Skip to content

Survivorship and Outcomes of Robotic-Arm Assisted Bicompartmental Arthroplasty

Survivorship and Outcomes of Robotic-Arm Assisted Bicompartmental Arthroplasty

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03668704
Enrollment
50
Registered
2018-09-13
Start date
2013-04-30
Completion date
2026-04-30
Last updated
2018-09-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Osteoarthritis

Keywords

osteoarthritis, medial, bicompartmental, patellofemoral

Brief summary

The purpose of the study is to determine the clinical outcomes and survivorship of robotic-arm assisted medial bicompartmental knee arthroplasty at two, five, seven and ten years postoperative.

Detailed description

The purpose of the study is to determine the survivorship, patient satisfaction and clinical outcomes of robotic-arm assisted medial bicompartmental knee arthroplasty using the MCK implant system starting at two years post-operative and continuing for five, seven and ten years post-operative.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Stryker Orthopaedics
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
St. Helena Hospital Coon Joint Replacement Institute
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* All patients over 21 years of age who underwent robotic-arm assisted medial bicompartmental arthroplasty by the investigating surgeon and received MCK implants and are at least 24 months post-operative. * Patient has signed an IRB approved Informed Consent Form or with IRB approved waiver of written signed consent, patient has verbally consented to study participation. * Patient is willing to comply with follow up

Exclusion criteria

* Patients will be excluded from participation in the study if they are cognitively unable to answer questions related to their index procedure and health quality of life forms. * Patient had active infection * Implants were implanted without bone cement * Patients did not have sufficient bone stock to allow for insertion and fixation of components * Patient did not have sufficient soft tissue integrity to allow for stability * Patient had a neurological or muscular deformity that did not allow for control of the knee.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
% of patients with Revisions10 years after surgeryTo determine the revision rate in this patient population

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
% of patients with Revisions2 years after surgeryTo determine the revision rate in this patient population

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
% of patients with revisions5 years after surgeryTo determine the revision rate in this patient population

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026