Skip to content

Dermacell ADM Without Basement Membrane

Randomized and Blinded Clinical Evaluation of Dermacell Without Basement Membrane in Breast Reconstruction.

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03667560
Enrollment
120
Registered
2018-09-12
Start date
2018-09-01
Completion date
2021-05-01
Last updated
2018-09-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breast Cancer

Keywords

Mastectomy, Breast Reconstruction, Acellular dermal matrix

Brief summary

DermACELL acellular dermal matrix (D-ADM) is the trade name of LifeNet Health's acellular dermal matrix (ADM). LifeNet Health will remove the basement membrane from the D-ADM and this product will be compared to FlexHD® Pliable, which does not include a basement membrane in order to demonstrate that D-ADM without a basement membrane is not inferior to FlexHD in the frequency of significant side effects that result from breast implants. This is a post market trial that is comparing two ADM products with a known safety profile. The D-ADM without a basement membrane is being prepared specifically for this UVA evaluation. Removal of the basement membrane by the manufacturer is considered minimal manipulation. D-ADM without a basement membrane will be considered a human cell, tissue, and cellular and tissue-based product (HCT/P) and is eligible for marketing immediately within the US, if desired by LifeNet Health (LNH). Additionally, the applications of the products are indicated. Therefore, the trial is not in support of an Investigational Device Exemption (IDE). Prior to surgery, the registered subject will be randomized to receive the D-ADM without the basement membrane or the comparator, FlexHD Pliable. The surgeon and the patient will be blinded to the product group. The patient will receive the ADM at the time of placement of the tissue expander. After a period of tissue expansion, the patient will have the expander-implant exchange. During this surgery, there will be 3 punch biopsies taken in 3 different locations: native breast tissue, center of the ADM, and the border of the ADM and subject's breast tissue. These specimens will be analyzed to estimate differences in immunologic and inflammatory response for each ADM product. The patient will follow up with the surgeon at 1-3 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, and 12 months post implant exchange. At these visits, the surgeon will assess for any adverse events and this information will be collected for research purposes. The patient will be asked to complete the reconstruction module of the Breast-Q at the baseline visit and 6 and 12 months to assess quality of life and patient satisfaction.

Interventions

PROCEDUREDermacell ADM without basement membrane

Patient will be implanted with Dermacell ADM.

PROCEDUREFlexHD

Patient will be implanted with FlexHD.

Sponsors

LifeNet Health
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
University of Virginia
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of breast cancer * Candidate for and decide to undergo implant-based reconstruction * Willing and able to provided written informed consent and comply with the study protocol.

Exclusion criteria

* Women planning to undergo radiation treatment or whose tumor characteristics of the mastectomy specimen dictate that post-op radiation will be required. * Women planning to undergo adjuvant chemotherapy. * Women who have had prior breast cancer treated with breast conservation therapy requiring radiation for the same breast being treated will be excluded. * Known sensitivity to either of the following antibiotics: lincomycin, gentamicin, polymyxin B, or vancomycin. * Women who have the presence of any condition that in the opinion of the investigator places the participant at undue risk or potentially jepordizes the quality of data to be generated.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Seroma Formation12 monthsDetermine severity of seroma formation with each arm by observing drainage output and if seroma requires significant surgical intervention.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Capsular Contracture12 monthsEstimate the degree of capsular contracture in participants in each study arm by using the Baker Scale. Grade I-The breast is soft and appears natural in size and shape. Grade II- The breast is slightly firm but appears normal Grade III- The breast is firm and appears abnormal Grade IV- the breast is hard, painful to the touch, and appears abnormal
Red breast syndrome12 monthsEstimate the frequency of red breast syndrome among participants on each arm
QOL12 monthsDetermine patient's quality of life and satisfaction with the reconstruction process. Assessment will be done with the standardized Breast-Q Reconstruction Module.
Infection12 monthsEstimate the frequency and degree of infection among patients on each study arm. Infections will be identified by the surgeon and determined to be major or minor. In addition to this, the need for IV s. oral antibiotics and/or further surgery will be used as a measure of degree of infection.
Histological AssessmentDay 1Estimate the differences in immunologic and inflammatory responses on each study arm by histological assessment of the capsular and ADM biopsies, including quantity of inflammatory cells, macrophages, and migration/differentiation of myelofibroblasts.

Countries

United States

Contacts

Primary ContactPatrick Cottler, PhD
psc5d@virginia.edu434-243-6899
Backup ContactDena Snyder, RN
ds6he@virginia.edu434-243-6899

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026