Skip to content

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Post-stroke Gait Rehab

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Post-stroke Gait Rehab

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03666533
Enrollment
44
Registered
2018-09-11
Start date
2018-09-13
Completion date
2024-03-29
Last updated
2025-09-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gait Impairment, Stroke

Keywords

Gait therapy, transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS), Neuroplasticity, walking ability, brain stimulation, virtual reality

Brief summary

Stroke affects upwards of 800,000 Americans every year and has an enormous impact on the well-being of the American Veteran population with 6,000 new stroke admissions every year. Many of these stroke survivors are living with walking disabilities. Gait problems result in inability to function independently, high risk of falls and poor quality of life. Unfortunately, current gait rehabilitation treatments are limited and many stroke survivors do not achieve full recovery. Therefore, it is critical to develop new approaches to enhance gait rehabilitation methods. The investigators propose to evaluate a brain stimulation treatment called transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) that can be added to physical therapy. tDCS has been applied for arm rehabilitation after stroke with positive results, but gait-related investigations are lacking. The investigators will test whether simultaneous tDCS and gait training produces greater improvement in walking abilities than gait training alone. Adjunct tDCS therapy may improve outcomes, and reduce cost of both rehabilitation and post-stroke care.

Detailed description

Current rehabilitation methods fail to restore normal gait for many stroke survivors leading to dependence on others, recurrent falls, limitations in community ambulation and poor quality of life. The main objective of this study is to test both efficacy and neurophysiological mechanisms of a novel approach to treat persistent gait deficits after stroke with a combination of simultaneous non-invasive brain stimulation with transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) and gait training. The investigators will enroll chronic stroke subjects (\>6 months) with gait deficits. Subjects will be randomized to 10 sessions of either active tDCS+gait training or sham tDCS+gait training. Gait training will be accomplished in the treadmill-based Virtual Reality environment targeting longer single limb stance with the paretic limb. The primary outcome measure will be both gait speed and single limb stance duration. Other outcome measures will assess various components of gait-related functional domains. The study will also characterize neuroplastic brain changes in response to bihemispheric tDCS combined with gait training based on corticospinal excitability using motor evoked potentials and functional connectivity using resting state functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (rs-fMRI).

Interventions

OTHERActive transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

Active tDCS is combined with gait therapy. Gait therapy includes gait task practice in Virtual Reality setting and overground gait therapy

OTHERSham transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

Sham tDCS is combined with gait therapy. Gait therapy includes gait task practice in Virtual Reality setting and overground gait therapy

Sponsors

VA Office of Research and Development
Lead SponsorFED

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Medically and psychologically stable and at least 6 months after first ever unilateral stroke * Cognition sufficiently intact to give valid informed consent to participate * FMLE score \>15; and ability to actively dorsiflex the paretic ankle in synergy (FMLE item II Flexor synergy-ankle dorsiflexion score 1). * Sufficient endurance to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

* Activity tolerance is insufficient to complete treadmill training * Inability to produce a trace contraction of ankle dorsiflexors in synergy * Normal ankle dorsiflexion/knee flexion on FMLE standing items (FMLE item IV score=4) * Stroke affecting both sides * Contraindications for rTMS according to the most recent TMS-use guidelines * Contraindications for MRI * Inability to understand English

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Gait Speed From Baseline (Meters/Second)baseline to post treatment (after 5 weeks of treatment)Gait speed will be calculated based on Ten Meter Walk Test

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline to Post Treatment on Timed up and go (Seconds)baseline to post treatment (after 5 weeks of treatment)Gait function measure where individuals rise from a chair, walk 3 meters, turn around and return to sitting in the chair
Change From Baseline to Post Treatment in Functional Gait Assessment (Points)baseline to post treatment (after 5 weeks of treatment)Functional gait measure where individuals walk under different conditions and are scored on a a 4 point scale for performance. 0-30 points; Higher score indicates better outcome
Change From Baseline to Post Treatment on Fugl Meyer Lower Limbbaseline to post treatment (after 5 weeks of treatment)Motor control measure for lower limb after stroke, items rated on a scale of 0-2. A higher score indicates better outcome. score range is 0-34 points.
Change From Baseline to Post Treatment on Gait Assessment and Intervention Toolbaseline to post treatment (after 5 weeks of treatment)Measure of gait coordination after stroke; lower score indicates better coordination; 0-62 points, with lower score indicating better outcome
Change in Asymmetry of Tibialis Anterior Muscle Motor Evoked Potentials From Baselinebaseline to after 5 weeks of treatmentMotor Evoked Potential (MEP) is a measure of corticospinal excitability using Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation. We collected maximum MEP from the paretic and non-paretic limbs. Asymmetry of paretic and non-paretic MEPs was calculated as follows: non-paretic minus paretic divided by a sum of paretic and non-paretic. It is expected that therapy reduces asymmetry caused by stroke. We report number of participants with reduced asymmetry of paretic and non-paretic tibialis anterior muscle Motor Evoked Potential.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Active tDCS
active tDCS plus gait training Active transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: Active tDCS is combined with gait therapy. Gait therapy includes gait task practice in Virtual Reality setting and overground gait therapy
21
Sham tDCS
sham tDCS plus gait training Sham transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: Sham tDCS is combined with gait therapy. Gait therapy includes gait task practice in Virtual Reality setting and overground gait therapy
23
Total44

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up22

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicActive tDCSSham tDCSTotal
Age, Continuous62.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.7
67.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.3
65.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
21 Participants23 Participants44 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
8 Participants4 Participants12 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
13 Participants19 Participants32 Participants
stroke type, Ischemic, n (count of participants)18 participants16 participants34 participants
years post stroke, mean (SD)4.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.4
4.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.9
4.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.2

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 210 / 23
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 210 / 23
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 210 / 23

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Gait Speed From Baseline (Meters/Second)

Gait speed will be calculated based on Ten Meter Walk Test

Time frame: baseline to post treatment (after 5 weeks of treatment)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active tDCSChange in Gait Speed From Baseline (Meters/Second)0.16 meters/secondStandard Deviation 0.183
Sham tDCSChange in Gait Speed From Baseline (Meters/Second)0.12 meters/secondStandard Deviation 0.141
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Post Treatment in Functional Gait Assessment (Points)

Functional gait measure where individuals walk under different conditions and are scored on a a 4 point scale for performance. 0-30 points; Higher score indicates better outcome

Time frame: baseline to post treatment (after 5 weeks of treatment)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active tDCSChange From Baseline to Post Treatment in Functional Gait Assessment (Points)2.79 pointsStandard Deviation 3.047
Sham tDCSChange From Baseline to Post Treatment in Functional Gait Assessment (Points)2.38 pointsStandard Deviation 1.717
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Post Treatment on Fugl Meyer Lower Limb

Motor control measure for lower limb after stroke, items rated on a scale of 0-2. A higher score indicates better outcome. score range is 0-34 points.

Time frame: baseline to post treatment (after 5 weeks of treatment)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active tDCSChange From Baseline to Post Treatment on Fugl Meyer Lower Limb2.26 pointsStandard Deviation 1.996
Sham tDCSChange From Baseline to Post Treatment on Fugl Meyer Lower Limb2.62 pointsStandard Deviation 2.334
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Post Treatment on Gait Assessment and Intervention Tool

Measure of gait coordination after stroke; lower score indicates better coordination; 0-62 points, with lower score indicating better outcome

Time frame: baseline to post treatment (after 5 weeks of treatment)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active tDCSChange From Baseline to Post Treatment on Gait Assessment and Intervention Tool-2.42 pointsStandard Deviation 2.219
Sham tDCSChange From Baseline to Post Treatment on Gait Assessment and Intervention Tool-2.86 pointsStandard Deviation 2.78
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Post Treatment on Timed up and go (Seconds)

Gait function measure where individuals rise from a chair, walk 3 meters, turn around and return to sitting in the chair

Time frame: baseline to post treatment (after 5 weeks of treatment)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active tDCSChange From Baseline to Post Treatment on Timed up and go (Seconds)-6.93 secondsStandard Deviation 16.957
Sham tDCSChange From Baseline to Post Treatment on Timed up and go (Seconds)-5.7 secondsStandard Deviation 8.314
Secondary

Change in Asymmetry of Tibialis Anterior Muscle Motor Evoked Potentials From Baseline

Motor Evoked Potential (MEP) is a measure of corticospinal excitability using Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation. We collected maximum MEP from the paretic and non-paretic limbs. Asymmetry of paretic and non-paretic MEPs was calculated as follows: non-paretic minus paretic divided by a sum of paretic and non-paretic. It is expected that therapy reduces asymmetry caused by stroke. We report number of participants with reduced asymmetry of paretic and non-paretic tibialis anterior muscle Motor Evoked Potential.

Time frame: baseline to after 5 weeks of treatment

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Active tDCSChange in Asymmetry of Tibialis Anterior Muscle Motor Evoked Potentials From Baseline9 Participants
Sham tDCSChange in Asymmetry of Tibialis Anterior Muscle Motor Evoked Potentials From Baseline8 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026