Skip to content

Local and Widespread Hypoalgesic Effects of Neurodynamic Mobilization in Healthy Controls

Local and Widespread Hypoalgesic Effects of Neurodynamic Mobilization in Healthy Controls

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03674489
Enrollment
60
Registered
2018-09-17
Start date
2018-10-01
Completion date
2019-08-01
Last updated
2019-12-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pain, Pain, Neuropathic

Keywords

neurodynamics, neurodynamic mobilization, quantitative sensory testing, median nerve, pressure pain threshold, thermal pain threshold, thermal pain tolerance

Brief summary

Background & Significance Pain is the primary reason many patients seek care from healthcare professionals who utilize various manual therapy techniques. Gaining further understanding of the hypoalgesic properties of such techniques can enable practitioners to more skillfully integrate them in managing patients presenting with pain. Previous research has revealed that various manual techniques result in both local and widespread hypoalgesic changes in asymptomatic controls and patients in pain. Much of this previous research has investigated thrust manipulation; however, there is a paucity of similar research investigating these effects in neurodynamic mobilization. Specific Aims Aim: To assess for immediate local and widespread hypoalgesic effects of neurodynamic mobilization applied to the upper extremity. Hypotheses: * Subjects who receive neurodynamic mobilizations will exhibit greater positive changes in local and widespread Qualitative Sensory Testing (QST) measures compared to those who receive a sham mobilization. * Subjects who receive neurodynamic mobilizations will exhibit greater positive changes in elbow ROM and reported sensation intensity with upper limb neurodyndamic testing as compared to those who receive a sham mobilization. Aim: To assess for differences in immediate local and widespread hypoalgesic effects of sliding vs tensioning neurodynamic mobilization techniques applied to the upper extremity Hypotheses: * Subjects who receive sliding neurodynamic mobilizations will exhibit greater positive changes in local and widespread QST measures compared to those who receive tensioning neurodynamic mobilization * Subjects who receive sliding neurodynamic mobilizations will exhibit greater positive changes in elbow range of motion (ROM) and reported sensation intensity with upper limb neurodynamic testing testing compared to those who receive a tensioning neurodynamic mobilization

Detailed description

See protocol uploaded in documents section

Interventions

OTHERNeurodynamic Slider Mobilization

Subjects will be positioned in supine with the examiner supporting his/her arm and facing caudally. The arm will be taken into the ULNT2a position as described in Butler's text - so as to bias the median nerve. Once passive resistance is felt or a feeling of mild tension is reported in the median nerve field, a series of mobilizations will be performed to slide the nerve proximally and distally in an alternating manner via providing wrist extension with concurrent shoulder girdle elevation and then providing wrist flexion with concurrent shoulder girdle depression. This will be performed for 2 sets of 10 cycles at a rate of 6 seconds per cycle (3 sec in each position) - not moving further into described tension or passive resistance.

OTHERNeurodynamic Tensioner Mobilization

Subjects will be positioned in supine with the examiner supporting his/her arm and facing caudally. The arm will be taken into the ULND2a position as described in Butler's text - so as to bias the median nerve. Once passive resistance is felt or a feeling of mild tension is reported in the median nerve field, a series of mobilizations will be performed to tension the nerve in an alternating on/off manner via providing wrist extension with concurrent shoulder girdle depression and then providing wrist flexion with concurrent shoulder girdle elevation. This will be performed for 2 sets of 10 cycles at a rate of 6 seconds per cycle (3 sec in each position) - not moving further into described tension or passive resistance.

OTHERSham Neurodynamic Mobilization

Subjects will be positioned in supine with the examiner supporting his/her arm and facing cranially - in a similar position as the UNLD1 test described previously. From here, the therapist will position the patient's arm in 45 deg. of shoulder abduction without scapular depression, 45 deg. of shoulder external rotation, 45 deg. of elbow flexion, and forearm pronation. From this position, a series of sham mobilizations will be performed by passively alternating flexion and extension of the wrist for 2 sets of 10 cycles at a rate of 6 seconds per cycle (3 sec in each position).

Sponsors

Brenau University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

Each subject will be randomized to one of three groups: * Neurodynamic Slider Mobilization * Neurodynamic Tensioner Mobilization * Sham Neurodynamic Mobilization Outcomes will be assessed immediately prior to and immediately following the intervention.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Age: 18-65 * Ability to speak and comprehend English.

Exclusion criteria

* Current neck or upper extremity symptoms * Disorders that could result in impaired sensation - such as diabetes. * Current use of prescription pain medication or other medications that could result in altered pain perception - such as anti-anxiety medications or anti-depressants. * History of any chronic painful condition * Diagnosis of any major psychiatric disorder * Current pregnancy * Any painful condition within the past 3 months for which care was sought

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pressure Pain Threshold (PPT)change from baseline immediately after interventionPPT will be assessed bilaterally over the thenar eminences, over the dorsal aspect of the 1st carpometacarpal (CMC) joint, and over the tibialis anterior using a pressure algometer with an affixed 1cm2 rubber tip.
Thermal Pain Threshold (TPT)change from baseline immediately after interventionTPT will be assessed bilaterally over the thenar eminences, over the dorsal aspect of the 1st carpometacarpal (CMC) joint, and over the tibialis anterior.
Thermal Pain Tolerance (TPTol)change from baseline immediately after interventionTPTol will be assessed bilaterally over the thenar eminences, over the dorsal aspect of the 1st carpometacarpal (CMC) joint, and over the tibialis anterior.
Elbow Extension ROM Obtained on Neurodynamic Testingchange from baseline immediately after interventionA neurodynamic test of the median nerve will be performed according to the ULNT1 procedure originally described by David Butler. Degrees of elbow extension will then be recorded using a universal goniometer, and each subject will rate each of the following 5 sensory descriptors on a 10 cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS): Stinging, Tingling, Tightness, Sharpness, and Numbness. The average of the 5 sensory descriptor ratings will then be averaged to create a single sensory descriptor VAS score - as outlined in Beneciuk et al 2009.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026