Skip to content

Esmolol vs. Labetalol in Endoscopic Sinus Surgery

Blood Loss and Visibility With Esmolol vs. Labetalol in Endoscopic Sinus Surgery: A Randomized Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03661346
Enrollment
28
Registered
2018-09-07
Start date
2017-03-01
Completion date
2018-03-30
Last updated
2021-02-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Sinusitis

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to compare esmolol and labetalol bleeding and intra-operative visibility scores in functional endoscopic sinus surgery.

Detailed description

BACKGROUND: Improved intraoperative visibility during functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) decreases the risk of serious orbital or skull base injuries. Beta blockers are among several methods used to reduce mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR) and mucosal bleeding. Labetalol (mixed alpha-1-beta blocker) reduces HR and MAP; however, its alpha-1 blockade may mitigate topical epinephrine decongestant effects. Esmolol (selective beta-1 blocker) does not have direct antagonistic effects on topical epinephrine. This study compares the hemodynamic parameters (rate of blood loss, MAP control, HR) and intraoperative visibility during FESS between esmolol and labetalol.

Interventions

DRUGLabetalol

Aliquots of 20mg of Labetol • Maximum Dose - 300mg total for case

DRUGEsmolol

Infusion - 0.1mg/kg/min • Maximum Dose - after 30 minutes, 0.3mg/kg/min

Sponsors

The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* History of CRS with or without nasal polyps * Undergoing FESS for CRS * American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status 1 (healthy) or 2 (patient with mild systemic disease).

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnancy * Asthma * COPD * Bradycardia * Heart failure * End stage renal disease * Cerebrovascular accident * Diabetes mellitus * Preoperative use of NSAIDs, aspirin, or beta-blockers * Body mass index (BMI) greater than 40 kg/m2.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Intra-operative Surgical Visibility - Wormald ScaleDuration of operation up to 3 hoursStandardized scoring systems used by surgeons to rate surgical field quality in FESS: Wormald scale (0-10): 0 = No bleeding (optimal) 1. = 1-2 points of blood ooze 2. = 3-4 points of ooze 3. = 5-6 points of ooze 4. = 7-8 points of ooze 5. = 9-10 points of ooze 6. = \>10 points of ooze, obscuring field 7. = Mild field bleeding with slow post-nasal accumulation 8. = Moderate field bleeding with moderate post-nasal accumulation 9. = Moderate-severe field bleeding with rapid post-nasal accumulation 10. = Severe bleeding (worst) with nose filling rapidly
Intra-operative Surgical Visibility - Boezaart ScaleDuration of operationStandardized scoring systems used by surgeons to rate surgical field quality in FESS: Boezaart scale (0-5): 0 = no bleeding (optimal) 1. = slight bleeding with no suction required 2. = slight bleeding with occasional suctioning required 3. = slight bleeding with frequent suctioning required 4. = moderate bleeding with frequent suctioning required and surgical field visibility is compromised when suctioning is removed 5. = severe bleeding (worst) with constant suctioning required and compromised view

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rate of Blood LossDuration of operation up to 3 hoursmilliliters per minute
Average Mean Arterial Blood PressureDuration of operation up 3 hours/completion of operationunits of mmHg, measured throughout operation
Average Heart RateDuration of operation up to 3 hours/completion of surgeryunits of beats per minute, measured throughout the operation

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Esmolol
Patients receiving esmolol when intra-operative MAP \> 80 mmHg. Esmolol: Infusion - 0.1mg/kg/min • Maximum Dose - after 30 minutes, 0.3mg/kg/min
13
Labetalol
Patients receiving labetalol when intra-operative MAP \> 80 mmHg Labetalol: Aliquots of 20mg of Labetol • Maximum Dose - 300mg total for case
15
Total28

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicLabetalolTotalEsmolol
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
6 Participants9 Participants3 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
9 Participants19 Participants10 Participants
Age, Continuous51 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16
50 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19
45 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
15 participants28 participants13 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
5 Participants9 Participants4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
10 Participants19 Participants9 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 130 / 15
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 130 / 15
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 130 / 15

Outcome results

Primary

Intra-operative Surgical Visibility - Boezaart Scale

Standardized scoring systems used by surgeons to rate surgical field quality in FESS: Boezaart scale (0-5): 0 = no bleeding (optimal) 1. = slight bleeding with no suction required 2. = slight bleeding with occasional suctioning required 3. = slight bleeding with frequent suctioning required 4. = moderate bleeding with frequent suctioning required and surgical field visibility is compromised when suctioning is removed 5. = severe bleeding (worst) with constant suctioning required and compromised view

Time frame: Duration of operation

Population: Those analyzed had complete data

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EsmololIntra-operative Surgical Visibility - Boezaart Scale3.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.69
LabetalolIntra-operative Surgical Visibility - Boezaart Scale3.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.89
Primary

Intra-operative Surgical Visibility - Wormald Scale

Standardized scoring systems used by surgeons to rate surgical field quality in FESS: Wormald scale (0-10): 0 = No bleeding (optimal) 1. = 1-2 points of blood ooze 2. = 3-4 points of ooze 3. = 5-6 points of ooze 4. = 7-8 points of ooze 5. = 9-10 points of ooze 6. = \>10 points of ooze, obscuring field 7. = Mild field bleeding with slow post-nasal accumulation 8. = Moderate field bleeding with moderate post-nasal accumulation 9. = Moderate-severe field bleeding with rapid post-nasal accumulation 10. = Severe bleeding (worst) with nose filling rapidly

Time frame: Duration of operation up to 3 hours

Population: Those included had complete data

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EsmololIntra-operative Surgical Visibility - Wormald Scale6.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.7
LabetalolIntra-operative Surgical Visibility - Wormald Scale5.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.9
Secondary

Average Heart Rate

units of beats per minute, measured throughout the operation

Time frame: Duration of operation up to 3 hours/completion of surgery

Population: Those included had complete data

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EsmololAverage Heart Rate72 bpmStandard Deviation 8.7
LabetalolAverage Heart Rate69 bpmStandard Deviation 11.7
Secondary

Average Mean Arterial Blood Pressure

units of mmHg, measured throughout operation

Time frame: Duration of operation up 3 hours/completion of operation

Population: Those included had complete data

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EsmololAverage Mean Arterial Blood Pressure79.7 mmHgStandard Deviation 7.5
LabetalolAverage Mean Arterial Blood Pressure79.4 mmHgStandard Deviation 7.7
Secondary

Rate of Blood Loss

milliliters per minute

Time frame: Duration of operation up to 3 hours

Population: Those included had complete data

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EsmololRate of Blood Loss.59 mL/minStandard Deviation 0.28
LabetalolRate of Blood Loss.66 mL/minStandard Deviation 0.37

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026