Skip to content

Evaluation of the Uses of a Digital-assisted Self-rehabilitation Device (TELE-PARK)

Evaluation of the Uses of a Digital-assisted Self-rehabilitation Device Coupled With a Tele-reeducative Follow-up in Patients With Parkinson's Disease on a Defined Health Area (TELE-PARK)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03667456
Acronym
TELE-PARK
Enrollment
31
Registered
2018-09-12
Start date
2018-06-11
Completion date
2020-06-26
Last updated
2020-07-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Parkinson Disease, Parkinson's Syndrome

Keywords

Parkinson, Serious Game, Self management, Rehabilitation, Telemedicine

Brief summary

Evaluate the use by the patient and his family and professional environment of a self-rehabilitation device with follow-up in tele-rehabilitation in people with Parkinson's disease taking into account the different actors within a health area (health professionals and paramedics in structure and in liberal).

Interventions

PROCEDURESelf-rehabilitation by digital support

Provision to patients selected by doctors or physiotherapists of an interactive digital tool (tablet + inertial sensor) to support self-rehabilitation home Parkinson's patients.

Sponsors

Réseau Parkinson Bretagne
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Rennes University Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Pôle Saint Hélier
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Patients: * Men and women over the age of 18 * With Parkinson's syndrome due to idiopathic Parkinson's disease or related syndromes * Presenting a complaint about balance and/or walking * With possible walking over a perimeter of at least 100 meters with or without technical aid * Hoehn and Yahr scale \< or = to 4 * Formulating their free and informed consent in writing. Health professionals: \- physiotherapists and physiatrists hospital or voluntary volunteers practicing in the territory of health 5 in Brittany agreeing to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

* Orthopedic and rheumatologic pathologies that may prevent the achievement of measures * Comprehension disorders preventing the implementation of the protocol

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
UTAUT Questionnaire12 monthsQuestionnaire of acceptability / acceptance of the tool and its use by professionals based on the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use Technology (UTAUT).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Observance12 monthsObservance of self-rehabilitation using tablet data at 2 months and 12 months: the tablet records the number of sessions performed, their duration, the number and type of exercises performed
SF3612 monthsThe 36-Item Short Form Health Survey is assessing the subjective quality of life of patients summarized in two component summary scores, the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS) scores. The SF-36 includes one multi-item scale that assesses eight health concepts. All questions are scored on a scale from 0 to 100, with 100 representing the highest level of functioning possible. Aggregate scores are compiled as a percentage of the total points possible, using the RAND scoring table. The scores from those questions that address each specific area of functional health status are then averaged together, for a final score within each of the 8 dimensions measured. Reliability is measured by Cronbach's alpha coefficient. Its value is less than or equal to 1. It is considered acceptable from 0.7.
Rosenberg SES12 monthsRosenberg's self-esteem scale (SES) assesses self-esteem. The questionnaire consists of 10 items of which 5 evaluate positive self-esteem and 5 negative self-esteem. The answer varies according to a four-point Likert-type scale from Strongly disagree (1) to Totally agree (4). A score between 10 and 40 is obtained. A score below 25 means very low self-esteem; a score between 25 and 31 means low self-esteem; a score between 31 and 34 means an average self-esteem; a score between 34 and 39 means a strong self-esteem; a score above 39 means a very strong self-esteem.
UTAUT Questionnaire12 monthsQuestionnaires for integrating the tool and its use at 12 months for professionals and patients / entourage
Performance indicators12 monthsAlternatives that would have been implemented to meet the difficulties of the liberal therapist with his patient, number of kilometers saved by telereducation
VAS Satisfaction12 monthsThe Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) allows a quick estimate of the level of satisfaction of patients by positioning themselves on a line whose extremities indicate the lowest level on the left (0) and the strongest on the right (10)
Zarit's Score12 monthsThe Zarit scale assesses the emotional, physical and financial burden for caregivers of caring for someone with a loss of autonomy. The 22-item grid allows an assessment of this burden, ranging from mild to moderate to severe. The total score (sum of the 22-item scores) ranges from 0 to 88. A score less than or equal to 20 indicates a low or no burden; a score between 21 and 40 indicates a light burden; a score between 41 and 60 indicates a moderate burden; a score above 60 indicates a severe burden

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026