Skip to content

Study to Evaluate Benefit of ProbioSatys™ on Weight Reduction in Overweight Subjects

Double-blind, Randomised, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate Benefit of ProbioSatys™ on Weight Reduction in Overweight Subjects

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03657186
Enrollment
236
Registered
2018-09-04
Start date
2018-08-31
Completion date
2019-11-28
Last updated
2020-03-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Overweight, Weight Loss

Keywords

Probiotics, Microbiome, Microbiota, Hafnia alvei, Overweight, Food intake, Appetite regulation, Satiety, Weight loss, Glucose Metabolism, Glycemia, Enterobacteriaceae, Gut-brain axis, Molecular mimicry

Brief summary

The study aims to evaluate the effects of ProbioSatys™ on body weight and related parameters in overweight subjects during a 12-week consumption period. In addition, tolerability and safety of ProbioSatys™ will be assessed.

Detailed description

ProbioSatys™ is a probiotic nutritional solution containing a commensal Enterobacteriaceae food grade strain, Hafnia alvei 4597. The microbiome is known to play a crucial role in body weight management and metabolic disease. ProbioSatys™ mechanism of action relies on bacterial metabolites that send local and central signals via the gut-brain axis by molecularly mimicking satiety hormones involved in appetite regulation. Numerous ProbioSatys™pre-clinical studies indicate that consumption of the strain leads to body weight loss based on food intake reduction, but also improvement of body composition (increase of lean mass/fat mass ratio), and improvement of glucose metabolism (oral glucose tolerance test, and fasted glycemia). The present study aims to evaluate the effects of ProbioSatys™ on body weight and related parameters in overweight subjects during a 12-week consumption period. In addition, tolerability and safety of ProbioSatys™ will be assessed.

Interventions

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTProbioSatys™

One capsule, twice a day, is to be orally taken with 100 mL of water during each breakfast and lunch (approx. 5 minutes after starting eating), total 2 capsules per day.

OTHERPlacebo

One capsule, twice a day, is to be orally taken with 100 mL of water during each breakfast and lunch (approx. 5 minutes after starting eating), total 2 capsules per day.

Sponsors

Analyze & Realize
CollaboratorNETWORK
TargEDys
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. 18 to 65 years old males and females 2. Overweight (Body Mass Index, BMI: 25 kg/m2 - 29.9 kg/m2) 3. Generally in good health 4. Desire to lose weight 5. Regularly consuming 3 main meals/day (breakfast, lunch, dinner) 6. Readiness to comply with study procedures, in particular: * Follow diet recommendation * Maintain the habitual level of physical activity during the study * Fill out the questionnaires and subject diary * Take the IP as instructed 7. Stable body weight in the last 3 months prior to V1 (≤5% self-reported change) 8. Stable concomitant medications (if any) for at least last 3 months prior to V1 9. Women of childbearing potential: * Negative pregnancy testing (beta HCG-test in urine) at V1 * Women of childbearing potential: commitment to use contraception methods (with the exception of starting new contraception medication) Participation is based upon written informed consent form by the participant following written and oral information by the investigator regarding nature, purpose, consequences and possible risks of the clinical study. Randomisation criteria (to be checked after run-in at V2): 1. No change in body weight or reduction up to 3 kg (compared to V1) 2. Adequately completed subject diary 3. Readiness and ability to comply with study requirements 4. Relevant inclusion and

Exclusion criteria

met

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Proportion of subjects who lost at least 3% of baseline body weight (=3% responders)12 weeks

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Body fat free mass assessed per bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), compared to baseline4, 8 and 12 weeks
Lipid metabolism parameters (low density lipid cholesterol), compared to screening values (V1)14 weeks
Fasting glucose, compared to screening values (V1)14 weeks
Glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), compared to screening values (V1)14 weeks
Evaluation of the overall feeling of satiety compared to baseline by using visual analogue scales (VAS)4, 8 and 12 weekscontinuous line between two endpoints: not saturated at all & fully saturated
Evaluation of the overall feeling of fullness compared to baseline by using visual analogue scales (VAS)4, 8 and 12 weekscontinuous line between two endpoints: not full at all & extremely full
Evaluation of the overall feeling of craving compared to baseline by using a 5 point Likert scale4, 8 and 12 weeks0= no, 1= slightly, 2= moderate, 3= strong and 4= very strong
General well-being parameters (Impact of Weight on Quality of Life-Lite, IWQOL-LITE), compared to baseline4, 8 and 12 weeks
Global evaluation of benefit at V5 by subject and the investigator12 weeksvery good, good, moderate and poor
Body weight change (in kg), compared to baseline (V2)4, 8 and 12 weeks
Body weight change (%), compared to baseline (V2)4, 8 and 12 weeks
Body weight (in kg )4, 8 and 12 weeks
Proportion of subjects who lost at least 3% of baseline body weight (=3% responders)4 and 8 weeks
Proportion of subjects who lost at least 5% of baseline body weight (=5% responders)4, 8 and 12 weeks
Body fat mass assessed per bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), compared to baseline4, 8 and 12 weeks
Waist circumference, compared to baseline4, 8 and 12 weeks
Hip circumference, compared to baseline4, 8 and 12 weeks
Lipid metabolism parameters (total cholesterol), compared to screening values (V1)14 weeks
Lipid metabolism parameters (high density lipid cholesterol), compared to screening values (V1)14 weeks

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pulse rate, compared to baseline4, 8 and 12 weeks
Safety laboratory parameters, compared to screening values (V1)14 weeksanalysis of full blood count parameters (haemoglobin)
Global evaluation of tolerability at V5 by subject and the investigator12 weeksvery good, good, moderate and poor
Gastrointestinal tolerability parameters (Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale questionnaire, GSRS), compared to baseline4, 8 and 12 weeks
Stool frequency in the week before each visit post- baseline, each compared to the week before baseline (V2)4, 8 and 12 weeks
Physical activity parameters (Global Physical Activity Questionnaire, GPAQ), compared to baseline4, 8 and 12 weeks
Assessment of adverse events throughout the study14 weeks
Blood pressure, compared to baseline4, 8 and 12 weeks

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026