Skip to content

Comparison of Insulin Degludec With Insulin Glargine U100 for Adults With Type 1 Diabetes Crossing Multiple Time Zones.

Comparison of Insulin Degludec With Insulin Glargine U100 for Adults With Type 1 Diabetes Travelling Across Multiple Time Zones. A Pilot Study.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03668808
Acronym
SafrTravlT1D
Enrollment
25
Registered
2018-09-13
Start date
2018-11-16
Completion date
2020-09-19
Last updated
2022-11-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1

Keywords

Insulin Degludec, Insulin Glargine, Air Travel, Continuous Glucose Monitor

Brief summary

The purpose of the proposed study is to compare insulin Degludec \[TRESIBA® (insulin degludec injection)\] with insulin Glargine U100 \[Lantus® (insulin glargine injection)\] to determine the basal insulin of choice for adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D) who fly non-stop across multiple time zones. With the introduction of Degludec as basal insulin for T1D and the opportunity to vary time of injection between 8 and 40 hours, the use of Degludec as a basal insulin may make it easier for both people living with T1D and diabetologists to plan long-haul travel compared to the use of existing basal insulins when crossing multiple time zones.The study hypothesis is that once daily Degludec as the basal insulin will provide better glycemic control for people with type 1 diabetes on multiple daily injections who are traveling non-stop across multiple time zones than once daily Glargine U100.

Detailed description

This study will be an open-label, single center, pilot study. Participants will be randomized to either Glargine U100 or Degludec as the basal insulin, then a 2 week break, and followed by a cross-over to the other insulin. Each study period will begin in Honolulu, Hawaii (HI) (airport code HNL) with a non-stop flight to Newark, New Jersey (NJ) (EWR) lasting approximately 10 hours with a 6 hour time difference between destinations. After up to 72 hours in EWR, participants will return to Honolulu and spend up to 72 hours at that destination. Investigators plan to recruit 25 adults with established T1D currently being treated with multiple daily injections of insulin (MDI).

Interventions

DRUGInsulin Degludec

Subjects will use Insulin Degludec (Tresiba) with TRESIBA® FLEXTOUCH® pens as their basal insulin during a 9-10 hour flight, at each destination, and then during a return flight.

DRUGInsulin Glargine

Subjects will use Insulin Glargine (Lantus) with LANTUS® SOLOSTAR® INSULIN PEN as their basal insulin during a 9-10 hour flight, at each destination, and then during a return flight.

DEVICETRESIBA® FLEXTOUCH®

Subjects will use Tresiba FlexTouch pens when using Tresiba as their basal insulin during a 9-10 hour flight, at each destination, and then during a return flight.

DEVICELANTUS® SOLOSTAR® INSULIN PEN

Subjects will use Lantus SoloStar insulin pens when using Lantus as their basal insulin during a 9-10 hour flight, at each destination, and then during a return flight.

Sponsors

Novo Nordisk A/S
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Sansum Diabetes Research Institute
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Subjects will begin in Honolulu, HI (HNL), fly to Newark (EWR) where they will stay for up to 72 hours followed by a return long-haul flight back to Honolulu with up to 72 hours at this destination. This journey will be repeated after a 2 week period when subjects return to their original insulin treatment regimen and then switch to the alternative basal insulin.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Males or females ≥18 and ≤65 years of age. 2. Type 1 diabetes mellitus (diagnosed clinically and treated with multiple daily injections of insulin) for ≥12 months. 3. HbA1c \<10% within 30 days of being enrolled in the study 4. Current treatment with any basal insulin analogue as the once daily basal insulin given in the evening (22) and no fewer than three injections with rapid acting bolus insulin (e.g. insulin aspart, insulin lispro, or insulin glulisine) as mealtime bolus insulin therapy. 5. No contraindication to long-haul travel. 6. No recurrent severe hypoglycemia (more than 1 severe hypoglycemic event requiring hospitalization during the last 12 months), or hypoglycemia unawareness as judged by a score of \>4 on the Gold score (23), or hospitalization for diabetic ketoacidosis during the previous 6 months. 7. Willing and able to use a continuous glucose monitoring device (e.g. Dexcom G4). 8. Ability to self-manage insulin therapy (verbal confirmation at screening visit) of a changed bolus insulin dose the preceding 2 months prior to screening. 9. Ability and willingness to adhere to the protocol, including performance of self-monitored blood glucose (SMBG) readings and self-adjustment of insulin doses according to protocol. \-

Exclusion criteria

1. Current use of an insulin pump. 2. Use within the last 3 months prior to enrollment visit 1 of any glucose-lowering drug other than insulin. 3. Initiation or significant change of any systemic treatment which, in the investigator's opinion, could interfere with glucose metabolism, such as systemic corticosteroids, beta-blockers or monoamine oxidase inhibitors (inhaled corticosteroids allowed). 4. Proliferative retinopathy or maculopathy requiring treatment, according to the investigator. 5. Pregnancy, breast-feeding, the intention of becoming pregnant or not using adequate contraceptive measures. 6. Any clinically significant disease or disorder, which in the investigator's opinion could interfere with the results of the trial. 7. Mental incapacity, psychiatric disorder, unwillingness or language barriers precluding adequate understanding or cooperation, including subjects not able to read or write, and known or suspected abuse of alcohol, narcotics, or illicit drugs. 8. Known or suspected allergy to any of the trial products or related products. 9. Receipt of any investigational drug or participation in other trials within 1 month prior to Visit 1. \-

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Continuous Glucose Monitoring - Time in Range (70-140 mg/dl)During the initial 24 hours local time and starting within 2 hours after arrivalTime in range (70-140 mg/dl) \[percentage of glucose readings or hours per day\] by continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) during the initial 24 hours local time (starting within 2 hours after arriving) in Newark, NJ after flying 9-10 hours West to East (from Honolulu, HI) and after the return journey from Newark to Honolulu (flying East to West).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Sleep Quantity Measured by ActiGraphDuring 24 hours at each destinationMeasurement of sleep duration (TST - Total sleep time in minutes)
Continuous Glucose Monitoring - Time in Range (70-180 mg/dl)During the initial 24 hours local time and starting within 2 hours after arrivalTime in range (70-180 mg/dl) \[percentage of glucose readings or hours per day\] by continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) during the first 24 hours after arriving in HNL and EWR (starting within 2 hours after arrival).
Mean ± SD CGM Glucose (mg/dl)In flight period of time and for 72 hours at each destinationMean ± standard deviation of CGM glucose (mg/dl) by CGM during the flight and during the 72 hours at the destination
CGM % Time <70 mg/dlIn flight period of time and for 72 hours at each destination% time \<70 mg/dl by CGM
Liverpool Jet-Lag QuestionnaireAfter 24 and 48 hours at the destination after arrivalThis is a Questionnaire about jet-lag and fatigue administered at the destinations after arrival. Jet Lag is rated on a 0-10 scale (0 - insignificant jet lag to 10 - very bad jet lag). Fatigue is rated on a scale of -5 to +5 (more fatigue to less fatigue).
CGM % Time >180 mg/dlIn flight period of time and for 72 hours at each destination% time \>180 mg/dl by CGM
CGM - Coefficient of Variation (CV)In flight period of time and for 72 hours at each destinationCoefficient of variation of CGM values - glycemic variability (CV, %)
CGM Fasting Blood Glucose (FBG)At 0600 local time on the morning after arrival at each destinationFasting Blood Glucose (FBG) was determined using CGM at each destination on the morning after arrival.
Sleep Efficiency Measured by ActiGraphDuring 24 hours at each destinationMeasurement of sleep efficiency (SE% - total sleep time in minutes divided by time in bed in minutes)
CGM % Time 70-180 mg/dlIn flight period of time and for 72 hours at each destination% time 70-180 mg/dl by CGM

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Between 2018-2019, 25 subjects from the local community were screened for eligibility and then randomly assigned to one arm of the study . When the first arm was completed, the subjects crossed over to the other arm of the study.

Pre-assignment details

25 Participants were randomly assigned to one arm and then crossed over to the other arm when the first assignment was completed.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
All Study Participants
Subjects with type 1 diabetes and on multiple daily injections will use either basal insulin Glargine U100 and the LANTUS® SOLOSTAR® INSULIN PEN or they will use basal insulin Degludec and the TRESIBA® FLEXTOUCH® pens during a long-haul flight and randomized to these arms first or second. For Insulin Glargine: Subjects will use Insulin Glargine (Lantus) with LANTUS® SOLOSTAR® INSULIN PEN as their basal insulin during a 9-10 hour flight, at each destination, and then during a return flight. After a washout period of 2 weeks, subjects crossed over to the other basal insulin, Insulin Degludec. For Insulin Degludec: Subjects will use Insulin Degludec (Tresiba) with TRESIBA® FLEXTOUCH® pens as their basal insulin during a 9-10 hour flight, at each destination, and then during a return flight. After a washout period of 2 weeks, the subjects crossed over to the other basal insulin, Insulin Glargine.
25
Total25

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
First InterventionWithdrawal by Subject22

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAll Study Participants
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
25 Participants
Age, Continuous35 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.5
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
3 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
22 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Hypoglycemia awareness
Fear of hypoglycemia scale
36.6 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.1
Hypoglycemia awareness
Gold score
2.0 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.2
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
23 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
25 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
14 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
11 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 210 / 21
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 210 / 21
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 210 / 21

Outcome results

Primary

Continuous Glucose Monitoring - Time in Range (70-140 mg/dl)

Time in range (70-140 mg/dl) \[percentage of glucose readings or hours per day\] by continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) during the initial 24 hours local time (starting within 2 hours after arriving) in Newark, NJ after flying 9-10 hours West to East (from Honolulu, HI) and after the return journey from Newark to Honolulu (flying East to West).

Time frame: During the initial 24 hours local time and starting within 2 hours after arrival

Population: All participants (n=21) who completed both arms of the study were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Insulin DegludecContinuous Glucose Monitoring - Time in Range (70-140 mg/dl)Eastward travel36.3 percentage of Time in Range 70-140mg/dLStandard Deviation 22.2
Insulin DegludecContinuous Glucose Monitoring - Time in Range (70-140 mg/dl)Westward travel37.2 percentage of Time in Range 70-140mg/dLStandard Deviation 22.2
Insulin Glargine U100Continuous Glucose Monitoring - Time in Range (70-140 mg/dl)Eastward travel45.6 percentage of Time in Range 70-140mg/dLStandard Deviation 21.1
Insulin Glargine U100Continuous Glucose Monitoring - Time in Range (70-140 mg/dl)Westward travel43.9 percentage of Time in Range 70-140mg/dLStandard Deviation 20
Comparison: Null hypothesis is there was no difference in Time in Range (70-140mg/dl) in the initial 24 hours at destination, whether after Eastward travel or Westward travel, between Insulin Degludec \& Insulin Glargine U100. Travel direction not tested. Criterion for significance set at 0.05; using paired t-test analysis, a sample size of 21 subjects would achieve a power of at least 77% to detect a difference of 10% between basal insulins assuming the standard deviation of the difference is \<106 minutes.p-value: <0.05t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

CGM - Coefficient of Variation (CV)

Coefficient of variation of CGM values - glycemic variability (CV, %)

Time frame: In flight period of time and for 72 hours at each destination

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Insulin DegludecCGM - Coefficient of Variation (CV)Eastward In-flight Glycemic variability CV %30.6 percentage of Glycemic Variability %Standard Deviation 15.9
Insulin DegludecCGM - Coefficient of Variation (CV)Eastward 72-hours at destination Glycemic variability CV %39.9 percentage of Glycemic Variability %Standard Deviation 9.3
Insulin DegludecCGM - Coefficient of Variation (CV)Westward In-flight Glycemic variability CV %28.2 percentage of Glycemic Variability %Standard Deviation 8.4
Insulin DegludecCGM - Coefficient of Variation (CV)Westward 72-hours at destination Glycemic variability CV %38.6 percentage of Glycemic Variability %Standard Deviation 7.4
Insulin Glargine U100CGM - Coefficient of Variation (CV)Westward In-flight Glycemic variability CV %33.7 percentage of Glycemic Variability %Standard Deviation 10.1
Insulin Glargine U100CGM - Coefficient of Variation (CV)Eastward In-flight Glycemic variability CV %31.0 percentage of Glycemic Variability %Standard Deviation 14
Insulin Glargine U100CGM - Coefficient of Variation (CV)Westward 72-hours at destination Glycemic variability CV %39.5 percentage of Glycemic Variability %Standard Deviation 9.3
Insulin Glargine U100CGM - Coefficient of Variation (CV)Eastward 72-hours at destination Glycemic variability CV %41.0 percentage of Glycemic Variability %Standard Deviation 10.8
Comparison: Null hypothesis is there was no difference in CGM - Coefficient of Variation (CV) in flight, East or West travel, and in 72 hours at destination, whether after East or West travel, between Insulin Degludec \& Insulin Glargine U100. Travel direction not tested. Criterion for significance was at 0.05. Using paired t-test analysis, a sample size of 21 subjects would achieve a power of at least 77% to detect a difference of 10% between basal insulins assuming the SD of the difference is \<106 minutes.p-value: <0.05t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

CGM Fasting Blood Glucose (FBG)

Fasting Blood Glucose (FBG) was determined using CGM at each destination on the morning after arrival.

Time frame: At 0600 local time on the morning after arrival at each destination

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Insulin DegludecCGM Fasting Blood Glucose (FBG)After eastward travel143 mg/dLStandard Deviation 80
Insulin DegludecCGM Fasting Blood Glucose (FBG)After westward travel137 mg/dLStandard Deviation 60
Insulin Glargine U100CGM Fasting Blood Glucose (FBG)After eastward travel137 mg/dLStandard Deviation 60
Insulin Glargine U100CGM Fasting Blood Glucose (FBG)After westward travel140 mg/dLStandard Deviation 79
Comparison: Null hypothesis is there was no difference in CGM Fasting Blood Glucose (FBG) at 0600 local time at destination, whether after East or West travel, between Insulin Degludec and Insulin Glargine U100. Travel direction not tested. Criterion for significance was set at 0.05, and using a paired t-test analysis, a sample size of 21 subjects would achieve a power of at least 77% to detect a difference of 10% between basal insulins assuming the standard deviation of the difference is \<106 minutes.p-value: <0.05t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

CGM % Time >180 mg/dl

% time \>180 mg/dl by CGM

Time frame: In flight period of time and for 72 hours at each destination

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Insulin DegludecCGM % Time >180 mg/dlIn flight Eastward travel %Time above Range >180mg/dL39.5 percentage of Time above Range >180mg/dLStandard Deviation 27.9
Insulin DegludecCGM % Time >180 mg/dlIn flight Westward travel %Time above Range >180mg/dL30.8 percentage of Time above Range >180mg/dLStandard Deviation 25.4
Insulin DegludecCGM % Time >180 mg/dlEastward 72 hours at destination % Time above Range >180mg/dL31.7 percentage of Time above Range >180mg/dLStandard Deviation 21.3
Insulin DegludecCGM % Time >180 mg/dlWestward 72 hours at destination % Time above Range >180mg/dL34.9 percentage of Time above Range >180mg/dLStandard Deviation 21.9
Insulin Glargine U100CGM % Time >180 mg/dlWestward 72 hours at destination % Time above Range >180mg/dL32.7 percentage of Time above Range >180mg/dLStandard Deviation 23.1
Insulin Glargine U100CGM % Time >180 mg/dlIn flight Eastward travel %Time above Range >180mg/dL32.3 percentage of Time above Range >180mg/dLStandard Deviation 31.5
Insulin Glargine U100CGM % Time >180 mg/dlEastward 72 hours at destination % Time above Range >180mg/dL27.6 percentage of Time above Range >180mg/dLStandard Deviation 17.2
Insulin Glargine U100CGM % Time >180 mg/dlIn flight Westward travel %Time above Range >180mg/dL26.0 percentage of Time above Range >180mg/dLStandard Deviation 23.5
Comparison: Null hypothesis is that there was no difference in CGM % time \>180 mg/dl in flight, East or West travel, and in 72 hours at destination, whether after East or West travel, between Insulin Degludec \& Insulin Glargine U100. Travel direction not tested. Criterion for significance was at 0.05. Using paired t-test analysis, a sample size of 21 subjects would achieve a power of at least 77% to detect a difference of 10% between basal insulins assuming the SD of the difference is \<106 minutes.p-value: <0.05t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

CGM % Time 70-180 mg/dl

% time 70-180 mg/dl by CGM

Time frame: In flight period of time and for 72 hours at each destination

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Insulin DegludecCGM % Time 70-180 mg/dlEastward travel in-flight50.5 percentage of Time in Range 70-180mg/dLStandard Deviation 24
Insulin DegludecCGM % Time 70-180 mg/dlWestward travel in-flight65.1 percentage of Time in Range 70-180mg/dLStandard Deviation 23.6
Insulin DegludecCGM % Time 70-180 mg/dlEastward travel 72 hours at destination58.3 percentage of Time in Range 70-180mg/dLStandard Deviation 18.8
Insulin DegludecCGM % Time 70-180 mg/dlWestward travel 72 hours at destination56.7 percentage of Time in Range 70-180mg/dLStandard Deviation 18.8
Insulin Glargine U100CGM % Time 70-180 mg/dlWestward travel 72 hours at destination59.2 percentage of Time in Range 70-180mg/dLStandard Deviation 23
Insulin Glargine U100CGM % Time 70-180 mg/dlEastward travel in-flight58.9 percentage of Time in Range 70-180mg/dLStandard Deviation 30.8
Insulin Glargine U100CGM % Time 70-180 mg/dlEastward travel 72 hours at destination62.0 percentage of Time in Range 70-180mg/dLStandard Deviation 16.2
Insulin Glargine U100CGM % Time 70-180 mg/dlWestward travel in-flight64.0 percentage of Time in Range 70-180mg/dLStandard Deviation 21
Comparison: Null hypothesis is that there was no difference in CGM % time 70-180 mg/dl in flight, East or West travel, and in 72 hours at destination, whether after East or West travel, between Insulin Degludec \& Insulin Glargine U100. Travel direction not tested. Criterion for significance was at 0.05. Using paired t-test analysis, a sample size of 21 subjects would achieve a power of at least 77% to detect a difference of 10% between basal insulins assuming the SD of the difference is \<106 minutes.p-value: <0.05t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

CGM % Time <70 mg/dl

% time \<70 mg/dl by CGM

Time frame: In flight period of time and for 72 hours at each destination

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Insulin DegludecCGM % Time <70 mg/dlEastward travel in flight9.9 percentage of Time below range <70 mg/dLStandard Deviation 21.5
Insulin DegludecCGM % Time <70 mg/dlEastward flight 72 hours at destination10.0 percentage of Time below range <70 mg/dLStandard Deviation 9.6
Insulin DegludecCGM % Time <70 mg/dlWestward travel in flight4.1 percentage of Time below range <70 mg/dLStandard Deviation 7.3
Insulin DegludecCGM % Time <70 mg/dlWestward flight 72 hours at destination8.4 percentage of Time below range <70 mg/dLStandard Deviation 6.8
Insulin Glargine U100CGM % Time <70 mg/dlWestward travel in flight9.9 percentage of Time below range <70 mg/dLStandard Deviation 12.9
Insulin Glargine U100CGM % Time <70 mg/dlEastward travel in flight8.9 percentage of Time below range <70 mg/dLStandard Deviation 13.5
Insulin Glargine U100CGM % Time <70 mg/dlWestward flight 72 hours at destination8.2 percentage of Time below range <70 mg/dLStandard Deviation 6.9
Insulin Glargine U100CGM % Time <70 mg/dlEastward flight 72 hours at destination10.5 percentage of Time below range <70 mg/dLStandard Deviation 8.6
Comparison: Null hypothesis is that there was no difference in CGM % time \<70 mg/dl in flight, East or West travel, and in 72 hours at destination, whether after East or West travel, between Insulin Degludec and Insulin Glargine U100. Travel direction not tested. Criterion for significance was at 0.05. Using paired t-test analysis, a sample size of 21 subjects would achieve a power of at least 77% to detect a difference of 10% between basal insulins assuming the SD of the difference is \<106 minutes.p-value: <0.05t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Continuous Glucose Monitoring - Time in Range (70-180 mg/dl)

Time in range (70-180 mg/dl) \[percentage of glucose readings or hours per day\] by continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) during the first 24 hours after arriving in HNL and EWR (starting within 2 hours after arrival).

Time frame: During the initial 24 hours local time and starting within 2 hours after arrival

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Insulin DegludecContinuous Glucose Monitoring - Time in Range (70-180 mg/dl)Eastward travel55.0 percentage of Time in Range 70-180mg/dLStandard Deviation 21.7
Insulin DegludecContinuous Glucose Monitoring - Time in Range (70-180 mg/dl)Westward travel54.5 percentage of Time in Range 70-180mg/dLStandard Deviation 24.7
Insulin Glargine U100Continuous Glucose Monitoring - Time in Range (70-180 mg/dl)Eastward travel62.3 percentage of Time in Range 70-180mg/dLStandard Deviation 19.3
Insulin Glargine U100Continuous Glucose Monitoring - Time in Range (70-180 mg/dl)Westward travel61.2 percentage of Time in Range 70-180mg/dLStandard Deviation 24.7
Comparison: Null hypothesis is there was no difference in Time in Range (70-180mg/dl) in the initial 24 hours at destination, whether after Eastward travel or Westward travel, between Insulin Degludec \& Insulin Glargine U100. Travel direction not tested. Criterion for significance set at 0.05; using paired t-test analysis, a sample size of 21 subjects would achieve a power of at least 77% to detect a difference of 10% between basal insulins assuming the standard deviation of the difference is \<106 minutes.p-value: <0.05t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Liverpool Jet-Lag Questionnaire

This is a Questionnaire about jet-lag and fatigue administered at the destinations after arrival. Jet Lag is rated on a 0-10 scale (0 - insignificant jet lag to 10 - very bad jet lag). Fatigue is rated on a scale of -5 to +5 (more fatigue to less fatigue).

Time frame: After 24 and 48 hours at the destination after arrival

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Insulin DegludecLiverpool Jet-Lag QuestionnaireEastward jet lag after 24 hours2.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6
Insulin DegludecLiverpool Jet-Lag QuestionnaireWestward jetlag after 24 hours3.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.3
Insulin DegludecLiverpool Jet-Lag QuestionnaireEastward fatigue after 24 hours0.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.6
Insulin DegludecLiverpool Jet-Lag QuestionnaireEastward jet lag after 48 hours1.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.7
Insulin DegludecLiverpool Jet-Lag QuestionnaireWestward fatigue after 24 hours-1.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2
Insulin DegludecLiverpool Jet-Lag QuestionnaireEastward fatigue after 48 hours-0.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.8
Insulin DegludecLiverpool Jet-Lag QuestionnaireWestward fatigue after 48 hours3.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.9
Insulin DegludecLiverpool Jet-Lag QuestionnaireWestward jetlag after 48 hours3.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.9
Insulin Glargine U100Liverpool Jet-Lag QuestionnaireWestward fatigue after 48 hours-0.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.4
Insulin Glargine U100Liverpool Jet-Lag QuestionnaireEastward jet lag after 24 hours4.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.8
Insulin Glargine U100Liverpool Jet-Lag QuestionnaireEastward jet lag after 48 hours3.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.4
Insulin Glargine U100Liverpool Jet-Lag QuestionnaireEastward fatigue after 24 hours0.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.7
Insulin Glargine U100Liverpool Jet-Lag QuestionnaireEastward fatigue after 48 hours-1.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.3
Insulin Glargine U100Liverpool Jet-Lag QuestionnaireWestward jetlag after 24 hours3.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.3
Insulin Glargine U100Liverpool Jet-Lag QuestionnaireWestward jetlag after 48 hours2.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.3
Insulin Glargine U100Liverpool Jet-Lag QuestionnaireWestward fatigue after 24 hours-1.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.3
Comparison: Null hypothesis is that there was no difference in Liverpool Jet-Lag Questionnaire after 24 and 48 hours at the destination, whether after Eastward travel or after Westward travel, between Insulin Degludec and Insulin Glargine U100. Travel direction not tested. The criterion for significance was set at 0.05, and using a paired t-test analysis, a sample size of 21 subjects would achieve a power of at least 77% to detect a difference of 10% between basal insulins.p-value: <0.01t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Mean ± SD CGM Glucose (mg/dl)

Mean ± standard deviation of CGM glucose (mg/dl) by CGM during the flight and during the 72 hours at the destination

Time frame: In flight period of time and for 72 hours at each destination

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Insulin DegludecMean ± SD CGM Glucose (mg/dl)In-flight eastward166.3 mg/dLStandard Deviation 55.2
Insulin DegludecMean ± SD CGM Glucose (mg/dl)In-flight westward157.0 mg/dLStandard Deviation 37.5
Insulin DegludecMean ± SD CGM Glucose (mg/dl)72 hours at destination after eastward travel154.3 mg/dLStandard Deviation 43.8
Insulin DegludecMean ± SD CGM Glucose (mg/dl)72 hours at destination after westward travel160.4 mg/dLStandard Deviation 35.4
Insulin Glargine U100Mean ± SD CGM Glucose (mg/dl)72 hours at destination after westward travel156.3 mg/dLStandard Deviation 34.6
Insulin Glargine U100Mean ± SD CGM Glucose (mg/dl)In-flight eastward158.8 mg/dLStandard Deviation 58.9
Insulin Glargine U100Mean ± SD CGM Glucose (mg/dl)72 hours at destination after eastward travel147.6 mg/dLStandard Deviation 34
Insulin Glargine U100Mean ± SD CGM Glucose (mg/dl)In-flight westward146.1 mg/dLStandard Deviation 52.3
Comparison: Null hypothesis is there was no difference in Mean ± SD CGM glucose (mg/dl) in flight, East or West travel, and in 72 hours at destination, whether after East or West travel, between Insulin Degludec \& Insulin Glargine U100. Travel direction not tested. Criterion for significance was at 0.05. Using paired t-test analysis, a sample size of 21 subjects would achieve a power of at least 77% to detect a difference of 10% between basal insulins assuming the SD of the difference is \<106 minutes.p-value: <0.05t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Sleep Efficiency Measured by ActiGraph

Measurement of sleep efficiency (SE% - total sleep time in minutes divided by time in bed in minutes)

Time frame: During 24 hours at each destination

Population: The pre-specified intent was to combine insulin arms if there were no differences between insulin arms. Sleep quality/efficiency was compared at each destination.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Insulin DegludecSleep Efficiency Measured by ActiGraphSE% in NY92 percentage of total sleep/time in bed
Insulin DegludecSleep Efficiency Measured by ActiGraphSE% in HI89 percentage of total sleep/time in bed
Comparison: Null hypothesis is there was no difference in Sleep efficiency measured by ActiGraph in 24 hours at the destination, whether after Eastward or after Westward travel, between Insulin Degludec and Insulin Glargine U100. Travel direction not tested. The criterion for significance was set at 0.05, and using a paired t-test analysis, a sample size of 21 subjects would achieve a power of at least 77% to detect a difference of 10% between basal insulins.p-value: <0.05Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Sleep Quantity Measured by ActiGraph

Measurement of sleep duration (TST - Total sleep time in minutes)

Time frame: During 24 hours at each destination

Population: The pre-specified intent was to combine insulin arms if there were no differences between insulin arms. Sleep quantity was compared at each destination.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Insulin DegludecSleep Quantity Measured by ActiGraphTotal sleep time, minutes in NY489 Minutes
Insulin DegludecSleep Quantity Measured by ActiGraphTotal sleep time, minutes in HI398 Minutes
Comparison: Null hypothesis is that there was no difference in Sleep quantity measured by ActiGraph in 24 hours at the destination, whether after Eastward or after Westward travel, between Insulin Degludec and Insulin Glargine U100. Travel direction not tested. The criterion for significance was set at 0.05, and using a paired t-test analysis, a sample size of 21 subjects would achieve a power of at least 77% to detect a difference of 10% between basal insulins.p-value: <0.05Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 18, 2026