Skip to content

Effect of Treatment Modality on Psychosocial Functioning of Survivors of Unilateral Retinoblastoma

Effect of Treatment Modality on Psychosocial Functioning of Survivors of Unilateral Retinoblastoma

Status
Enrolling by invitation
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03662776
Enrollment
120
Registered
2018-09-07
Start date
2018-08-31
Completion date
2027-08-01
Last updated
2026-09-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Survivors of Unilateral Retinoblastoma

Keywords

Quality of Life, physical health, emotional health, 18-397

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to find out about the quality of life and health in patients who had retinoblastoma in one eye (unilateral retinoblastoma), who either received treatment with chemotherapy injected directly into an artery leading to the eye (intra-arterial chemotherapy) or removal of the eye (enucleation). By quality of life, the investigators mean how the participants are feeling about being satisfied with things in their life, including, physical health, emotional health, and their ability to carry out daily activities. The investigators want to see if either treatment option would affect quality of life differently. The investigators hope that this information will help us provide better care to future children with retinoblastoma and better follow-up care for survivors of retinoblastoma.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALBASC-3 survey

A comprehensive questionnaire, incorporating the BASC-3 and PROMIS measures, will be administered to parents of participants ages 8-17. The BASC-3 and PROMIS scales each have a parent and child version; these scales will be used to measure the secondary objective of parent and patient concordance rates for all participants ages 8 and older.

BEHAVIORALPROMIS survey

A comprehensive questionnaire, incorporating the BASC-3 and PROMIS measures, will be administered to parents of participants ages 8-17. The BASC-3 and PROMIS scales each have a parent and child version; these scales will be used to measure the secondary objective of parent and patient concordance rates for all participants ages 8 and older.

Sponsors

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CROSSOVER
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
8 Years to 17 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Ability to speak and understand English or Spanish * Diagnosis of unilateral retinoblastoma at any age, confirmed by the enrolling institution * Treatment of retinoblastoma between 2006 or later * Patients must between the age of 8-17 years old * At least 1 year since completion of all cancer-directed therapy * Treatment with enucleation of the affected eye or intra-arterial chemotherapy Parent of patient: * Ability to speak and understand English or Spanish * Ability to confirm that he or she is the parent of a child treated for unilateral retinoblastoma who meets the eligibility criteria listed above * Ability to provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Patients, or parents of patients, treated with both enucleation and intra-arterial chemotherapy are not eligible

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
social-emotional health2 yearsas measured by Behavior Assessment System for Children, 3rd edition, (BASC™-3;as measured by the BASC-3) Surveys have been normed on a representative sample that closely matches United States census population characteristics; T scores and percentiles in relation to general norms are calculated for each scale. The BASC-3 uses a T score metric where 50 is the mean for the population norm and the standard deviation is 10.
behavioral health2 yearas measured by Behavior Assessment System for Children, 3rd edition, (BASC™-3; The following four T Scores will be analyzed for these BASC-3 summary scores (1) Externalizing Problems, (2) Internalizing Problems, (3) Behavior Symptoms Index and (4) Adaptive Skills. The "at-risk" category applies to any individual who scores 2 SD above the mean of 50, while "clinically significant" risk refers to those who score 3 SD above the mean. Additional scores are also provided which may be used to identify risk for more specific behavioral or emotional areas of concern.
compare HRQoL2 yearsas measured by the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) PROMIS measures use a T-score metric where 50 is the mean for the reference population and 10 is the standard deviation of that population. Higher scores correspond to a higher degree of symptom burden (for those items measuring symptoms) or a higher level of functioning (for physical functioning items)

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORLaura Cimini, PhD

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 9, 2026