Skip to content

The Relationship Between Autobiographical Memory and Motivation

Is There a Relationship Between Memory for Past Events and Motivation for Future Activities?

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03677635
Enrollment
31
Registered
2018-09-19
Start date
2017-05-18
Completion date
2020-02-19
Last updated
2025-07-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Psychosis

Keywords

Negative Symptoms, Autobiographical Memory

Brief summary

People with a diagnosis of psychosis often experience low motivation and pleasure when thinking about doing future activities. This leads, quite understandably, to doing fewer activities they used to enjoy and not taking up opportunities to do new activities. One model suggests that this may be partly due to difficulties using memories of previous events to help boost motivation and anticipation before a future activity. Research shows that people with psychosis may recall previous events in less detail. These memories therefore may not be as helpful as they could be for motivation. This study will investigate this by asking people with experience of psychosis and low motivation who are seen by a care team in South London and Maudsley NHS Trust to attend two research sessions. In the first session the participants will be asked to recall memories of events from their lives and the researcher will assess how detailed the memories are and how much the participant refers to the past and future. Alongside this task the participants will also be asked to complete measures of symptoms such as low pleasure and motivation as well as a measure of depression. These will be used to find out if the detail and specificity of the memories are related to these symptoms in people with psychosis. The second half of the study will then investigate whether additional prompts to support positive memory retrieval can increase the specificity of this and subsequently improve mood, motivation and self-belief. Participants will be randomised to one of two groups. The clinical group will be guided through their memory recall using prompts and a control group will be asked to recall positive memories without prompts. If the investigators show that supporting memory recall is beneficial then memories for past events may be an important target for future therapies.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALGuided Autobiographical Memory Recall

Participants are asked to recall positive autobiographical memories with the assistance of prompts to promote specificity, generalisability and links to the future. The participants will also view a 5min psychoeducation video on the subject of memory specificity and motivation.

Sponsors

King's College London
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* A diagnosis of non-affective psychosis (as determined by medical records). * Above 18yrs old. * A score of at least 18 on the Clinical Assessment Interview for Negative Symptoms. * A sufficient command of the English language to engage with the research materials

Exclusion criteria

* Lack of capacity to provide informed consent. * Primary diagnosis of intellectual disability, head injury, substance misuse or known organic cause of psychosis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Post-Intervention Motivation ScoreImmediately after completing the interventionA rating on a visual analogue scale assessing motivation to repeat the same activity recalled in the future. The scale is rated from 0-100 and a higher score indicated better outcome.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Post-Intervention Anticipatory PleasureImmediately after completing the interventionA rating on a visual analogue scale assessing how pleasant that activity is anticipated to be if repeated. The scale is rated from 0-100 and a higher score indicated better outcome.

Countries

United Kingdom

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A total of 31 people with a diagnosis of non-affective psychosis participated between May 2017-Feb 2018.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Intervention
Guided autobiographical memory recall to enhance specificity and links to the future.
21
Control
Recall without prompts or psychoeducation video.
10
Total31

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicInterventionControlTotal
Age, Continuous38.62 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.98
41.10 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.09
39.55 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.83
Clinical Assessment Interview for Negative Symptoms24.1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.37
17.1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.82
21.73 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.04
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
21 Participants9 Participants30 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
5 Participants2 Participants7 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
16 Participants8 Participants24 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 210 / 10
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 210 / 10
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 210 / 10

Outcome results

Primary

Post-Intervention Motivation Score

A rating on a visual analogue scale assessing motivation to repeat the same activity recalled in the future. The scale is rated from 0-100 and a higher score indicated better outcome.

Time frame: Immediately after completing the intervention

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionPost-Intervention Motivation Score81.01 units on a scaleStandard Error 4.15
ControlPost-Intervention Motivation Score72.89 units on a scaleStandard Error 5.79
95% CI: [0.21, 0.86]Standardised Effect Size
Secondary

Post-Intervention Anticipatory Pleasure

A rating on a visual analogue scale assessing how pleasant that activity is anticipated to be if repeated. The scale is rated from 0-100 and a higher score indicated better outcome.

Time frame: Immediately after completing the intervention

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionPost-Intervention Anticipatory Pleasure84.35 units on a scaleStandard Error 3.05
ControlPost-Intervention Anticipatory Pleasure86.58 units on a scaleStandard Error 4.76
95% CI: [-0.59, 0.48]Standardised Effect Size

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026