Skip to content

Study of Rezafungin Compared to Caspofungin in Subjects With Candidemia and/or Invasive Candidiasis

A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Rezafungin for Injection vs. Intravenous Caspofungin Followed by Oral Fluconazole Step Down in the Treatment of Subjects With Candidemia and/or Invasive Candidiasis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03667690
Acronym
ReSTORE
Enrollment
199
Registered
2018-09-12
Start date
2018-10-07
Completion date
2021-10-07
Last updated
2023-01-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Candidemia, Fungal Infection, Invasive Candidiases, Mycoses

Keywords

Mycoses, Candidiasis, Candidiasis, Invasive, Candidemia, Fungemia, Sepsis, Invasive Fungal Infections, Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome, Pathologic Processes, Fluconazole, Caspofungin, Echinocandins, Antifungal Agents, Anti-infective Agents, 14-alpha Demethylase Inhibitors, Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme Inhibitors, Enzyme Inhibitors, Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action, Steroid Synthesis Inhibitors, Physiological Effects of Drugs, Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C9 Inhibitors, Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19 Inhibitors

Brief summary

The purpose of this pivotal study is to determine if intravenous Rezafungin is efficacious and safe in the treatment of candidemia and/or invasive candidiasis when compared to caspofungin (followed by optional oral fluconazole).

Detailed description

A Phase 3, multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind, efficacy and safety study of Rezafungin for Injection versus an active comparator regimen of caspofungin followed by optional oral fluconazole step-down therapy in subjects with candidemia and/or invasive candidiasis.

Interventions

Intravenous antifungal therapy

DRUGCaspofungin

Intravenous antifungal therapy

DRUGFluconazole

Oral antifungal therapy

DRUGintravenous placebo

Normal saline

DRUGoral placebo

Microcrystalline cellulose

Sponsors

Cidara Therapeutics Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Willing and able to provide written informed consent. If the subject is unable to consent for himself/herself, a legally acceptable representative must provide informed consent on his/her behalf. 2. Males or females ≥18 years of age. 3. Established mycological diagnosis of candidemia and/or invasive candidiasis from a sample taken ≤4 days (96 hours) before randomization defined as * ≥1 blood culture positive for yeast or Candida OR * Positive test for Candida from a Sponsor-approved rapid in vitro diagnostic (IVD) OR * Positive gram stain (or other method of direct microscopy) for yeast or positive culture for Candida spp. from a specimen obtained from a normally sterile site. 4. Presence of one or more systemic signs attributable to candidemia or invasive candidiasis appearing from ≤12 hours prior to the qualifying positive culture through time of randomization. 5. Willing to initiate or continue medical treatment to cure infections, including receipt of antibiotics and surgical procedures, if required. 6. Female subjects of childbearing potential (all female subjects between 18 years \<2 years post-menopausal unless surgically sterile) must agree to and comply with using one barrier method (e.g., female condom with spermicide) plus one other highly effective method of birth control, or sexual abstinence while participating in this study. Male subjects must be vasectomized, abstain from sexual intercourse, or agree to use barrier contraception, and also agree not to donate sperm while participating in the study and for 90 days thereafter (and at least 120 days from the last dose of study drug). 7. For Candidemia only subjects, drawing of a set of blood cultures within 12 hours prior to randomization in the study. The result of these blood cultures is not required for inclusion in the study.

Exclusion criteria

1. Any of the following forms of invasive candidiasis at baseline: 1. Septic arthritis in a prosthetic joint (septic arthritis in a native joint is allowed) 2. Osteomyelitis 3. Endocarditis or myocarditis 4. Meningitis, endophthalmitis, chorioretinitis, or any central nervous system infection 5. Chronic disseminated candidiasis 6. Urinary tract candidiasis due to ascending Candida infection secondary to obstruction or surgical instrumentation of the urinary tract 2. Received systemic treatment with an antifungal agent at approved doses for treatment of candidemia for \>48 hours (e.g., \>2 doses of a once daily antifungal agent or \>4 doses of a twice daily antifungal agent) ≤4 days (96 hours) before randomization a. Exception: Receipt of antifungal therapy to which any Candida spp. isolated in culture is not susceptible 3. Alanine aminotransferase or aspartate aminotransferase levels \>10-fold the upper limit of normal 4. Severe hepatic impairment in subjects with a history of chronic cirrhosis (Child-Pugh score \>9) 5. Presence of an indwelling vascular catheter or device that cannot be removed or an abscess that cannot be drained and is likely to be the source of candidemia or invasive candidiasis 6. Known hypersensitivity to Rezafungin for Injection, caspofungin, any echinocandin, or to any of their excipients 7. Meets National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5, criteria for ataxia, tremor, motor neuropathy, or sensory neuropathy of Grade 2 or higher 8. History of severe ataxia, tremor, or neuropathy or a diagnosis of multiple sclerosis or a movement disorder (including Parkinson's Disease or Huntington's Disease) 9. Planned or ongoing therapy at Screening with a known neurotoxic medication 10. Previous participation in this or any previous rezafungin study 11. Current participation in another interventional treatment trial with an investigational agent 12. Recent use of an investigational medicinal product within 28 days of the first dose of study drug or presence of an investigational device at the time of screening. 13. Pregnant or lactating females 14. The Principal Investigator (PI) is of the opinion the subject should not participate in the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
All-Cause Mortality (US FDA Only)Day 30 (-2 days)The number and percentage of subjects in each treatment group who are alive and deceased (or with missing data) in the mITT population.
Global Response as Assessed by Data Review Committee (EU European Medicines Agency [EMA] Only)Day 14 (±1 day)The number and percentage of subjects in each treatment group who have a global response of cure (clinical cure as assessed by the Investigator, radiological cure \[for qualifying invasive candidiasis subjects at baseline\], and mycological eradication, as confirmed by the Data Review Committee \[DRC\]), failure and indeterminate in the mITT population. A global response of cure is indicative of an efficacious outcome and the desired result, whereas a response of failure is indicative of a non-efficacious outcome and the undesired response. Indeterminate responses indicate there was not enough data obtained to determine if the response was cure or failure. Definitions for the global responses of cure, failure, and indeterminate are complex. Detailed definitions for the possible responses to this outcome measure type are provided in Table 7 (Global Response) of the clinical protocol.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Comparison of Global Response (as Assessed by the DRC) by VisitDay 5, Day 30 (-2 days), End of Treatment (EOT) (≤2 days of last dose) and Follow-up (Days 52-59)The number and percentage of subjects in each treatment group who have a global response of cure (clinical cure as assessed by the Investigator, radiological cure \[for qualifying invasive candidiasis subjects at baseline\], and mycological eradication, as confirmed by the Data Review Committee \[DRC\]), failure and indeterminate in the mITT population. A global response of cure is indicative of an efficacious outcome and the desired result, whereas a response of failure is indicative of a non-efficacious outcome and the undesired response. Indeterminate responses indicate there was not enough data obtained to determine if the response was cure or failure. Definitions for the global responses of cure, failure, and indeterminate are complex. Detailed definitions for the possible responses to this outcome measure type are provided in Table 7 (Global Response) of the clinical protocol.
Comparison of Mycological Eradication by VisitDay 5, Day 14 (±1 day), Day 30 (-2 days), End of Treatment (EOT) (≤2 days of last dose), and Follow-up (Days 52-59)The number and percentage of subjects in each treatment group who have a mycological response of eradication, failure, or indeterminate in the mITT population. A mycological response of eradication means clearance of objective evidence of infection and is indicative of an efficacious outcome and the desired result, whereas a response of failure is indicative of a non-efficacious outcome and the undesired response. Indeterminate responses indicate there was not enough data obtained to determine if the response was eradication or failure. Definitions for the mycological responses of eradication, failure, and indeterminate are complex. Detailed definitions for the possible responses to this outcome measure type are provided in Table 8 (Mycological Response) of the clinical protocol. Note: Eradication includes both documented and presumed eradication.
Comparison of Investigators' Assessment of Clinical Response by VisitDay 5, Day 14 (±1 day), Day 30 (-2 days), End of Treatment (EOT) (≤2 days of last dose), and Follow-up (Days 52-59)The number and percentage of subjects in each treatment group for whom the Investigator determined a clinical response of cure, failure, or indeterminate in the mITT population. A clinical response of cure, as assessed by the Investigator, is indicative of an efficacious outcome and the desired result, whereas a response of failure is indicative of a non-efficacious outcome and the undesired response. Indeterminate responses indicate there was not enough data obtained to determine if the response was cure or failure. Definitions for the clinical responses of cure, failure, and indeterminate are complex. Detailed definitions for the possible responses to this outcome measure type are provided in Table 9 (Investigator's Assessment of Clinical Response) of the clinical protocol.
Global Response as Assessed by Data Review Committee (US FDA Only)Day 14 (±1 day)The number and percentage of subjects in each treatment group who have a global response of cure (clinical cure as assessed by the Investigator, radiological cure \[for qualifying invasive candidiasis subjects at baseline\], and mycological eradication, as confirmed by the Data Review Committee \[DRC\]), failure and indeterminate in the mITT population. A global response of cure is indicative of an efficacious outcome and the desired result, whereas a response of failure is indicative of a non-efficacious outcome and the undesired response. Indeterminate responses indicate there was not enough data obtained to determine if the response was cure or failure. Definitions for the global responses of cure, failure, and indeterminate are complex. Detailed definitions for the possible responses to this outcome measure type are provided in Table 7 (Global Response) of the clinical protocol.
Number of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability]Day 1 through Follow-up Visit (Days 52-59)The number and percentage of subjects in each treatment group that experienced at least one treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) based on clinical chemistry, hematology and urine analysis laboratory test, vital sign, physical exams and electrocardiogram (ECG) abnormalities. Notes: A subject with multiple adverse events (AEs) was counted only once. TEAE was defined as an AE that occurred during or after study drug administration and up through the Follow-up visit. The maximum severity and strongest relationship were counted for subjects with multiple events.
Evaluate Pharmacokinetics (Cmax)Day 1, 10 minutes before the end of infusionEvaluate the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) of rezafungin for injection.
Evaluate Pharmacokinetics (Cmin)Day 8, pre-dose, within 30 minutes prior to the start of infusionEvaluate the minimum plasma concentration (Cmin) of rezafungin for injection.
Comparison of Radiological Response by Investigator by VisitDay 5, Day 14 (±1 day), Day 30 (-2 days), End of Treatment (EOT) (≤2 days of last dose), and Follow-up (Days 52-59)The number and percentage of subjects with invasive candidiasis (documented by radiologic/imaging evidence at baseline) in each treatment group who have a radiological response (as assessed by the Investigator) of cure, failure, and indeterminate in the mITT population. A radiological response of cure is indicative of an efficacious outcome and the desired result, whereas a response of failure is indicative of a non-efficacious outcome and the undesired response. Indeterminate responses indicate there was not enough data obtained to determine if the response was cure or failure. Definitions for the radiological responses of cure, failure, and indeterminate are complex. Detailed definitions for the possible responses to this outcome measure type are provided in Table 10 (Radiological Response) of the clinical protocol.
All-Cause Mortality (EU EMA Only)Day 30 (-2 days)The number and percentage of subjects in each treatment group who are alive and deceased (or with missing data) in the mITT population.

Countries

Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Bulgaria, China, Colombia, France, Germany, Greece, Israel, Italy, Singapore, South Korea, Spain, Taiwan, Thailand, Turkey (Türkiye), United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Group 1: Rezafungin for Injection
Subjects in Rezafungin treatment group will receive a 400 mg loading dose in Week 1, followed by 200 mg once weekly, for a total of 2 to 4 doses. Daily intravenous placebo infusions, when not administered Rezafungin and a daily placebo for oral step-down therapy (first eligibility on Day 4 or later as advised by a site's national/regional/local guidelines) administered every day. Rezafungin for Injection: Intravenous antifungal therapy oral placebo: Microcrystalline cellulose
100
Group 2: Caspofungin
Subjects in caspofungin arm will receive a total treatment of ≥14 days beginning with a single caspofungin 70 mg IV loading dose on Day 1 followed by 50 mg IV once daily up to 28 days. After ≥3 days of caspofungin treatment(or the minimum duration of IV therapy advised by the site's national/regional/local guidelines, whichever is greater), subjects may be switched to oral fluconazole if specific parameters are met. If the subject qualifies, then oral step-down therapy of fluconazole (6 mg/kg to the nearest 200 mg) is administered. After switch to oral step down before Day 8, subjects in the caspofungin group will receive IV placebo on Day 8 to preserve the study blind. Caspofungin: Intravenous antifungal therapy Fluconazole: Oral antifungal therapy intravenous placebo: Normal saline
99
Total199

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event03
Overall StudyDeath2221
Overall StudyDiagnosis of other types of invasive candidiasis11
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up45
Overall StudyPer Medical Monitor, visits performed over the phone were to be considered as early discontinuation01
Overall StudyStudy visit missed or conducted over the phone due to Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic21
Overall StudySubject could not return for additional investigational product10
Overall StudySubject discharged to hospice care20
Overall StudySubject was dropped due to exclusion criterion number 910
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject78
Overall StudyWithdrawal of consent by subject's legally authorized representative; subject placed in hospice10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicGroup 1: Rezafungin for InjectionTotalGroup 2: Caspofungin
Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) (per microliter) at Baseline
<500/μL
9 Participants15 Participants6 Participants
Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) (per microliter) at Baseline
≥500/μL
88 Participants181 Participants93 Participants
Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) (per microliter) at Baseline
Missing
3 Participants3 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
40 Participants81 Participants41 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
60 Participants118 Participants58 Participants
Age, Continuous59.0 years61.0 years62.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.57
Body Mass Index (BMI)25.43 kilograms/meter^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.037
24.97 kilograms/meter^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.763
24.07 kilograms/meter^2
Child-Pugh Score Category
<7
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Child-Pugh Score Category
7-9
2 Participants8 Participants6 Participants
Child-Pugh Score Category
No History of Liver Disease/Not Calculated
98 Participants191 Participants93 Participants
Diagnosis
Candidemia only
70 Participants138 Participants68 Participants
Diagnosis
Invasive candidiasis
30 Participants61 Participants31 Participants
Estimated Creatinine Clearance93.73 milliliters (mL)/minute
STANDARD_DEVIATION 109.485
87.98 milliliters (mL)/minute
STANDARD_DEVIATION 89.788
64.93 milliliters (mL)/minute
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
7 Participants11 Participants4 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
89 Participants183 Participants94 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
4 Participants5 Participants1 Participants
Height169.51 centimeters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.984
168.42 centimeters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.727
168.00 centimeters
Modified Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II Score12.5 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.01
12.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.56
12.0 units on a scale
Modified Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II Score Category
0-9
41 Participants78 Participants37 Participants
Modified Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II Score Category
10-19
43 Participants87 Participants44 Participants
Modified Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II Score Category
≥20
15 Participants33 Participants18 Participants
Modified Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II Score Category
Missing
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Modified APACHE II Score/ANC
APACHE II score <20 and ANC ≥500/μL
75 Participants153 Participants78 Participants
Modified APACHE II Score/ANC
APACHE II score ≥20 or ANC <500/μL
22 Participants43 Participants21 Participants
Modified APACHE II Score/ANC
Missing
3 Participants3 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
27 Participants58 Participants31 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
5 Participants9 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
6 Participants9 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
61 Participants121 Participants60 Participants
Randomization Strata
Candidemia only, APACHE II score <20 and ANC ≥500/μL
51 Participants104 Participants53 Participants
Randomization Strata
Candidemia only, APACHE II score ≥20 or ANC <500/μL
19 Participants36 Participants17 Participants
Randomization Strata
Invasive candidiasis, APACHE II score <20 and ANC ≥500/μL
25 Participants49 Participants24 Participants
Randomization Strata
Invasive candidiasis, APACHE II score ≥20 or ANC <500/μL
5 Participants10 Participants5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Australia
8 participants13 participants5 participants
Region of Enrollment
Belgium
5 participants12 participants7 participants
Region of Enrollment
Bulgaria
6 participants10 participants4 participants
Region of Enrollment
China
6 participants11 participants5 participants
Region of Enrollment
Colombia
1 participants1 participants0 participants
Region of Enrollment
France
5 participants6 participants1 participants
Region of Enrollment
Greece
6 participants17 participants11 participants
Region of Enrollment
Israel
3 participants5 participants2 participants
Region of Enrollment
Italy
2 participants5 participants3 participants
Region of Enrollment
Singapore
3 participants3 participants0 participants
Region of Enrollment
South Korea
6 participants12 participants6 participants
Region of Enrollment
Spain
12 participants24 participants12 participants
Region of Enrollment
Taiwan
3 participants4 participants1 participants
Region of Enrollment
Thailand
8 participants25 participants17 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
26 participants51 participants25 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
33 Participants76 Participants43 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
67 Participants123 Participants56 Participants
Weight68.00 kilograms67.90 kilograms69.82 kilograms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.602

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
29 / 9825 / 98
other
Total, other adverse events
90 / 9866 / 98
serious
Total, serious adverse events
55 / 9852 / 98

Outcome results

Primary

All-Cause Mortality (US FDA Only)

The number and percentage of subjects in each treatment group who are alive and deceased (or with missing data) in the mITT population.

Time frame: Day 30 (-2 days)

Population: The modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) Population includes all subjects who had a documented Candida infection based on central laboratory evaluation of a blood culture or a culture from a normally sterile site obtained ≤4 days (96 hours) before randomization and received ≥1 dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Group 1: Rezafungin for InjectionAll-Cause Mortality (US FDA Only)Deceased: Known Deceased (subjects who died on or before Day 30)19 Participants
Group 1: Rezafungin for InjectionAll-Cause Mortality (US FDA Only)Deceased: Unknown Survival Status3 Participants
Group 1: Rezafungin for InjectionAll-Cause Mortality (US FDA Only)Alive71 Participants
Group 2: CaspofunginAll-Cause Mortality (US FDA Only)Alive74 Participants
Group 2: CaspofunginAll-Cause Mortality (US FDA Only)Deceased: Known Deceased (subjects who died on or before Day 30)17 Participants
Group 2: CaspofunginAll-Cause Mortality (US FDA Only)Deceased: Unknown Survival Status3 Participants
Primary

Global Response as Assessed by Data Review Committee (EU European Medicines Agency [EMA] Only)

The number and percentage of subjects in each treatment group who have a global response of cure (clinical cure as assessed by the Investigator, radiological cure \[for qualifying invasive candidiasis subjects at baseline\], and mycological eradication, as confirmed by the Data Review Committee \[DRC\]), failure and indeterminate in the mITT population. A global response of cure is indicative of an efficacious outcome and the desired result, whereas a response of failure is indicative of a non-efficacious outcome and the undesired response. Indeterminate responses indicate there was not enough data obtained to determine if the response was cure or failure. Definitions for the global responses of cure, failure, and indeterminate are complex. Detailed definitions for the possible responses to this outcome measure type are provided in Table 7 (Global Response) of the clinical protocol.

Time frame: Day 14 (±1 day)

Population: The modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) Population includes all subjects who had a documented Candida infection based on central laboratory evaluation of a blood culture or a culture from a normally sterile site obtained ≤4 days (96 hours) before randomization and received ≥1 dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Group 1: Rezafungin for InjectionGlobal Response as Assessed by Data Review Committee (EU European Medicines Agency [EMA] Only)Cure55 Participants
Group 1: Rezafungin for InjectionGlobal Response as Assessed by Data Review Committee (EU European Medicines Agency [EMA] Only)Failure28 Participants
Group 1: Rezafungin for InjectionGlobal Response as Assessed by Data Review Committee (EU European Medicines Agency [EMA] Only)Indeterminate10 Participants
Group 2: CaspofunginGlobal Response as Assessed by Data Review Committee (EU European Medicines Agency [EMA] Only)Cure57 Participants
Group 2: CaspofunginGlobal Response as Assessed by Data Review Committee (EU European Medicines Agency [EMA] Only)Failure29 Participants
Group 2: CaspofunginGlobal Response as Assessed by Data Review Committee (EU European Medicines Agency [EMA] Only)Indeterminate8 Participants
Secondary

All-Cause Mortality (EU EMA Only)

The number and percentage of subjects in each treatment group who are alive and deceased (or with missing data) in the mITT population.

Time frame: Day 30 (-2 days)

Population: The modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) Population includes all subjects who had a documented Candida infection based on central laboratory evaluation of a blood culture or a culture from a normally sterile site obtained ≤4 days (96 hours) before randomization and received ≥1 dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Group 1: Rezafungin for InjectionAll-Cause Mortality (EU EMA Only)Alive71 Participants
Group 1: Rezafungin for InjectionAll-Cause Mortality (EU EMA Only)Deceased: Known Deceased (subjects who died on or before Day 30)19 Participants
Group 1: Rezafungin for InjectionAll-Cause Mortality (EU EMA Only)Deceased: Unknown Survival Status3 Participants
Group 2: CaspofunginAll-Cause Mortality (EU EMA Only)Deceased: Unknown Survival Status3 Participants
Group 2: CaspofunginAll-Cause Mortality (EU EMA Only)Deceased: Known Deceased (subjects who died on or before Day 30)17 Participants
Group 2: CaspofunginAll-Cause Mortality (EU EMA Only)Alive74 Participants
Secondary

Comparison of Global Response (as Assessed by the DRC) by Visit

The number and percentage of subjects in each treatment group who have a global response of cure (clinical cure as assessed by the Investigator, radiological cure \[for qualifying invasive candidiasis subjects at baseline\], and mycological eradication, as confirmed by the Data Review Committee \[DRC\]), failure and indeterminate in the mITT population. A global response of cure is indicative of an efficacious outcome and the desired result, whereas a response of failure is indicative of a non-efficacious outcome and the undesired response. Indeterminate responses indicate there was not enough data obtained to determine if the response was cure or failure. Definitions for the global responses of cure, failure, and indeterminate are complex. Detailed definitions for the possible responses to this outcome measure type are provided in Table 7 (Global Response) of the clinical protocol.

Time frame: Day 5, Day 30 (-2 days), End of Treatment (EOT) (≤2 days of last dose) and Follow-up (Days 52-59)

Population: The modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) Population includes all subjects who had a documented Candida infection based on central laboratory evaluation of a blood culture or a culture from a normally sterile site obtained ≤4 days (96 hours) before randomization and received ≥1 dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Group 1: Rezafungin for InjectionComparison of Global Response (as Assessed by the DRC) by VisitFollow-up (Days 52-59)Indeterminate13 Participants
Group 1: Rezafungin for InjectionComparison of Global Response (as Assessed by the DRC) by VisitEOT (≤2 days of last dose)Cure56 Participants
Group 1: Rezafungin for InjectionComparison of Global Response (as Assessed by the DRC) by VisitEOT (≤2 days of last dose)Failure29 Participants
Group 1: Rezafungin for InjectionComparison of Global Response (as Assessed by the DRC) by VisitEOT (≤2 days of last dose)Indeterminate8 Participants
Group 1: Rezafungin for InjectionComparison of Global Response (as Assessed by the DRC) by VisitDay 5Cure52 Participants
Group 1: Rezafungin for InjectionComparison of Global Response (as Assessed by the DRC) by VisitDay 5Failure32 Participants
Group 1: Rezafungin for InjectionComparison of Global Response (as Assessed by the DRC) by VisitDay 30 (-2 days)Cure46 Participants
Group 1: Rezafungin for InjectionComparison of Global Response (as Assessed by the DRC) by VisitDay 30 (-2 days)Failure31 Participants
Group 1: Rezafungin for InjectionComparison of Global Response (as Assessed by the DRC) by VisitDay 5Indeterminate9 Participants
Group 1: Rezafungin for InjectionComparison of Global Response (as Assessed by the DRC) by VisitFollow-up (Days 52-59)Cure42 Participants
Group 1: Rezafungin for InjectionComparison of Global Response (as Assessed by the DRC) by VisitFollow-up (Days 52-59)Failure38 Participants
Group 1: Rezafungin for InjectionComparison of Global Response (as Assessed by the DRC) by VisitDay 30 (-2 days)Indeterminate16 Participants
Group 2: CaspofunginComparison of Global Response (as Assessed by the DRC) by VisitDay 30 (-2 days)Failure36 Participants
Group 2: CaspofunginComparison of Global Response (as Assessed by the DRC) by VisitDay 30 (-2 days)Indeterminate12 Participants
Group 2: CaspofunginComparison of Global Response (as Assessed by the DRC) by VisitFollow-up (Days 52-59)Failure42 Participants
Group 2: CaspofunginComparison of Global Response (as Assessed by the DRC) by VisitEOT (≤2 days of last dose)Cure59 Participants
Group 2: CaspofunginComparison of Global Response (as Assessed by the DRC) by VisitFollow-up (Days 52-59)Cure39 Participants
Group 2: CaspofunginComparison of Global Response (as Assessed by the DRC) by VisitEOT (≤2 days of last dose)Failure32 Participants
Group 2: CaspofunginComparison of Global Response (as Assessed by the DRC) by VisitDay 30 (-2 days)Cure46 Participants
Group 2: CaspofunginComparison of Global Response (as Assessed by the DRC) by VisitDay 5Failure37 Participants
Group 2: CaspofunginComparison of Global Response (as Assessed by the DRC) by VisitFollow-up (Days 52-59)Indeterminate13 Participants
Group 2: CaspofunginComparison of Global Response (as Assessed by the DRC) by VisitDay 5Indeterminate8 Participants
Group 2: CaspofunginComparison of Global Response (as Assessed by the DRC) by VisitEOT (≤2 days of last dose)Indeterminate3 Participants
Group 2: CaspofunginComparison of Global Response (as Assessed by the DRC) by VisitDay 5Cure49 Participants
Secondary

Comparison of Investigators' Assessment of Clinical Response by Visit

The number and percentage of subjects in each treatment group for whom the Investigator determined a clinical response of cure, failure, or indeterminate in the mITT population. A clinical response of cure, as assessed by the Investigator, is indicative of an efficacious outcome and the desired result, whereas a response of failure is indicative of a non-efficacious outcome and the undesired response. Indeterminate responses indicate there was not enough data obtained to determine if the response was cure or failure. Definitions for the clinical responses of cure, failure, and indeterminate are complex. Detailed definitions for the possible responses to this outcome measure type are provided in Table 9 (Investigator's Assessment of Clinical Response) of the clinical protocol.

Time frame: Day 5, Day 14 (±1 day), Day 30 (-2 days), End of Treatment (EOT) (≤2 days of last dose), and Follow-up (Days 52-59)

Population: The modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) Population includes all subjects who had a documented Candida infection based on central laboratory evaluation of a blood culture or a culture from a normally sterile site obtained ≤4 days (96 hours) before randomization and received ≥1 dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Group 1: Rezafungin for InjectionComparison of Investigators' Assessment of Clinical Response by VisitDay 5Cure59 Participants
Group 1: Rezafungin for InjectionComparison of Investigators' Assessment of Clinical Response by VisitDay 5Failure31 Participants
Group 1: Rezafungin for InjectionComparison of Investigators' Assessment of Clinical Response by VisitDay 5Indeterminate3 Participants
Group 1: Rezafungin for InjectionComparison of Investigators' Assessment of Clinical Response by VisitDay 14 (±1 day)Cure62 Participants
Group 1: Rezafungin for InjectionComparison of Investigators' Assessment of Clinical Response by VisitDay 14 (±1 day)Failure26 Participants
Group 1: Rezafungin for InjectionComparison of Investigators' Assessment of Clinical Response by VisitDay 14 (±1 day)Indeterminate5 Participants
Group 1: Rezafungin for InjectionComparison of Investigators' Assessment of Clinical Response by VisitDay 30 (-2 days)Cure51 Participants
Group 1: Rezafungin for InjectionComparison of Investigators' Assessment of Clinical Response by VisitDay 30 (-2 days)Failure32 Participants
Group 1: Rezafungin for InjectionComparison of Investigators' Assessment of Clinical Response by VisitDay 30 (-2 days)Indeterminate10 Participants
Group 1: Rezafungin for InjectionComparison of Investigators' Assessment of Clinical Response by VisitFollow-up (Days 52-59)Indeterminate9 Participants
Group 1: Rezafungin for InjectionComparison of Investigators' Assessment of Clinical Response by VisitFollow-up (Days 52-59)Cure46 Participants
Group 1: Rezafungin for InjectionComparison of Investigators' Assessment of Clinical Response by VisitFollow-up (Days 52-59)Failure38 Participants
Group 1: Rezafungin for InjectionComparison of Investigators' Assessment of Clinical Response by VisitEOT (≤2 days of last dose)Cure65 Participants
Group 1: Rezafungin for InjectionComparison of Investigators' Assessment of Clinical Response by VisitEOT (≤2 days of last dose)Failure22 Participants
Group 1: Rezafungin for InjectionComparison of Investigators' Assessment of Clinical Response by VisitEOT (≤2 days of last dose)Indeterminate6 Participants
Group 2: CaspofunginComparison of Investigators' Assessment of Clinical Response by VisitDay 30 (-2 days)Failure34 Participants
Group 2: CaspofunginComparison of Investigators' Assessment of Clinical Response by VisitDay 5Cure70 Participants
Group 2: CaspofunginComparison of Investigators' Assessment of Clinical Response by VisitFollow-up (Days 52-59)Failure40 Participants
Group 2: CaspofunginComparison of Investigators' Assessment of Clinical Response by VisitDay 5Failure22 Participants
Group 2: CaspofunginComparison of Investigators' Assessment of Clinical Response by VisitDay 30 (-2 days)Indeterminate8 Participants
Group 2: CaspofunginComparison of Investigators' Assessment of Clinical Response by VisitDay 5Indeterminate2 Participants
Group 2: CaspofunginComparison of Investigators' Assessment of Clinical Response by VisitFollow-up (Days 52-59)Indeterminate10 Participants
Group 2: CaspofunginComparison of Investigators' Assessment of Clinical Response by VisitDay 14 (±1 day)Cure63 Participants
Group 2: CaspofunginComparison of Investigators' Assessment of Clinical Response by VisitEOT (≤2 days of last dose)Indeterminate4 Participants
Group 2: CaspofunginComparison of Investigators' Assessment of Clinical Response by VisitDay 14 (±1 day)Failure27 Participants
Group 2: CaspofunginComparison of Investigators' Assessment of Clinical Response by VisitEOT (≤2 days of last dose)Failure26 Participants
Group 2: CaspofunginComparison of Investigators' Assessment of Clinical Response by VisitDay 14 (±1 day)Indeterminate4 Participants
Group 2: CaspofunginComparison of Investigators' Assessment of Clinical Response by VisitFollow-up (Days 52-59)Cure44 Participants
Group 2: CaspofunginComparison of Investigators' Assessment of Clinical Response by VisitDay 30 (-2 days)Cure52 Participants
Group 2: CaspofunginComparison of Investigators' Assessment of Clinical Response by VisitEOT (≤2 days of last dose)Cure64 Participants
Secondary

Comparison of Mycological Eradication by Visit

The number and percentage of subjects in each treatment group who have a mycological response of eradication, failure, or indeterminate in the mITT population. A mycological response of eradication means clearance of objective evidence of infection and is indicative of an efficacious outcome and the desired result, whereas a response of failure is indicative of a non-efficacious outcome and the undesired response. Indeterminate responses indicate there was not enough data obtained to determine if the response was eradication or failure. Definitions for the mycological responses of eradication, failure, and indeterminate are complex. Detailed definitions for the possible responses to this outcome measure type are provided in Table 8 (Mycological Response) of the clinical protocol. Note: Eradication includes both documented and presumed eradication.

Time frame: Day 5, Day 14 (±1 day), Day 30 (-2 days), End of Treatment (EOT) (≤2 days of last dose), and Follow-up (Days 52-59)

Population: The modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) Population includes all subjects who had a documented Candida infection based on central laboratory evaluation of a blood culture or a culture from a normally sterile site obtained ≤4 days (96 hours) before randomization and received ≥1 dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Group 1: Rezafungin for InjectionComparison of Mycological Eradication by VisitDay 5Indeterminate4 Participants
Group 1: Rezafungin for InjectionComparison of Mycological Eradication by VisitDay 30 (-2 days)Eradication56 Participants
Group 1: Rezafungin for InjectionComparison of Mycological Eradication by VisitFollow-up (Days 52-59)Failure41 Participants
Group 1: Rezafungin for InjectionComparison of Mycological Eradication by VisitDay 30 (-2 days)Indeterminate4 Participants
Group 1: Rezafungin for InjectionComparison of Mycological Eradication by VisitDay 14 (±1 day)Eradication63 Participants
Group 1: Rezafungin for InjectionComparison of Mycological Eradication by VisitEOT (≤2 days of last dose)Eradication63 Participants
Group 1: Rezafungin for InjectionComparison of Mycological Eradication by VisitDay 5Failure25 Participants
Group 1: Rezafungin for InjectionComparison of Mycological Eradication by VisitEOT (≤2 days of last dose)Failure26 Participants
Group 1: Rezafungin for InjectionComparison of Mycological Eradication by VisitDay 14 (±1 day)Failure26 Participants
Group 1: Rezafungin for InjectionComparison of Mycological Eradication by VisitDay 5Eradication64 Participants
Group 1: Rezafungin for InjectionComparison of Mycological Eradication by VisitDay 30 (-2 days)Failure33 Participants
Group 1: Rezafungin for InjectionComparison of Mycological Eradication by VisitEOT (≤2 days of last dose)Indeterminate4 Participants
Group 1: Rezafungin for InjectionComparison of Mycological Eradication by VisitDay 14 (±1 day)Indeterminate4 Participants
Group 1: Rezafungin for InjectionComparison of Mycological Eradication by VisitFollow-up (Days 52-59)Eradication48 Participants
Group 1: Rezafungin for InjectionComparison of Mycological Eradication by VisitFollow-up (Days 52-59)Indeterminate4 Participants
Group 2: CaspofunginComparison of Mycological Eradication by VisitFollow-up (Days 52-59)Eradication49 Participants
Group 2: CaspofunginComparison of Mycological Eradication by VisitFollow-up (Days 52-59)Failure43 Participants
Group 2: CaspofunginComparison of Mycological Eradication by VisitFollow-up (Days 52-59)Indeterminate2 Participants
Group 2: CaspofunginComparison of Mycological Eradication by VisitDay 5Eradication58 Participants
Group 2: CaspofunginComparison of Mycological Eradication by VisitDay 5Failure27 Participants
Group 2: CaspofunginComparison of Mycological Eradication by VisitDay 5Indeterminate9 Participants
Group 2: CaspofunginComparison of Mycological Eradication by VisitDay 14 (±1 day)Eradication62 Participants
Group 2: CaspofunginComparison of Mycological Eradication by VisitDay 14 (±1 day)Failure28 Participants
Group 2: CaspofunginComparison of Mycological Eradication by VisitDay 14 (±1 day)Indeterminate4 Participants
Group 2: CaspofunginComparison of Mycological Eradication by VisitDay 30 (-2 days)Failure38 Participants
Group 2: CaspofunginComparison of Mycological Eradication by VisitDay 30 (-2 days)Indeterminate3 Participants
Group 2: CaspofunginComparison of Mycological Eradication by VisitEOT (≤2 days of last dose)Eradication63 Participants
Group 2: CaspofunginComparison of Mycological Eradication by VisitEOT (≤2 days of last dose)Failure29 Participants
Group 2: CaspofunginComparison of Mycological Eradication by VisitDay 30 (-2 days)Eradication53 Participants
Group 2: CaspofunginComparison of Mycological Eradication by VisitEOT (≤2 days of last dose)Indeterminate2 Participants
Secondary

Comparison of Radiological Response by Investigator by Visit

The number and percentage of subjects with invasive candidiasis (documented by radiologic/imaging evidence at baseline) in each treatment group who have a radiological response (as assessed by the Investigator) of cure, failure, and indeterminate in the mITT population. A radiological response of cure is indicative of an efficacious outcome and the desired result, whereas a response of failure is indicative of a non-efficacious outcome and the undesired response. Indeterminate responses indicate there was not enough data obtained to determine if the response was cure or failure. Definitions for the radiological responses of cure, failure, and indeterminate are complex. Detailed definitions for the possible responses to this outcome measure type are provided in Table 10 (Radiological Response) of the clinical protocol.

Time frame: Day 5, Day 14 (±1 day), Day 30 (-2 days), End of Treatment (EOT) (≤2 days of last dose), and Follow-up (Days 52-59)

Population: The modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) Population includes all subjects who had a documented Candida infection based on central laboratory evaluation of a blood culture or a culture from a normally sterile site obtained ≤4 days (96 hours) before randomization and received ≥1 dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Group 1: Rezafungin for InjectionComparison of Radiological Response by Investigator by VisitDay 30 (-2 days)Cure10 Participants
Group 1: Rezafungin for InjectionComparison of Radiological Response by Investigator by VisitEOT (≤2 days of last dose)Failure2 Participants
Group 1: Rezafungin for InjectionComparison of Radiological Response by Investigator by VisitDay 5Failure2 Participants
Group 1: Rezafungin for InjectionComparison of Radiological Response by Investigator by VisitEOT (≤2 days of last dose)Indeterminate5 Participants
Group 1: Rezafungin for InjectionComparison of Radiological Response by Investigator by VisitDay 30 (-2 days)Failure4 Participants
Group 1: Rezafungin for InjectionComparison of Radiological Response by Investigator by VisitFollow-up (Days 52-59)Cure12 Participants
Group 1: Rezafungin for InjectionComparison of Radiological Response by Investigator by VisitDay 14 (±1 day)Indeterminate4 Participants
Group 1: Rezafungin for InjectionComparison of Radiological Response by Investigator by VisitDay 14 (±1 day)Failure2 Participants
Group 1: Rezafungin for InjectionComparison of Radiological Response by Investigator by VisitDay 30 (-2 days)Indeterminate3 Participants
Group 1: Rezafungin for InjectionComparison of Radiological Response by Investigator by VisitDay 5Cure4 Participants
Group 1: Rezafungin for InjectionComparison of Radiological Response by Investigator by VisitFollow-up (Days 52-59)Failure3 Participants
Group 1: Rezafungin for InjectionComparison of Radiological Response by Investigator by VisitEOT (≤2 days of last dose)Cure9 Participants
Group 1: Rezafungin for InjectionComparison of Radiological Response by Investigator by VisitFollow-up (Days 52-59)Indeterminate2 Participants
Group 1: Rezafungin for InjectionComparison of Radiological Response by Investigator by VisitDay 5Indeterminate9 Participants
Group 1: Rezafungin for InjectionComparison of Radiological Response by Investigator by VisitDay 14 (±1 day)Cure11 Participants
Group 2: CaspofunginComparison of Radiological Response by Investigator by VisitDay 5Indeterminate9 Participants
Group 2: CaspofunginComparison of Radiological Response by Investigator by VisitDay 5Cure6 Participants
Group 2: CaspofunginComparison of Radiological Response by Investigator by VisitDay 5Failure2 Participants
Group 2: CaspofunginComparison of Radiological Response by Investigator by VisitFollow-up (Days 52-59)Indeterminate0 Participants
Group 2: CaspofunginComparison of Radiological Response by Investigator by VisitDay 14 (±1 day)Indeterminate1 Participants
Group 2: CaspofunginComparison of Radiological Response by Investigator by VisitDay 30 (-2 days)Cure11 Participants
Group 2: CaspofunginComparison of Radiological Response by Investigator by VisitDay 30 (-2 days)Failure6 Participants
Group 2: CaspofunginComparison of Radiological Response by Investigator by VisitDay 30 (-2 days)Indeterminate0 Participants
Group 2: CaspofunginComparison of Radiological Response by Investigator by VisitEOT (≤2 days of last dose)Cure11 Participants
Group 2: CaspofunginComparison of Radiological Response by Investigator by VisitEOT (≤2 days of last dose)Failure6 Participants
Group 2: CaspofunginComparison of Radiological Response by Investigator by VisitEOT (≤2 days of last dose)Indeterminate0 Participants
Group 2: CaspofunginComparison of Radiological Response by Investigator by VisitDay 14 (±1 day)Cure10 Participants
Group 2: CaspofunginComparison of Radiological Response by Investigator by VisitDay 14 (±1 day)Failure6 Participants
Group 2: CaspofunginComparison of Radiological Response by Investigator by VisitFollow-up (Days 52-59)Cure10 Participants
Group 2: CaspofunginComparison of Radiological Response by Investigator by VisitFollow-up (Days 52-59)Failure7 Participants
Secondary

Evaluate Pharmacokinetics (Cmax)

Evaluate the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) of rezafungin for injection.

Time frame: Day 1, 10 minutes before the end of infusion

Population: The Pharmacokinetic (PK) Population includes all subjects who received any amount of study drug and had at least one blood sample with measurable concentrations.~Note: Although blood samples were collected from all subjects receiving study drug, only PK samples from subjects receiving rezafungin for injection were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group 1: Rezafungin for InjectionEvaluate Pharmacokinetics (Cmax)24.18 micrograms/milliliterStandard Deviation 32.497
Secondary

Evaluate Pharmacokinetics (Cmin)

Evaluate the minimum plasma concentration (Cmin) of rezafungin for injection.

Time frame: Day 8, pre-dose, within 30 minutes prior to the start of infusion

Population: The Pharmacokinetic (PK) Population includes all subjects who received any amount of study drug and had at least one blood sample with measurable concentrations.~Note: Although blood samples were collected from all subjects receiving study drug, only PK samples from subjects receiving rezafungin for injection were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group 1: Rezafungin for InjectionEvaluate Pharmacokinetics (Cmin)2.94 micrograms/milliliterStandard Deviation 2.656
Secondary

Evaluate Pharmacokinetics (Cmin)

Evaluate the minimum plasma concentration (Cmin) of rezafungin for injection.

Time frame: Day 15, pre-dose, within 30 minutes prior to the start of infusion

Population: The Pharmacokinetic (PK) Population includes all subjects who received any amount of study drug and had at least one blood sample with measurable concentrations.~Note: Although blood samples were collected from all subjects receiving study drug, only PK samples from subjects receiving rezafungin for injection were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group 1: Rezafungin for InjectionEvaluate Pharmacokinetics (Cmin)2.81 micrograms/milliliterStandard Deviation 1.378
Secondary

Evaluate Pharmacokinetics (Cmin)

Evaluate the minimum plasma concentration (Cmin) of rezafungin for injection.

Time frame: Day 22, pre-dose, within 30 minutes prior to the start of infusion

Population: The Pharmacokinetic (PK) Population includes all subjects who received any amount of study drug and had at least one blood sample with measurable concentrations.~Note: Although blood samples were collected from all subjects receiving study drug, only PK samples from subjects receiving rezafungin for injection were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group 1: Rezafungin for InjectionEvaluate Pharmacokinetics (Cmin)3.74 micrograms/milliliterStandard Deviation 1.948
Secondary

Global Response as Assessed by Data Review Committee (US FDA Only)

The number and percentage of subjects in each treatment group who have a global response of cure (clinical cure as assessed by the Investigator, radiological cure \[for qualifying invasive candidiasis subjects at baseline\], and mycological eradication, as confirmed by the Data Review Committee \[DRC\]), failure and indeterminate in the mITT population. A global response of cure is indicative of an efficacious outcome and the desired result, whereas a response of failure is indicative of a non-efficacious outcome and the undesired response. Indeterminate responses indicate there was not enough data obtained to determine if the response was cure or failure. Definitions for the global responses of cure, failure, and indeterminate are complex. Detailed definitions for the possible responses to this outcome measure type are provided in Table 7 (Global Response) of the clinical protocol.

Time frame: Day 14 (±1 day)

Population: The modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) Population includes all subjects who had a documented Candida infection based on central laboratory evaluation of a blood culture or a culture from a normally sterile site obtained ≤4 days (96 hours) before randomization and received ≥1 dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Group 1: Rezafungin for InjectionGlobal Response as Assessed by Data Review Committee (US FDA Only)Cure55 Participants
Group 1: Rezafungin for InjectionGlobal Response as Assessed by Data Review Committee (US FDA Only)Failure28 Participants
Group 1: Rezafungin for InjectionGlobal Response as Assessed by Data Review Committee (US FDA Only)Indeterminate10 Participants
Group 2: CaspofunginGlobal Response as Assessed by Data Review Committee (US FDA Only)Cure57 Participants
Group 2: CaspofunginGlobal Response as Assessed by Data Review Committee (US FDA Only)Indeterminate8 Participants
Group 2: CaspofunginGlobal Response as Assessed by Data Review Committee (US FDA Only)Failure29 Participants
Secondary

Number of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability]

The number and percentage of subjects in each treatment group that experienced at least one treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) based on clinical chemistry, hematology and urine analysis laboratory test, vital sign, physical exams and electrocardiogram (ECG) abnormalities. Notes: A subject with multiple adverse events (AEs) was counted only once. TEAE was defined as an AE that occurred during or after study drug administration and up through the Follow-up visit. The maximum severity and strongest relationship were counted for subjects with multiple events.

Time frame: Day 1 through Follow-up Visit (Days 52-59)

Population: The Safety Population includes all subjects who received any amount of the study drug. Safety analyses were performed on the Safety Population. Subjects who received the wrong study drug for their entire course of study drug were analyzed in the treatment group based on the drug received. Subjects who received the wrong study drug for part of their course of study drug were analyzed in the treatment group based on majority of (i.e., most frequent) doses received.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Group 1: Rezafungin for InjectionNumber of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability]At least one TEAE leading to study discontinuation20 Participants
Group 1: Rezafungin for InjectionNumber of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability]At least one grade 4/5 TEAE36 Participants
Group 1: Rezafungin for InjectionNumber of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability]At least one study drug-related TEAE16 Participants
Group 1: Rezafungin for InjectionNumber of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability]At least one TEAE89 Participants
Group 1: Rezafungin for InjectionNumber of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability]At least one TEAE leading to discontinuation of study drug13 Participants
Group 1: Rezafungin for InjectionNumber of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability]At least one TEAE up through Day 768 Participants
Group 1: Rezafungin for InjectionNumber of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability]At least one TEAE leading to interruption of study drug3 Participants
Group 2: CaspofunginNumber of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability]At least one TEAE up through Day 761 Participants
Group 2: CaspofunginNumber of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability]At least one grade 4/5 TEAE37 Participants
Group 2: CaspofunginNumber of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability]At least one TEAE leading to interruption of study drug1 Participants
Group 2: CaspofunginNumber of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability]At least one TEAE leading to discontinuation of study drug11 Participants
Group 2: CaspofunginNumber of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability]At least one TEAE leading to study discontinuation17 Participants
Group 2: CaspofunginNumber of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability]At least one TEAE83 Participants
Group 2: CaspofunginNumber of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability]At least one study drug-related TEAE9 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 20, 2026