Skip to content

Stoma Hernia Intraperitoneal Full-Thickness Skin

Full-thickness Skin vs. Synthetic Mesh in the Repair of Parastomal Hernia

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03667287
Acronym
SHIFT
Enrollment
90
Registered
2018-09-12
Start date
2018-01-23
Completion date
2025-12-31
Last updated
2019-05-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Parastomal Hernia

Brief summary

This is a prospective randomized study to compare surgical methods for the repair of parastomal hernia.

Detailed description

Parastomal hernia is a common complication to a stoma which can cause considerable suffering for the patient. The conventional methods of repair available today have disappointing results with high recurrence rates and serious complications. Some of the complications can be related to the introduction of foreign material into the abdominal wall. The investigators hypothesis is that the use of autologous full-thickness skin graft as reinforcement material can offer an alternative with fewer complications and recurrences. Patients with symptomatic parastomal hernia will be included in a prospective randomized multicenter study comparing reinforcement with conventional synthetic mesh (with the best available technique today), to full thickness skin grafts placed in an intraperitoneal position. The intervention will be blinded to the participants, nursing staff and the follow-up staff. The participants will be followed up at 3, 12 and 36 months monitoring complications, recurrences, quality of life, strength of the abdomino-lumbar girdle and calculations will be done on the health economics.

Interventions

PROCEDURERepair of parastomal hernia

Surgical repair of symptomatic parastomal hernia.

Sponsors

Umeå University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Colo-, ileo- or urostomy * Parastomal hernia diagnosed with intrastomal ultrasound and/or CT * Symptoms from the parastomal hernia requiring surgical intervention * Informed consent * \>18 years of age * Sufficient knowledge in the Swedish language so that questionnaires can be answered

Exclusion criteria

* Cognitive impairment unabling compliance to post-operative prescriptions and/or answering questionnaires * Insufficient amount of good quality skin suitable for transplantation * Expected high donor-site morbidity * Fistula/e adjacent to stoma * Mb Crohn

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rate of complications at 3 months3 month post-operative clinical follow-upComplications will be assessed over a 3 year period of regular follow-up by an objective surgeon who is unaware of which surgical method which was used. Eventual complications may include infection, bleeding, seroma and fistula formation.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain - VHPQ3, 12 and 36 months.All subjects will complete Ventral Hernia Pain Questionaire (VHPQ) to assess and compare pre- and postoperative pain.
QoL - EORTC CR293, 12 and 36 months.All subject will complete European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer questionnaire module for colorectal cancer (EORTC CR29) as a complement to EORTC C30, to assess and compare pre- and postoperative quality of life.
QoL - EORTC C303, 12 and 36 months.All subject will complete European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer core quality of life questionnaire (EORTC CR30) to assess and compare pre- and postoperative quality of life.
Recurrence3, 12 and 36 monthsParastomal hernia recurrence measured clinically, with stomal ultrasound and/or computerized tomography.
Health economics12 and 36 months.Cost-effectiveness of the separate procedures. The total cost of each method will be calculated from the hospital economic systems including duration of surgery, cost of operating time and equipment as well as duration and cost of anesthesia.
Rate of complications at 12 months12 month post-operative clinical follow-upComplications will be assessed over a 3 year period of regular follow-up by an objective surgeon who is unaware of which surgical method which was used. Eventual complications may include infection, bleeding, seroma and fistula formation.
Rate of complications at 36 months36 month post-operative clinical follow-upComplications will be assessed over a 3 year period of regular follow-up by an objective surgeon who is unaware of which surgical method which was used. Eventual complications may include infection, bleeding, seroma and fistula formation.
Abdominal strength12 and 36 months.Strength of the abdomino-lumbar girdle measured in Biodex-4.

Countries

Sweden

Contacts

Primary ContactViktor Holmdahl, MD
viktor.holmdahl@umu.se+4690 785 00 00

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 13, 2026