score Over TimeWeek 320.9 lettersStandard Deviation 0.6
Intravitreal ArmChange From Baseline in BCVA Score Over TimeWeek 840.3 lettersStandard Deviation 0.77
Intravitreal ArmChange From Baseline in BCVA Score Over TimeWeek 360.3 lettersStandard Deviation 0.58
Intravitreal ArmChange From Baseline in BCVA Score Over TimeWeek 68-0.3 lettersStandard Deviation 0.79
Intravitreal ArmChange From Baseline in BCVA Score Over TimeWeek 400.7 lettersStandard Deviation 0.63
Intravitreal ArmChange From Baseline in BCVA Score Over TimeWeek 720.1 lettersStandard Deviation 0.79
Intravitreal ArmChange From Baseline in BCVA Score Over TimeWeek 440.6 lettersStandard Deviation 0.65
Intravitreal ArmChange From Baseline in BCVA Score Over TimeWeek 92-1.0 lettersStandard Deviation 0.78
Intravitreal ArmChange From Baseline in BCVA Score Over TimeWeek 48-0.2 lettersStandard Deviation 0.65
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Center Point Thickness (CPT) at Week 36

Time frame: Baseline to Week 36

Population: Adult patients with nAMD diagnosed within 9 months and receiving at least 4 anti-VEGF intravitreal injections (with the last injection being ranibizumab), responsive to prior anti-VEGF treatment. 14 participants (7 participants in each arm) discontinued before Week 36 or the CPT value was missing (or not able to be measured on image) for the week 36 visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PDS Implant ArmChange From Baseline in Center Point Thickness (CPT) at Week 36Baseline Value176.9 micronsStandard Deviation 3.48
PDS Implant ArmChange From Baseline in Center Point Thickness (CPT) at Week 36Week 365.4 micronsStandard Deviation 2.91
Intravitreal ArmChange From Baseline in Center Point Thickness (CPT) at Week 36Baseline Value177.4 micronsStandard Deviation 3.84
Intravitreal ArmChange From Baseline in Center Point Thickness (CPT) at Week 36Week 362.6 micronsStandard Deviation 3.56
Secondary

Change From Baseline in CPT Over Time

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 96

Population: Efficacy Population comprising all patients who are randomized and receive the study treatment, with patients grouped according to treatment actually received

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PDS Implant ArmChange From Baseline in CPT Over TimeWeek 80.3 micronsStandard Deviation 2.17
PDS Implant ArmChange From Baseline in CPT Over TimeWeek 523.2 micronsStandard Deviation 3.43
PDS Implant ArmChange From Baseline in CPT Over TimeWeek 28-0.4 micronsStandard Deviation 2.5
PDS Implant ArmChange From Baseline in CPT Over TimeWeek 562.7 micronsStandard Deviation 3.36
PDS Implant ArmChange From Baseline in CPT Over TimeWeek 166.0 micronsStandard Deviation 3.45
PDS Implant ArmChange From Baseline in CPT Over TimeWeek 603.9 micronsStandard Deviation 3.39
PDS Implant ArmChange From Baseline in CPT Over TimeWeek 324.5 micronsStandard Deviation 2.69
PDS Implant ArmChange From Baseline in CPT Over TimeWeek 645.5 micronsStandard Deviation 3.54
PDS Implant ArmChange From Baseline in CPT Over TimeWeek 40.2 micronsStandard Deviation 2.05
PDS Implant ArmChange From Baseline in CPT Over TimeWeek 688.4 micronsStandard Deviation 3.48
PDS Implant ArmChange From Baseline in CPT Over TimeWeek 365.4 micronsStandard Deviation 2.91
PDS Implant ArmChange From Baseline in CPT Over TimeWeek 728.1 micronsStandard Deviation 3.35
PDS Implant ArmChange From Baseline in CPT Over TimeWeek 206.5 micronsStandard Deviation 2.7
PDS Implant ArmChange From Baseline in CPT Over TimeWeek 763.4 micronsStandard Deviation 3.61
PDS Implant ArmChange From Baseline in CPT Over TimeWeek 409.0 micronsStandard Deviation 3.37
PDS Implant ArmChange From Baseline in CPT Over TimeWeek 806.1 micronsStandard Deviation 3.56
PDS Implant ArmChange From Baseline in CPT Over TimeWeek 125.3 micronsStandard Deviation 2.87
PDS Implant ArmChange From Baseline in CPT Over TimeWeek 848.4 micronsStandard Deviation 3.87
PDS Implant ArmChange From Baseline in CPT Over TimeWeek 447.3 micronsStandard Deviation 3.13
PDS Implant ArmChange From Baseline in CPT Over TimeWeek 889.8 micronsStandard Deviation 3.88
PDS Implant ArmChange From Baseline in CPT Over TimeWeek 246.7 micronsStandard Deviation 2.5
PDS Implant ArmChange From Baseline in CPT Over TimeWeek 9210.3 micronsStandard Deviation 3.57
PDS Implant ArmChange From Baseline in CPT Over TimeWeek 488.9 micronsStandard Deviation 3.55
PDS Implant ArmChange From Baseline in CPT Over TimeWeek 969.9 micronsStandard Deviation 3.64
PDS Implant ArmChange From Baseline in CPT Over TimeBaseline Value176.9 micronsStandard Deviation 3.48
Intravitreal ArmChange From Baseline in CPT Over TimeWeek 96-1.3 micronsStandard Deviation 4.48
Intravitreal ArmChange From Baseline in CPT Over TimeBaseline Value177.4 micronsStandard Deviation 3.84
Intravitreal ArmChange From Baseline in CPT Over TimeWeek 42.1 micronsStandard Deviation 2.51
Intravitreal ArmChange From Baseline in CPT Over TimeWeek 83.0 micronsStandard Deviation 2.66
Intravitreal ArmChange From Baseline in CPT Over TimeWeek 120.3 micronsStandard Deviation 3.52
Intravitreal ArmChange From Baseline in CPT Over TimeWeek 167.3 micronsStandard Deviation 4.23
Intravitreal ArmChange From Baseline in CPT Over TimeWeek 201.3 micronsStandard Deviation 3.31
Intravitreal ArmChange From Baseline in CPT Over TimeWeek 24-0.8 micronsStandard Deviation 3.06
Intravitreal ArmChange From Baseline in CPT Over TimeWeek 281.6 micronsStandard Deviation 3.07
Intravitreal ArmChange From Baseline in CPT Over TimeWeek 322.3 micronsStandard Deviation 3.29
Intravitreal ArmChange From Baseline in CPT Over TimeWeek 362.7 micronsStandard Deviation 3.56
Intravitreal ArmChange From Baseline in CPT Over TimeWeek 405.1 micronsStandard Deviation 4.13
Intravitreal ArmChange From Baseline in CPT Over TimeWeek 443.4 micronsStandard Deviation 3.84
Intravitreal ArmChange From Baseline in CPT Over TimeWeek 486.4 micronsStandard Deviation 4.36
Intravitreal ArmChange From Baseline in CPT Over TimeWeek 526.6 micronsStandard Deviation 4.2
Intravitreal ArmChange From Baseline in CPT Over TimeWeek 563.3 micronsStandard Deviation 4.1
Intravitreal ArmChange From Baseline in CPT Over TimeWeek 602.5 micronsStandard Deviation 4.12
Intravitreal ArmChange From Baseline in CPT Over TimeWeek 643.6 micronsStandard Deviation 4.34
Intravitreal ArmChange From Baseline in CPT Over TimeWeek 682.1 micronsStandard Deviation 4.27
Intravitreal ArmChange From Baseline in CPT Over TimeWeek 720.9 micronsStandard Deviation 4.14
Intravitreal ArmChange From Baseline in CPT Over TimeWeek 760.1 micronsStandard Deviation 4.44
Intravitreal ArmChange From Baseline in CPT Over TimeWeek 80-2.7 micronsStandard Deviation 4.38
Intravitreal ArmChange From Baseline in CPT Over TimeWeek 84-2.0 micronsStandard Deviation 4.76
Intravitreal ArmChange From Baseline in CPT Over TimeWeek 88-0.6 micronsStandard Deviation 4.77
Intravitreal ArmChange From Baseline in CPT Over TimeWeek 92-1.3 micronsStandard Deviation 4.39
Secondary

Estimated PK Parameter Value Cmax

Cmax = Maximum Serum Concentration

Time frame: Randomization to Week 96

Population: PK Population excluding patients receiving intravitreal injections of ranibizumab in the study eye post PDS implant (including supplemental treatment), patients with fellow eye ranibizumab or bevacizumab treatment, or prior bevacizumab treatment in either eye.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PDS Implant ArmEstimated PK Parameter Value Cmax0.47 ng/mLStandard Deviation 0.16
Secondary

Estimated PK Parameter Value Cmin

Cmin = Minimum Serum Concentration

Time frame: Randomization to Week 96

Population: PK Population excluding patients receiving intravitreal injections of ranibizumab in the study eye post PDS implant (including supplemental treatment), patients with fellow eye ranibizumab or bevacizumab treatment, or prior bevacizumab treatment in either eye.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PDS Implant ArmEstimated PK Parameter Value Cmin0.31 ng/mLStandard Deviation 0.08
Secondary

Estimated PK Parameter Values AUC0-6M

AUC0-6M = Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve From 0 to 6 Months

Time frame: Randomization to Week 96

Population: PK Population excluding patients receiving intravitreal injections of ranibizumab in the study eye post PDS implant (including supplemental treatment), patients with fellow eye ranibizumab or bevacizumab treatment, or prior bevacizumab treatment in either eye.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PDS Implant ArmEstimated PK Parameter Values AUC0-6M59.42 day.ng/mLStandard Deviation 21.11
Secondary

Estimated PK Parameter Value t1/2 After PDS Implant Insertion

Apparent terminal half-life

Time frame: Randomization to Week 96

Population: PK Population excluding patients receiving intravitreal injections of ranibizumab in the study eye post PDS implant (including supplemental treatment), patients with fellow eye ranibizumab or bevacizumab treatment, or prior bevacizumab treatment in either eye.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PDS Implant ArmEstimated PK Parameter Value t1/2 After PDS Implant Insertion442.29 dayStandard Deviation 276.92
Secondary

Observed Serum Ranibizumab Concentrations at Specified Timepoints

Time frame: Randomization to Week 96

Population: PK Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
PDS Implant ArmObserved Serum Ranibizumab Concentrations at Specified TimepointsRandomization0.125 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 115
PDS Implant ArmObserved Serum Ranibizumab Concentrations at Specified TimepointsWeek 24 prerefill-exchange0.397 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 71.1
PDS Implant ArmObserved Serum Ranibizumab Concentrations at Specified TimepointsWeek 280.564 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 40.7
PDS Implant ArmObserved Serum Ranibizumab Concentrations at Specified TimepointsWeek 48 prerefill-exchange0.289 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 90.6
PDS Implant ArmObserved Serum Ranibizumab Concentrations at Specified TimepointsWeek 520.499 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 41.7
PDS Implant ArmObserved Serum Ranibizumab Concentrations at Specified TimepointsWeek 72 prerefill-exchange0.257 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 73.7
PDS Implant ArmObserved Serum Ranibizumab Concentrations at Specified TimepointsWeek 760.291 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 247
PDS Implant ArmObserved Serum Ranibizumab Concentrations at Specified TimepointsWeek 960.191 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 154
Intravitreal ArmObserved Serum Ranibizumab Concentrations at Specified TimepointsWeek 960.0680 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 157
Intravitreal ArmObserved Serum Ranibizumab Concentrations at Specified TimepointsRandomization0.117 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 78.5
Intravitreal ArmObserved Serum Ranibizumab Concentrations at Specified TimepointsWeek 520.0531 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 123
Intravitreal ArmObserved Serum Ranibizumab Concentrations at Specified TimepointsWeek 24 prerefill-exchange0.0592 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 180
Intravitreal ArmObserved Serum Ranibizumab Concentrations at Specified TimepointsWeek 760.0500 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 127
Intravitreal ArmObserved Serum Ranibizumab Concentrations at Specified TimepointsWeek 280.0581 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 178
Intravitreal ArmObserved Serum Ranibizumab Concentrations at Specified TimepointsWeek 72 prerefill-exchange0.0376 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 152
Intravitreal ArmObserved Serum Ranibizumab Concentrations at Specified TimepointsWeek 48 prerefill-exchange0.0594 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 146
Secondary

Percentage of Participants in the PDS Implant Arm Who Undergo a Supplemental Treatment That Requires Subsequent Additional Supplemental Treatments During the Study

Time frame: Week 16 to Week 92

Population: Efficacy Population comprising all patients who are randomized and receive the study treatment, with patients grouped according to treatment actually received

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PDS Implant ArmPercentage of Participants in the PDS Implant Arm Who Undergo a Supplemental Treatment That Requires Subsequent Additional Supplemental Treatments During the Study2 supplemental treatments4.1 Percentage of Participants
PDS Implant ArmPercentage of Participants in the PDS Implant Arm Who Undergo a Supplemental Treatment That Requires Subsequent Additional Supplemental Treatments During the Study3 supplemental treatments0.8 Percentage of Participants
PDS Implant ArmPercentage of Participants in the PDS Implant Arm Who Undergo a Supplemental Treatment That Requires Subsequent Additional Supplemental Treatments During the Study5 supplemental treatments0.4 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants in the PDS Implant Arm Who Undergo Supplemental Treatment With Intravitreal Ranibizumab 0.5 mg Before the First, Second, Third, and Fourth Fixed Refill-Exchange Intervals

Time frame: Day 1 to Week 24, Week 25 to Week 48, Week 49 to Week 72, Week73 to Week 96

Population: Efficacy Population comprising all patients who are randomized and receive the study treatment, with patients grouped according to treatment actually received

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PDS Implant ArmPercentage of Participants in the PDS Implant Arm Who Undergo Supplemental Treatment With Intravitreal Ranibizumab 0.5 mg Before the First, Second, Third, and Fourth Fixed Refill-Exchange IntervalsDay 1 to Week 24Need for supplemental treatment4 Participants
PDS Implant ArmPercentage of Participants in the PDS Implant Arm Who Undergo Supplemental Treatment With Intravitreal Ranibizumab 0.5 mg Before the First, Second, Third, and Fourth Fixed Refill-Exchange IntervalsDay 1 to Week 24No need for supplemental treatment242 Participants
PDS Implant ArmPercentage of Participants in the PDS Implant Arm Who Undergo Supplemental Treatment With Intravitreal Ranibizumab 0.5 mg Before the First, Second, Third, and Fourth Fixed Refill-Exchange IntervalsWeek 25 to Week 48Need for supplemental treatment13 Participants
PDS Implant ArmPercentage of Participants in the PDS Implant Arm Who Undergo Supplemental Treatment With Intravitreal Ranibizumab 0.5 mg Before the First, Second, Third, and Fourth Fixed Refill-Exchange IntervalsWeek 25 to Week 48No need for supplemental treatment228 Participants
PDS Implant ArmPercentage of Participants in the PDS Implant Arm Who Undergo Supplemental Treatment With Intravitreal Ranibizumab 0.5 mg Before the First, Second, Third, and Fourth Fixed Refill-Exchange IntervalsWeek 49 to Week 72Need for supplemental treatment12 Participants
PDS Implant ArmPercentage of Participants in the PDS Implant Arm Who Undergo Supplemental Treatment With Intravitreal Ranibizumab 0.5 mg Before the First, Second, Third, and Fourth Fixed Refill-Exchange IntervalsWeek 49 to Week 72No need for supplemental treatment219 Participants
PDS Implant ArmPercentage of Participants in the PDS Implant Arm Who Undergo Supplemental Treatment With Intravitreal Ranibizumab 0.5 mg Before the First, Second, Third, and Fourth Fixed Refill-Exchange IntervalsWeek 73 to Week 96Need for supplemental treatment12 Participants
PDS Implant ArmPercentage of Participants in the PDS Implant Arm Who Undergo Supplemental Treatment With Intravitreal Ranibizumab 0.5 mg Before the First, Second, Third, and Fourth Fixed Refill-Exchange IntervalsWeek 73 to Week 96No need for supplemental treatment213 Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Gain ≥0 Letters in BCVA Score From Baseline Over Time

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 96

Population: Efficacy Population comprising all patients who are randomized and receive the study treatment, with patients grouped according to treatment actually received

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PDS Implant ArmPercentage of Participants Who Gain ≥0 Letters in BCVA Score From Baseline Over Time52.4 Percentage of Participants
Intravitreal ArmPercentage of Participants Who Gain ≥0 Letters in BCVA Score From Baseline Over Time55.6 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Gain ≥0 Letters in BCVA Score From Baseline to the Average Over Week 36 and Week 40

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 40

Population: Adult patients with nAMD diagnosed within 9 months and receiving at least 4 anti-VEGF intravitreal injections (with the last injection being ranibizumab), responsive to prior anti-VEGF treatment

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PDS Implant ArmPercentage of Participants Who Gain ≥0 Letters in BCVA Score From Baseline to the Average Over Week 36 and Week 4057.8 Percentage of participants
Intravitreal ArmPercentage of Participants Who Gain ≥0 Letters in BCVA Score From Baseline to the Average Over Week 36 and Week 4058.9 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Lose <10 or <5 Letters in BCVA Score From Baseline Over Time

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 96

Population: Efficacy Population comprising all patients who are randomized and receive the study treatment, with patients grouped according to treatment actually received

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PDS Implant ArmPercentage of Participants Who Lose <10 or <5 Letters in BCVA Score From Baseline Over Time<10 letters88.9 Percentage of participants
PDS Implant ArmPercentage of Participants Who Lose <10 or <5 Letters in BCVA Score From Baseline Over Time< 5 letters75.1 Percentage of participants
Intravitreal ArmPercentage of Participants Who Lose <10 or <5 Letters in BCVA Score From Baseline Over Time<10 letters84.1 Percentage of participants
Intravitreal ArmPercentage of Participants Who Lose <10 or <5 Letters in BCVA Score From Baseline Over Time< 5 letters73.5 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Lose <10 or <5 Letters in BCVA Score From Baseline to the Average Over Week 36 and Week 40

Time frame: Baseline, and the average of Week 36 and Week 40

Population: Adult patients with nAMD diagnosed within 9 months and receiving at least 4 anti-VEGF intravitreal injections (with the last injection being ranibizumab), responsive to prior anti-VEGF treatment

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PDS Implant ArmPercentage of Participants Who Lose <10 or <5 Letters in BCVA Score From Baseline to the Average Over Week 36 and Week 40Loss of Visual Function <10 letters95.1 Percentage of participants
PDS Implant ArmPercentage of Participants Who Lose <10 or <5 Letters in BCVA Score From Baseline to the Average Over Week 36 and Week 40Loss of Visual Function <5 letters85.0 Percentage of participants
Intravitreal ArmPercentage of Participants Who Lose <10 or <5 Letters in BCVA Score From Baseline to the Average Over Week 36 and Week 40Loss of Visual Function <10 letters95.1 Percentage of participants
Intravitreal ArmPercentage of Participants Who Lose <10 or <5 Letters in BCVA Score From Baseline to the Average Over Week 36 and Week 40Loss of Visual Function <5 letters88.3 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events of Special Interest

Percentage of Participants with Adverse Events of Special Interest

Time frame: Randomization to Week 96

Population: Safety Population comprising all patients who receive the study treatment, with patients grouped according to treatment actually received.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PDS Implant ArmPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events of Special InterestAdverse Events of Special Interest in Study Eye64 Participants
PDS Implant ArmPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events of Special InterestAdverse Events of Special Interest in Fellow Eye21 Participants
PDS Implant ArmPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events of Special InterestNon-Ocular Adverse Events of Special Interest0 Participants
Intravitreal ArmPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events of Special InterestAdverse Events of Special Interest in Study Eye18 Participants
Intravitreal ArmPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events of Special InterestAdverse Events of Special Interest in Fellow Eye6 Participants
Intravitreal ArmPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events of Special InterestNon-Ocular Adverse Events of Special Interest0 Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With BCVA Score of 38 Letters (20/200 Approximate Snellen Equivalent) or Worse at the Average Over Week 36 and Week 40

Time frame: Baseline, and the average of Week 36 and Week 40

Population: Adult patients with nAMD diagnosed within 9 months and receiving at least 4 anti-VEGF intravitreal injections (with the last injection being ranibizumab), responsive to prior anti-VEGF treatment

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PDS Implant ArmPercentage of Participants With BCVA Score of 38 Letters (20/200 Approximate Snellen Equivalent) or Worse at the Average Over Week 36 and Week 401.2 Percentage of participants
Intravitreal ArmPercentage of Participants With BCVA Score of 38 Letters (20/200 Approximate Snellen Equivalent) or Worse at the Average Over Week 36 and Week 401.8 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With BCVA Score of 38 Letters (20/200 Approximate Snellen Equivalent) or Worse Over Time

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 96

Population: Efficacy Population comprising all patients who are randomized and receive the study treatment, with patients grouped according to treatment actually received

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PDS Implant ArmPercentage of Participants With BCVA Score of 38 Letters (20/200 Approximate Snellen Equivalent) or Worse Over Time2.7 Percentage of Participants
Intravitreal ArmPercentage of Participants With BCVA Score of 38 Letters (20/200 Approximate Snellen Equivalent) or Worse Over Time5.3 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With BCVA Score of 69 Letters (20/40 Approximate Snellen Equivalent) or Better at the Average Over Week 36 and Week 40

Time frame: Baseline, and the average of Week 36 and Week 40

Population: Adult patients with nAMD diagnosed within 9 months and receiving at least 4 anti-VEGF intravitreal injections (with the last injection being ranibizumab), responsive to prior anti-VEGF treatment

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PDS Implant ArmPercentage of Participants With BCVA Score of 69 Letters (20/40 Approximate Snellen Equivalent) or Better at the Average Over Week 36 and Week 4080.7 Percentage of participants
Intravitreal ArmPercentage of Participants With BCVA Score of 69 Letters (20/40 Approximate Snellen Equivalent) or Better at the Average Over Week 36 and Week 4082.1 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With BCVA Score of 69 Letters (20/40 Approximate Snellen Equivalent) or Better Over Time

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 96

Population: Efficacy Population comprising all patients who are randomized and receive the study treatment, with patients grouped according to treatment actually received

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PDS Implant ArmPercentage of Participants With BCVA Score of 69 Letters (20/40 Approximate Snellen Equivalent) or Better Over Time75.6 Percentage of participants
Intravitreal ArmPercentage of Participants With BCVA Score of 69 Letters (20/40 Approximate Snellen Equivalent) or Better Over Time78.1 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Ocular and Systemic (Non-Ocular) AEs

Time frame: Randomization to Week 96

Population: Safety Population comprising all patients who receive the study treatment, with patients grouped according to treatment actually received.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PDS Implant ArmPercentage of Participants With Ocular and Systemic (Non-Ocular) AEsOcular Events: Study Eye242 Participants
PDS Implant ArmPercentage of Participants With Ocular and Systemic (Non-Ocular) AEsOcular Events: Fellow Eye124 Participants
PDS Implant ArmPercentage of Participants With Ocular and Systemic (Non-Ocular) AEsNon-Ocular Events213 Participants
Intravitreal ArmPercentage of Participants With Ocular and Systemic (Non-Ocular) AEsOcular Events: Study Eye87 Participants
Intravitreal ArmPercentage of Participants With Ocular and Systemic (Non-Ocular) AEsOcular Events: Fellow Eye65 Participants
Intravitreal ArmPercentage of Participants With Ocular and Systemic (Non-Ocular) AEsNon-Ocular Events121 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 18, 2026