Skip to content

Comparison Between Bladder Dissection Before and After Uterine Incision in Cesarean Section for Morbidly Adherent Placenta

Comparison Between Bladder Dissection Before and After Uterine Incision in Cesarean Section for Morbidly Adherent Placenta

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03676855
Enrollment
60
Registered
2018-09-19
Start date
2018-03-31
Completion date
2019-03-31
Last updated
2018-09-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Morbidly Adherent Placenta

Brief summary

Comparison between bladder dissection at the beginning of cesarean section For morbidly adherent placenta and between delaying dissection until planning for cesarean hysterectomy

Interventions

PROCEDUREbladder dissection

Comparison between bladder dissection at the beginning of cesarean section For morbidly adherent placenta and between delaying dissection until planning for cesarean hysterectomy

Sponsors

Ain Shams University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Women with BMI at or under 35 Kg/m2. 2. Women having previous two cesarean section or more. 3. Women with gestational age more than 32 weeks with viable fetus. 4. Women with any degree of placenta previa . 5. Patient with morbidly adherent placenta on cesarean scar only.

Exclusion criteria

1. Patient who are haemodynamically unstable before skin incision. 2. Patient with clinically evident intraamniotic infection. 3. Patient with previous history of bladder injury .

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Operative timeicluding all cs over the period of one yearof whole cs
Blood lossicluding all cs over the period of one yearthrough counting soaked towels and weighting them before and after being soaked considering the difference in grams as the calculated blood loss and calculating blood in the suction reservoir and comparing pre and post operative Hb level also haemotacrit level and number of units of packed RBCs transfused
- Incidence of urologicalduring cs and post operative delayed complication icluding all cs over the period of one year\- Incidence of urological injuries discovered intraoperative and procedure needed to repair or as a late complication as fistula formation.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Neonatal APGAR scoreafter delivery of the baby during the 1st 15 minutesNeonatal APGAR score
Time taken to create bladder flapfrom the start of bladder dissection icluding all cs over the period of one yearfrom the start of bladder dissection
3 months post operative filling cystometry3 months post operative3 months post operative filling cystometry

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Primary Contacthassan helmy, master
saberaleek2222@yahoo.com01023308711
Backup Contactmohamed elsenity, MD
01226573332

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026