Digestive Cancer, Undernourished
Conditions
Brief summary
Hospitalization, for cancer patients, exposes to a risk of undernutrition which has the effect of significantly increasing infections, pressure ulcers, muscle wasting, loss of autonomy, impaired function and delayed healing. All of these factors contribute to increase the length of stay in hospital, thus lengthening the spiral of undernutrition, which has serious consequences for the patient welbeing, health establishments and public health. Undernutrition has been the subject of many studies over the last twenty years, that outline that an adequate nutritional management exerts a direct effect on the reduction of comorbidities and duration of hospitalization. However, there are periods, in the preoperative course of care, where nutritional and phisical care are not realized in the current clinical practice whereas they could be done, for example, between the diagnosis and the consultation of anesthesia, between the anesthesia consultation and the surgical procedure and the end of hospitalization of the patient. Current management is usually limited to the period of hospitalization which tends to be reduced. This situation is reinforced by the absence of relays at home, dietary consultations being not reimbursed by French health insurance. Moreover, a preliminary survey, conducted in 2012 during the pre-operative outpatient anesthesia consultation, shows that 26% of patients are already clinically malnourished, with 16.5 % of them who have lost more than 10% of their weight.
Detailed description
Then, the investigators hypothesize that the combination of perioperative nutrition and mobilization program coordinated andrealized by dieticians and physiotherapists, with the Nutrimus follow-up booklet, would improve the post-operative evolution of patients and reduce their postoperative comorbidities. This management, initiated at the consultation of anesthesia, would include an accurate nutritional diagnosis, nutritional and physical support therapy to improve their nutritional and muscular status.
Interventions
OTHERDietary advice
Nutritional status assessment Explanation of standard nutritional advices with an written explanation sheet
OTHERPhysiotherapist intervention
Respiratory capacity Functional capacity
OTHERDietary intervention
Nutritional status assessment Presentation of the Nutrimus booklet by the coordinating dietitian Establishment or adaptation of a nutritional support (prescription of nutritional supplements if necessary). Delivery and explanation of the preoperative nutritional counseling support
OTHERIntensify physiotherapist intervention
Respiratory capacity Functional capacity Tips adapted for physical activity and strengthening or maintenance of muscle mass Presentation of respiratory physiotherapy exercises to prevent postoperative bronchial congestion Nutrition and physical mobilization tips with the Nutrimus booklet
Sponsors
University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Patient ≥ 18 years old * Patient with Karnofsky index superior or equal to 60%. * Patient with cancer of the following digestive tract: peritoneal carcinoma, sarcoma, pancreas, rectum, esophagus, stomach diagnosed or under diagnosis * Patient admitted for a scheduled surgery at least 10 days after a preoperative consultation * Patient affiliated to a social health insurance scheme * Patient having dated and signed an informed consent * Patient having been informed of the results of the prior medical examination
Exclusion criteria
* Inhospital patients * Patient admitted in emergency * Impossibility of giving the patient information (alteration of patient's cognitive function) * Illiteracy or dyscalculia * Patients protected (guardianship, curatorship, safeguard of justice) * Pregnancy, breastfeeding * Subject in exclusion period (determined by a previous or ongoing study), * Patient included in another ongoing clinical trial * Patient with neuro-endocrine cancer * Patient reoperated for the same pathology
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Variation of the Medical Outcome Study Short Form 36 score | Change in score at 30 days before surgery and 1 Day before hospital discharge | Use of a scale for quality of life |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Satisfaction score of the Nutrimus tool | 6 months postoperative | Use of a questionnaire |
| Ease of use of the Nutrimus tool | 6 months postoperative | Use of a questionnaire |
| Measurement of the Medical Outcome Study Short Form 36 score | Change in score at 1 day before surgery, 1 day before the end of hospitalization, 1 Month, 3 Months and 6 Months post hospitalization | Use of a scale for quality of life |
| Sarcopenia index measurement | 30 days before surgery | Measure from routine preoperative Computerized Tomography scan |
| Evaluation of respiratory and functional capacities | Change in measures at 30 days to 10 days, 1 day before surgery, 1 day before the end of hospitalization, 1 Month, 3 Months and 6 Months post hospitalization | — |
| Pain assessment | Change in score at 30 days to 10 days, 1 day before surgery, 1 day before the end of hospitalization, 1 Month, 3 Months and 6 Months post hospitalization | Use of a visual analogue scale Measure of score from 0 to 10 |
| Length hospitalization | Duration (in days) of patient's hospitalization | Length (in days) between hospital admission and discharge |
| Evaluation of nutritional parameters | Change in values measures at 30 days to 10 days, 1 day before surgery, 1 day before the end of hospitalization, 1 Month, 3 Months and 6 Months post hospitalization | Use of a notebook |
Countries
France
Contacts
Primary ContactDRCI Strasbourg
Outcome results
None listed