Skip to content

Dysport in Post-Surgical Neuralgia

A Double-blind, Randomised, Placebo Controlled, Proof-of-concept Study in Subjects With Abdominal or Thoracic Chronic Scar Pain to Assess the Analgesic Properties of Intradermal Doses of Dysport®

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03663101
Acronym
PMOD03
Enrollment
16
Registered
2018-09-10
Start date
2018-10-30
Completion date
2019-11-08
Last updated
2021-01-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Scar Pain

Brief summary

The study is designed to determine whether a currently licensed version of botulinum toxin (Dysport®) is effective for the treatment of pain that has developed and/or persisted for months or years around the scar of a previous surgical site, and whether this condition could be suitable for the testing of similar new medicines. The study will compare three different doses of Dysport® to see if there is benefit and/or a best dose for treating persistent post-surgery scar pain.

Interventions

DRUGLidocaine

0.5 mL (2.5 mg) of lidocaine per injection point will be injected subcutaneously (maximum 10 injection points).

BIOLOGICALBotulinum toxin type A

0.2 mL of one of three different doses of Dysport per injection point will be injected intradermally (maximum 10 injection points).

DRUGPlacebo

Part A - 0.5 mL of sodium chloride solution 0.9% (saline solution) per injection point will be injected subcutaneously (maximum 10 injection points).

Sponsors

Ipsen
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male and female subjects aged between 18 and 75 years inclusive at the time of giving informed consent. * Subjects suffering from an area of chronic pain post-abdominal or thoracic surgery, chronic abdominal or thoracic scar pain. * Longitudinal axis of the pain area of 10 cm long maximum (as mapped upon screening). * Subjects with moderate to severe pain, i.e. spontaneous NRS score of 4-8 which has been stable for the previous month before screening. * Stable use of analgesics (or any medication impacting pain perception) during the month before screening and expected to be stable for the study duration. * Under stable medication regimen for other medication, i.e. during the month before screening. * Time from surgery which caused the painful scar more than six months and less than ten years at screening. * No other distracting pain either chronic or acute. * Female subjects of childbearing potential must have a negative urine pregnancy test result and be willing to use reliable contraceptive measures throughout study participation. * The subject's primary care physician has provided evidence which can be used to confirm that within the last 12 months of dosing that there is nothing in their medical history that would preclude their enrolment into a clinical study.

Exclusion criteria

* Previous treatment with Botulinum neurotoxin (BTX) (any serotype) during the past six months before screening. * History of hypersensitivity to any of the components of the Dysport formulation (which includes human serum albumin and lactose) or allergy to cow's milk protein. * Known hypersensitivity to lidocaine or other anaesthetics of the amide type, known hypersensitivity to hydroxybenzoates, complete heart block, hypovolaemia. * Any medical condition that may put the subject at risk with exposure to BTX, including diagnosed myasthenia gravis, Eaton-Lambert syndrome, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, or any other disease that might interfere with neuromuscular function. * Opioid analgesic use at a Morphine Equivalent Dosage (MED) of \>75mg per day. * Neuroma in the scar pain area, diagnosed per ultrasound. * Use of agents that could interfere with neuromuscular transmission, including calcium channel blockers, penicillamine, aminoglycosides, lincosamides, polymixins, magnesium sulphate, anticholinesterases, succinylcholine and quinidine. * Need of any prohibited medication. * Any abnormal laboratory value, physical examination, vital signs, or electrocardiogram (ECG) that, in the opinion of the investigator, is clinically significant and that would compromise the safety of the subject in the study. * Positive for hepatitis B antigen or hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid, positive results for human immunodeficiency virus, or who receives diagnosis for acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. * Positive urine screen for drugs of abuse (except for cotinine and unless explained by the investigator for therapeutic use of medication) or any history of drug or alcohol abuse, misuse, physical or psychological dependence, mood changes, sleep disturbance and functional capacity which have an impact on pain perception. * Significant neurological or psychiatric disorders including mental instability (unrelated to the pain) that could interfere with pain assessments; other pre-existing pain syndromes, acute or chronic, that might impair the assessment of the scar pain. * Any medical history of significance and/or inadequately controlled such as cardiovascular (e.g. uncontrolled high blood pressure, high risk of cardiovascular events, severe heart failure), pulmonary (e.g. uncontrolled asthma or emphysema), haematologic, (e.g. coagulopathy/bleeding disorders), neurological (e.g. swallowing problems, blurred or double vision, trouble saying words clearly (dysarthria), hoarseness or change or loss of voice (dysphonia)), liver disease (e.g. severe hepatic impairment), kidney disease (e.g. impaired renal function in subjects taking diuretics, angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE)-inhibitors, or angiotensin II antagonists), endocrine, immunologic, dermatologic painful conditions or any other conditions that may compromise in the opinion of the investigator the ability of the subject to participate in the study. * Subjects who participated in a clinical research study involving a new chemical entity or an experimental drug within 30 days before screening.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to Onset of Effect in the Spontaneous Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) ScorePart B: From baseline (defined as mean of all predose data from Day -7 and including predose on Day 1) up to end of study (Week 16) or early discontinuation.The time to onset of effect was defined as the time to a decrease from baseline of two points or greater in the spontaneous NRS score. Pain intensity was scored using an 11-point NRS score ranging from 0 to 10, where 0= no pain and 10= worst possible pain. Participants were provided with an Actiwatch® during an Actiwatch® training visit to record their spontaneous NRS scores at home. The Actiwatch® alerted the participants twice a day to record their average and maximal NRS scores over the preceding 12 hours. The questions were asked of the participants by the Actiwatch®: Please rate your pain by selecting the one number that best describes your pain on average during the last 12 hours. and Please rate your pain by selecting the one number that best describes your pain at its worst during the last 12 hours. Only descriptive statistical analysis was performed for this outcome measure.
Peak Effect in the Spontaneous NRS ScorePart B: From baseline (defined as mean of all predose data from Day -7 and including predose on Day 1) up to end of study (Week 16) or early discontinuation.The peak effect was defined as the maximal decrease from baseline in the spontaneous NRS score over a 12-hour period. Pain intensity was scored using an 11-point NRS score ranging from 0 to 10, where 0= no pain and 10= worst possible pain. Participants were provided with an Actiwatch® during an Actiwatch® training visit to record their spontaneous NRS scores at home. The Actiwatch® alerted the participants twice a day to record their average and maximal NRS scores over the preceding 12 hours. The questions were asked of the participants by the Actiwatch®: Please rate your pain by selecting the one number that best describes your pain on average during the last 12 hours. and Please rate your pain by selecting the one number that best describes your pain at its worst during the last 12 hours. Greater reductions in change from baseline correspond to greater pain relief.
Time to Peak Effect in the Spontaneous NRS ScorePart B: From baseline (defined as mean of all predose data from Day -7 and including predose on Day 1) up to end of study (Week 16) or early discontinuation.The time to peak effect was defined as the time to reach the peak effect over a 12-hour period. Pain intensity was scored using an 11-point NRS score ranging from 0 to 10, where 0= no pain and 10= worst possible pain. Participants were provided with an Actiwatch® during an Actiwatch® training visit to record their spontaneous NRS scores at home. The Actiwatch® alerted the participants twice a day to record their average and maximal NRS scores over the preceding 12 hours. The questions were asked of the participants by the Actiwatch®: Please rate your pain by selecting the one number that best describes your pain on average during the last 12 hours. and Please rate your pain by selecting the one number that best describes your pain at its worst during the last 12 hours.
Duration of Effect in the Spontaneous NRS ScorePart B: From baseline (defined as mean of all predose data from Day -7 and including predose on Day 1) up to end of study (Week 16) or early discontinuation.The duration of effect was defined as the duration between time to onset and last timepoint for which decrease from baseline in the spontaneous NRS score was two points or greater. Pain intensity was scored using an 11-point NRS score ranging from 0 to 10, where 0= no pain and 10= worst possible pain. Participants were provided with an Actiwatch® during an Actiwatch® training visit to record their spontaneous NRS scores at home. The Actiwatch® alerted the participants twice a day to record their average and maximal NRS scores over the preceding 12 hours. The questions were asked of the participants by the Actiwatch®: Please rate your pain by selecting the one number that best describes your pain on average during the last 12 hours. and Please rate your pain by selecting the one number that best describes your pain at its worst during the last 12 hours.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in the Spontaneous NRS Score Throughout the StudyPart B: From baseline (defined as mean of all predose data from Day -7 and including predose on Day 1) up to end of study (Week 16) or early discontinuation.Pain intensity was scored using an 11-point NRS score ranging from 0 to 10, where 0= no pain and 10= worst possible pain. Participants were provided with an Actiwatch® during an Actiwatch® training visit to record their spontaneous NRS scores at home. The Actiwatch® alerted the participants twice a day to record their average and maximal NRS scores over the preceding 12 hours. The questions were asked of the participants by the Actiwatch®: Please rate your pain by selecting the one number that best describes your pain on average during the last 12 hours. and Please rate your pain by selecting the one number that best describes your pain at its worst during the last 12 hours. Greater reductions in change from baseline correspond to greater pain relief.
Change From Baseline in the Stimulus-Evoked NRS Score on the Painful Area at Weeks 6 and 12Part B: Baseline (defined as mean of all predose data from Day -7 and including predose on Day 1) and Weeks 6 and 12For stimulus-evoked NRS score during Quantitative Sensory Testing, participants were submitted to stimuli of various nature (light touch, pressure and temperature) applied to the painful area. Pain intensity was scored using an 11-point NRS score ranging from 0 to 10, where 0= no pain and 10= worst possible pain. Static mechanical allodynia is the response to light sustained normally innocuous pressure against the skin. Dynamic mechanical allodynia is the response to a normally innocuous light moving mechanical stimulus on the skin. Temporal summation is a condition, which demonstrates an increased perception of pain to repetitive painful stimuli.

Countries

United Kingdom

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This Phase II proof-of-concept study was conducted at single investigational site in the United Kingdom between 30 October 2018 and 08 November 2019. The study consisted of two sequential parts: Part A (Pre-randomisation run-in period) and Part B (Randomised double-blind period). Part A was considered as an extended screening period.

Pre-assignment details

Part A was conducted to identify participants who would potentially benefit from Dysport® injection, considered as 'responders'. Part B was a double-blind study of Dysport or placebo injection in responders from Part A. Of the 46 participants who were included in Part A, 17 were responders. Of which, 16 participants were randomised into Part B of the study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Participants received a single dose of placebo (matching with Dysport) intradermal injection per injection point (maximum of 10 injection points) on Day 1. Injections were performed under a constant volume of 0.2 mL.
4
Dysport 2.5 U/Injection Site
Participants received a single dose of Dysport 2.5 U intradermal injection per injection point (maximum of 10 injection points) on Day 1. The maximal total dose was 25 U. Injections were performed under a constant volume of 0.2 mL.
3
Dysport 10 U/Injection Site
Participants received a single dose of Dysport 10 U intradermal injection per injection point (maximum of 10 injection points) on Day 1. The maximal total dose was 100 U. Injections were performed under a constant volume of 0.2 mL.
5
Dysport 20 U/Injection Site
Participants received a single dose of Dysport 20 U intradermal injection per injection point (maximum of 10 injection points) on Day 1. The maximal total dose was 200 U. Injections were performed under a constant volume of 0.2 mL.
4
Total16

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboTotalDysport 20 U/Injection SiteDysport 10 U/Injection SiteDysport 2.5 U/Injection Site
Age, Continuous56.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.7
50.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.6
48.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.7
46.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.3
49.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants4 Participants1 Participants3 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
4 Participants12 Participants3 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
3 Participants11 Participants2 Participants3 Participants3 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
1 Participants5 Participants2 Participants2 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 40 / 30 / 50 / 4
other
Total, other adverse events
3 / 43 / 34 / 54 / 4
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 41 / 30 / 50 / 4

Outcome results

Primary

Duration of Effect in the Spontaneous NRS Score

The duration of effect was defined as the duration between time to onset and last timepoint for which decrease from baseline in the spontaneous NRS score was two points or greater. Pain intensity was scored using an 11-point NRS score ranging from 0 to 10, where 0= no pain and 10= worst possible pain. Participants were provided with an Actiwatch® during an Actiwatch® training visit to record their spontaneous NRS scores at home. The Actiwatch® alerted the participants twice a day to record their average and maximal NRS scores over the preceding 12 hours. The questions were asked of the participants by the Actiwatch®: Please rate your pain by selecting the one number that best describes your pain on average during the last 12 hours. and Please rate your pain by selecting the one number that best describes your pain at its worst during the last 12 hours.

Time frame: Part B: From baseline (defined as mean of all predose data from Day -7 and including predose on Day 1) up to end of study (Week 16) or early discontinuation.

Population: Randomised population included all participants randomised in the double-blind period (Part B). Only participants who reached the time to onset were analysed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboDuration of Effect in the Spontaneous NRS ScoreWorst NRS score86.04 daysStandard Deviation 25.52
PlaceboDuration of Effect in the Spontaneous NRS ScoreAverage NRS score53.53 daysStandard Deviation 51.44
Dysport 2.5 U/Injection SiteDuration of Effect in the Spontaneous NRS ScoreAverage NRS score65.17 daysStandard Deviation 58.21
Dysport 2.5 U/Injection SiteDuration of Effect in the Spontaneous NRS ScoreWorst NRS score86.68 daysStandard Deviation 23.89
Dysport 10 U/Injection SiteDuration of Effect in the Spontaneous NRS ScoreWorst NRS score66.80 daysStandard Deviation 44.28
Dysport 10 U/Injection SiteDuration of Effect in the Spontaneous NRS ScoreAverage NRS score102.75 daysStandard Deviation 18.36
Dysport 20 U/Injection SiteDuration of Effect in the Spontaneous NRS ScoreWorst NRS score110.52 daysStandard Deviation 0.74
Dysport 20 U/Injection SiteDuration of Effect in the Spontaneous NRS ScoreAverage NRS score110.02 daysStandard Deviation 1.45
Primary

Peak Effect in the Spontaneous NRS Score

The peak effect was defined as the maximal decrease from baseline in the spontaneous NRS score over a 12-hour period. Pain intensity was scored using an 11-point NRS score ranging from 0 to 10, where 0= no pain and 10= worst possible pain. Participants were provided with an Actiwatch® during an Actiwatch® training visit to record their spontaneous NRS scores at home. The Actiwatch® alerted the participants twice a day to record their average and maximal NRS scores over the preceding 12 hours. The questions were asked of the participants by the Actiwatch®: Please rate your pain by selecting the one number that best describes your pain on average during the last 12 hours. and Please rate your pain by selecting the one number that best describes your pain at its worst during the last 12 hours. Greater reductions in change from baseline correspond to greater pain relief.

Time frame: Part B: From baseline (defined as mean of all predose data from Day -7 and including predose on Day 1) up to end of study (Week 16) or early discontinuation.

Population: Randomised population included all participants randomised in the double-blind period (Part B).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPeak Effect in the Spontaneous NRS ScoreWorst NRS score-2.36 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.58
PlaceboPeak Effect in the Spontaneous NRS ScoreAverage NRS score-2.52 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.91
Dysport 2.5 U/Injection SitePeak Effect in the Spontaneous NRS ScoreAverage NRS score-3.53 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.45
Dysport 2.5 U/Injection SitePeak Effect in the Spontaneous NRS ScoreWorst NRS score-4.73 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.55
Dysport 10 U/Injection SitePeak Effect in the Spontaneous NRS ScoreWorst NRS score-3.54 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.15
Dysport 10 U/Injection SitePeak Effect in the Spontaneous NRS ScoreAverage NRS score-3.72 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.57
Dysport 20 U/Injection SitePeak Effect in the Spontaneous NRS ScoreWorst NRS score-2.82 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.91
Dysport 20 U/Injection SitePeak Effect in the Spontaneous NRS ScoreAverage NRS score-2.12 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.37
Primary

Time to Onset of Effect in the Spontaneous Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score

The time to onset of effect was defined as the time to a decrease from baseline of two points or greater in the spontaneous NRS score. Pain intensity was scored using an 11-point NRS score ranging from 0 to 10, where 0= no pain and 10= worst possible pain. Participants were provided with an Actiwatch® during an Actiwatch® training visit to record their spontaneous NRS scores at home. The Actiwatch® alerted the participants twice a day to record their average and maximal NRS scores over the preceding 12 hours. The questions were asked of the participants by the Actiwatch®: Please rate your pain by selecting the one number that best describes your pain on average during the last 12 hours. and Please rate your pain by selecting the one number that best describes your pain at its worst during the last 12 hours. Only descriptive statistical analysis was performed for this outcome measure.

Time frame: Part B: From baseline (defined as mean of all predose data from Day -7 and including predose on Day 1) up to end of study (Week 16) or early discontinuation.

Population: Randomised population included all participants randomised in the double-blind period (Part B). Only participants who reached the time to onset were analysed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboTime to Onset of Effect in the Spontaneous Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) ScoreWorst NRS score4.41 daysStandard Deviation 4.92
PlaceboTime to Onset of Effect in the Spontaneous Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) ScoreAverage NRS score6.75 daysStandard Deviation 2.74
Dysport 2.5 U/Injection SiteTime to Onset of Effect in the Spontaneous Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) ScoreAverage NRS score31.63 daysStandard Deviation 53.78
Dysport 2.5 U/Injection SiteTime to Onset of Effect in the Spontaneous Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) ScoreWorst NRS score15.11 daysStandard Deviation 25.17
Dysport 10 U/Injection SiteTime to Onset of Effect in the Spontaneous Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) ScoreWorst NRS score29.45 daysStandard Deviation 39.82
Dysport 10 U/Injection SiteTime to Onset of Effect in the Spontaneous Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) ScoreAverage NRS score4.60 daysStandard Deviation 6.55
Dysport 20 U/Injection SiteTime to Onset of Effect in the Spontaneous Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) ScoreWorst NRS score0.65 daysStandard Deviation 0.32
Dysport 20 U/Injection SiteTime to Onset of Effect in the Spontaneous Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) ScoreAverage NRS score0.90 daysStandard Deviation 0.03
Primary

Time to Peak Effect in the Spontaneous NRS Score

The time to peak effect was defined as the time to reach the peak effect over a 12-hour period. Pain intensity was scored using an 11-point NRS score ranging from 0 to 10, where 0= no pain and 10= worst possible pain. Participants were provided with an Actiwatch® during an Actiwatch® training visit to record their spontaneous NRS scores at home. The Actiwatch® alerted the participants twice a day to record their average and maximal NRS scores over the preceding 12 hours. The questions were asked of the participants by the Actiwatch®: Please rate your pain by selecting the one number that best describes your pain on average during the last 12 hours. and Please rate your pain by selecting the one number that best describes your pain at its worst during the last 12 hours.

Time frame: Part B: From baseline (defined as mean of all predose data from Day -7 and including predose on Day 1) up to end of study (Week 16) or early discontinuation.

Population: Randomised population included all participants randomised in the double-blind period (Part B).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboTime to Peak Effect in the Spontaneous NRS ScoreWorst NRS score10.63 daysStandard Deviation 10.18
PlaceboTime to Peak Effect in the Spontaneous NRS ScoreAverage NRS score12.51 daysStandard Deviation 7.26
Dysport 2.5 U/Injection SiteTime to Peak Effect in the Spontaneous NRS ScoreAverage NRS score33.13 daysStandard Deviation 52.51
Dysport 2.5 U/Injection SiteTime to Peak Effect in the Spontaneous NRS ScoreWorst NRS score33.46 daysStandard Deviation 51.41
Dysport 10 U/Injection SiteTime to Peak Effect in the Spontaneous NRS ScoreWorst NRS score41.94 daysStandard Deviation 35.72
Dysport 10 U/Injection SiteTime to Peak Effect in the Spontaneous NRS ScoreAverage NRS score11.04 daysStandard Deviation 11.58
Dysport 20 U/Injection SiteTime to Peak Effect in the Spontaneous NRS ScoreWorst NRS score3.11 daysStandard Deviation 1.56
Dysport 20 U/Injection SiteTime to Peak Effect in the Spontaneous NRS ScoreAverage NRS score26.49 daysStandard Deviation 49.89
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Spontaneous NRS Score Throughout the Study

Pain intensity was scored using an 11-point NRS score ranging from 0 to 10, where 0= no pain and 10= worst possible pain. Participants were provided with an Actiwatch® during an Actiwatch® training visit to record their spontaneous NRS scores at home. The Actiwatch® alerted the participants twice a day to record their average and maximal NRS scores over the preceding 12 hours. The questions were asked of the participants by the Actiwatch®: Please rate your pain by selecting the one number that best describes your pain on average during the last 12 hours. and Please rate your pain by selecting the one number that best describes your pain at its worst during the last 12 hours. Greater reductions in change from baseline correspond to greater pain relief.

Time frame: Part B: From baseline (defined as mean of all predose data from Day -7 and including predose on Day 1) up to end of study (Week 16) or early discontinuation.

Population: Randomised population included all participants randomised in the double-blind period (Part B).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Spontaneous NRS Score Throughout the StudyDaily worst NRS score: Baseline5.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Spontaneous NRS Score Throughout the StudyDaily average NRS score: Week 6-1.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Spontaneous NRS Score Throughout the StudyDaily worst NRS score: Week 2-0.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Spontaneous NRS Score Throughout the StudyDaily average NRS score: Week 2-0.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Spontaneous NRS Score Throughout the StudyDaily worst NRS score: Week 4-1.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.8
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Spontaneous NRS Score Throughout the StudyDaily average NRS score: Baseline4.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Spontaneous NRS Score Throughout the StudyDaily worst NRS score: Week 16-0.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Spontaneous NRS Score Throughout the StudyDaily average NRS score: Week 4-1.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.9
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Spontaneous NRS Score Throughout the StudyDaily average NRS score: Week 12-0.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.6
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Spontaneous NRS Score Throughout the StudyDaily worst NRS score: Week 12-0.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.4
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Spontaneous NRS Score Throughout the StudyDaily average NRS score: Week 16-0.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.5
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Spontaneous NRS Score Throughout the StudyDaily worst NRS score: Week 6-1.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Dysport 2.5 U/Injection SiteChange From Baseline in the Spontaneous NRS Score Throughout the StudyDaily worst NRS score: Week 16-1.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
Dysport 2.5 U/Injection SiteChange From Baseline in the Spontaneous NRS Score Throughout the StudyDaily worst NRS score: Baseline5.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Dysport 2.5 U/Injection SiteChange From Baseline in the Spontaneous NRS Score Throughout the StudyDaily worst NRS score: Week 6-0.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Dysport 2.5 U/Injection SiteChange From Baseline in the Spontaneous NRS Score Throughout the StudyDaily worst NRS score: Week 4-2.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.8
Dysport 2.5 U/Injection SiteChange From Baseline in the Spontaneous NRS Score Throughout the StudyDaily average NRS score: Week 4-1.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
Dysport 2.5 U/Injection SiteChange From Baseline in the Spontaneous NRS Score Throughout the StudyDaily worst NRS score: Week 2-2.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.1
Dysport 2.5 U/Injection SiteChange From Baseline in the Spontaneous NRS Score Throughout the StudyDaily average NRS score: Baseline3.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Dysport 2.5 U/Injection SiteChange From Baseline in the Spontaneous NRS Score Throughout the StudyDaily worst NRS score: Week 12-1.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
Dysport 2.5 U/Injection SiteChange From Baseline in the Spontaneous NRS Score Throughout the StudyDaily average NRS score: Week 2-2.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.8
Dysport 2.5 U/Injection SiteChange From Baseline in the Spontaneous NRS Score Throughout the StudyDaily average NRS score: Week 6-0.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2
Dysport 2.5 U/Injection SiteChange From Baseline in the Spontaneous NRS Score Throughout the StudyDaily average NRS score: Week 12-1.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
Dysport 2.5 U/Injection SiteChange From Baseline in the Spontaneous NRS Score Throughout the StudyDaily average NRS score: Week 16-0.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
Dysport 10 U/Injection SiteChange From Baseline in the Spontaneous NRS Score Throughout the StudyDaily average NRS score: Week 4-2.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.2
Dysport 10 U/Injection SiteChange From Baseline in the Spontaneous NRS Score Throughout the StudyDaily worst NRS score: Week 16-1.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.1
Dysport 10 U/Injection SiteChange From Baseline in the Spontaneous NRS Score Throughout the StudyDaily average NRS score: Baseline4.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.2
Dysport 10 U/Injection SiteChange From Baseline in the Spontaneous NRS Score Throughout the StudyDaily average NRS score: Week 2-2.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.8
Dysport 10 U/Injection SiteChange From Baseline in the Spontaneous NRS Score Throughout the StudyDaily average NRS score: Week 6-2.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6
Dysport 10 U/Injection SiteChange From Baseline in the Spontaneous NRS Score Throughout the StudyDaily average NRS score: Week 16-1.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.3
Dysport 10 U/Injection SiteChange From Baseline in the Spontaneous NRS Score Throughout the StudyDaily worst NRS score: Baseline5.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.6
Dysport 10 U/Injection SiteChange From Baseline in the Spontaneous NRS Score Throughout the StudyDaily worst NRS score: Week 2-1.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.5
Dysport 10 U/Injection SiteChange From Baseline in the Spontaneous NRS Score Throughout the StudyDaily worst NRS score: Week 4-1.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.2
Dysport 10 U/Injection SiteChange From Baseline in the Spontaneous NRS Score Throughout the StudyDaily worst NRS score: Week 6-1.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.9
Dysport 10 U/Injection SiteChange From Baseline in the Spontaneous NRS Score Throughout the StudyDaily worst NRS score: Week 12-0.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
Dysport 10 U/Injection SiteChange From Baseline in the Spontaneous NRS Score Throughout the StudyDaily average NRS score: Week 12-1.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.9
Dysport 20 U/Injection SiteChange From Baseline in the Spontaneous NRS Score Throughout the StudyDaily average NRS score: Week 4-1.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2
Dysport 20 U/Injection SiteChange From Baseline in the Spontaneous NRS Score Throughout the StudyDaily worst NRS score: Week 16-0.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.7
Dysport 20 U/Injection SiteChange From Baseline in the Spontaneous NRS Score Throughout the StudyDaily worst NRS score: Week 6-1.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6
Dysport 20 U/Injection SiteChange From Baseline in the Spontaneous NRS Score Throughout the StudyDaily average NRS score: Week 12-0.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5
Dysport 20 U/Injection SiteChange From Baseline in the Spontaneous NRS Score Throughout the StudyDaily average NRS score: Week 6-1.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2
Dysport 20 U/Injection SiteChange From Baseline in the Spontaneous NRS Score Throughout the StudyDaily average NRS score: Week 16-0.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.5
Dysport 20 U/Injection SiteChange From Baseline in the Spontaneous NRS Score Throughout the StudyDaily worst NRS score: Week 12-0.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.3
Dysport 20 U/Injection SiteChange From Baseline in the Spontaneous NRS Score Throughout the StudyDaily average NRS score: Week 2-1.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5
Dysport 20 U/Injection SiteChange From Baseline in the Spontaneous NRS Score Throughout the StudyDaily worst NRS score: Week 2-1.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.7
Dysport 20 U/Injection SiteChange From Baseline in the Spontaneous NRS Score Throughout the StudyDaily worst NRS score: Baseline5.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
Dysport 20 U/Injection SiteChange From Baseline in the Spontaneous NRS Score Throughout the StudyDaily average NRS score: Baseline4.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.2
Dysport 20 U/Injection SiteChange From Baseline in the Spontaneous NRS Score Throughout the StudyDaily worst NRS score: Week 4-1.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.7
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Stimulus-Evoked NRS Score on the Painful Area at Weeks 6 and 12

For stimulus-evoked NRS score during Quantitative Sensory Testing, participants were submitted to stimuli of various nature (light touch, pressure and temperature) applied to the painful area. Pain intensity was scored using an 11-point NRS score ranging from 0 to 10, where 0= no pain and 10= worst possible pain. Static mechanical allodynia is the response to light sustained normally innocuous pressure against the skin. Dynamic mechanical allodynia is the response to a normally innocuous light moving mechanical stimulus on the skin. Temporal summation is a condition, which demonstrates an increased perception of pain to repetitive painful stimuli.

Time frame: Part B: Baseline (defined as mean of all predose data from Day -7 and including predose on Day 1) and Weeks 6 and 12

Population: Randomised population included all participants randomised in the double-blind period (Part B).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Stimulus-Evoked NRS Score on the Painful Area at Weeks 6 and 12Temporal summation: Week 61.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.1
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Stimulus-Evoked NRS Score on the Painful Area at Weeks 6 and 12Temporal summation: Week 122.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Stimulus-Evoked NRS Score on the Painful Area at Weeks 6 and 12Dynamic mechanical allodynia: Week 6-0.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Stimulus-Evoked NRS Score on the Painful Area at Weeks 6 and 12Temporal summation: Baseline1.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Stimulus-Evoked NRS Score on the Painful Area at Weeks 6 and 12Dynamic mechanical allodynia: Week 12-0.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.1
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Stimulus-Evoked NRS Score on the Painful Area at Weeks 6 and 12Static mechanical allodynia: Week 120.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Stimulus-Evoked NRS Score on the Painful Area at Weeks 6 and 12Static mechanical allodynia: Week 61.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.2
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Stimulus-Evoked NRS Score on the Painful Area at Weeks 6 and 12Static mechanical allodynia: Baseline1.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.5
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Stimulus-Evoked NRS Score on the Painful Area at Weeks 6 and 12Dynamic mechanical allodynia: Baseline1.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Dysport 2.5 U/Injection SiteChange From Baseline in the Stimulus-Evoked NRS Score on the Painful Area at Weeks 6 and 12Static mechanical allodynia: Baseline3.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.6
Dysport 2.5 U/Injection SiteChange From Baseline in the Stimulus-Evoked NRS Score on the Painful Area at Weeks 6 and 12Static mechanical allodynia: Week 6-1.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4
Dysport 2.5 U/Injection SiteChange From Baseline in the Stimulus-Evoked NRS Score on the Painful Area at Weeks 6 and 12Static mechanical allodynia: Week 12-0.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.7
Dysport 2.5 U/Injection SiteChange From Baseline in the Stimulus-Evoked NRS Score on the Painful Area at Weeks 6 and 12Dynamic mechanical allodynia: Baseline2.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.2
Dysport 2.5 U/Injection SiteChange From Baseline in the Stimulus-Evoked NRS Score on the Painful Area at Weeks 6 and 12Dynamic mechanical allodynia: Week 6-1.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.1
Dysport 2.5 U/Injection SiteChange From Baseline in the Stimulus-Evoked NRS Score on the Painful Area at Weeks 6 and 12Dynamic mechanical allodynia: Week 12-1.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.5
Dysport 2.5 U/Injection SiteChange From Baseline in the Stimulus-Evoked NRS Score on the Painful Area at Weeks 6 and 12Temporal summation: Week 60.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
Dysport 2.5 U/Injection SiteChange From Baseline in the Stimulus-Evoked NRS Score on the Painful Area at Weeks 6 and 12Temporal summation: Week 120.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.1
Dysport 2.5 U/Injection SiteChange From Baseline in the Stimulus-Evoked NRS Score on the Painful Area at Weeks 6 and 12Temporal summation: Baseline0.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.5
Dysport 10 U/Injection SiteChange From Baseline in the Stimulus-Evoked NRS Score on the Painful Area at Weeks 6 and 12Temporal summation: Baseline3.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3
Dysport 10 U/Injection SiteChange From Baseline in the Stimulus-Evoked NRS Score on the Painful Area at Weeks 6 and 12Temporal summation: Week 61.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
Dysport 10 U/Injection SiteChange From Baseline in the Stimulus-Evoked NRS Score on the Painful Area at Weeks 6 and 12Static mechanical allodynia: Baseline4.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
Dysport 10 U/Injection SiteChange From Baseline in the Stimulus-Evoked NRS Score on the Painful Area at Weeks 6 and 12Static mechanical allodynia: Week 6-2.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.8
Dysport 10 U/Injection SiteChange From Baseline in the Stimulus-Evoked NRS Score on the Painful Area at Weeks 6 and 12Static mechanical allodynia: Week 12-2.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.4
Dysport 10 U/Injection SiteChange From Baseline in the Stimulus-Evoked NRS Score on the Painful Area at Weeks 6 and 12Temporal summation: Week 121.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
Dysport 10 U/Injection SiteChange From Baseline in the Stimulus-Evoked NRS Score on the Painful Area at Weeks 6 and 12Dynamic mechanical allodynia: Week 6-2.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.9
Dysport 10 U/Injection SiteChange From Baseline in the Stimulus-Evoked NRS Score on the Painful Area at Weeks 6 and 12Dynamic mechanical allodynia: Baseline2.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.7
Dysport 10 U/Injection SiteChange From Baseline in the Stimulus-Evoked NRS Score on the Painful Area at Weeks 6 and 12Dynamic mechanical allodynia: Week 12-0.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.5
Dysport 20 U/Injection SiteChange From Baseline in the Stimulus-Evoked NRS Score on the Painful Area at Weeks 6 and 12Temporal summation: Week 122.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.7
Dysport 20 U/Injection SiteChange From Baseline in the Stimulus-Evoked NRS Score on the Painful Area at Weeks 6 and 12Temporal summation: Baseline1.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.1
Dysport 20 U/Injection SiteChange From Baseline in the Stimulus-Evoked NRS Score on the Painful Area at Weeks 6 and 12Static mechanical allodynia: Week 6-1.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.5
Dysport 20 U/Injection SiteChange From Baseline in the Stimulus-Evoked NRS Score on the Painful Area at Weeks 6 and 12Temporal summation: Week 62.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.7
Dysport 20 U/Injection SiteChange From Baseline in the Stimulus-Evoked NRS Score on the Painful Area at Weeks 6 and 12Dynamic mechanical allodynia: Baseline5.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Dysport 20 U/Injection SiteChange From Baseline in the Stimulus-Evoked NRS Score on the Painful Area at Weeks 6 and 12Dynamic mechanical allodynia: Week 12-2.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.7
Dysport 20 U/Injection SiteChange From Baseline in the Stimulus-Evoked NRS Score on the Painful Area at Weeks 6 and 12Static mechanical allodynia: Week 12-0.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.1
Dysport 20 U/Injection SiteChange From Baseline in the Stimulus-Evoked NRS Score on the Painful Area at Weeks 6 and 12Static mechanical allodynia: Baseline4.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.1
Dysport 20 U/Injection SiteChange From Baseline in the Stimulus-Evoked NRS Score on the Painful Area at Weeks 6 and 12Dynamic mechanical allodynia: Week 6-2.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026