Skip to content

Fluids in Septic Shock (FISSH)

Fluids in Septic Shock (FISSH): a Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03677102
Acronym
FISSH
Enrollment
1113
Registered
2018-09-19
Start date
2018-09-09
Completion date
2026-02-10
Last updated
2026-02-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Sepsis, Septic Shock

Brief summary

Despite evidence of the physiologic benefits and possible lower mortality associated with low chloride solutions, normal saline remains the most wildly used fluid in the world. Given uncertainty about the impact of lower chloride versus higher chloride solutions on mortality, it is unlikely that clinical practice will change without new and direct randomized controlled trial (RCT) evidence. Editorials published in leading critical care journals have called for RCT's to address this important clinical question. This trial will directly compare low chloride versus normal chloride for resuscitation in septic shock on patient-important outcomes such as mortality and AKI.

Detailed description

Severe infection can lead to many complications within the human body including low blood pressure, which is called septic shock. The main treatments for septic shock are intravenous antibiotics and intravenous fluid. There are many different intravenous fluids available for doctors to use. Each one of these fluids has potential advantages as well as potential disadvantages. Doctors will often look at many things when deciding which fluid to give including the results of bloodwork and the clinical characteristics of the patients themselves. There is limited direction from research studies that using one fluid type is better than another. Some preliminary research in the field has suggested that one specific electrolyte, call chloride, may be harmful when given to patients in high concentrations. Animal research has shown that the administration of high chloride fluids may be harmful to the lungs, kidneys, gastrointestinal and muscle cells. Some intravenous fluids have higher concentrations of chloride than others. The investigators plan to study the impact of giving patients with severe infection intravenous fluids with either a high chloride concentration (normal saline or high chloride albumin) or a low chloride concentration (Ringers Lactate or low chloride albumin). This trial will build on the earlier pilot, phase 1 study and will look at patient-important outcomes such as rate of death, kidney failure and length of stay in the ICU. This larger study has the potential to guide the care of critically ill patients with infection worldwide.

Interventions

Normal saline (chloride concentration 154 mmol/L)

Ringer's Lactate (chloride concentration 110 mmol/L)

Sponsors

McMaster University
Lead SponsorOTHER
The Physicians' Services Incorporated Foundation
CollaboratorOTHER
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
16 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* patients 16 years or greater who meet all of the following: * require fluid resuscitation for refractory hypotension (systolic blood pressure \<90 mmHg or mean arterial blood pressure\<65 mmHg after 1 Litre bolus over 1 hour or less or organ hypo-perfusion (serum lactate \>4 mmol/L) * have a clinical suspicion of infection * are within 6 hours of hospital admission or critical care response team consultation * are anticipated to require ICU admission

Exclusion criteria

* intracranial bleed or intracranial hypertension during the index hospital admission * 10% of body surface area acute burn injury * bleeding/hemorrhage as likely cause of hypotension * a lack of commitment to life support * have previously enrolled in FISSH, or a confounding trial (e.g. a trial examining the effect of other intravenous fluids in septic shock patients) * been transferred from another hospital or facility \>6 hours since presentation to first hospital * pre-established end stage renal disease (ESRD) or are receiving hemodialysis (intermittent or continuous) at time of enrolment, or * been admitted to ICU directly from the operating room or post anaesthetic care unit

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
30 day mortalityup to 30 daysInvestigators expect that if a difference in survival is demonstrated that this will be evident within 30 days.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Hospital mortalityup to 30 daysInvestigators expect that if a difference in survival is demonstrated, that this will be evident within 30 days.
ICU mortalityup to 30 daysInvestigators expect that if a difference in survival is demonstrated, that this will be evident within 30 days.
Hospital length of stayup to 30 dayslength of hospital stay up to 30 days
ICU length of stayup to 30 dayslength of ICU stay up to 30 days
Acute Kidney Injuryup to 30 daysAcute kidney injury - development of stage 2 or worse acute kidney injury (AKI) according to KDIGO guidelines17 based strictly on serum creatinine criteria. Stage 2 AKI is defined as serum creatinine 2.0-2.9 times baseline. For the purposes of analysis, baseline creatinine will be an outpatient reading within 365 days of the current admission date. If multiple pre-hospitalization values are available, the value closest to the date of hospital admission will be used. If an outpatient pre-hospitalization value is not available, the lowest creatinine value obtained during the current hospitalization will be considered baseline 18.
Ventilator free daysup to 30 daysdefined as cumulative number of days alive without receiving greater than or equal to 2 hours of mechanical ventilation, censored at 30 days; patients who die prior to 30 days will be assigned -1
Vasopressor-free daysup to 30 daysdefined as the cumulative number of days alive without requiring greater than or equal to 2 hours of intravenous vasopressor support, censored at 30 days; patients who die prior to 30 days will be assigned -1
Change in organ failure scoreup to 30 dayscalculated using the SOFA score (sequential organ failure assessments score) , defined as the net change in SOFA from day 1 until ICU discharge or death minimum 0, maximum 24 higher score is worse
hyperchloremiaup to 30 daysthe number of patients with hyperchloremia
Hyperkalemiaup to 30 daysthe number of patients with hyperkalemia
Hypernatremiaup to 30 daysthe number of patients with hypernatremia
Acidosisup to 30 daysthe number of patients with acidosis
Serious adverse events related to study fluidup to 30 dayscritically ill patients are admitted to the ICU for life-sustaining therapies and medical complications are likely to occur in this population consistent with severity of illness. Due to these unique morbidity and mortality expectations, we don't collect generic adverse events but instead focus on study-related SAEs that the attending physician believes related to the study fluid with plausible time sequence and biological plausibility

Countries

Canada, Saudi Arabia

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORBram Rochwerg, MSc,MD,FRCPC

McMaster University

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 28, 2026