Communication Research
Conditions
Keywords
Cancer
Brief summary
Despite advanced cancer patients and their caregivers frequently experiencing psychological distress and wanting to know about their prognosis, oncologists rarely respond with empathy and provide adequate information regarding patient prognosis. We aim to address the communication gap during consultations by developing an Oncologist E-Learning Communications Skills Training Program guiding physicians on how to recognize and respond to patient/caregiver distress and to disclose prognosis; and a Patient Prompt Sheet to encourage discussions of psychological distress and prognosis. We will assess the feasibility of delivering this two-component intervention program within a cancer center in Singapore through a 2-arm randomized controlled trial in which 8 oncologists will be randomly assigned to Control Arm (n=4) and Intervention Arm (n=4). Oncologists in the intervention arm will receive the E-Learning Program. Their patients will also receive the Patient Prompt Sheet before their consultation with oncologist. After completion of oncologist intervention we will audio-record and survey 3 patients with Stage IV cancer and their caregivers per oncologist before and after their consultations. If the study is shown to be feasible and acceptable, then its effectiveness will be assessed in a larger trial.
Interventions
BEHAVIORALCommunication Training Program and Patient Prompt Sheet
The intervention being delivered is a two-component intervent. First component is the Oncologist Communication Skills Training Program. This is an e-learning module teaching oncologists to recognize and respond to patient/caregiver distress, provide information including prognosis and discuss goals of care. The second component is a patient prompt sheet which will be administered to three patients of intervention arm oncologists in the waiting area at least 30 minutes before their consultation. The sheet includes structured questions for patients to ask the oncologist about diagnosis and prognosis and will prompt patients to label and express their emotions in a direct manner.
Sponsors
Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
The inclusion criteria for oncologists are 1. All consultants and senior residents/registrars in the Departments of Medical Oncology at National Cancer Centre, Singapore 2. Able to allow audio-recording during consultation The inclusion criteria for patients are 1. Age ≥ 21 years old 2. Patients who are consulting an oncologist who is participating in the study 3. Patients who are Singaporeans or Singapore Permanent Residents 4. Diagnosis of stage IV cancer (with metastasis to visceral organs) 5. Able to allow audio-recording during consultation
Exclusion criteria
The
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Assess feasibility and acceptability of intervention | up to 3 months | Measured by proportion of intervention arm oncologists completing their intervention |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Assess increase in number of empathic statements by oncologists | within 5 months | Measured by coding audio-recorded consultations post-intervention |
| Assess increase in number of questions related to their prognosis asked by patients | within 5 months | Measured by coding audio-recorded consultations post-intervention |
Countries
Singapore
Outcome results
None listed