Skip to content

Efficacy and Dose Ranging Study of Seroguard

Phase II Multi-center Randomized Double-blind Placebo-controlled Efficacy and Dose Ranging Trial of the Drug Product Seroguard, Solution (JSC Pharmasyntez, Russia) Used for the Prevention of Pelvic Adhesions

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03660787
Enrollment
114
Registered
2018-09-07
Start date
2017-05-04
Completion date
2018-01-23
Last updated
2019-06-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Adhesion

Keywords

Adhesion, Efficacy

Brief summary

This trial was a multi-center, double-blind, randomized, parallel group, placebo-controlled, phase II study in adult hospitalized female patients with the confirmed diagnosis of pelvic adhesive disease in Study centres in Russia.

Detailed description

In order to evaluate efficacy and safety of Seroguard, solution for IP administration, a study design meeting the set objectives was selected: prospective, multi-center, double-blind, randomized, parallel group, placebo-controlled study. Given the fact that comparison with placebo is considered the best way to prove efficacy and safety of a drug and that currently there are no drugs with a similar mechanism of action at the pharmaceutical product market, a placebo-controlled, parallel group study design was selected. A randomized, parallel group study design was chosen in order to ensure minimization of a selection bias. Subjects were randomized into four groups (two groups of the test drug and two placebo groups corresponding to the two doses) to enable a comparison of Seroguard administration at two doses. A double-blind study design was selected in order to ensure minimization of an outcome evaluation bias.

Interventions

Seroguard 0.41 g/L solution

DRUGPlacebo

Saline

Sponsors

Cromos Pharma LLC
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Pharmasyntez
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Masking description

The present study was conducted as a double blind trial. Neither a medical investigator, nor patients had access to the treatment assignment code in order to ensure the maximum objective evaluation of the primary endpoint. Blinding was performed in such a way that disclosing a randomization code of a certain subject excluded a disclosure of the code in general (i.e. the randomization code had no indication to the treatment group). However, there were no cases of the randomization code disclosure in the study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Female patients aged from 18 to 45 years with the confirmed diagnosis of pelvic adhesions having indications for surgery (laparoscopic adhesiolysis). 2. Voluntarily and personally signed and dated Form of Informed Consent. 3. Female patients with pelvic adhesions confirmed by gynecological and ultrasound examination.

Exclusion criteria

1. Female patients having contraindications to surgical treatment (including acute or exacerbated chronical adnexal inflammation); 2. Body mass index of 30.0 kg/m2 and more; 3. Known hypersensitivity to the test drug components (Seroguard); 4. Pregnancy, breastfeeding or planning a pregnancy during the clinical trial; 5. Refusal to use effective contraception methods throughout the study; 6. Positive HIV, RW, HBV or HCV test result; 7. Alcohol abuse, drug addiction, and toxicomania (except smoking); 8. American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status category III and more (ASA); 9. Purulent process in the abdominal cavity; 10. Disseminated endometriosis; 11. WBC count more than 10\*109/L at the complete blood count; 12. Need of using any drugs during the surgery other than 0.02% chlorhexidine aqueous solution throughout the surgery, as well as the test drug or the placebo (0.9% sodium chloride) administered intraperitoneally in the end of surgery. 13. Concomitant diseases that may require conversion of the surgical intervention by other indications; 14. Type I or II diabetes mellitus; 15. Deep vein thrombosis and/or PATE at the screening or in the medical history; 16. Renal impairment (glomerular filtration rate less than 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 assessed by the CKD-EPI equation); 17. Liver disorders defined as more than 2-fold rise of the upper limit of normal of one of the following enzymes: ALT, AST, GGTP, AP, or more than 2-fold total bilirubin increase; 18. Myocardial infarction within 6 months before screening; 19. Any concomitant diseases accompanied by heart failure; 20. Clinically significant ECG changes (as to the investigator's opinion); 21. Any concomitant diseases accompanied by respiratory failure; 22. Any oncological disease within 3 years before enrollment into the study; 23. Systemic inflammatory diseases; 24. Diseases associated with chronic hemorrhages; 25. Blood diseases (anemias of any origin, hemoglobinopathies, inherited and acquired coagulopathies, hemostasis disorders, thrombocytopenias, and thrombocytopathias, any hemoblastoses); 26. Any other disease that, in the investigator's opinion, may affect study results or present an additional threat to well-being of a patient after administration of the study drug; 27. Use of anticoagulants, antiaggregants (except for acetylsalicylic acid at the dose of less than 325 mg/day) at the moment of inclusion into the study or planning to do so during the study; 28. Use of drugs with pronounced hemato-, hepato-, or nephrotoxic action, drugs of biological origin; 29. Need to administer cytostatics, systemic glucocorticosteroids, and other immunosuppressive agents during the patient's participation in the study. 30. Participation in any other clinical trial within 30 days before screening; 31. Contraindications to MRI (presence of implants or implanted electronic devices); 32. Impossibility or inability to comply with the requirements of the protocol, including for physical, psychic or social reasons, in the investigator's opinion.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Reduction of Adhesions Number by 3 or More30±4 days after surgical interventionThe number of adhesions according to the first MRI data was compared to the number according to the data of second MRI

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Detection of Pelvic Organs Limited Mobility30±4 days after surgeryThe frequency was estimated based on transvaginal ultrasound results
Number of Participants With Detection of Hyperechoic Linear Lesions Post Surgery30±4 days after surgeryThe frequency was estimated based on transvaginal ultrasound results
Change in Thickness of Pelvic Adhesions30±4 days after surgeryThe change from baseline was defined. It was evaluated by comparing baseline MRI data and repeated MRI data. Results were estimated according to scale from 0 to 3 where 0 - no adhesions, 1 - thin (filmy or filiform), 2 - marked, 3 - marked with an impaired passage through organs involved.
Change Number of Participants in Detecting Hyperechoic Linear Lesions30±4 days after surgeryFrequency of detecting after repeated transvaginal ultrasound results was compared to baseline indications (4 or more)
Number of Participants With Detection of no Ultrasound Signs of Pelvic Adhesive Disease Post Surgery30±4 days after surgeryNo limited mobility of pelvic organs and no hyperechoic linear lesions should be shown
Change in Number of Participants in Detecting Pelvic Organs Limited Mobility30±4 days after surgeryAbsolute change of count of participants was measured with detecting pelvic organs limited mobility from the baseline

Countries

Russia

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

114 is the number of enrolled and screened participants according to the protocol, but during the screening process some people were withdrawn from the study before randomization because some of them did not meet the inclusion criteria and some withdrew the informed consent form themselves. So, the number of randomized participants is 104.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo, 1.5 mL/kg
each subject received the placebo at the dose of 1.5 mL/kg of body weight; Placebo: Saline
26
Placebo, 2.4 mL/kg
each subject received the placebo at the dose of 2.4 mL/kg of body weight; Placebo: Saline
26
Seroguard, 1.5 mL/kg
each subject received the test drug at the dose of 1.5 mL/kg of body weight; Seroguard: Seroguard 0.41 g/L solution
26
Seroguard, 2.4 mL/kg
each subject received the test drug at the dose of 2.4 mL/kg of body weight. Seroguard: Seroguard 0.41 g/L solution
26
Total104

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlacebo, 1.5 mL/kgPlacebo, 2.4 mL/kgSeroguard, 1.5 mL/kgSeroguard, 2.4 mL/kgTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
26 Participants26 Participants26 Participants26 Participants104 Participants
Age, Continuous31.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.2
31.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.3
31.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.4
31.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.4
31.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.6
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian race
26 Participants26 Participants26 Participants26 Participants104 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Russia
26 participants26 participants26 participants26 participants26 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
26 Participants26 Participants26 Participants26 Participants104 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 250 / 250 / 250 / 26
other
Total, other adverse events
3 / 252 / 251 / 250 / 26
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 250 / 250 / 250 / 26

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With Reduction of Adhesions Number by 3 or More

The number of adhesions according to the first MRI data was compared to the number according to the data of second MRI

Time frame: 30±4 days after surgical intervention

Population: 7 patients had no results of repeated Pelvic MRI examination that is why the number of Participants is different

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Placebo, 1.5 mL/kgNumber of Participants With Reduction of Adhesions Number by 3 or More1 Participants
Placebo, 2.4 mL/kgNumber of Participants With Reduction of Adhesions Number by 3 or More1 Participants
Seroguard, 1.5 mL/kgNumber of Participants With Reduction of Adhesions Number by 3 or More10 Participants
Seroguard, 2.4 mL/kgNumber of Participants With Reduction of Adhesions Number by 3 or More10 Participants
Secondary

Change in Number of Participants in Detecting Pelvic Organs Limited Mobility

Absolute change of count of participants was measured with detecting pelvic organs limited mobility from the baseline

Time frame: 30±4 days after surgery

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo, 1.5 mL/kgChange in Number of Participants in Detecting Pelvic Organs Limited Mobility-17 participants
Placebo, 2.4 mL/kgChange in Number of Participants in Detecting Pelvic Organs Limited Mobility-17 participants
Seroguard, 1.5 mL/kgChange in Number of Participants in Detecting Pelvic Organs Limited Mobility-21 participants
Seroguard, 2.4 mL/kgChange in Number of Participants in Detecting Pelvic Organs Limited Mobility-21 participants
Secondary

Change in Thickness of Pelvic Adhesions

The change from baseline was defined. It was evaluated by comparing baseline MRI data and repeated MRI data. Results were estimated according to scale from 0 to 3 where 0 - no adhesions, 1 - thin (filmy or filiform), 2 - marked, 3 - marked with an impaired passage through organs involved.

Time frame: 30±4 days after surgery

Population: 7 patients had no results of repeated Pelvic MRI examination that is why the number of Participants is different

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Placebo, 1.5 mL/kgChange in Thickness of Pelvic Adhesions0 score on a scale
Placebo, 2.4 mL/kgChange in Thickness of Pelvic Adhesions0 score on a scale
Seroguard, 1.5 mL/kgChange in Thickness of Pelvic Adhesions0 score on a scale
Seroguard, 2.4 mL/kgChange in Thickness of Pelvic Adhesions0 score on a scale
Secondary

Change Number of Participants in Detecting Hyperechoic Linear Lesions

Frequency of detecting after repeated transvaginal ultrasound results was compared to baseline indications (4 or more)

Time frame: 30±4 days after surgery

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo, 1.5 mL/kgChange Number of Participants in Detecting Hyperechoic Linear Lesions-17 participants
Placebo, 2.4 mL/kgChange Number of Participants in Detecting Hyperechoic Linear Lesions-16 participants
Seroguard, 1.5 mL/kgChange Number of Participants in Detecting Hyperechoic Linear Lesions-19 participants
Seroguard, 2.4 mL/kgChange Number of Participants in Detecting Hyperechoic Linear Lesions-18 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Detection of Hyperechoic Linear Lesions Post Surgery

The frequency was estimated based on transvaginal ultrasound results

Time frame: 30±4 days after surgery

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo, 1.5 mL/kgNumber of Participants With Detection of Hyperechoic Linear Lesions Post Surgery3 participants
Placebo, 2.4 mL/kgNumber of Participants With Detection of Hyperechoic Linear Lesions Post Surgery2 participants
Seroguard, 1.5 mL/kgNumber of Participants With Detection of Hyperechoic Linear Lesions Post Surgery1 participants
Seroguard, 2.4 mL/kgNumber of Participants With Detection of Hyperechoic Linear Lesions Post Surgery3 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Detection of no Ultrasound Signs of Pelvic Adhesive Disease Post Surgery

No limited mobility of pelvic organs and no hyperechoic linear lesions should be shown

Time frame: 30±4 days after surgery

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Placebo, 1.5 mL/kgNumber of Participants With Detection of no Ultrasound Signs of Pelvic Adhesive Disease Post Surgery19 Participants
Placebo, 2.4 mL/kgNumber of Participants With Detection of no Ultrasound Signs of Pelvic Adhesive Disease Post Surgery19 Participants
Seroguard, 1.5 mL/kgNumber of Participants With Detection of no Ultrasound Signs of Pelvic Adhesive Disease Post Surgery23 Participants
Seroguard, 2.4 mL/kgNumber of Participants With Detection of no Ultrasound Signs of Pelvic Adhesive Disease Post Surgery20 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Detection of Pelvic Organs Limited Mobility

The frequency was estimated based on transvaginal ultrasound results

Time frame: 30±4 days after surgery

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo, 1.5 mL/kgNumber of Participants With Detection of Pelvic Organs Limited Mobility4 participants
Placebo, 2.4 mL/kgNumber of Participants With Detection of Pelvic Organs Limited Mobility4 participants
Seroguard, 1.5 mL/kgNumber of Participants With Detection of Pelvic Organs Limited Mobility0 participants
Seroguard, 2.4 mL/kgNumber of Participants With Detection of Pelvic Organs Limited Mobility2 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026