Skip to content

Endoscopy First or Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy First for Patients With Intermediate Risk of Choledocholithiasis

Comparison of Two Management Strategies, Endoscopy First and Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy First, for Patients With Gallbladder Stones and Intermediate Risk for Choledocholithiasis

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03658863
Enrollment
106
Registered
2018-09-05
Start date
2017-12-15
Completion date
2020-12-15
Last updated
2019-10-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Choledocholithiasis

Keywords

choledocholithiasis, endoscopic ultrasound, ERCP, intraoperative cholangiography, common bile duct stone, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, gallstone disease, cholelithiasis, bile duct obstruction, laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Brief summary

The study compares two different methods to evaluate extrahepatic bile ducts for possible stones for patients with cholecystolithiasis and intermediate risk for choledocholithiasis when laparoscopic cholecystectomy is indicated. Endosonoscopic evaluation of bile ducts and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERCP) on demand are performed before laparoscopic cholecystectomy for one arm. Intraoperative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy and postoperative ERCP on demand are administered in another arm.

Detailed description

Use of ERCP as a diagnostic tool should be minimized as it carries considerable risk (5 to 10%) of post-procedural complications. It is noticed that adverse events occur more often to patients with low risk of choledocholithiasis. Therefore the best possible patient selection for ERCP procedure is needed. At the Centre of Abdominal Surgery of Vilnius University Hospital Santaros klinikos an original prognostic index (Vilnius University Hospital index (VUHI)) is used for evaluation of risk of choledocholithiasis. It is calculated by formula VUHI = A/30 + 0.4×B, where A - total bilirubin concentration (µmol/l), B - common bile duct (CBD) diameter measured by ultrasound exam. A retrospective study evaluated its accuracy and determined threshold values for low, intermediate and high risk groups. The intermediate risk group (risk for choledocholithiasis 25-75%) would benefit from additional examination before ERCP. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and intraoperative cholangiography are less invasive procedures with high accuracy identifying common bile duct stones. Main hypothesis of the trial is that intraoperative cholangiography with ERCP on demand can shorten the duration and costs of treatment and avoid diagnostic ERCPs.

Interventions

PROCEDUREendoscopic ultrasound

Evaluation of bile ducts with endoscope with special ultrasonographic function

evaluation of bile ducts by injecting radiocontrast media to cystic duct during laparoscopic cholecystectomy

PROCEDUREERCP

evaluation of bile ducts by injecting radiocontrast media to common bile duct via endoscope inserted to duodenum

DEVICEUltrasound endoscope

Endoscope with built-in ultrasound function

Sponsors

Vilnius University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* patients with cholecystolithiasis when laparoscopic cholecystectomy is indicated * intermediate risk for choledocholithiasis (VUHI 2,6 - 6,9 and one of the predictors: dilated common bile duct, elevated total bilirubin or suspected stone in CBD on ultrasound)

Exclusion criteria

* pregnancy; * acute cholangitis; * biliary pancreatitis; * acute cholecystitis, degree II-III by Tokyo guidelines 2013; * anastomosis in upper gastrointestinal tract; * other known cholestatic hepatopancreatobiliary disease; * known or suspected hepatitis of another origin (viral, toxic, etc.); * contraindications for general anaesthesia or surgery; * IV-VI class of American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification; * morbid obesity (body mass index \> 40); * patient's refusal to participate in the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Duration of treatmentup to one monthduration from admission to hospital or decision to perform laparoscopic cholecystectomy to discharge in days

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Accuracy of different management strategies6 to 7 monthsProportion of correctly diagnosed (true positive and true negative) cases in all sample
Technical success of interventions (IOC, EUS, ERCP)up to one monthFor intraoperative cholangiography: successful cannulation and contrast media injection into CBD. For endoscopic sonoscopy: successful visualisation of CBD. For ERCP: successful cannulation and contrast media injection into CBD.
Adverse events of interventionsup to one monthBleeding, acute pancreatitis, perforation, allergic reactions
Costs of treatmentup to one monthcharges of diagnostic procedures, invasive procedures, surgery, antibacterial treatment if needed and hospital charges

Countries

Lithuania

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 17, 2026