Skip to content

The Effect of Rapid Fluid Challenge Under Pulmonary Artery Catheter Monitoring on Physiological Indexes of Patients With Septic Shock

The Effect of Rapid Fluid Challenge Under Pulmonary Artery Catheter Monitoring on Physiological Indexes of Patients With Septic Shock

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03661268
Enrollment
100
Registered
2018-09-07
Start date
2018-10-01
Completion date
2021-09-30
Last updated
2021-01-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Septic Shock

Brief summary

Fluid challenge is often carried out in septic shock patients. Its responsiveness usually requires invasive monitoring. The pulmonary artery catheter(PAC) is the most effective means of monitoring.To use non-invasive methods is very tempting. Investigators hypothesize that venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide difference,venous-to-arterial carbon oxygen difference, central venous-arterial carbon dioxide to arterial-venous oxygen content ratio and Central Venous SO2 variations provides feasible estimation on fluid responsiveness in septic shock patients.

Interventions

OTHERfluid chanllenge

A bag of 500ml of normal saline is infused within 15 minutes using a bag pressurized to 300 mmHg.

Sponsors

Chengdu Fifth People's Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

A bag of 500ml of normal saline is infused within 15 minutes using a bag pressurized to 300 mmHg. All other treatments, including maintenance fluids, dose of vasoactive agents and ventilator settings, remain unchanged during the study period.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* more than 18 years old; less than 75 years old ICU patients * Septic shock * Monitored with pulmonary artery catheter (Swan-Ganz catheter) * The decision of fluid challenge made by the treating physician

Exclusion criteria

* Evidence of fluid overload * Pregnancy * Recently participated in other studies * Severe heart failure

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
cardiac index changeImmediately after fluid challengeFluid responsiveness: increase in CI of at least 10% after fluid challenge ;Fluid nonresponsiveness:no increase or increase in CI less than 10%.

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary Contactxiang xiang, MD
xiangxiang0711@foxmail.com+86-028-61702187

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026