Skip to content

Mini Gastric Bypass vs Roux enY Gastric Bypass

Mini Gastric Bypass vs Roux enY Gastric Bypass

Status
Withdrawn
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03673969
Acronym
MGB vs RYGB
Enrollment
0
Registered
2018-09-17
Start date
2019-02-01
Completion date
2019-07-24
Last updated
2019-07-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gastric Bypass

Keywords

Mini Gastric Bypass, Roux En-Y Gastric Bypass, Bariatric surgery, Type 2 diabetes

Brief summary

The primary aim of this research project is to assess the safety and efficacy of the MGB operation in the UK

Detailed description

The main aim of this project is to develop an ideal bariatric/metabolic surgery operation. The ideal features are highly safe operation, revisable, reversible, extremely effective, short operative time, short hospital stay, cost-effective, no long-term complications and acceptable to the patients. Mini Gastric Bypass/One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass MGB/OAGB is relatively a new bariatric /metabolic surgery operation that is increasing in popularity and currently more than 60,000 operations are performed worldwide. Only 125 MGB operations are published from UK. No previous RCT to date in the UK to test the new operation although RCT was done in Taiwan 2005 and showed that MGB is not inferior to the Roux EnY Gastric Bypass RYGB. This research project is assessing the outcomes of this operation and opening the doors to understand its effects and how it works compared to the standard RYGB. The possible development in the project is to study the hormonal changes after the MGB.

Interventions

PROCEDUREGastric bypass

Surgical method of gastric bypass

Sponsors

Doncaster And Bassetlaw Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Masking description

Participant will not know the arm prior to surgery, but will be made aware of it afterward

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* They have a BMI of 40 kg/m2 or more, or between 35 kg/m2 and 40 kg/m2 and other significant disease (for example, type 2 diabetes or high blood pressure) that could be improved if they lost weight. * All appropriate non-surgical measures have been tried but the person has not achieved or maintained adequate, clinically beneficial weight loss. * The person has been receiving or will receive intensive management in a tier 3 service. * The person is generally fit for anaesthesia and surgery. * The person commits to the need for long-term follow-up

Exclusion criteria

* Not meeting the eligibility criteria * Under 18s

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Excess weight loss2 years post surgeryAmount of weight lost

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Gastro-oesophageal reflux6 months, 2 years, 5 years and 10 yearsGastro-oesophageal reflux
Upper GI cancer6 months, 2 years, 5 years and 10 yearsUpper GI cancer
Diarrhoea6 months, 2 years, 5 years and 10 yearsDiarrhoea
Type 2 diabetes remission6 months, 2 years, 5 years and 10 yearsType 2 diabetes remission
Morbidity6 months, 2 years, 5 years and 10 yearsMorbidity
Liver failure6 months, 2 years, 5 years and 10 yearsLiver failure
Operative time6 months, 2 years, 5 years and 10 yearsOperative time
Length of stay6 months, 2 years, 5 years and 10 yearsLength of stay
Readmission rate6 months, 2 years, 5 years and 10 yearsReadmission rate
Lipid profile6 months, 2 years, 5 years and 10 yearsLipid profile
Malnutrition6 months, 2 years, 5 years and 10 yearsMalnutrition
Mortality6 months, 2 years, 5 years and 10 yearsMortality

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026