Skip to content

The Tomosynthesis Trial in Bergen - Part 2

Digital Breast Tomosynthesis - The Future Screening Tool for Breast Cancer?

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03669926
Acronym
To-Be 2
Enrollment
31082
Registered
2018-09-13
Start date
2018-01-01
Completion date
2023-06-30
Last updated
2024-08-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breast Neoplasms

Keywords

Diagnostic Imaging, Mammography, Tomosynthesis, Breast cancer screening, Subsequent screening, Cancer detection, Cost effectiveness, Early performance measures, Interval cancer

Brief summary

The aim of the study is to compare early performance measures and economic aspects of organized breast cancer screening for women screened using digital breast tomosynthesis+synthetic mammography (DBT+SM) to women with a prior DBT+SM or digital mammography (DM) from To-Be 1 (NCT02835625).

Detailed description

Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) is a new three-dimensional screening tool for breast cancer, claimed to be superior to standard two-dimensional (2D) digital mammography (DM) based on results of lower or similar recall rate, and a 30-50% higher rate of screen-detected breast cancer for DBT compared to DM. The Bergen Tomosynthesis Trial (To-Be) is a randomized controlled trial investigating whether DBT, including synthetic mammography (SM), is superior for breast cancer screening to DM (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02835625) - hereafter referred to as To-Be 1. The study is run as part of BreastScreen Norway (inviting women aged 50-69 to screening every two years). It started in October 2015 and finished recruitment in December 2017, after two years - one screening round - of data collection. Results from To-Be 1 will fill some of the knowledge gaps regarding DBT+SM in screening. However, running To-Be 1 and recent publications on the topic have identified additional challenges and new evidence gaps that are important to address before DBT can be considered for use in organized screening. Thus, the To-Be trail will be extended with five more year (To-Be 2), consisting of one additional screening round (two years) where all women in the study population are screened with DBT+SM with a three year follow-up. To investigate the effect of subsequent screening with DBT+SM all women attending mammography screening in Bergen in 2018 and 2019 will be screened with DBT+SM. To-Be 2 is a prospective cohort study targeting 32 000 women, and all women attending screening will be asked if they are willing to take part in the study after receiving written and oral information about the study. Women willing to participate in the study will sign an informed consent form. We expect a participation rate of 90%. The participating women will be screened with DBT+SM. Women not willing to participate in the study will be screened with DM, and not included in our study. Continuing To-Be 1 with To-Be 2 is the only opportunity to get information on women subsequently screened with DBT+SM, that have a prior DBT+SM or DM based on random allocation. This will also allow the investigators to analyze data on interval breast cancer among women screened with DBT+SM after DBT+SM and with DBT+SM after DM in To-Be 1 in 2020. The investigators aim to address the following topics and research questions: Part I: Early performance measures for screening with DBT+SM after DBT+SM, and DBT+SM after DM. Part II: Interval breast cancer following screening with DBT+SM versus DM, focusing on interval breast cancers identified among women screened in To-Be 1. Part III: Missed and true screen-detected and interval breast cancer in mammographic screening with DBT+SM versus DM. Part IV: Expected and experienced discomfort and pain in DBT+SM by compression force and pressure. Part V: Economic evaluation of continuous use of DBT.

Interventions

RADIATIONDigital Breast Tomosynthesis+synthetic mammography

Two-view tomosynthesis performed with GE Senographe Pristina.

Sponsors

Haukeland University Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Oslo
CollaboratorOTHER
Norwegian Cancer Society
CollaboratorOTHER
Norwegian Institute of Public Health
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
48 Years to 71 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Written, informed consent to participation

Exclusion criteria

* No written, informed consent to participation * Breast implants

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Compare rates of screen detected breast cancer after subsequent screening with DBT+SM after DBT+SM versus screening with DBT+SM after prior DM, as performed in a population based screening program.48 months from start up of the trialRate of screening detected breast cancer, among those screened

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Positive predictive value of recalls after subsequent screening with DBT+SM after DBT+SM versus screening with DBT+SM after prior DM, as performed in a population based screening program.48 months from start up of the trialRate of breast cancer cases among those recalled
Prognostic and predictive tumor characteristics for screening detected breast cancer after subsequent screening with DBT+SM after DBT+SM versus screening with DBT+SM after prior DM, as performed in a population based screening program.48 months from start up of the trialDistribution of characteristics among the women diagnosed with breast cancer
Rate of interval breast cancer following screening with DBT+SM after DBT+SM versus screening with DBT+SM after prior DM, as performed in a population based screening program.48 months from start up of the trialRates and prognostic and predictive tumor characteristics of interval cancer among women screened in To-Be 1, stratified by mammographic density.
Compare recall rates after subsequent screening with DBT+SM after DBT+SM versus screening with DBT+SM after prior DM, as performed in a population based screening program.48 months from start up of the trialRate of recalled women due to mammographic findings, among those screened
Economical aspects of continuous use of DBT+SM48 months from start up of the trialEstimation of the financial impact of running a screening program with DBT+SM in an everyday setting.
Comparing interpretation times to investigate possible learning effects when reading DBT+SM in two consecutive screening rounds48 months from start up of the trialEvaluation of difference in interpretation time for subsequent versus prevalent DBT+SM screens
Assessing degree of experienced and expected pain in DBT+SM screening by compression pressure using questionnaire6 to 48 months after start up of the trialExplore whether individualized, standardized compression pressure influences women's screening experiences using a numeric rating scale (0 No discomfort/pain to 10 Very much discomfort/pain). Drafting of the questionnaire is in progress.
Rate of missed and true screen-detected and interval breast cancer in mammographic screening with DBT+SM versus DM.24-48 month after start up of the trialRetrospective review of prior and actual mammograms from women with interval and screen-detected breast cancers detected in To-Be 1 and 2, respectively.

Countries

Norway

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026