Trial of Fistula Versus Graft in Elderly Patients

Arteriovenous Fistula, Arteriovenous Graft, End Stage Renal Disease

Fistula vs. Graft

This open-label pilot randomized controlled trial will test the feasibility and safety of randomizing patients over 65 years old who start hemodialysis with a tunneled dialysis catheter (TDC), and are eligible to receive either arteriovenous fistula (AVF) or arteriovenous graft (AVG), to an AVF strategy (comparator) or to an AVG strategy (intervention). The primary outcome is feasibility, which we will assess by measuring: (1) the proportion of randomized participants who receive the assigned arteriovenous access; and (2) the annual rate of enrollment in the study, accounting for the number of surgeons who participate. Secondary outcomes will include perioperative morbidity and mortality, catheter removal rates, additional procedures performed, and the reasons a patient may not receive the assigned AV access.

End-stage renal disease requiring dialysis affects approximately 400,000 patients in the United States with 100,000 new patients starting dialysis annually. The vast majority of those patients utilize hemodialysis (HD), and of that group, approximately 80% start with a tunneled dialysis catheter (TDC). Current guidelines discourage TDC, due to the risk of serious complications like bloodstream infections, central venous stenosis, and an associated increased mortality risk. The preferred alternative is an arteriovenous (AV) access, either native arteriovenous fistulas (AVF) or prosthetic arteriovenous grafts (AVG). AVF are considered the ideal long-term vascular access due to longer patency, lower costs, and an association with longer survival as compared to AVG when they successfully mature. However, AVF frequently require many months to mature after being constructed and have high primary failure rates (i.e., inability to be used without revision); AVG typically perform better short term, enabling early TDC removal and reduction in catheter related harms, but higher rates of failure and complications long term. In older populations, multiple studies have suggested that the elderly population may not benefit from AVF as opposed to AVG, due to high AVF primary failure rates and overall abbreviated life expectancy that minimizes any possible long-term benefit with AVF. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This open-label pilot randomized controlled trial will test the feasibility and safety of randomizing patients over 65 years old who start hemodialysis with a TDC (the most common initial type of HD access), and are eligible to receive either AVF or AVG, to an AVF strategy (comparator) or to an AVG strategy (intervention). We will enroll 50 patients. Participants will provide informed consent, and they will be assigned to the AVF or AVG arms. The primary outcome is feasibility, which we will assess by measuring: (1) the annual rate of enrollment in the study, accounting for the number of surgeons who participate; and (2) the proportion of randomized participants who receive the assigned AV access. Secondary outcomes will include perioperative morbidity and mortality, catheter removal rates, additional procedures performed, and the reasons a patient may not receive the assigned AV access after randomization.

No related papers found yet.

United States