Skip to content

Evaluating Quality and Cost of (Partial) Oncological Home-Hospitalization

A Single-center, Open Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Quality and Cost of (Partial) Oncological Home-hospitalization Compared to Standard Ambulatory Hospital Care

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03668275
Enrollment
148
Registered
2018-09-12
Start date
2018-05-02
Completion date
2019-06-30
Last updated
2020-08-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cancer

Brief summary

Oncological home-hospitalization might be a patient-centred, cost-effective approach to deal wiht the current challenges in cancer healthcare. The primary aim of this clinical trial is to evaluate patient-reported quality of life of patients receiving (partial) oncological home-hospitalization and to compare this outcome with patients receiving standard ambulatory hospital care. Secondary endpoints that will be evaluated and compared between both randomized groups are: Quality of life related endpoints (i.e. distress, depression & anxiety and general health-related quality of life); Costs; Safety; patients' reported Satisfaction & Preferences and Efficiency for the hospital day care unit.

Interventions

PROCEDURE(partial) oncological home-hospitalization

Patients assigned to oncological home-hospitalization will receive as many as possible parts of their oncological treatment at their homes. These include the required preparatory actions before treatment administration is possible and/or the treatment administration itself in case of subcutaneous cancer drugs.

Sponsors

General Hospital Groeninge
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Starting new oncological treatment at the outpatient hospital * ECOG ≤ 2 * Living within 30 minutes of drive from the hospital

Exclusion criteria

* Important comorbidity (ECOG \> 2) * Life expectancy \< 6 months * Simultaneous treatment with radiotherapy * Taking part in clinical trial with any Investigational Medicinal Product * Language barriers or communication difficulties * Problematic venous access

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Patient-reported Quality of Life - Cancer specificInquiry at baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 12 weeksEvaluation of the change of patient-reported quality of life for both study arms using FACT-G (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General) questionnaire.
Change in Patient-reported Quality of Life - GeneralInquiry at baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 12 weeksEvaluation of the change of patient-reported quality of life for both study arms using EQ-5D (EuroQol 5 dimensions) questionnaire.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cost evaluation using study-specific costs questionnaire12 weeksEvaluation of healthcare use and related costs for both study arms, using a self-designed costs form in which patients can complete their healthcare use and related expenses during the course of the trial.
Number of grade 3/4 toxicities according to CTCAE v4.0Inquiry at baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 12 weeksEvaluation of safety for both study arms, by registrating grade 3/4 toxicities (according to the CTCAE v4.0) during 12 weeks
Patient-reported SafetyInquiry at baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 12 weeksEvaluation of patient-reported safety for both study arms, by assessing patients-reported feeling of safety using VAS (Visual analogue scale).
Patient-reported DistressInquiry at baseline and 12 weeksEvaluation of distress for both study arms using Distress Barometer (DB).
Preference using a self-designed patient-reported questionnaireInquiry at baseline and 12 weeksEvaluation of patients-reported preference for the provided care in both study arms, using a self-designed preference questionnaire.
Wait times for administration of treatment at the oncology day care unit.12 weeksEvaluation of the efficiency of the workflow at the oncological day care unit for both study arms, by examining the waiting time for treatment administration for each visit of each patient.
Satisfaction using OUT-PATSAT35 CT questionnaireInquiry at baseline and 12 weeksEvaluation of patients-reported satisfaction with the provided care in both study arms, using the Cancer Out-Patient Satisfaction with Care questionnaire (OUT-PATSAT35) .
Patient-reported Depression & AnxietyInquiry at baseline and 12 weeksEvaluation of depression and anxiety for both study arms using the hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS).

Countries

Belgium

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026