Skip to content

SharkCore Versus Acquire FNB

Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Franseen Needle With a Fork-tip Needle for EUS-guided Fine Needle Biopsy

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03672032
Enrollment
134
Registered
2018-09-14
Start date
2018-10-29
Completion date
2019-06-30
Last updated
2021-07-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

EUS Guided Biopsy

Brief summary

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) has been established as an effective technique for sampling tissue inside and around the gastrointestinal tract, including the pancreas, liver, lymph nodes, and adrenal glands. EUS-FNA is convenient, minimally invasive, and safe procedure with an estimated sensitivity of 75%-92% and a specificity of 82%-100%. Diagnosis of various pathologies in the GI tract including solid pancreatic masses, mediastinal or gastric lymph nodes, gastrointestinal submucosal lesions, and peri-rectal lesions require adequate tissue architecture and immunohistochemical analysis. This is difficult to obtain and is frequently insufficient with EUS-FNA cytology alone. The core tissue is required to improve the diagnostic yield and obtain histologic diagnosis along with immunostaining to establish specimen adequacy. In past 1 year two new needle EUS needle (Shark Core)and Acquire EUS needles has been introduced to improve diagnostic accuracy, tissue yield, and potentially obtain a core tissue sample. So far, no prospective studies have compared these two needles to see which one is better for overall diagnostic accuracy. Our goal is to perform a prospective analysis to compare the diagnostic yield and safety profile of these 2 new EUS needle.

Detailed description

Subjects will come to a pre-procedure room on the day of the procedure. The investigator will again go over the risk and benefit of procedure and indication of the procedure. Once the consent form is signed, a large bore IV cannula is placed and the subject will be taken to the DHC procedure room. Once all the team members required to perform the procedure are in the room we will do a time-out to make sure current patient and procedure are performed. A time-out is done by asking the subject to tell his full name with date of birth and describe in his own words what procedure is planned for subject today. If all the things match the investigator will go ahead and start the sedation. All EUS-FNB will be performed in the standard manner using linear echoendoscopes. All EUS-FNB procedures were performed by 1 of 2 highly experienced endosonographers (Henning Gerke or Rami EL-Abiad). The needle to be used (SharkCore vs Acquire) will be decided based on randomization software. The needle will then be used to puncture the target lesion in standard fashion. Aspirated cellular materials will be expressed into the slide by advancing the stylet. The remainder will be expressed onto filter paper and submitted for cell block preparation. The subject's medical information including diagnosis, date of diagnosis, date of admission, blood test results, and medications received will be reviewed for analysis.

Interventions

Fork-tip Needle will be used to obtain biopsy

Franseen Needle will be used to obtain biopsy

Sponsors

Henning Gerke
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients schedule for EUS guided biopsy

Exclusion criteria

* Patients who had EUS-FNA for cystic fluid aspiration * Pregnant females * International normalized ratio \>1.5 and platelet count \< 50,000 * Medically unstable

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Is the Acquire Needle Non-inferior Compared to SharkCore Needle in Histologic Yield of the Sample Obtained?12 monthsA pathologist blinded to clinical information will access each Biopsy specimen for adequacy (scoring system where scores of 0 were samples with no material, 1 - sufficient material for adequate histological interpretation, low quality (total material \<10x power field in length), 2 - sufficient material for adequate histological interpretation, high quality (\>10x power field in length)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Is the Acquire Needle Non-inferior Compared to SharkCore Needle in Diagnostic Accuracy?12 monthsThe diagnostic accuracy was calculated considering malignant diagnoses as a true positive. A histological or cytological diagnosis of a neoplastic lesion will be considered correct since false-positive diagnoses have been reported to be rare if strict cytological criteria are applied. The criterion standard for diagnosis of benign, non-neoplastic lesion that will not undergo surgical resection will be based on a combination of clinal impression, imaging characteristics and a clinical course that was consistent with the study diagnosis.
Is the Acquire Needle Non-inferior Compared to SharkCore Needle in Number of Needle Passes Required to Obtain the Tissue Sample?12 monthsWe will be collecting data on how many needle passes are required to get adequate FNB sample for each procedure. In the end, we will use this data to calculate using standard statistical measures to compare the average number of passes required to get adequate sample by both SharkCore and Acquire needle.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Fork-tip Needle
Fork-tip Needle: Fork-tip Needle will be used to obtain biopsy
67
Franseen Needle
Franseen Needle: Franseen Needle will be used to obtain biopsy
67
Total134

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicFranseen NeedleTotalFork-tip Needle
Age, Continuous65.90 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.34
64 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
63.81 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.49
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
67 Participants134 Participants67 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
30 Participants64 Participants34 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
37 Participants70 Participants33 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 670 / 67
other
Total, other adverse events
8 / 679 / 67
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 671 / 67

Outcome results

Primary

Is the Acquire Needle Non-inferior Compared to SharkCore Needle in Histologic Yield of the Sample Obtained?

A pathologist blinded to clinical information will access each Biopsy specimen for adequacy (scoring system where scores of 0 were samples with no material, 1 - sufficient material for adequate histological interpretation, low quality (total material \<10x power field in length), 2 - sufficient material for adequate histological interpretation, high quality (\>10x power field in length)

Time frame: 12 months

Population: Histology Adequacy Score (0-2)

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_UNITS)
Fork-tip NeedleIs the Acquire Needle Non-inferior Compared to SharkCore Needle in Histologic Yield of the Sample Obtained?0, Insufficient3 Lesions
Fork-tip NeedleIs the Acquire Needle Non-inferior Compared to SharkCore Needle in Histologic Yield of the Sample Obtained?1, Sufficient, low quality10 Lesions
Fork-tip NeedleIs the Acquire Needle Non-inferior Compared to SharkCore Needle in Histologic Yield of the Sample Obtained?2, Sufficient, high quality62 Lesions
Franseen NeedleIs the Acquire Needle Non-inferior Compared to SharkCore Needle in Histologic Yield of the Sample Obtained?0, Insufficient4 Lesions
Franseen NeedleIs the Acquire Needle Non-inferior Compared to SharkCore Needle in Histologic Yield of the Sample Obtained?1, Sufficient, low quality14 Lesions
Franseen NeedleIs the Acquire Needle Non-inferior Compared to SharkCore Needle in Histologic Yield of the Sample Obtained?2, Sufficient, high quality57 Lesions
Secondary

Is the Acquire Needle Non-inferior Compared to SharkCore Needle in Diagnostic Accuracy?

The diagnostic accuracy was calculated considering malignant diagnoses as a true positive. A histological or cytological diagnosis of a neoplastic lesion will be considered correct since false-positive diagnoses have been reported to be rare if strict cytological criteria are applied. The criterion standard for diagnosis of benign, non-neoplastic lesion that will not undergo surgical resection will be based on a combination of clinal impression, imaging characteristics and a clinical course that was consistent with the study diagnosis.

Time frame: 12 months

Population: Combined diagnostic accuracy

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_UNITS)
Fork-tip NeedleIs the Acquire Needle Non-inferior Compared to SharkCore Needle in Diagnostic Accuracy?69 Lesions
Franseen NeedleIs the Acquire Needle Non-inferior Compared to SharkCore Needle in Diagnostic Accuracy?65 Lesions
Secondary

Is the Acquire Needle Non-inferior Compared to SharkCore Needle in Number of Needle Passes Required to Obtain the Tissue Sample?

We will be collecting data on how many needle passes are required to get adequate FNB sample for each procedure. In the end, we will use this data to calculate using standard statistical measures to compare the average number of passes required to get adequate sample by both SharkCore and Acquire needle.

Time frame: 12 months

Population: Needle passes

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Fork-tip NeedleIs the Acquire Needle Non-inferior Compared to SharkCore Needle in Number of Needle Passes Required to Obtain the Tissue Sample?3 number of needle passes
Franseen NeedleIs the Acquire Needle Non-inferior Compared to SharkCore Needle in Number of Needle Passes Required to Obtain the Tissue Sample?3 number of needle passes

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 27, 2026