Implant Site Reaction
Conditions
Brief summary
Immediate implant placement with immediate professionalization in the maxillary esthetic zone using mixture of allograft and xenograft vs xenografts to augment the jumping gap
Detailed description
Implant placement in fresh extraction sockets in conjunction with appropriate guided bone regeneration has many benefits, which ultimately affect the total treatment plan. The immediate placement of implants provides significant advantages, including fewer surgical procedures, shorter treatment time, and improved esthetics. The goals of osseous replacement are maintenance of contour, elimination of dead space, and reduce postoperative infection, provide good support for dental implant and enhance bony and soft tissue healing. allograft bone has gold standard over other augment techniques including favorable bone quality and minimal bone resorption.
Interventions
OTHERimmediate implant using mixed allograft and xenograft
immediate implant using mixed allograft and xenograft in anterior area to fill jumping area
Sponsors
Cairo University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Intervention model description
jumping gap area in aesthetic area
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* Adult patients with badly broken teeth in upper esthetic zone indicated for extraction, presence of at least 4 mm of bone beyond the root apex to guarantee implant primary stability, implant placement within the alveoli confines. * Both sexes. * No intraoral soft and hard tissue pathology. * No systemic condition that contraindicate implant placement.
Exclusion criteria
* Presence of fenestrations or dehiscence of the residual bony Walls after extraction. * Heavy smokers more than 20 cigarettes per day .(24) * Patients with systemic disease that may affect normal healing. * Psychiatric problems * Disorders to implant are related to history of radiation therapy to the head and neck neoplasia, or bone augmentation to implant site.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Crestal bone loss | 1 year | Will be measured using calliper with scale(1-10mm) for evaluation of crestal bone loss around implant which are the lower values represent a better outcome. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Patient satisfaction | 1 year | Will be measured using a satisfaction table chart which divided in 4 paraments with scale from 1-4 include( pain-infection-radiography-successful implant ),the number represent (4 excellent-3 very good -2 good-1 bad) |
Countries
Kuwait
Contacts
Primary Contactmohamed hammad, BDS
Outcome results
None listed