Skip to content

Prevalence of Stool Outlet Obstruction After Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexie

Prospective Cross-sectional Study on the Prevalence of Stool Outlet Obstruction After Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexie at the KSA

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03667521
Enrollment
55
Registered
2018-09-12
Start date
2015-08-31
Completion date
2018-03-31
Last updated
2018-09-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stool Outlet Obstruction

Brief summary

The aim was to evaluate the prevalence of stool outlet obstruction after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexie at the Kantonsspital Aarau in a prospective cross-sectional study. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy techniques involving the dissection of the presacral space can compromise fibers of the superior hypogastric plexus. This can contribute to postoperative problems such as incomplete voiding, defecatory dysfunction, pain, and sensory problems. In 2010, the Kantonsspital Aarau has implemented a new nerve-sparing laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy technique. This technique has subjectively reduced the prevalence of stool outlet obstructions but this has not been tested systematically yet. The aim of this study is therefore to compare the patients' subjective conditions between these two surgical techniques using the investigator's standard-of-care German pelvic floor questionnaire.

Detailed description

The (pre-) sacral space is characterized by a complex neuroanatomy and surgical intervention in this part of the body is often associated with the dissection of nerve bundels, a procedure which may finally lead to transient defecatory dysfunction. In a earlier study we could show that \ 17.8% of patient with laparoscopic sacrocolpopexie developed postoperative constipation within 3-6 months. In november 2010 the Frauenklinik Aarau introduced a novel, nerve-sparing technique of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexie. In this study we assess the pre-and postoperative differences in defecatory dysfunction between the two procedures trough the analysis of our standard of care pelvic floor questionnaire.

Interventions

PROCEDUREnerve-sparing laparaoscopic sacrocolpopexy

nerve-sparing laparaoscopic sacrocolpopexy implemented after 2010

Sponsors

Kantonsspital Aarau
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

* Women affected by symptomatic vault prolapse, who underwent laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy at the KSA * informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* participation in other studies * Sacrocolpopexie done by Da Vinci Roboter * Patients who had a conversion to laparotomy perioperatively * Patients with a recurrence who had to undergo a second surgery * Patients who had a relaps operation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
the number of de novo or worsened obstructed defecation2003-2017comparison of the number of de novo or worsened obstructed defecation of a cohort of patients who underwent nerve-sparing laparaoscopic sacrocolpopexy versus patients who underwent non-nerve-sparing laparaoscopic sacrocolpopexy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026