Skip to content

Study to Evaluate Safety and Antiviral Activity of Doses of JNJ-53718678 in Children (>=28 Days to <=3 Years) With Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection

A Phase 2, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Antiviral Activity, Clinical Outcomes, Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Relationships of Different Doses of JNJ-53718678 in Children >=28 Days and <=3 Years of Age With Acute Respiratory Tract Infection Due to Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03656510
Enrollment
246
Registered
2018-09-04
Start date
2018-11-29
Completion date
2022-04-18
Last updated
2025-02-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the antiviral activity, clinical outcomes, safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationships of different oral dose levels of JNJ-53718678 in children greater than or equal to 28 days and less than or equal to 3 years of age with respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) disease (hospitalized participants \[Cohort 1\] or outpatients \[Cohort 2\]).

Detailed description

JNJ-53718678 is an investigational respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) specific fusion inhibitor and is under development for the treatment of RSV infection, which results in an upper and/or lower respiratory tract illness. The primary hypothesis of this study is that JNJ-53718678 has antiviral activity against RSV (that is, results in a decrease in RSV nasal viral load from immediately prior to first dose of study drug until Day 5). This will be assessed by a positive dose-response relationship of JNJ-53718678 compared to placebo. Besides the RSV nasal viral load through day 5, other timepoints will also be evaluated as well as other nasal viral load related parameters. In addition, the evolution of signs and symptoms of RSV disease will be evaluated. Participants' safety will be monitored throughout the study by evaluating the occurrence and severity of adverse events and by laboratory and electrocardiogram measurements. Study participants will be identified when they are hospitalized or expected to be hospitalized within 24 hours after presentation to the hospital (Cohort 1) or present for medical care as outpatients (Cohort 2) with symptoms of an acute respiratory illness supporting a diagnosis of RSV infection. Eligible participants will be randomized 1:1:1 to receive either a low or a high dose of JNJ 53718678 or placebo and will be receiving study treatment for 7 days. They will be followed up for 3 weeks after the last dose. The total study duration for each participant will be approximately 29 days.

Interventions

Participants will receive JNJ-53718678 (high dose or low dose) orally twice daily for 7 days.

DRUGPlacebo

Participants will receive matching placebo (high volume or low volume) orally twice daily for 7 days.

Sponsors

Janssen Research & Development, LLC
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
28 Days to 3 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Informed consent form (ICF) must be given * Laboratory diagnosis of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection * The participant has an acute respiratory illness * The time of onset of RSV symptoms to the anticipated time of randomization must be less than or equal to (\<=) 5 days * Except for the RSV-related illness, the Participant must be medically stable in case of allowed co-morbid conditions * The participant must have been assessed per local public health practice and considered not to have Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection during this respiratory infection

Exclusion criteria

* The participant is less than (\<) 3 months postnatal age at screening and was born prematurely (i.e, \<37 weeks and 0 days of gestation) OR if the participant weighs \<2.4 kilogram (kg) or greater than (\>) 16.8 kg * Participant is considered by the investigator to be immunocompromised within the past 12 months * Participant unwilling or unable to undergo mid-turbinate nasal swab procedures * Participant is receiving chronic home oxygen therapy at screening * Participant has other clinically significant abnormal electrocardiogram (ECG) findings not consistent with the present risk factor for severe RSV disease (if applicable) in the study population, as judged by the investigator based on the machine read ECG results at screening * The participant has a QTcF interval greater than (\>)450 millisecond (ms) per the machine read (mean of triplicate) parameter result confirmed by repeat triplicate ECG recording during screening

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) Viral Load Area Under Curve (AUC) From Immediately Prior to First Dose of Study Drug (Baseline) Through Day 5 (AUC[Day 5])Baseline through Day 5RSV viral load AUC from immediately prior to first dose of study drug through Day 5 was determined. The RSV viral load was measured by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) assay in mid-turbinate nasal swab specimens. As planned, combined data for both the cohorts was collected, analyzed and reported for this outcome measure.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Body TemperatureBaseline to Days 3, 5, 8, 14 and 21Change from baseline in body temperature (either investigator or caregiver measured) was assessed.
Peripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) Over TimeBaseline, Days 3, 5, 8, 14 and 21Peripheral capillary oxygen saturation was measured by the investigator over time.
RSV Viral Load Over TimeBaseline, Days 3, 5, 8, 14, and 21RSV viral load actual values over time were measured by qRT-PCR in the nasal swab specimens collected at the clinic visits and at home. As planned, combined data for both the cohorts was collected, analyzed and reported for this outcome measure.
Change From Baseline in RSV Viral Load Over TimeBaseline up to Days 3, 5, 8, 14, and 21Change from baseline in RSV viral load over time was measured by qRT-PCR in the nasal swab specimens collected at the clinic visits and at home. As planned, combined data for both the cohorts was collected, analyzed and reported for this outcome measure.
Change From Baseline in Peripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2)Baseline to Days 3, 5, 8, 14, and 21Change from baseline in peripheral capillary oxygen saturation levels was derived based on reported values over time.
Least Squares (LS) Mean RSV Viral Load on Days 3, 8 and 14Baseline through Days 3, 8, and 14LS mean RSV viral load on Days 3, 8, and 14 was reported. LS mean viral load (log10 copies/mL) was estimated per time point. The difference in RSV viral Load AUC (log10 copies\*day/mL) from immediately prior to first dose of study drug (baseline) through Day 3, 8 and 14 was determined from the model estimating the LS Mean Viral Load per time point, and is presented in the statistical analysis. The RSV viral load was measured by qRT-PCR assay in mid-turbinate nasal swab specimens. As planned, combined data for both the cohorts was collected, and analyzed for this outcome measure at Days 3 and 8, however combined Cohort 1 and Cohort 2 data were not analyzed for this outcome measure at Day 14, due to the premature study termination.
Time to Undetectable RSV Viral LoadUp to Day 21Time to undetectable RSV viral load (as measured by qRT-PCR) was defined as the time in hours from first dose of study drug to first post-baseline timepoint at which the virus was undetectable and after which there were no more detectable virus assessments. As planned, combined data for both the cohorts was collected, analyzed and reported for this outcome measure.
Percentage of Participants With Undetectable RSV Viral Load at Each Timepoint Throughout the StudyBaseline, Days 3, 5, 8, 14 and 21Percentage of participants with undetectable RSV viral load (as measured by qRT-PCR) at each timepoint throughout the study was reported. As planned, combined data for both the cohorts were collected, analyzed and reported for this outcome measure.
Change From Baseline in Parent(s)/Caregiver(s) Pediatric RSV Electronic Severity and Outcomes Rating System (PRESORS) ScoresBaseline up to Days 3, 5, 8, 14 and 21PRESORS is a questionnaire recording presence and severity of signs and symptoms of RSV disease (fever, cough, sputum, wheezing, difficulty breathing, nasal congestion, and feeding issues). PRESORS overall RSV symptoms summary parameter consisted of 12-items, each item score ranges from 0 to 3. A summary score was derived (mean of the item scores) which also ranges from 0 to 3. The higher the score, the worse the symptom.
Change From Baseline in Clinician PRESORS ScoreBaseline, up to Days 3, 5, 8, 14 and 21Change from baseline in clinician PRESORS scores (for concepts: activity level, sleep disturbance, breathing problems, retractions, tachypnea, feeding problem, cough, nasal secretions, wheezing, dehydration) was assessed. Clinician PRESORS is a questionnaire recording presence and severity of signs and symptoms of RSV disease and consisted of 10-items, each item score ranges from 0 to 3. Overall RSV symptoms summary parameter was derived (mean of the item scores) which also ranges from 0 to 3. The higher the score, the worse the symptom.
Time to Resolution of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO)Up to Day 21Time to resolution is defined as time from first dose of study drug until the first time of resolution of all RSV symptoms (breathing problems, retractions, tachypnea, breathing sounds, cough, tachycardia, nasal secretions, sleep disturbance, crying, illness behavior, feeding problems, and dehydration). Resolution occurs when all symptoms from the caregiver reported outcomes (ObsRO) are scored as none or mild (score of 0 or 1, respectively) for at least 24 hours.
Time to Improvement on Overall HealthUp to Day 21Time to improvement based on general questions on overall health was assessed. Time from first dose of study drug until first time status of improvement of RSV symptoms reported as very much improved or much improved based on response to question 'Would you say the child's RSV symptoms have improved, are about the same or are worse than when the child entered the study'.
Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeBaseline, Days 3, 5, 8, 14, and 21Percentage of participants by status of RSV symptoms based on PRESORS caregiver (ObsRO) general question over time was assessed. PRESORS is a questionnaire recording presence and severity of signs and symptoms of RSV disease (fever, cough, sputum, wheezing, difficulty breathing, nasal congestion, and feeding issues). Status of RSV symptoms was assessed by a question (how would you rate the child's RSV symptoms now?) of PRESORS questionnaire and responses were categorized as: 1) none, 2) very mild, 3) mild, 4) moderate, 5) severe, and 6) very severe.
Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeBaseline, Days 3, 5, 8, 14, and 21Percentage of participants by health status assessment based on PRESORS caregiver (ObsRO) general question over time was assessed. PRESORS is a questionnaire recording presence and severity of signs and symptoms of RSV disease (fever, cough, sputum, wheezing, difficulty breathing, nasal congestion, and feeding issues). Health status was assessed by a question (how is the child's health now) of PRESORS questionnaire and responses were categorized as: 1) excellent, 2) very good, 3) good, 4) fair, 5) poor, and 6) very poor.
Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV DiseaseDays 14 and 21Percentage of participants with worsening or improvement of RSV disease based on general questions of overall health was assessed. Improvement or worsening was assessed by a question 'Would you say the child's RSV symptoms have improved, are about the same or are worse than when the child entered the study' and responses were categorized as: 1) very much improved, 2) much improved, 3) a little improved, 4) about the same, 5) a little worse, 6) much worse, and 7) very much worse.
Percentage of Participants by Return to Pre-RSV Disease Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeBaseline, Days 3, 5, 8, 14, and 21Percentage of participants by return to pre-RSV disease health status assessment based on PRESORS caregiver (ObsRO) general question over time was assessed by a question (Has the child's health returned to normal \[how it was before RSV?\]) of PRESORS questionnaire and responses were categorized as: 1) No, and 2) Yes. PRESORS is a questionnaire recording presence and severity of signs and symptoms of RSV disease (fever, cough, sputum, wheezing, difficulty breathing, nasal congestion, and feeding issues). Below results are reported for category 'Yes'.
Respiratory Rate (RR) Over TimeBaseline, Days 3, 5, 8, 14 and 21Respiratory rate (RR) was measured by the investigator over time.
Change From Baseline in Respiratory RateBaseline to Days 3, 5, 8, 14 and 21Change from baseline in respiratory rate was derived based on the reported measurements of respiratory rate over time. The respiratory rate over time was reported by the investigator.
Heart Rate Over TimeBaseline, Days 3, 5, 8, 14 and 21Heart rate was measured by the investigator over time.
Change From Baseline in Heart RateBaseline to Days 3, 5, 8, 14 and 21Change from baseline in heart rate was assessed.
Percentage of Participants Who Required (re)Hospitalization During Treatment and Follow-upUp to Day 28Percentage of participants who required (re)hospitalization during treatment and follow-up was assessed. Percentage of participants requiring re-hospitalization following the initial hospital discharge was assessed in Cohort 1 participants (hospitalized cohort) whilst percentage of participants requiring hospitalization after first dose of study drug was assessed in Cohort 2 participants (outpatient cohort).
Cohort 1: Time to Return to Age-adjusted Normal Values for Vital SignsUp to Day 28Time to return to age-adjusted normal values from first dose of study drug based on the reported vital signs (respiratory rate, heart rate, SpO2 \>=92%, and SpO2 \>=95%) values was assessed. As per the study protocol and study design, this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for participants who were hospitalized only. Only participants in Cohort 1 were hospitalized, hence this outcome measure is only reported for Cohort 1.
Cohort 1: Time to Discharge From HospitalUp to Day 28Time to discharge from hospital was derived from the reported discharge date/time and from first dose date/time. As per the study protocol and study design, this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for participants who were hospitalized only. Only participants in Cohort 1 were hospitalized, hence this outcome measure is only reported for Cohort 1.
Cohort 1: Percentage of Participants Who Required Admission to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU)Up to Day 21Percentage of participants who required admission to the ICU was assessed. This outcome measure was applicable for those participants that were not in ICU before first dose of study drug. As per the study protocol and study design, this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for participants who were hospitalized only. Only participants in Cohort 1 were hospitalized, hence this outcome measure is only reported for Cohort 1.
Cohort 1: Duration of ICU StayUp to Day 21Duration of ICU stay was derived based on the reported admission/discharge date/time for ICU. Duration defined as total number of hours a participant was in ICU from first dose of study drug until study termination. As per the study protocol and study design, this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for participants who were hospitalized only. Only participants in Cohort 1 were hospitalized, hence this outcome measure is only reported for Cohort 1.
Cohort 1: Time to Clinical Stability Evaluated by the InvestigatorUp to Day 21Time to clinical stability was derived based on vital signs(SpO2 \>= 92%, SpO2 \>=95% on room air) assessments and supplementation end dates as collected. Time to clinical stability=time from initiation of study treatment until time at which following criteria were met: Time to return to age-adjusted normal value for otherwise healthy, pre-RSV infection status for participant with risk factor for severe RSV disease,no more oxygen supplementation in otherwise healthy participant, participant with risk factor for severe RSV disease and no more IV administered/nasogastric tube feeding/hydration supplementation in otherwise healthy participant or pre-RSV status of IV/nasogastric tube feeding/hydration in participant with risk factor for severe RSV disease. As per protocol and study design,this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for participants who were hospitalized only. Only participants in Cohort 1 were hospitalized, hence this outcome measure is only reported for Cohort 1.
Cohort 1: Percentage of Participants Who Required Supplemental OxygenUp to Day 21Percentage of participants who required supplemental oxygen after first dose of study drug was reported. This parameter was only for participants that did not require oxygen supplementation before first dose of study drug. As per the study protocol and study design, this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for participants who were hospitalized only. Only participants in Cohort 1 were hospitalized, hence this outcome measure is only reported for Cohort 1.
Cohort 1: Duration of Supplemental OxygenUp to Day 28Duration of supplemental oxygen was assessed. Duration was defined as total number of hours a participant used supplemental oxygen from first dose of study drug until study termination. As per the study protocol and study design, this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for participants who were hospitalized only. Only participants in Cohort 1 were hospitalized, hence this outcome measure is only reported for Cohort 1.
Cohort 1: Percentage of Participants Who Required Non-invasive Mechanical Ventilation SupportUp to Day 21Percentage of participants who required non-invasive mechanical ventilation support (example: continuous positive airway pressure) after first dose of study drug was assessed. This parameter was only for participants who did not require non-invasive mechanical ventilation support before first dose of study drug. As per the study protocol and study design, this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for participants who were hospitalized only. Only participants in Cohort 1 were hospitalized, hence this outcome measure is only reported for Cohort 1.
Cohort 1: Percentage of Participants Who Required Invasive Mechanical Ventilation SupportUp to Day 21Percentage of participants who required invasive mechanical ventilation support (example: endotracheal-mechanical ventilation) after first dose of study drug was assessed. This parameter was only for participants who did not require invasive mechanical ventilation support before first dose of study drug. As per the study protocol and study design, this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for participants who were hospitalized only. Only participants in Cohort 1 were hospitalized, hence this outcome measure is only reported for Cohort 1.
Cohort 1: Percentage of Participants Who Required Non-invasive Non-mechanical Ventilation SupportUp to Day 21Percentage of participants who required non-invasive non-mechanical ventilation support (example: nasal cannula) after first dose of study drug was assessed. This parameter was only for participants who did not require non-invasive non-mechanical ventilation support before first dose of study drug. As per the study protocol and study design, this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for participants who were hospitalized only. Only participants in Cohort 1 were hospitalized, hence this outcome measure is only reported for Cohort 1.
Cohort 1: Duration of Non-invasive Ventilation SupportUp to Day 21For the subset of participants who received non-invasive ventilation post dose, duration for non-invasive ventilation could not be derived by individual type as start/end dates and times were not collected in full to allow breakdown of duration derivation by ventilation type and only overall duration of oxygen supplementation (overall ventilation support) could be derived which is reported in the outcome measure Duration of Supplemental Oxygen. As per the study protocol and study design, this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for participants who were hospitalized only. Only participants in Cohort 1 were hospitalized, hence this outcome measure could only have been reported for Cohort 1.
Cohort 1: Duration of Invasive Ventilation SupportUp to Day 21For the subset of participants who received invasive ventilation post dose, duration for invasive ventilation could not be derived by individual type as start/end dates and times were not collected in full to allow breakdown of duration derivation by ventilation type and only overall duration of oxygen supplementation (overall ventilation support) could be derived which is reported in the outcome measure Duration of Supplemental Oxygen. As per the study protocol and study design, this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for participants who were hospitalized only. Only participants in Cohort 1 were hospitalized, hence this outcome measure could only have been reported for Cohort 1.
Cohort 1: Time to End of Supplemental Oxygen up to 72 Hours From First Hospital DischargeUp to end of supplemental oxygen including supplemental oxygen within 72 hours after first hospital discharge (up to Day 28)Time to end of supplemental oxygen up to 72 hours from first hospital discharge was assessed. Time to end of supplemental oxygen was defined as time (hours) from first dose of study drug to last end date/time of any oxygen supplementation received, but within 72 hours following first hospital discharge. As per the study protocol and study design, this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for participants who were hospitalized only. Only participants in Cohort 1 were hospitalized, hence this outcome measure is only reported for Cohort 1.
Cohort 1: Percentage of Participants Who Needed Hydration and/or Feeding by Intravenous (IV) Administration or Nasogastric TubeUp to Day 28Percentage of participants who needed hydration and/or feeding by IV Administration or nasogastric tube after the first dose of study drug was assessed. This parameter was only for participants who didn't require supplemental feeding/hydration before first dose of study drug. As per the study protocol and study design, this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for participants who were hospitalized only. Only participants in Cohort 1 were hospitalized, hence this outcome measure is only reported for Cohort 1.
Percentage of Participants With Adverse EventsUp to Day 28Percentage of participants with adverse events was assessed. An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in clinical study participants administered a medicinal (investigational or non-investigational) product. An adverse event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the intervention.
Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsUp to Day 28Percentage of participants with abnormal laboratory findings (chemistry and hematology) worst toxicity grade was assessed based on Division of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (DMID) toxicity grading scale. DMID toxicity grades range from 1 to 4. Grade 1 = mild: transient or mild discomfort (\<48 hours); no medical intervention/therapy required. Grade 2 = moderate: mild to moderate limitation in activity - some assistance may be needed; no or minimal medical intervention/therapy required. Grade 3 = severe: marked limitation in activity, some assistance usually required; medical intervention/therapy required, hospitalizations possible. Grade 4 = life-threatening or death: Extreme limitation in activity, significant assistance required; significant medical intervention/therapy required, hospitalization or hospice care probable.
Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs) FindingsUp to Day 28Percentage of participants with abnormal ECG (PR interval \[for age 0 to 2 years: \>150 msec is abnormally high, for age group 2 to \<3.5 years: \<100 msec is abnormally low and \>150 msec is abnormally high\]; QRS interval \[for 0 to 2 years: \>79 msec is abnormally high, for age group 2 to \<3.5 years: \<40 msec is abnormally low and \>79 msec is abnormally high\]; QT interval \[for age 0 to 2 years: \>500 msec is abnormally high, for age group 2 to \<18 years: \<320 msec is abnormally low and \>450 msec is abnormally high\]; RR interval \[for age 0 to 3 months: \<333 msec is abnormally low and \>750 msec is abnormally high; for age group 3 to 12 months: \<400 msec is abnormally low and \>860 msec is abnormally high; for age 1 to 2 years: \<430 msec is abnormally low and \>1000 msec is abnormally high; for age group 2 to \<18 years: \<600 msec is abnormally low and \>1200 msec is abnormally high\]) findings were assessed.
Percentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF)Baseline to Day 28Percentage of participants with categorized change from Baseline in ECG parameters (QT/ QTcB/ QTcF interval) was assessed. Abnormal ECG change from baseline in QTc and QTcB Interval is categorized as borderline QTc change: 30 ms (milliseconds) to \<60 ms, and abnormally high QTc change: greater than \[\>\] 60 ms), and QTcF Interval is categorized as borderline QTc change: 30 ms to \<60 ms, and abnormally high QTc change: \>60 ms.
Percentage of Participants With Vital Signs AbnormalitiesUp to Day 28Percentage of participants with vital signs (SBP,DBP, pulse rate, respiratory rate, body temperature and SpO2) abnormalities (abnormally low \[ABL\] and abnormally high \[ABH\]) were reported. DBP: ABL: \<35 mmHg:0-3 months (mths), \<40 mmHg:3 mths- \<3.5 years,ABH: \>65 mmHg:0-3 mths, \>85 mmHg:3-12 mths, \>90 mmHg:1-2 years, \>70 mmHg: 2- \<3.5 years; SBP:ABL: \<60 mmHg:0-12 mths,\<75 mmHg:1-2 years, \<80:2- \<3.5 years,ABH: \>110:0-12 mths, \>120 mmHg:1-2 years, \>10 mmHg:2- \<3.5 years; Pulse rate:ABL: \<80 bpm:0-3 mths, \<70 bpm:3 mths-12 mth,\<60 bpm:1-2 years, \<90 bpm:2- \<3.5 years,ABH: \>180 bpm:0-3 mths, \>150 bpm:3 mths-12 mths, \>140 bpm:1-2 years, \>130:2- \<3.5 years; Respiratory rate:ABL: \<25 bpm:0-3 mths, \<20 bpm: 3 mths-12 mths,\<18 bpm:1-2 years, \<20 bpm:2- \<3.5 years, ABH:\>70 bpm:0-3 mths, \>60 bpm:3 mths-12 mths, \>50 bpm:1-2 years, \>35 bpm:2- \<3.5 years; SpO2: ABL: \<92%: 0-\<3.5 years; Temperature (Celsius): ABH:\>37.8:Tympanic, \>38.0:forehead, oral, axillary, \>37.2:rectal.
Cohort 1: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Timepoint 0 Hours Until 24 Hours Post Dose (AUC[0-24 Hours])0 to 24 hours post dose on Days 1 and 7AUC (0-24) is defined as area under the plasma concentration-time curve from timepoint 0 hours until 24 hours post dose estimated by population PK model.
Body Temperature Over TimeBaseline, Days 3, 5, 8, 14 and 21Body temperature was reported over time (either investigator or caregiver measured).
Cohort 1: Trough Plasma Concentration (Ctrough) of JNJ-53718678Days 1 and 7Ctrough is the trough plasma concentration of JNJ-53718678 estimated by population PK model.
Cohort 2: Plasma Concentration of JNJ-53718678Once daily dosing: Day 3 and Day 8 pre- or post-dose. Twice daily dosing: Day 1 at least 1 hour post-dose, and Days 3 or 5 (combined in one timepoint) at least 4 hours after morning dose but prior to evening dosePlasma concentration of JNJ-53718678 was measured for Cohort-2. As per planned analysis in the protocol, PK sampling was performed on either Day 3 or Day 5 for participants receiving twice daily dosing, resulting in one combined timepoint of Day 3 or Day 5. Hence, the data collected on either Day 3 or Day 5 was pooled and is reported here collectively.
Percentage of Participants With Medical Resource Utilization (MRU)Up to Day 28Percentage of participants with MRU (any medical care encounters) was reported.
Percentage of Participants With Acceptability and Palatability of the JNJ-53718678 Formulation as Assessed by Parent(s)/Caregiver(s)Day 8Percentage of participants with acceptability and palatability of the JNJ-53718678 formulation was assessed through a questionnaire asking about the child's reaction when given the medicine, completed by parent(s)/caregiver(s) after last dosing that categorized as 1) child took medicine easily, 2) disgusted expressions after tasting medicine, 3) cried after tasting medicine, 4) would not open mouth or turned head away to avoid medicine, 5) spit out or coughed out medicine, 6) gagged, and 7) vomited (within 2 minutes of swallowing medicine). Below results are based on response to child took medicine easily.
Number of Participants With Emerging Variations in the Viral Genome Potentially Associated With Resistance to JNJ-53718678Up to Day 21Number of participants with emerging variations in the viral genome potentially associated with resistance to JNJ-53718678 was reported. Number of participants with F gene sequencing data available and with emerging genetic variations post-baseline as compared to baseline, considering 24 RSV F protein positions of interest (positions 127, 137, 138, 140, 141, 143, 144, 323, 338, 339, 392, 394, 396, 397, 398, 399, 400, 401, 474, 486, 487, 488, 489, and 517) was reported.
Cohort 1: Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of JNJ-53718678Days 1 and 7Cmax is the maximum plasma concentration of JNJ-53718678 estimated by population PK model.

Countries

Argentina, Belgium, Brazil, Bulgaria, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, Poland, Russia, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Taiwan, Thailand, Turkey (Türkiye), United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Cohort 1: Placebo
Participants of age groups (age group 1: greater than or equal to \[\>=\] 28 days to less than \[\<\] 3 months, age group 2: \>=3 months to \<6 months, and age group 3: \>=6 months to less than or equal to \[\<=\] 3 years), who were hospitalized or expected to be hospitalized within 24 hours after presentation to the hospital received placebo matching to JNJ-53718678 (high volume placebo or low volume placebo to match the calculated volume of the JNJ-53718678 for the high dose or low dose, respectively) orally once daily for 7 days.
50
Cohort 1: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose
Participants who were hospitalized or expected to be hospitalized within 24 hours after presentation to the hospital received JNJ-53718678 1.7 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) for age group 1: \>=28 days to \<3 months; 2 mg/kg for age group 2: \>=3 months to \<6 months; and 3 mg/kg for age group 3: \>=6 months to \<=3 years, orally once daily for 7 days.
49
Cohort 1: JNJ-53718678 High Dose
Participants who were hospitalized or expected to be hospitalized within 24 hours after presentation to the hospital received JNJ-53718678 5 mg/kg for age group 1: \>=28 days to \<3 months; 6 mg/kg for age group 2: \>=3 months to \<6 months; and 9 mg/kg for age group 3: \>=6 months to \<=3 years, orally once daily for 7 days.
48
Cohort 2: Placebo
As per the original dosing, outpatients of age groups (age group 1: \>=28 days to \<3 months, age group 2: \>=3 months to \<6 months, and age group 3: \>=6 months to \<=3 years) were randomized to receive placebo matching to JNJ-53718678 (high volume placebo or low volume placebo to match the calculated volume of the JNJ-53718678 for the high dose or low dose, respectively) orally once daily for 7 days. After protocol amendment 4, participants received placebo matching to JNJ-53718678 (high dose or low dose) orally twice daily for 7 days.
34
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose
As per the original dosing, outpatients were randomized to receive JNJ-53718678 1.7 mg/kg for age group 1: \>=28 days to \<3 months; 2 mg/kg for age group 2: \>=3 months to \<6 months; and 3 mg/kg for age group 3: \>=6 months to \<=3 years, orally once daily for 7 days. After protocol amendment 4, participants were randomized to receive JNJ-53718678 0.85 mg/kg for age group 1, JNJ-53718678 1.0 mg/kg for age group 2, and JNJ-53718678 1.5 mg/kg for age group 3, orally twice daily for 7 days.
34
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose
As per the original dosing, outpatients were randomized to receive JNJ-53718678 5 mg/kg for age group 1: \>=28 days to \<3 months; 6 mg/kg for age group 2: \>=3 months to \<6 months; and 9 mg/kg for age group 3: \>=6 months to \<=3 years, orally once daily for 7 days. After protocol amendment 4, participants were randomized to receive JNJ-53718678 2.5 mg/kg for age group 1, JNJ-53718678 3.0 mg/kg for age group 2, and JNJ-53718678 4.5 mg/kg for age group 3, orally twice daily for 7 days.
31
Total246

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004FG005
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up100000
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject110100

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCohort 1: PlaceboCohort 1: JNJ-53718678 High DoseCohort 2: PlaceboCohort 1: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseCohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseCohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseTotal
Age, Continuous8.4 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.59
8.5 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.21
13.8 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.31
8.6 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.74
14.8 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.9
17.2 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.81
11.2 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.71
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
18 Participants21 Participants10 Participants19 Participants9 Participants10 Participants87 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
29 Participants24 Participants24 Participants28 Participants25 Participants21 Participants151 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
3 Participants3 Participants0 Participants2 Participants0 Participants0 Participants8 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
3 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
15 Participants11 Participants11 Participants14 Participants14 Participants13 Participants78 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants4 Participants0 Participants0 Participants5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
4 Participants4 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants10 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
28 Participants31 Participants22 Participants29 Participants19 Participants18 Participants147 Participants
Region of Enrollment
ARGENTINA
5 Participants6 Participants0 Participants5 Participants0 Participants0 Participants16 Participants
Region of Enrollment
BRAZIL
1 Participants3 Participants7 Participants5 Participants5 Participants5 Participants26 Participants
Region of Enrollment
BULGARIA
3 Participants2 Participants6 Participants0 Participants6 Participants7 Participants24 Participants
Region of Enrollment
GERMANY
0 Participants2 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants3 Participants
Region of Enrollment
HUNGARY
2 Participants4 Participants3 Participants2 Participants2 Participants0 Participants13 Participants
Region of Enrollment
ITALY
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants3 Participants
Region of Enrollment
JAPAN
5 Participants4 Participants8 Participants3 Participants12 Participants7 Participants39 Participants
Region of Enrollment
MALAYSIA
4 Participants4 Participants1 Participants2 Participants0 Participants1 Participants12 Participants
Region of Enrollment
MEXICO
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
Region of Enrollment
POLAND
0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Region of Enrollment
RUSSIAN FEDERATION
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Region of Enrollment
SOUTH AFRICA
0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Region of Enrollment
SOUTH KOREA
2 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Region of Enrollment
SPAIN
17 Participants20 Participants5 Participants17 Participants3 Participants3 Participants65 Participants
Region of Enrollment
SWEDEN
2 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants3 Participants
Region of Enrollment
TAIWAN
3 Participants2 Participants0 Participants5 Participants0 Participants2 Participants12 Participants
Region of Enrollment
THAILAND
1 Participants0 Participants2 Participants3 Participants2 Participants2 Participants10 Participants
Region of Enrollment
TURKEY
3 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants4 Participants
Region of Enrollment
UNITED KINGDOM
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants2 Participants0 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Region of Enrollment
UNITED STATES
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
23 Participants23 Participants13 Participants20 Participants8 Participants14 Participants101 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
27 Participants25 Participants21 Participants29 Participants26 Participants17 Participants145 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 500 / 490 / 480 / 340 / 340 / 31
other
Total, other adverse events
28 / 5029 / 4930 / 4814 / 3420 / 3413 / 31
serious
Total, serious adverse events
4 / 505 / 492 / 482 / 342 / 343 / 31

Outcome results

Primary

Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) Viral Load Area Under Curve (AUC) From Immediately Prior to First Dose of Study Drug (Baseline) Through Day 5 (AUC[Day 5])

RSV viral load AUC from immediately prior to first dose of study drug through Day 5 was determined. The RSV viral load was measured by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) assay in mid-turbinate nasal swab specimens. As planned, combined data for both the cohorts was collected, analyzed and reported for this outcome measure.

Time frame: Baseline through Day 5

Population: Intent-to-Treat-infected (ITT-i) analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and who had a centrally confirmed RSV RNA viral load of greater than or equal to (\>=) 1 log10 copies/mL above the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) of the RSV RT-qPCR assay at baseline. Analyses on the ITT-i set were performed as randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboRespiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) Viral Load Area Under Curve (AUC) From Immediately Prior to First Dose of Study Drug (Baseline) Through Day 5 (AUC[Day 5])22.74 log10 copies*day per milliliter (mL)
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseRespiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) Viral Load Area Under Curve (AUC) From Immediately Prior to First Dose of Study Drug (Baseline) Through Day 5 (AUC[Day 5])21.48 log10 copies*day per milliliter (mL)
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseRespiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) Viral Load Area Under Curve (AUC) From Immediately Prior to First Dose of Study Drug (Baseline) Through Day 5 (AUC[Day 5])21.51 log10 copies*day per milliliter (mL)
Secondary

Body Temperature Over Time

Body temperature was reported over time (either investigator or caregiver measured).

Time frame: Baseline, Days 3, 5, 8, 14 and 21

Population: The Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, and were analyzed as treated, regardless of the randomized treatment group assigned. Here, 'n' (number analyzed) represents number of participants who were evaluable at specified timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboBody Temperature Over TimeBaseline36.84 Degrees celsiusStandard Deviation 0.635
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboBody Temperature Over TimeDay 336.77 Degrees celsiusStandard Deviation 0.464
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboBody Temperature Over TimeDay 536.75 Degrees celsiusStandard Deviation 0.407
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboBody Temperature Over TimeDay 836.70 Degrees celsiusStandard Deviation 0.416
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboBody Temperature Over TimeDay 1436.86 Degrees celsiusStandard Deviation 0.315
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboBody Temperature Over TimeDay 2136.76 Degrees celsiusStandard Deviation 0.577
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseBody Temperature Over TimeDay 336.87 Degrees celsiusStandard Deviation 0.524
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseBody Temperature Over TimeDay 836.73 Degrees celsiusStandard Deviation 0.513
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseBody Temperature Over TimeDay 2136.67 Degrees celsiusStandard Deviation 0.407
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseBody Temperature Over TimeBaseline36.64 Degrees celsiusStandard Deviation 0.468
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseBody Temperature Over TimeDay 536.54 Degrees celsiusStandard Deviation 0.557
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseBody Temperature Over TimeDay 1436.68 Degrees celsiusStandard Deviation 0.44
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseBody Temperature Over TimeDay 2136.66 Degrees celsiusStandard Deviation 0.573
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseBody Temperature Over TimeDay 1436.60 Degrees celsiusStandard Deviation 0.396
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseBody Temperature Over TimeDay 836.65 Degrees celsiusStandard Deviation 0.441
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseBody Temperature Over TimeDay 536.70 Degrees celsiusStandard Deviation 0.408
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseBody Temperature Over TimeBaseline36.82 Degrees celsiusStandard Deviation 0.623
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseBody Temperature Over TimeDay 336.80 Degrees celsiusStandard Deviation 0.601
Cohort 2: PlaceboBody Temperature Over TimeDay 836.67 Degrees celsiusStandard Deviation 0.369
Cohort 2: PlaceboBody Temperature Over TimeDay 337.14 Degrees celsiusStandard Deviation 0.725
Cohort 2: PlaceboBody Temperature Over TimeDay 536.87 Degrees celsiusStandard Deviation 0.567
Cohort 2: PlaceboBody Temperature Over TimeDay 2136.74 Degrees celsiusStandard Deviation 0.615
Cohort 2: PlaceboBody Temperature Over TimeDay 1436.63 Degrees celsiusStandard Deviation 0.357
Cohort 2: PlaceboBody Temperature Over TimeBaseline36.84 Degrees celsiusStandard Deviation 0.613
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseBody Temperature Over TimeBaseline36.94 Degrees celsiusStandard Deviation 0.845
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseBody Temperature Over TimeDay 1436.72 Degrees celsiusStandard Deviation 0.364
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseBody Temperature Over TimeDay 337.20 Degrees celsiusStandard Deviation 0.694
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseBody Temperature Over TimeDay 536.71 Degrees celsiusStandard Deviation 0.348
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseBody Temperature Over TimeDay 836.76 Degrees celsiusStandard Deviation 0.536
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseBody Temperature Over TimeDay 2136.64 Degrees celsiusStandard Deviation 0.292
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseBody Temperature Over TimeDay 836.74 Degrees celsiusStandard Deviation 0.559
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseBody Temperature Over TimeDay 536.84 Degrees celsiusStandard Deviation 0.718
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseBody Temperature Over TimeDay 1436.59 Degrees celsiusStandard Deviation 0.377
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseBody Temperature Over TimeDay 2136.62 Degrees celsiusStandard Deviation 0.418
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseBody Temperature Over TimeDay 336.98 Degrees celsiusStandard Deviation 0.817
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseBody Temperature Over TimeBaseline36.79 Degrees celsiusStandard Deviation 0.785
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Body Temperature

Change from baseline in body temperature (either investigator or caregiver measured) was assessed.

Time frame: Baseline to Days 3, 5, 8, 14 and 21

Population: The Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, and were analyzed as treated, regardless of the randomized treatment group assigned. Here, 'n' (number analyzed) represents number of participants who were evaluable at specified timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Body TemperatureDay 140.01 Degrees celsiusStandard Deviation 0.594
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Body TemperatureDay 5-0.10 Degrees celsiusStandard Deviation 0.713
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Body TemperatureDay 3-0.08 Degrees celsiusStandard Deviation 0.697
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Body TemperatureDay 21-0.09 Degrees celsiusStandard Deviation 0.758
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Body TemperatureDay 8-0.13 Degrees celsiusStandard Deviation 0.659
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseChange From Baseline in Body TemperatureDay 5-0.09 Degrees celsiusStandard Deviation 0.532
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseChange From Baseline in Body TemperatureDay 140.04 Degrees celsiusStandard Deviation 0.528
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseChange From Baseline in Body TemperatureDay 30.23 Degrees celsiusStandard Deviation 0.541
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseChange From Baseline in Body TemperatureDay 210.03 Degrees celsiusStandard Deviation 0.519
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseChange From Baseline in Body TemperatureDay 80.10 Degrees celsiusStandard Deviation 0.6
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseChange From Baseline in Body TemperatureDay 5-0.12 Degrees celsiusStandard Deviation 0.627
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseChange From Baseline in Body TemperatureDay 14-0.21 Degrees celsiusStandard Deviation 0.609
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseChange From Baseline in Body TemperatureDay 21-0.17 Degrees celsiusStandard Deviation 0.724
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseChange From Baseline in Body TemperatureDay 8-0.17 Degrees celsiusStandard Deviation 0.596
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseChange From Baseline in Body TemperatureDay 3-0.02 Degrees celsiusStandard Deviation 0.629
Cohort 2: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Body TemperatureDay 8-0.13 Degrees celsiusStandard Deviation 0.588
Cohort 2: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Body TemperatureDay 30.33 Degrees celsiusStandard Deviation 0.768
Cohort 2: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Body TemperatureDay 50.07 Degrees celsiusStandard Deviation 0.7
Cohort 2: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Body TemperatureDay 14-0.17 Degrees celsiusStandard Deviation 0.687
Cohort 2: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Body TemperatureDay 21-0.06 Degrees celsiusStandard Deviation 0.704
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseChange From Baseline in Body TemperatureDay 14-0.21 Degrees celsiusStandard Deviation 0.866
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseChange From Baseline in Body TemperatureDay 30.26 Degrees celsiusStandard Deviation 0.835
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseChange From Baseline in Body TemperatureDay 21-0.30 Degrees celsiusStandard Deviation 0.826
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseChange From Baseline in Body TemperatureDay 5-0.22 Degrees celsiusStandard Deviation 0.767
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseChange From Baseline in Body TemperatureDay 8-0.17 Degrees celsiusStandard Deviation 1.016
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseChange From Baseline in Body TemperatureDay 30.21 Degrees celsiusStandard Deviation 0.724
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseChange From Baseline in Body TemperatureDay 14-0.19 Degrees celsiusStandard Deviation 0.843
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseChange From Baseline in Body TemperatureDay 5-0.04 Degrees celsiusStandard Deviation 0.627
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseChange From Baseline in Body TemperatureDay 21-0.18 Degrees celsiusStandard Deviation 0.913
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseChange From Baseline in Body TemperatureDay 8-0.11 Degrees celsiusStandard Deviation 0.772
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Clinician PRESORS Score

Change from baseline in clinician PRESORS scores (for concepts: activity level, sleep disturbance, breathing problems, retractions, tachypnea, feeding problem, cough, nasal secretions, wheezing, dehydration) was assessed. Clinician PRESORS is a questionnaire recording presence and severity of signs and symptoms of RSV disease and consisted of 10-items, each item score ranges from 0 to 3. Overall RSV symptoms summary parameter was derived (mean of the item scores) which also ranges from 0 to 3. The higher the score, the worse the symptom.

Time frame: Baseline, up to Days 3, 5, 8, 14 and 21

Population: ITT-i analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and who had centrally confirmed RSV RNA viral load of \>=1 log10 copies/mL above the LLOQ of the RSV RT-qPCR assay at baseline. Analyses on ITT-i set were performed as randomized. Here, 'n' (number analyzed) represents number of participants who were evaluable at specified timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinician PRESORS ScoreDay 14-1.10 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.466
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinician PRESORS ScoreDay 5-0.73 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.582
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinician PRESORS ScoreDay 3-0.45 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.441
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinician PRESORS ScoreDay 21-1.13 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.424
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinician PRESORS ScoreDay 8-0.92 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.461
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseChange From Baseline in Clinician PRESORS ScoreDay 5-0.71 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.424
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseChange From Baseline in Clinician PRESORS ScoreDay 14-1.11 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.428
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseChange From Baseline in Clinician PRESORS ScoreDay 3-0.45 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.517
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseChange From Baseline in Clinician PRESORS ScoreDay 21-1.12 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.433
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseChange From Baseline in Clinician PRESORS ScoreDay 8-1.04 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.396
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseChange From Baseline in Clinician PRESORS ScoreDay 5-0.83 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.483
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseChange From Baseline in Clinician PRESORS ScoreDay 14-1.14 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.369
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseChange From Baseline in Clinician PRESORS ScoreDay 21-1.17 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.336
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseChange From Baseline in Clinician PRESORS ScoreDay 8-1.04 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.449
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseChange From Baseline in Clinician PRESORS ScoreDay 3-0.48 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.469
Cohort 2: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinician PRESORS ScoreDay 8-0.71 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.529
Cohort 2: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinician PRESORS ScoreDay 3-0.25 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.424
Cohort 2: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinician PRESORS ScoreDay 5-0.38 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.415
Cohort 2: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinician PRESORS ScoreDay 14-0.81 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.497
Cohort 2: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Clinician PRESORS ScoreDay 21-0.87 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.455
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseChange From Baseline in Clinician PRESORS ScoreDay 14-0.77 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.436
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseChange From Baseline in Clinician PRESORS ScoreDay 3-0.21 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.378
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseChange From Baseline in Clinician PRESORS ScoreDay 21-0.81 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.411
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseChange From Baseline in Clinician PRESORS ScoreDay 5-0.37 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.462
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseChange From Baseline in Clinician PRESORS ScoreDay 8-0.63 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.423
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseChange From Baseline in Clinician PRESORS ScoreDay 3-0.29 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.338
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseChange From Baseline in Clinician PRESORS ScoreDay 14-0.91 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.541
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseChange From Baseline in Clinician PRESORS ScoreDay 5-0.60 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.516
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseChange From Baseline in Clinician PRESORS ScoreDay 21-0.93 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.524
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseChange From Baseline in Clinician PRESORS ScoreDay 8-0.85 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.552
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Heart Rate

Change from baseline in heart rate was assessed.

Time frame: Baseline to Days 3, 5, 8, 14 and 21

Population: The Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, and were analyzed as treated, regardless of the randomized treatment group assigned. Here, 'n' (number analyzed) represents number of participants who were evaluable at specified timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Heart RateDay 3-4.9 Beats/minuteStandard Deviation 19.36
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Heart RateDay 14-12.0 Beats/minuteStandard Deviation 21.79
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Heart RateDay 21-15.0 Beats/minuteStandard Deviation 23.8
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Heart RateDay 8-10.4 Beats/minuteStandard Deviation 18.45
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Heart RateDay 5-7.9 Beats/minuteStandard Deviation 20.31
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseChange From Baseline in Heart RateDay 14-6.5 Beats/minuteStandard Deviation 23.99
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseChange From Baseline in Heart RateDay 3-1.6 Beats/minuteStandard Deviation 19.82
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseChange From Baseline in Heart RateDay 8-12.2 Beats/minuteStandard Deviation 23.2
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseChange From Baseline in Heart RateDay 5-5.8 Beats/minuteStandard Deviation 22.94
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseChange From Baseline in Heart RateDay 21-7.7 Beats/minuteStandard Deviation 25.88
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseChange From Baseline in Heart RateDay 21-6.5 Beats/minuteStandard Deviation 19.52
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseChange From Baseline in Heart RateDay 5-2.9 Beats/minuteStandard Deviation 20.56
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseChange From Baseline in Heart RateDay 14-5.1 Beats/minuteStandard Deviation 22.44
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseChange From Baseline in Heart RateDay 3-0.6 Beats/minuteStandard Deviation 18.84
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseChange From Baseline in Heart RateDay 8-5.2 Beats/minuteStandard Deviation 22.02
Cohort 2: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Heart RateDay 8-12.7 Beats/minuteStandard Deviation 26.09
Cohort 2: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Heart RateDay 21-14.0 Beats/minuteStandard Deviation 25.38
Cohort 2: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Heart RateDay 14-14.4 Beats/minuteStandard Deviation 24.62
Cohort 2: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Heart RateDay 3-3.0 Beats/minuteStandard Deviation 24.71
Cohort 2: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Heart RateDay 5-11.6 Beats/minuteStandard Deviation 18.55
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseChange From Baseline in Heart RateDay 5-13.0 Beats/minuteStandard Deviation 17.11
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseChange From Baseline in Heart RateDay 3-7.4 Beats/minuteStandard Deviation 16.83
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseChange From Baseline in Heart RateDay 8-15.6 Beats/minuteStandard Deviation 20.67
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseChange From Baseline in Heart RateDay 14-17.7 Beats/minuteStandard Deviation 17.69
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseChange From Baseline in Heart RateDay 21-10.4 Beats/minuteStandard Deviation 21.02
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseChange From Baseline in Heart RateDay 8-7.2 Beats/minuteStandard Deviation 35.9
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseChange From Baseline in Heart RateDay 5-5.6 Beats/minuteStandard Deviation 28.53
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseChange From Baseline in Heart RateDay 3-7.3 Beats/minuteStandard Deviation 28.39
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseChange From Baseline in Heart RateDay 21-10.9 Beats/minuteStandard Deviation 28.63
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseChange From Baseline in Heart RateDay 14-10.1 Beats/minuteStandard Deviation 28.02
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Parent(s)/Caregiver(s) Pediatric RSV Electronic Severity and Outcomes Rating System (PRESORS) Scores

PRESORS is a questionnaire recording presence and severity of signs and symptoms of RSV disease (fever, cough, sputum, wheezing, difficulty breathing, nasal congestion, and feeding issues). PRESORS overall RSV symptoms summary parameter consisted of 12-items, each item score ranges from 0 to 3. A summary score was derived (mean of the item scores) which also ranges from 0 to 3. The higher the score, the worse the symptom.

Time frame: Baseline up to Days 3, 5, 8, 14 and 21

Population: ITT-i analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and who had centrally confirmed RSV RNA viral load of \>=1 log10 copies/mL above the LLOQ of the RSV RT-qPCR assay at baseline. Analyses on ITT-i set were performed as randomized. Here, 'n' (number analyzed) represents number of participants who were evaluable at specified timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Parent(s)/Caregiver(s) Pediatric RSV Electronic Severity and Outcomes Rating System (PRESORS) ScoresDay 8-1.15 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.581
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Parent(s)/Caregiver(s) Pediatric RSV Electronic Severity and Outcomes Rating System (PRESORS) ScoresDay 14-1.40 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.591
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Parent(s)/Caregiver(s) Pediatric RSV Electronic Severity and Outcomes Rating System (PRESORS) ScoresDay 5-0.91 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.585
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Parent(s)/Caregiver(s) Pediatric RSV Electronic Severity and Outcomes Rating System (PRESORS) ScoresDay 3-0.51 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.571
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Parent(s)/Caregiver(s) Pediatric RSV Electronic Severity and Outcomes Rating System (PRESORS) ScoresDay 21-1.41 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.637
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseChange From Baseline in Parent(s)/Caregiver(s) Pediatric RSV Electronic Severity and Outcomes Rating System (PRESORS) ScoresDay 3-0.55 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.618
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseChange From Baseline in Parent(s)/Caregiver(s) Pediatric RSV Electronic Severity and Outcomes Rating System (PRESORS) ScoresDay 8-1.25 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.537
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseChange From Baseline in Parent(s)/Caregiver(s) Pediatric RSV Electronic Severity and Outcomes Rating System (PRESORS) ScoresDay 14-1.39 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.582
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseChange From Baseline in Parent(s)/Caregiver(s) Pediatric RSV Electronic Severity and Outcomes Rating System (PRESORS) ScoresDay 5-0.88 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.542
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseChange From Baseline in Parent(s)/Caregiver(s) Pediatric RSV Electronic Severity and Outcomes Rating System (PRESORS) ScoresDay 21-1.33 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.559
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseChange From Baseline in Parent(s)/Caregiver(s) Pediatric RSV Electronic Severity and Outcomes Rating System (PRESORS) ScoresDay 8-1.39 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.514
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseChange From Baseline in Parent(s)/Caregiver(s) Pediatric RSV Electronic Severity and Outcomes Rating System (PRESORS) ScoresDay 3-0.70 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.594
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseChange From Baseline in Parent(s)/Caregiver(s) Pediatric RSV Electronic Severity and Outcomes Rating System (PRESORS) ScoresDay 5-1.11 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.581
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseChange From Baseline in Parent(s)/Caregiver(s) Pediatric RSV Electronic Severity and Outcomes Rating System (PRESORS) ScoresDay 14-1.59 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.458
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseChange From Baseline in Parent(s)/Caregiver(s) Pediatric RSV Electronic Severity and Outcomes Rating System (PRESORS) ScoresDay 21-1.56 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.468
Cohort 2: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Parent(s)/Caregiver(s) Pediatric RSV Electronic Severity and Outcomes Rating System (PRESORS) ScoresDay 5-0.48 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.572
Cohort 2: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Parent(s)/Caregiver(s) Pediatric RSV Electronic Severity and Outcomes Rating System (PRESORS) ScoresDay 8-0.85 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.526
Cohort 2: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Parent(s)/Caregiver(s) Pediatric RSV Electronic Severity and Outcomes Rating System (PRESORS) ScoresDay 14-1.06 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.529
Cohort 2: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Parent(s)/Caregiver(s) Pediatric RSV Electronic Severity and Outcomes Rating System (PRESORS) ScoresDay 3-0.25 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.576
Cohort 2: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Parent(s)/Caregiver(s) Pediatric RSV Electronic Severity and Outcomes Rating System (PRESORS) ScoresDay 21-1.12 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.529
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseChange From Baseline in Parent(s)/Caregiver(s) Pediatric RSV Electronic Severity and Outcomes Rating System (PRESORS) ScoresDay 5-0.52 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.558
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseChange From Baseline in Parent(s)/Caregiver(s) Pediatric RSV Electronic Severity and Outcomes Rating System (PRESORS) ScoresDay 14-1.08 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.568
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseChange From Baseline in Parent(s)/Caregiver(s) Pediatric RSV Electronic Severity and Outcomes Rating System (PRESORS) ScoresDay 8-0.83 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.582
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseChange From Baseline in Parent(s)/Caregiver(s) Pediatric RSV Electronic Severity and Outcomes Rating System (PRESORS) ScoresDay 21-1.15 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.496
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseChange From Baseline in Parent(s)/Caregiver(s) Pediatric RSV Electronic Severity and Outcomes Rating System (PRESORS) ScoresDay 3-0.15 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.427
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseChange From Baseline in Parent(s)/Caregiver(s) Pediatric RSV Electronic Severity and Outcomes Rating System (PRESORS) ScoresDay 3-0.21 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.537
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseChange From Baseline in Parent(s)/Caregiver(s) Pediatric RSV Electronic Severity and Outcomes Rating System (PRESORS) ScoresDay 14-1.24 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.681
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseChange From Baseline in Parent(s)/Caregiver(s) Pediatric RSV Electronic Severity and Outcomes Rating System (PRESORS) ScoresDay 5-0.58 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.644
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseChange From Baseline in Parent(s)/Caregiver(s) Pediatric RSV Electronic Severity and Outcomes Rating System (PRESORS) ScoresDay 21-1.29 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.596
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseChange From Baseline in Parent(s)/Caregiver(s) Pediatric RSV Electronic Severity and Outcomes Rating System (PRESORS) ScoresDay 8-1.04 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.628
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Peripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2)

Change from baseline in peripheral capillary oxygen saturation levels was derived based on reported values over time.

Time frame: Baseline to Days 3, 5, 8, 14, and 21

Population: The Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, and were analyzed as treated, regardless of the randomized treatment group assigned. Here, 'n' (number analyzed) represents number of participants who were evaluable at specified timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Peripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2)Day 141.0 Percentage of SpO2Standard Deviation 2.28
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Peripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2)Day 50.0 Percentage of SpO2Standard Deviation 2.92
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Peripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2)Day 3-0.5 Percentage of SpO2Standard Deviation 2.93
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Peripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2)Day 211.1 Percentage of SpO2Standard Deviation 2.45
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Peripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2)Day 80.1 Percentage of SpO2Standard Deviation 3.02
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseChange From Baseline in Peripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2)Day 50.4 Percentage of SpO2Standard Deviation 2.93
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseChange From Baseline in Peripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2)Day 141.7 Percentage of SpO2Standard Deviation 3.08
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseChange From Baseline in Peripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2)Day 3-0.2 Percentage of SpO2Standard Deviation 3.09
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseChange From Baseline in Peripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2)Day 211.7 Percentage of SpO2Standard Deviation 3.38
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseChange From Baseline in Peripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2)Day 80.9 Percentage of SpO2Standard Deviation 3.53
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseChange From Baseline in Peripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2)Day 50.1 Percentage of SpO2Standard Deviation 2.38
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseChange From Baseline in Peripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2)Day 141.4 Percentage of SpO2Standard Deviation 2.32
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseChange From Baseline in Peripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2)Day 211.3 Percentage of SpO2Standard Deviation 2.4
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseChange From Baseline in Peripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2)Day 80.8 Percentage of SpO2Standard Deviation 2.47
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseChange From Baseline in Peripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2)Day 3-0.6 Percentage of SpO2Standard Deviation 2.72
Cohort 2: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Peripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2)Day 80.9 Percentage of SpO2Standard Deviation 2.59
Cohort 2: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Peripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2)Day 30.2 Percentage of SpO2Standard Deviation 2.31
Cohort 2: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Peripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2)Day 50.1 Percentage of SpO2Standard Deviation 2.49
Cohort 2: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Peripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2)Day 142.0 Percentage of SpO2Standard Deviation 2.72
Cohort 2: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Peripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2)Day 211.8 Percentage of SpO2Standard Deviation 2.57
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseChange From Baseline in Peripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2)Day 141.8 Percentage of SpO2Standard Deviation 2.05
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseChange From Baseline in Peripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2)Day 3-0.4 Percentage of SpO2Standard Deviation 2.45
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseChange From Baseline in Peripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2)Day 212.0 Percentage of SpO2Standard Deviation 2.12
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseChange From Baseline in Peripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2)Day 50.4 Percentage of SpO2Standard Deviation 2.41
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseChange From Baseline in Peripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2)Day 80.8 Percentage of SpO2Standard Deviation 2.86
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseChange From Baseline in Peripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2)Day 30.7 Percentage of SpO2Standard Deviation 1.63
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseChange From Baseline in Peripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2)Day 142.6 Percentage of SpO2Standard Deviation 3.06
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseChange From Baseline in Peripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2)Day 51.2 Percentage of SpO2Standard Deviation 2.54
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseChange From Baseline in Peripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2)Day 213.0 Percentage of SpO2Standard Deviation 2.8
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseChange From Baseline in Peripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2)Day 82.0 Percentage of SpO2Standard Deviation 3.36
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate

Change from baseline in respiratory rate was derived based on the reported measurements of respiratory rate over time. The respiratory rate over time was reported by the investigator.

Time frame: Baseline to Days 3, 5, 8, 14 and 21

Population: The Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, and were analyzed as treated, regardless of the randomized treatment group assigned. Here, 'n' (number analyzed) represents number of participants who were evaluable at specified timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Respiratory RateDay 5-6.5 Breaths/minuteStandard Deviation 9.41
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Respiratory RateDay 21-8.4 Breaths/minuteStandard Deviation 10.84
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Respiratory RateDay 14-9.3 Breaths/minuteStandard Deviation 9.96
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Respiratory RateDay 8-9.4 Breaths/minuteStandard Deviation 9.19
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Respiratory RateDay 3-0.8 Breaths/minuteStandard Deviation 10.88
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseChange From Baseline in Respiratory RateDay 21-10.4 Breaths/minuteStandard Deviation 13.01
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseChange From Baseline in Respiratory RateDay 8-11.4 Breaths/minuteStandard Deviation 12.96
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseChange From Baseline in Respiratory RateDay 5-7.1 Breaths/minuteStandard Deviation 11.13
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseChange From Baseline in Respiratory RateDay 14-10.3 Breaths/minuteStandard Deviation 12.59
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseChange From Baseline in Respiratory RateDay 3-3.5 Breaths/minuteStandard Deviation 11.99
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseChange From Baseline in Respiratory RateDay 8-6.3 Breaths/minuteStandard Deviation 12.69
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseChange From Baseline in Respiratory RateDay 5-7.0 Breaths/minuteStandard Deviation 11.94
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseChange From Baseline in Respiratory RateDay 3-3.0 Breaths/minuteStandard Deviation 12.43
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseChange From Baseline in Respiratory RateDay 21-9.8 Breaths/minuteStandard Deviation 12.36
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseChange From Baseline in Respiratory RateDay 14-10.2 Breaths/minuteStandard Deviation 10.92
Cohort 2: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Respiratory RateDay 8-4.4 Breaths/minuteStandard Deviation 11.56
Cohort 2: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Respiratory RateDay 3-3.7 Breaths/minuteStandard Deviation 12.47
Cohort 2: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Respiratory RateDay 5-3.4 Breaths/minuteStandard Deviation 8.59
Cohort 2: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Respiratory RateDay 21-5.5 Breaths/minuteStandard Deviation 14.15
Cohort 2: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Respiratory RateDay 14-6.4 Breaths/minuteStandard Deviation 3.13
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseChange From Baseline in Respiratory RateDay 3-4.0 Breaths/minuteStandard Deviation 9.54
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseChange From Baseline in Respiratory RateDay 5-3.3 Breaths/minuteStandard Deviation 8.4
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseChange From Baseline in Respiratory RateDay 8-4.4 Breaths/minuteStandard Deviation 10.39
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseChange From Baseline in Respiratory RateDay 14-5.8 Breaths/minuteStandard Deviation 12.82
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseChange From Baseline in Respiratory RateDay 21-5.8 Breaths/minuteStandard Deviation 11.95
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseChange From Baseline in Respiratory RateDay 21-2.3 Breaths/minuteStandard Deviation 13.25
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseChange From Baseline in Respiratory RateDay 14-4.0 Breaths/minuteStandard Deviation 9.92
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseChange From Baseline in Respiratory RateDay 8-2.9 Breaths/minuteStandard Deviation 10.54
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseChange From Baseline in Respiratory RateDay 5-1.5 Breaths/minuteStandard Deviation 9.62
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseChange From Baseline in Respiratory RateDay 3-2.6 Breaths/minuteStandard Deviation 9.2
Secondary

Change From Baseline in RSV Viral Load Over Time

Change from baseline in RSV viral load over time was measured by qRT-PCR in the nasal swab specimens collected at the clinic visits and at home. As planned, combined data for both the cohorts was collected, analyzed and reported for this outcome measure.

Time frame: Baseline up to Days 3, 5, 8, 14, and 21

Population: ITT-i analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and who had centrally confirmed RSV RNA viral load of \>=1 log10 copies/mL above the LLOQ of the RSV RT-qPCR assay at baseline. Analyses on ITT-i set were performed as randomized. Here, 'n' (number analyzed) represents number of participants who were evaluable at specified timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboChange From Baseline in RSV Viral Load Over TimeDay 14-5.292 log10 copies/mLStandard Deviation 2.2968
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboChange From Baseline in RSV Viral Load Over TimeDay 8-4.308 log10 copies/mLStandard Deviation 2.2435
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboChange From Baseline in RSV Viral Load Over TimeDay 3-1.502 log10 copies/mLStandard Deviation 1.329
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboChange From Baseline in RSV Viral Load Over TimeDay 5-2.754 log10 copies/mLStandard Deviation 1.7699
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboChange From Baseline in RSV Viral Load Over TimeDay 21-5.801 log10 copies/mLStandard Deviation 2.1652
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseChange From Baseline in RSV Viral Load Over TimeDay 8-5.017 log10 copies/mLStandard Deviation 1.8563
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseChange From Baseline in RSV Viral Load Over TimeDay 3-1.690 log10 copies/mLStandard Deviation 1.6225
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseChange From Baseline in RSV Viral Load Over TimeDay 5-3.049 log10 copies/mLStandard Deviation 1.6493
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseChange From Baseline in RSV Viral Load Over TimeDay 14-5.471 log10 copies/mLStandard Deviation 2.4289
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseChange From Baseline in RSV Viral Load Over TimeDay 21-6.302 log10 copies/mLStandard Deviation 2.0439
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseChange From Baseline in RSV Viral Load Over TimeDay 21-6.268 log10 copies/mLStandard Deviation 1.9394
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseChange From Baseline in RSV Viral Load Over TimeDay 14-5.578 log10 copies/mLStandard Deviation 2.2707
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseChange From Baseline in RSV Viral Load Over TimeDay 3-1.694 log10 copies/mLStandard Deviation 1.5134
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseChange From Baseline in RSV Viral Load Over TimeDay 8-4.948 log10 copies/mLStandard Deviation 1.8428
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseChange From Baseline in RSV Viral Load Over TimeDay 5-3.121 log10 copies/mLStandard Deviation 1.8453
Secondary

Cohort 1: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Timepoint 0 Hours Until 24 Hours Post Dose (AUC[0-24 Hours])

AUC (0-24) is defined as area under the plasma concentration-time curve from timepoint 0 hours until 24 hours post dose estimated by population PK model.

Time frame: 0 to 24 hours post dose on Days 1 and 7

Population: PK analysis set included all participants from Cohort-1 who received JNJ-53718678 and for whom at least one PK concentration was reported. Here, 'n' (number analyzed) represents number of participants who were evaluable for specified timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboCohort 1: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Timepoint 0 Hours Until 24 Hours Post Dose (AUC[0-24 Hours])>=28 days to <3 months: Day 16690 Nanograms*hours per milliliter (ng*h/mL)Standard Deviation 1950
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboCohort 1: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Timepoint 0 Hours Until 24 Hours Post Dose (AUC[0-24 Hours])>=28 days to<3 months: Day 711400 Nanograms*hours per milliliter (ng*h/mL)Standard Deviation 3930
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboCohort 1: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Timepoint 0 Hours Until 24 Hours Post Dose (AUC[0-24 Hours])>=3 months to <6 months: Day 15340 Nanograms*hours per milliliter (ng*h/mL)Standard Deviation 2670
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboCohort 1: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Timepoint 0 Hours Until 24 Hours Post Dose (AUC[0-24 Hours])>=3 months to <6 months: Day 77370 Nanograms*hours per milliliter (ng*h/mL)Standard Deviation 4270
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboCohort 1: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Timepoint 0 Hours Until 24 Hours Post Dose (AUC[0-24 Hours])>=6 months to <=3 years: Day 16910 Nanograms*hours per milliliter (ng*h/mL)Standard Deviation 2900
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboCohort 1: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Timepoint 0 Hours Until 24 Hours Post Dose (AUC[0-24 Hours])>=6 months to <=3 years: Day 78160 Nanograms*hours per milliliter (ng*h/mL)Standard Deviation 3950
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseCohort 1: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Timepoint 0 Hours Until 24 Hours Post Dose (AUC[0-24 Hours])>=6 months to <=3 years: Day 125000 Nanograms*hours per milliliter (ng*h/mL)Standard Deviation 11600
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseCohort 1: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Timepoint 0 Hours Until 24 Hours Post Dose (AUC[0-24 Hours])>=28 days to <3 months: Day 120600 Nanograms*hours per milliliter (ng*h/mL)Standard Deviation 3990
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseCohort 1: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Timepoint 0 Hours Until 24 Hours Post Dose (AUC[0-24 Hours])>=3 months to <6 months: Day 735000 Nanograms*hours per milliliter (ng*h/mL)Standard Deviation 20100
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseCohort 1: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Timepoint 0 Hours Until 24 Hours Post Dose (AUC[0-24 Hours])>=28 days to<3 months: Day 736000 Nanograms*hours per milliliter (ng*h/mL)Standard Deviation 8140
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseCohort 1: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Timepoint 0 Hours Until 24 Hours Post Dose (AUC[0-24 Hours])>=6 months to <=3 years: Day 731000 Nanograms*hours per milliliter (ng*h/mL)Standard Deviation 16300
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseCohort 1: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Timepoint 0 Hours Until 24 Hours Post Dose (AUC[0-24 Hours])>=3 months to <6 months: Day 123600 Nanograms*hours per milliliter (ng*h/mL)Standard Deviation 12500
Secondary

Cohort 1: Duration of ICU Stay

Duration of ICU stay was derived based on the reported admission/discharge date/time for ICU. Duration defined as total number of hours a participant was in ICU from first dose of study drug until study termination. As per the study protocol and study design, this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for participants who were hospitalized only. Only participants in Cohort 1 were hospitalized, hence this outcome measure is only reported for Cohort 1.

Time frame: Up to Day 21

Population: ITT-i analysis set included all randomized participants who were admitted to ICU and received at least one dose of study drug and who had centrally confirmed RSV RNA viral load of \>=1 log10 copies/mL above the LLOQ of the RSV RT-qPCR assay at baseline. Analyses on ITT-i set were performed as randomized. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboCohort 1: Duration of ICU Stay238.22 HoursStandard Deviation 70.57
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseCohort 1: Duration of ICU Stay206.94 HoursStandard Deviation 204.94
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseCohort 1: Duration of ICU Stay127.72 HoursStandard Deviation 89.389
Secondary

Cohort 1: Duration of Invasive Ventilation Support

For the subset of participants who received invasive ventilation post dose, duration for invasive ventilation could not be derived by individual type as start/end dates and times were not collected in full to allow breakdown of duration derivation by ventilation type and only overall duration of oxygen supplementation (overall ventilation support) could be derived which is reported in the outcome measure Duration of Supplemental Oxygen. As per the study protocol and study design, this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for participants who were hospitalized only. Only participants in Cohort 1 were hospitalized, hence this outcome measure could only have been reported for Cohort 1.

Time frame: Up to Day 21

Population: ITT-i analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and who had centrally confirmed RSV RNA viral load of \>=1 log10 copies/mL above LLOQ of RSV RT-qPCR assay at baseline. Analyses on ITT-i set were performed as randomized.

Secondary

Cohort 1: Duration of Non-invasive Ventilation Support

For the subset of participants who received non-invasive ventilation post dose, duration for non-invasive ventilation could not be derived by individual type as start/end dates and times were not collected in full to allow breakdown of duration derivation by ventilation type and only overall duration of oxygen supplementation (overall ventilation support) could be derived which is reported in the outcome measure Duration of Supplemental Oxygen. As per the study protocol and study design, this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for participants who were hospitalized only. Only participants in Cohort 1 were hospitalized, hence this outcome measure could only have been reported for Cohort 1.

Time frame: Up to Day 21

Population: ITT-i analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and who had centrally confirmed RSV RNA viral load of \>=1 log10 copies/mL above LLOQ of RSV RT-qPCR assay at baseline. Analyses on ITT-i set were performed as randomized. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure and 'n' (number analyzed) represents number of participants who were evaluable at specified categories.

Secondary

Cohort 1: Duration of Supplemental Oxygen

Duration of supplemental oxygen was assessed. Duration was defined as total number of hours a participant used supplemental oxygen from first dose of study drug until study termination. As per the study protocol and study design, this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for participants who were hospitalized only. Only participants in Cohort 1 were hospitalized, hence this outcome measure is only reported for Cohort 1.

Time frame: Up to Day 28

Population: ITT-i analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and who had centrally confirmed RSV RNA viral load of \>=1 log10 copies/mL above the LLOQ of the RSV RT-qPCR assay at baseline. Analyses on ITT-i set were performed as randomized. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboCohort 1: Duration of Supplemental Oxygen74.25 Hours
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseCohort 1: Duration of Supplemental Oxygen74.60 Hours
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseCohort 1: Duration of Supplemental Oxygen68.05 Hours
Secondary

Cohort 1: Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of JNJ-53718678

Cmax is the maximum plasma concentration of JNJ-53718678 estimated by population PK model.

Time frame: Days 1 and 7

Population: PK analysis set included all participants from Cohort-1 who received JNJ-53718678 and for whom at least one PK concentration was reported. Here, 'n' (number analyzed) represents number of participants who were evaluable for specified timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboCohort 1: Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of JNJ-53718678>=28 days to <3 months: Day 1531 Nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 193
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboCohort 1: Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of JNJ-53718678>=28 days to <3 months: Day 7843 Nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 255
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboCohort 1: Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of JNJ-53718678>=3 months to <6 months: Day 1497 Nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 256
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboCohort 1: Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of JNJ-53718678>=3 months to <6 months: Day 7691 Nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 306
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboCohort 1: Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of JNJ-53718678>=6 months to <=3 years: Day 1846 Nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 268
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboCohort 1: Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of JNJ-53718678>=6 months to <=3 years: Day 71030 Nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 310
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseCohort 1: Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of JNJ-53718678>=6 months to <=3 years: Day 12720 Nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 1040
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseCohort 1: Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of JNJ-53718678>=28 days to <3 months: Day 11590 Nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 345
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseCohort 1: Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of JNJ-53718678>=3 months to <6 months: Day 72920 Nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 1500
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseCohort 1: Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of JNJ-53718678>=28 days to <3 months: Day 72550 Nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 550
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseCohort 1: Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of JNJ-53718678>=6 months to <=3 years: Day 73560 Nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 1330
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseCohort 1: Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of JNJ-53718678>=3 months to <6 months: Day 12070 Nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 1200
Secondary

Cohort 1: Percentage of Participants Who Needed Hydration and/or Feeding by Intravenous (IV) Administration or Nasogastric Tube

Percentage of participants who needed hydration and/or feeding by IV Administration or nasogastric tube after the first dose of study drug was assessed. This parameter was only for participants who didn't require supplemental feeding/hydration before first dose of study drug. As per the study protocol and study design, this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for participants who were hospitalized only. Only participants in Cohort 1 were hospitalized, hence this outcome measure is only reported for Cohort 1.

Time frame: Up to Day 28

Population: ITT-i analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and who had centrally confirmed RSV RNA viral load of \>=1 log10 copies/mL above the LLOQ of the RSV RT-qPCR assay at baseline. Analyses on ITT-i set were performed as randomized. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboCohort 1: Percentage of Participants Who Needed Hydration and/or Feeding by Intravenous (IV) Administration or Nasogastric Tube6.3 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseCohort 1: Percentage of Participants Who Needed Hydration and/or Feeding by Intravenous (IV) Administration or Nasogastric Tube15.6 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseCohort 1: Percentage of Participants Who Needed Hydration and/or Feeding by Intravenous (IV) Administration or Nasogastric Tube19.2 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Cohort 1: Percentage of Participants Who Required Admission to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU)

Percentage of participants who required admission to the ICU was assessed. This outcome measure was applicable for those participants that were not in ICU before first dose of study drug. As per the study protocol and study design, this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for participants who were hospitalized only. Only participants in Cohort 1 were hospitalized, hence this outcome measure is only reported for Cohort 1.

Time frame: Up to Day 21

Population: ITT-i analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and who had centrally confirmed RSV RNA viral load of \>=1 log10 copies/mL above the LLOQ of the RSV RT-qPCR assay at baseline. Analyses on ITT-i set were performed as randomized. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboCohort 1: Percentage of Participants Who Required Admission to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU)2.4 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseCohort 1: Percentage of Participants Who Required Admission to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU)4.5 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseCohort 1: Percentage of Participants Who Required Admission to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU)2.6 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Cohort 1: Percentage of Participants Who Required Invasive Mechanical Ventilation Support

Percentage of participants who required invasive mechanical ventilation support (example: endotracheal-mechanical ventilation) after first dose of study drug was assessed. This parameter was only for participants who did not require invasive mechanical ventilation support before first dose of study drug. As per the study protocol and study design, this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for participants who were hospitalized only. Only participants in Cohort 1 were hospitalized, hence this outcome measure is only reported for Cohort 1.

Time frame: Up to Day 21

Population: ITT-i analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and who had centrally confirmed RSV RNA viral load of \>=1 log10 copies/mL above the LLOQ of the RSV RT-qPCR assay at baseline. Analyses on ITT-i set were performed as randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboCohort 1: Percentage of Participants Who Required Invasive Mechanical Ventilation Support4.3 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseCohort 1: Percentage of Participants Who Required Invasive Mechanical Ventilation Support2.1 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseCohort 1: Percentage of Participants Who Required Invasive Mechanical Ventilation Support2.3 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Cohort 1: Percentage of Participants Who Required Non-invasive Mechanical Ventilation Support

Percentage of participants who required non-invasive mechanical ventilation support (example: continuous positive airway pressure) after first dose of study drug was assessed. This parameter was only for participants who did not require non-invasive mechanical ventilation support before first dose of study drug. As per the study protocol and study design, this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for participants who were hospitalized only. Only participants in Cohort 1 were hospitalized, hence this outcome measure is only reported for Cohort 1.

Time frame: Up to Day 21

Population: ITT-i analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and who had centrally confirmed RSV RNA viral load of \>=1 log10 copies/mL above the LLOQ of the RSV RT-qPCR assay at baseline. Analyses on ITT-i set were performed as randomized. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboCohort 1: Percentage of Participants Who Required Non-invasive Mechanical Ventilation Support2.2 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseCohort 1: Percentage of Participants Who Required Non-invasive Mechanical Ventilation Support6.8 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseCohort 1: Percentage of Participants Who Required Non-invasive Mechanical Ventilation Support2.6 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Cohort 1: Percentage of Participants Who Required Non-invasive Non-mechanical Ventilation Support

Percentage of participants who required non-invasive non-mechanical ventilation support (example: nasal cannula) after first dose of study drug was assessed. This parameter was only for participants who did not require non-invasive non-mechanical ventilation support before first dose of study drug. As per the study protocol and study design, this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for participants who were hospitalized only. Only participants in Cohort 1 were hospitalized, hence this outcome measure is only reported for Cohort 1.

Time frame: Up to Day 21

Population: ITT-i analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and who had centrally confirmed RSV RNA viral load of \>=1 log10 copies/mL above the LLOQ of the RSV RT-qPCR assay at baseline. Analyses on ITT-i set were performed as randomized. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboCohort 1: Percentage of Participants Who Required Non-invasive Non-mechanical Ventilation Support31.3 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseCohort 1: Percentage of Participants Who Required Non-invasive Non-mechanical Ventilation Support35.7 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseCohort 1: Percentage of Participants Who Required Non-invasive Non-mechanical Ventilation Support45.5 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Cohort 1: Percentage of Participants Who Required Supplemental Oxygen

Percentage of participants who required supplemental oxygen after first dose of study drug was reported. This parameter was only for participants that did not require oxygen supplementation before first dose of study drug. As per the study protocol and study design, this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for participants who were hospitalized only. Only participants in Cohort 1 were hospitalized, hence this outcome measure is only reported for Cohort 1.

Time frame: Up to Day 21

Population: ITT-i analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and who had centrally confirmed RSV RNA viral load of \>=1 log10 copies/mL above the LLOQ of the RSV RT-qPCR assay at baseline. Analyses on ITT-i set were performed as randomized. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboCohort 1: Percentage of Participants Who Required Supplemental Oxygen21.4 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseCohort 1: Percentage of Participants Who Required Supplemental Oxygen25.0 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseCohort 1: Percentage of Participants Who Required Supplemental Oxygen28.6 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Cohort 1: Time to Clinical Stability Evaluated by the Investigator

Time to clinical stability was derived based on vital signs(SpO2 \>= 92%, SpO2 \>=95% on room air) assessments and supplementation end dates as collected. Time to clinical stability=time from initiation of study treatment until time at which following criteria were met: Time to return to age-adjusted normal value for otherwise healthy, pre-RSV infection status for participant with risk factor for severe RSV disease,no more oxygen supplementation in otherwise healthy participant, participant with risk factor for severe RSV disease and no more IV administered/nasogastric tube feeding/hydration supplementation in otherwise healthy participant or pre-RSV status of IV/nasogastric tube feeding/hydration in participant with risk factor for severe RSV disease. As per protocol and study design,this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for participants who were hospitalized only. Only participants in Cohort 1 were hospitalized, hence this outcome measure is only reported for Cohort 1.

Time frame: Up to Day 21

Population: ITT-i analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and who had centrally confirmed RSV RNA viral load of \>=1 log10 copies/mL above the LLOQ of the RSV RT-qPCR assay at baseline. Analyses on ITT-i set were performed as randomized.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboCohort 1: Time to Clinical Stability Evaluated by the InvestigatorSpO2 >=92% on Room Air95.8 Hours
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboCohort 1: Time to Clinical Stability Evaluated by the InvestigatorSpO2 >=95% on Room Air95.8 Hours
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseCohort 1: Time to Clinical Stability Evaluated by the InvestigatorSpO2 >=92% on Room Air123.3 Hours
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseCohort 1: Time to Clinical Stability Evaluated by the InvestigatorSpO2 >=95% on Room Air134.8 Hours
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseCohort 1: Time to Clinical Stability Evaluated by the InvestigatorSpO2 >=92% on Room Air176.5 Hours
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseCohort 1: Time to Clinical Stability Evaluated by the InvestigatorSpO2 >=95% on Room Air180.5 Hours
Secondary

Cohort 1: Time to Discharge From Hospital

Time to discharge from hospital was derived from the reported discharge date/time and from first dose date/time. As per the study protocol and study design, this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for participants who were hospitalized only. Only participants in Cohort 1 were hospitalized, hence this outcome measure is only reported for Cohort 1.

Time frame: Up to Day 28

Population: ITT-i analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and who had centrally confirmed RSV RNA viral load of \>=1 log10 copies/mL above the LLOQ of the RSV RT-qPCR assay at baseline. Analyses on ITT-i set were performed as randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboCohort 1: Time to Discharge From Hospital96.2 Hours
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseCohort 1: Time to Discharge From Hospital95.3 Hours
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseCohort 1: Time to Discharge From Hospital96.2 Hours
Secondary

Cohort 1: Time to End of Supplemental Oxygen up to 72 Hours From First Hospital Discharge

Time to end of supplemental oxygen up to 72 hours from first hospital discharge was assessed. Time to end of supplemental oxygen was defined as time (hours) from first dose of study drug to last end date/time of any oxygen supplementation received, but within 72 hours following first hospital discharge. As per the study protocol and study design, this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for participants who were hospitalized only. Only participants in Cohort 1 were hospitalized, hence this outcome measure is only reported for Cohort 1.

Time frame: Up to end of supplemental oxygen including supplemental oxygen within 72 hours after first hospital discharge (up to Day 28)

Population: ITT-i analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and who had centrally confirmed RSV RNA viral load of \>=1 log10 copies/mL above the LLOQ of the RSV RT-qPCR assay at baseline. Analyses on ITT-i set were performed as randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboCohort 1: Time to End of Supplemental Oxygen up to 72 Hours From First Hospital Discharge58.1 Hours
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseCohort 1: Time to End of Supplemental Oxygen up to 72 Hours From First Hospital Discharge57.9 Hours
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseCohort 1: Time to End of Supplemental Oxygen up to 72 Hours From First Hospital Discharge63.0 Hours
Secondary

Cohort 1: Time to Return to Age-adjusted Normal Values for Vital Signs

Time to return to age-adjusted normal values from first dose of study drug based on the reported vital signs (respiratory rate, heart rate, SpO2 \>=92%, and SpO2 \>=95%) values was assessed. As per the study protocol and study design, this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for participants who were hospitalized only. Only participants in Cohort 1 were hospitalized, hence this outcome measure is only reported for Cohort 1.

Time frame: Up to Day 28

Population: ITT-i analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and who had centrally confirmed RSV RNA viral load of \>=1 log10 copies/mL above the LLOQ of the RSV RT-qPCR assay at baseline. Analyses on ITT-i set were performed as randomized.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboCohort 1: Time to Return to Age-adjusted Normal Values for Vital SignsRespiratory Rate13.6 Hours
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboCohort 1: Time to Return to Age-adjusted Normal Values for Vital SignsHeart Rate37.3 Hours
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboCohort 1: Time to Return to Age-adjusted Normal Values for Vital SignsSpO2 >=92% on Room Air65.4 Hours
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboCohort 1: Time to Return to Age-adjusted Normal Values for Vital SignsSpO2 >=95% on Room Air71.3 Hours
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseCohort 1: Time to Return to Age-adjusted Normal Values for Vital SignsSpO2 >=95% on Room Air87.0 Hours
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseCohort 1: Time to Return to Age-adjusted Normal Values for Vital SignsRespiratory Rate20.0 Hours
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseCohort 1: Time to Return to Age-adjusted Normal Values for Vital SignsSpO2 >=92% on Room Air86.6 Hours
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseCohort 1: Time to Return to Age-adjusted Normal Values for Vital SignsHeart Rate17.0 Hours
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseCohort 1: Time to Return to Age-adjusted Normal Values for Vital SignsSpO2 >=95% on Room Air92.5 Hours
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseCohort 1: Time to Return to Age-adjusted Normal Values for Vital SignsHeart Rate10.2 Hours
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseCohort 1: Time to Return to Age-adjusted Normal Values for Vital SignsSpO2 >=92% on Room Air68.9 Hours
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseCohort 1: Time to Return to Age-adjusted Normal Values for Vital SignsRespiratory Rate30.2 Hours
Secondary

Cohort 1: Trough Plasma Concentration (Ctrough) of JNJ-53718678

Ctrough is the trough plasma concentration of JNJ-53718678 estimated by population PK model.

Time frame: Days 1 and 7

Population: PK analysis set included all participants from Cohort-1 who received JNJ-53718678 and for whom at least one PK concentration was reported. Here, 'n' (number analyzed) represents number of participants who were evaluable for specified timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboCohort 1: Trough Plasma Concentration (Ctrough) of JNJ-53718678>=28 days to <3 months: Day 7267 ng/mLStandard Deviation 111
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboCohort 1: Trough Plasma Concentration (Ctrough) of JNJ-53718678>=28 days to <3 months: Day 164 ng/mLStandard Deviation 31.3
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboCohort 1: Trough Plasma Concentration (Ctrough) of JNJ-53718678>=6 months to <=3 years: Day 159.9 ng/mLStandard Deviation 43
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboCohort 1: Trough Plasma Concentration (Ctrough) of JNJ-53718678>=3 months to <6 months: Day 155.5 ng/mLStandard Deviation 33.5
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboCohort 1: Trough Plasma Concentration (Ctrough) of JNJ-53718678>=6 months to <=3 years: Day 789 ng/mLStandard Deviation 73.6
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboCohort 1: Trough Plasma Concentration (Ctrough) of JNJ-53718678>=3 months to <6 months: Day 7126 ng/mLStandard Deviation 103
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseCohort 1: Trough Plasma Concentration (Ctrough) of JNJ-53718678>=6 months to <=3 years: Day 7386 ng/mLStandard Deviation 331
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseCohort 1: Trough Plasma Concentration (Ctrough) of JNJ-53718678>=28 days to <3 months: Day 1167 ng/mLStandard Deviation 147
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseCohort 1: Trough Plasma Concentration (Ctrough) of JNJ-53718678>=28 days to <3 months: Day 7885 ng/mLStandard Deviation 239
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseCohort 1: Trough Plasma Concentration (Ctrough) of JNJ-53718678>=3 months to <6 months: Day 1204 ng/mLStandard Deviation 58.5
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseCohort 1: Trough Plasma Concentration (Ctrough) of JNJ-53718678>=3 months to <6 months: Day 7702 ng/mLStandard Deviation 487
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseCohort 1: Trough Plasma Concentration (Ctrough) of JNJ-53718678>=6 months to <=3 years: Day 1227 ng/mLStandard Deviation 149
Secondary

Cohort 2: Plasma Concentration of JNJ-53718678

Plasma concentration of JNJ-53718678 was measured for Cohort-2. As per planned analysis in the protocol, PK sampling was performed on either Day 3 or Day 5 for participants receiving twice daily dosing, resulting in one combined timepoint of Day 3 or Day 5. Hence, the data collected on either Day 3 or Day 5 was pooled and is reported here collectively.

Time frame: Once daily dosing: Day 3 and Day 8 pre- or post-dose. Twice daily dosing: Day 1 at least 1 hour post-dose, and Days 3 or 5 (combined in one timepoint) at least 4 hours after morning dose but prior to evening dose

Population: PK analysis set included all participants from Cohort-2 who received JNJ-53718678 and for whom at least one PK concentration was reported. Here, 'n' (number analyzed) represents number of participants who were evaluable at specified timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboCohort 2: Plasma Concentration of JNJ-53718678Day 3 (Once daily)392.97 ng/mLStandard Deviation 638.253
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboCohort 2: Plasma Concentration of JNJ-53718678Day 8 (Once daily)59.05 ng/mLStandard Deviation 84.552
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboCohort 2: Plasma Concentration of JNJ-53718678Day 1 (Twice daily)394.58 ng/mLStandard Deviation 297.539
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboCohort 2: Plasma Concentration of JNJ-53718678Day 3 or Day 5 (Twice daily)441.13 ng/mLStandard Deviation 305.45
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseCohort 2: Plasma Concentration of JNJ-53718678Day 3 or Day 5 (Twice daily)1050.44 ng/mLStandard Deviation 663.166
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseCohort 2: Plasma Concentration of JNJ-53718678Day 3 (Once daily)931.66 ng/mLStandard Deviation 1757.958
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseCohort 2: Plasma Concentration of JNJ-53718678Day 1 (Twice daily)1539.43 ng/mLStandard Deviation 602.591
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseCohort 2: Plasma Concentration of JNJ-53718678Day 8 (Once daily)364.73 ng/mLStandard Deviation 951.896
Secondary

Heart Rate Over Time

Heart rate was measured by the investigator over time.

Time frame: Baseline, Days 3, 5, 8, 14 and 21

Population: The Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, and were analyzed as treated, regardless of the randomized treatment group assigned. Here, 'n' (number analyzed) represents number of participants who were evaluable at specified timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboHeart Rate Over TimeBaseline143.2 Beats/minuteStandard Deviation 17.4
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboHeart Rate Over TimeDay 3138.8 Beats/minuteStandard Deviation 16.82
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboHeart Rate Over TimeDay 5136.0 Beats/minuteStandard Deviation 15.81
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboHeart Rate Over TimeDay 8133.3 Beats/minuteStandard Deviation 17.59
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboHeart Rate Over TimeDay 14131.7 Beats/minuteStandard Deviation 19.81
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboHeart Rate Over TimeDay 21128.2 Beats/minuteStandard Deviation 20.27
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseHeart Rate Over TimeDay 3137.5 Beats/minuteStandard Deviation 18.25
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseHeart Rate Over TimeDay 8127.9 Beats/minuteStandard Deviation 18.13
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseHeart Rate Over TimeDay 21131.5 Beats/minuteStandard Deviation 15.74
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseHeart Rate Over TimeBaseline138.9 Beats/minuteStandard Deviation 17.57
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseHeart Rate Over TimeDay 5132.7 Beats/minuteStandard Deviation 18.28
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseHeart Rate Over TimeDay 14132.4 Beats/minuteStandard Deviation 19.33
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseHeart Rate Over TimeDay 21132.5 Beats/minuteStandard Deviation 19.14
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseHeart Rate Over TimeDay 14134.4 Beats/minuteStandard Deviation 20.7
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseHeart Rate Over TimeDay 8134.0 Beats/minuteStandard Deviation 19.14
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseHeart Rate Over TimeDay 516.1 Beats/minuteStandard Deviation 19.68
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseHeart Rate Over TimeBaseline139.0 Beats/minuteStandard Deviation 18.57
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseHeart Rate Over TimeDay 3138.5 Beats/minuteStandard Deviation 17.06
Cohort 2: PlaceboHeart Rate Over TimeDay 8118.7 Beats/minuteStandard Deviation 20.25
Cohort 2: PlaceboHeart Rate Over TimeDay 3127.8 Beats/minuteStandard Deviation 20.99
Cohort 2: PlaceboHeart Rate Over TimeDay 5119.2 Beats/minuteStandard Deviation 14.75
Cohort 2: PlaceboHeart Rate Over TimeDay 21117.2 Beats/minuteStandard Deviation 22.56
Cohort 2: PlaceboHeart Rate Over TimeDay 14117.4 Beats/minuteStandard Deviation 18.17
Cohort 2: PlaceboHeart Rate Over TimeBaseline131.2 Beats/minuteStandard Deviation 24.28
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseHeart Rate Over TimeBaseline135.6 Beats/minuteStandard Deviation 19.35
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseHeart Rate Over TimeDay 14118.0 Beats/minuteStandard Deviation 19.17
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseHeart Rate Over TimeDay 3128.3 Beats/minuteStandard Deviation 17.97
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseHeart Rate Over TimeDay 5122.6 Beats/minuteStandard Deviation 19.85
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseHeart Rate Over TimeDay 8120.0 Beats/minuteStandard Deviation 19.61
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseHeart Rate Over TimeDay 21125.3 Beats/minuteStandard Deviation 20.95
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseHeart Rate Over TimeDay 8118.9 Beats/minuteStandard Deviation 27.04
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseHeart Rate Over TimeDay 5120.4 Beats/minuteStandard Deviation 23.31
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseHeart Rate Over TimeDay 14115.2 Beats/minuteStandard Deviation 18.82
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseHeart Rate Over TimeDay 21115.2 Beats/minuteStandard Deviation 19.78
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseHeart Rate Over TimeDay 3118.8 Beats/minuteStandard Deviation 28.1
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseHeart Rate Over TimeBaseline126.1 Beats/minuteStandard Deviation 22.55
Secondary

Least Squares (LS) Mean RSV Viral Load on Days 3, 8 and 14

LS mean RSV viral load on Days 3, 8, and 14 was reported. LS mean viral load (log10 copies/mL) was estimated per time point. The difference in RSV viral Load AUC (log10 copies\*day/mL) from immediately prior to first dose of study drug (baseline) through Day 3, 8 and 14 was determined from the model estimating the LS Mean Viral Load per time point, and is presented in the statistical analysis. The RSV viral load was measured by qRT-PCR assay in mid-turbinate nasal swab specimens. As planned, combined data for both the cohorts was collected, and analyzed for this outcome measure at Days 3 and 8, however combined Cohort 1 and Cohort 2 data were not analyzed for this outcome measure at Day 14, due to the premature study termination.

Time frame: Baseline through Days 3, 8, and 14

Population: ITT-i analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and who had centrally confirmed RSV RNA viral load of \>=1 log10 copies/mL above the LLOQ of the RSV RT-qPCR assay at baseline. Analyses on ITT-i set were performed as randomized. Here, 'n' (number analyzed) represents number of participants who were evaluable at specified timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboLeast Squares (LS) Mean RSV Viral Load on Days 3, 8 and 14Day 3: LS means RSV Viral Load5.48 log10 copies*day/mL
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboLeast Squares (LS) Mean RSV Viral Load on Days 3, 8 and 14Day 8: LS means RSV Viral Load2.66 log10 copies*day/mL
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseLeast Squares (LS) Mean RSV Viral Load on Days 3, 8 and 14Day 3: LS means RSV Viral Load5.36 log10 copies*day/mL
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseLeast Squares (LS) Mean RSV Viral Load on Days 3, 8 and 14Day 8: LS means RSV Viral Load2.08 log10 copies*day/mL
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseLeast Squares (LS) Mean RSV Viral Load on Days 3, 8 and 14Day 3: LS means RSV Viral Load5.32 log10 copies*day/mL
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseLeast Squares (LS) Mean RSV Viral Load on Days 3, 8 and 14Day 8: LS means RSV Viral Load2.08 log10 copies*day/mL
Comparison: Difference versus placebo in mean RSV viral load AUC on Day 395% CI: [-1.382, 0.185]
Comparison: Difference versus placebo in mean RSV viral load AUC on Day 395% CI: [-1.19, 0.418]
Comparison: Difference versus placebo in mean RSV viral load AUC on Day 895% CI: [-4.674, -0.25]
Comparison: Difference versus placebo in mean RSV viral load AUC on Day 895% CI: [-4.645, -0.114]
Secondary

Number of Participants With Emerging Variations in the Viral Genome Potentially Associated With Resistance to JNJ-53718678

Number of participants with emerging variations in the viral genome potentially associated with resistance to JNJ-53718678 was reported. Number of participants with F gene sequencing data available and with emerging genetic variations post-baseline as compared to baseline, considering 24 RSV F protein positions of interest (positions 127, 137, 138, 140, 141, 143, 144, 323, 338, 339, 392, 394, 396, 397, 398, 399, 400, 401, 474, 486, 487, 488, 489, and 517) was reported.

Time frame: Up to Day 21

Population: ITT-i analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and who had centrally confirmed RSV RNA viral load of \>=1 log10 copies/mL above the LLOQ of the RSV RT-qPCR assay at baseline. Analyses on ITT-i set were performed as randomized. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Emerging Variations in the Viral Genome Potentially Associated With Resistance to JNJ-537186780 Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseNumber of Participants With Emerging Variations in the Viral Genome Potentially Associated With Resistance to JNJ-537186780 Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseNumber of Participants With Emerging Variations in the Viral Genome Potentially Associated With Resistance to JNJ-537186782 Participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Emerging Variations in the Viral Genome Potentially Associated With Resistance to JNJ-537186780 Participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseNumber of Participants With Emerging Variations in the Viral Genome Potentially Associated With Resistance to JNJ-537186780 Participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseNumber of Participants With Emerging Variations in the Viral Genome Potentially Associated With Resistance to JNJ-537186782 Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time

Percentage of participants by health status assessment based on PRESORS caregiver (ObsRO) general question over time was assessed. PRESORS is a questionnaire recording presence and severity of signs and symptoms of RSV disease (fever, cough, sputum, wheezing, difficulty breathing, nasal congestion, and feeding issues). Health status was assessed by a question (how is the child's health now) of PRESORS questionnaire and responses were categorized as: 1) excellent, 2) very good, 3) good, 4) fair, 5) poor, and 6) very poor.

Time frame: Baseline, Days 3, 5, 8, 14, and 21

Population: ITT-i analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and who had centrally confirmed RSV RNA viral load of \>=1 log10 copies/mL above LLOQ of RSV RT-qPCR assay at baseline. Analyses on ITT-i set were performed as randomized. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure and 'n' (number analyzed) represents number of participants who were evaluable at specified timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 5: Very good19.1 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 14: Good19.5 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 14: Poor2.4 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 14: Very poor0 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 21: Good11.1 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 5: Fair36.2 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 8: Good32.6 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeBaseline: Excellent0 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeBaseline: Fair42.2 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 21: Fair11.1 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 3: Very good8.5 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeBaseline: Poor48.9 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeBaseline: Very good0 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 14: Very good43.9 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 21: Very good22.2 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 3: Good23.4 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 5: Poor12.8 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 21: Very poor0 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 8: Poor4.3 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 5: Excellent2.1 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 21: Excellent55.6 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 3: Fair38.3 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeBaseline: Good4.4 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 8: Very good23.9 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 8: Fair23.9 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 14: Fair9.8 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 5: Very poor6.4 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 3: Poor21.3 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 5: Good23.4 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 8: Very poor2.2 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeBaseline: Very poor4.4 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 3: Excellent0 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 8: Excellent13.0 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 3: Very poor8.5 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 14: Excellent24.4 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 21: Poor0 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 14: Very poor0 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 8: Very good32.6 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 5: Excellent0 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 14: Fair5.0 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 5: Very good9.3 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeBaseline: Fair51.2 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 8: Excellent9.3 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 14: Good5.0 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 5: Good41.9 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeBaseline: Very good4.7 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 21: Fair5.4 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 5: Fair39.5 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 14: Very good47.5 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 5: Poor9.3 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeBaseline: Poor30.2 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 14: Excellent42.5 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 5: Very poor0 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 21: Good13.5 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeBaseline: Very poor4.7 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 8: Poor0 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 3: Excellent0 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 8: Good32.6 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 21: Very good32.4 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 3: Very good9.3 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 21: Poor2.7 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeBaseline: Excellent2.3 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 3: Good20.9 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeBaseline: Good7.0 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 21: Excellent45.9 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 3: Fair46.5 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 8: Very poor0 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 8: Fair25.6 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 21: Very poor0 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 3: Poor23.3 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 14: Poor0 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 3: Very poor0 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 21: Poor0 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 8: Very poor0 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 8: Excellent16.7 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 8: Very good21.4 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 8: Poor2.4 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 8: Good38.1 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 8: Fair21.4 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeBaseline: Good7.3 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 21: Fair6.1 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeBaseline: Fair43.9 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeBaseline: Poor48.8 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 21: Good15.2 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeBaseline: Very poor0 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 3: Excellent0 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 21: Very good33.3 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 3: Very good2.3 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 3: Good34.1 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 21: Excellent45.5 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 3: Fair45.5 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeBaseline: Excellent0 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 14: Very poor0 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 3: Poor13.6 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 14: Poor2.4 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 3: Very poor4.5 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 14: Fair7.3 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 5: Excellent0 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 5: Very good20.9 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 14: Good9.8 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 5: Good37.2 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 14: Very good36.6 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 5: Fair34.9 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeBaseline: Very good0 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 5: Poor7.0 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 21: Very poor0 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 14: Excellent43.9 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 5: Very poor0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 3: Good17.2 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeBaseline: Excellent0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeBaseline: Very good3.6 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeBaseline: Good14.3 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeBaseline: Fair57.1 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeBaseline: Poor25.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeBaseline: Very poor0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 3: Excellent3.4 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 3: Very good0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 3: Fair58.6 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 3: Poor20.7 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 3: Very poor0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 5: Excellent6.7 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 5: Very good0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 5: Good26.7 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 5: Fair63.3 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 5: Poor3.3 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 5: Very poor0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 8: Excellent6.5 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 8: Very good19.4 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 8: Good48.4 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 8: Fair22.6 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 8: Poor3.2 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 8: Very poor0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 14: Excellent50.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 14: Very good23.3 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 14: Good20.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 14: Fair6.7 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 14: Poor0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 14: Very poor0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 21: Excellent60.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 21: Very good28.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 21: Good8.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 21: Fair0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 21: Poor4.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 21: Very poor0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 14: Good16.7 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 3: Good12.9 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 5: Fair40.6 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeBaseline: Good11.1 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 21: Excellent79.2 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 5: Excellent0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 3: Very good0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 14: Excellent56.7 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 3: Excellent0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeBaseline: Excellent3.7 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 21: Very good12.5 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 21: Very poor0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeBaseline: Very poor0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 14: Fair6.7 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeBaseline: Poor44.4 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 14: Very good16.7 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 21: Good4.2 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 3: Very poor0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 5: Very poor0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeBaseline: Fair40.7 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 3: Poor45.2 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 21: Poor0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 14: Poor3.3 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 8: Fair36.4 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 5: Good31.3 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 8: Good36.4 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 5: Poor21.9 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 8: Very good21.2 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 21: Fair4.2 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 8: Poor3.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 3: Fair41.9 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 5: Very good6.3 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 8: Excellent3.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 14: Very poor0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeBaseline: Very good0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 8: Very poor0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 8: Very good22.2 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 5: Poor25.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 14: Excellent53.6 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 5: Fair42.9 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 5: Good28.6 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeBaseline: Very good7.7 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 14: Very good28.6 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 5: Very good3.6 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 14: Good7.1 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 5: Excellent0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 3: Very poor0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 14: Fair3.6 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 3: Poor35.7 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 14: Poor3.6 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 3: Fair53.6 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 21: Poor0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 14: Very poor3.6 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 3: Good10.7 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 3: Very good0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeBaseline: Excellent0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 21: Excellent68.2 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 3: Excellent0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 21: Very good9.1 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeBaseline: Poor65.4 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeBaseline: Very poor0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 21: Good13.6 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeBaseline: Fair23.1 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeBaseline: Good3.8 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 8: Good33.3 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 21: Very poor0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 8: Fair33.3 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 8: Very poor3.7 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 8: Poor3.7 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 8: Excellent3.7 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 5: Very poor0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 21: Fair9.1 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants by Return to Pre-RSV Disease Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time

Percentage of participants by return to pre-RSV disease health status assessment based on PRESORS caregiver (ObsRO) general question over time was assessed by a question (Has the child's health returned to normal \[how it was before RSV?\]) of PRESORS questionnaire and responses were categorized as: 1) No, and 2) Yes. PRESORS is a questionnaire recording presence and severity of signs and symptoms of RSV disease (fever, cough, sputum, wheezing, difficulty breathing, nasal congestion, and feeding issues). Below results are reported for category 'Yes'.

Time frame: Baseline, Days 3, 5, 8, 14, and 21

Population: ITT-i analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and who had centrally confirmed RSV RNA viral load of \>=1 log10 copies/mL above the LLOQ of the RSV RT-qPCR assay at baseline. Analyses on ITT-i set were performed as randomized. Here, 'n' (number analyzed) represents number of participants who were evaluable at specified timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Return to Pre-RSV Disease Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 1472.4 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Return to Pre-RSV Disease Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 523.8 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Return to Pre-RSV Disease Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 837.5 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Return to Pre-RSV Disease Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 2181.5 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Return to Pre-RSV Disease Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeBaseline0 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Return to Pre-RSV Disease Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 315.4 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Return to Pre-RSV Disease Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeBaseline0 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Return to Pre-RSV Disease Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 844.7 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Return to Pre-RSV Disease Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 2186.1 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Return to Pre-RSV Disease Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 38.6 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Return to Pre-RSV Disease Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 1477.8 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Return to Pre-RSV Disease Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 516.2 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Return to Pre-RSV Disease Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 525.6 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Return to Pre-RSV Disease Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeBaseline0 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Return to Pre-RSV Disease Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 328.1 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Return to Pre-RSV Disease Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 2184.4 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Return to Pre-RSV Disease Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 858.8 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Return to Pre-RSV Disease Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 1484.4 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Return to Pre-RSV Disease Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeBaseline22.2 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Return to Pre-RSV Disease Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 1481.5 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Return to Pre-RSV Disease Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 312.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Return to Pre-RSV Disease Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 851.9 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Return to Pre-RSV Disease Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 2192.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Return to Pre-RSV Disease Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 516.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Return to Pre-RSV Disease Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 2195.7 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Return to Pre-RSV Disease Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 54.3 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Return to Pre-RSV Disease Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 1485.7 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Return to Pre-RSV Disease Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 312.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Return to Pre-RSV Disease Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeBaseline0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Return to Pre-RSV Disease Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 836.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Return to Pre-RSV Disease Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 810.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Return to Pre-RSV Disease Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 1473.1 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Return to Pre-RSV Disease Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 50 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Return to Pre-RSV Disease Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeBaseline12.5 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Return to Pre-RSV Disease Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 2195.5 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Return to Pre-RSV Disease Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 34.3 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time

Percentage of participants by status of RSV symptoms based on PRESORS caregiver (ObsRO) general question over time was assessed. PRESORS is a questionnaire recording presence and severity of signs and symptoms of RSV disease (fever, cough, sputum, wheezing, difficulty breathing, nasal congestion, and feeding issues). Status of RSV symptoms was assessed by a question (how would you rate the child's RSV symptoms now?) of PRESORS questionnaire and responses were categorized as: 1) none, 2) very mild, 3) mild, 4) moderate, 5) severe, and 6) very severe.

Time frame: Baseline, Days 3, 5, 8, 14, and 21

Population: ITT-i analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and who had centrally confirmed RSV RNA viral load of \>=1 log10 copies/mL above LLOQ of RSV RT-qPCR assay at baseline. Analyses on ITT-i set were performed as randomized. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure and 'n' (number analyzed) represents number of participants who were evaluable at specified timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 21: Very mild18.5 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 8: Mild34.8 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 5: Severe10.6 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 21: None66.7 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeBaseline: Severe37.8 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 21: Very severe0 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeBaseline: Mild6.7 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 14: Mild12.2 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 8: Very mild30.4 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeBaseline: Very severe4.4 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 21: Severe0 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 8: Very severe2.2 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 5: Very severe4.3 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 5: Mild38.3 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 21: Mild11.1 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 5: Very mild23.4 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 21: Moderate3.7 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 14: Very mild36.6 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 8: None13.0 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 14: None48.8 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeBaseline: Very mild0 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 14: Moderate2.4 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 3: None0 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 3: Mild23.4 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeBaseline: Moderate51.1 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 8: Severe2.2 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 8: Moderate17.4 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 14: Severe0 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 5: Moderate21.3 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeBaseline: None0 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 3: Very severe6.4 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 3: Moderate46.8 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 3: Very mild6.4 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 14: Very severe0 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 5: None2.1 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 3: Severe17.0 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 3: Very mild9.3 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 5: Moderate39.5 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeBaseline: Very severe9.3 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 3: Very severe2.3 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 5: None0 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 5: Mild27.9 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 5: Very mild23.3 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 14: Moderate10.0 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 14: None55.0 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 8: Moderate23.3 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 14: Severe2.5 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 8: Mild23.3 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 14: Very severe0 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 21: None67.6 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 8: Very severe0 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 8: Very mild37.2 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 21: Very mild18.9 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 8: None16.3 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 21: Mild2.7 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 21: Moderate8.1 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 14: Very mild30.0 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 5: Very severe0 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 21: Severe2.7 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 5: Severe9.3 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 21: Very severe0 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 3: Moderate48.8 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 3: Severe18.6 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeBaseline: None0 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 8: Severe0 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 3: Mild18.6 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeBaseline: Very mild0 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeBaseline: Severe27.9 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeBaseline: Mild7.0 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 14: Mild2.5 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeBaseline: Moderate55.8 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 3: None2.3 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 8: Very mild28.6 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 5: Moderate41.9 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 3: Moderate43.2 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeBaseline: Mild4.9 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 14: Very severe0 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeBaseline: Severe41.5 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 3: Severe9.1 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 8: Severe0 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 8: Mild28.6 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 3: Mild36.4 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 14: None58.5 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 14: Severe0 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 5: Mild32.6 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeBaseline: None0 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 3: None0 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 3: Very severe4.5 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 14: Moderate7.3 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 5: Very mild16.3 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeBaseline: Very severe0 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 5: Very severe0 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 21: Mild12.1 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeBaseline: Very mild2.4 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 21: Moderate6.1 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 8: Moderate16.7 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 3: Very mild6.8 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 8: None26.2 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 21: Very mild24.2 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeBaseline: Moderate51.2 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 21: Severe0 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 14: Very mild26.8 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 5: Severe2.3 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 5: None7.0 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 21: None57.6 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 14: Mild7.3 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 21: Very severe0 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 8: Very severe0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 8: None12.9 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 14: None70.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 14: Very mild20.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 14: Mild6.7 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 14: Moderate3.3 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 14: Severe0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 14: Very severe0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 21: None84.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 21: Very mild8.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 21: Mild0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 21: Moderate8.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 21: Severe0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 21: Very severe0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 3: Severe6.9 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeBaseline: None0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeBaseline: Very mild7.1 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeBaseline: Mild32.1 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeBaseline: Moderate53.6 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeBaseline: Severe7.1 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 3: Very severe0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 5: None3.3 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 5: Very mild10.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 5: Mild36.7 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeBaseline: Very severe0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 3: None3.4 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 3: Very mild0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 3: Mild27.6 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 3: Moderate62.1 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 5: Moderate46.7 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 5: Severe3.3 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 5: Very severe0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 8: Very mild35.5 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 8: Mild38.7 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 8: Moderate12.9 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 8: Severe0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 8: Very severe0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 5: Very severe0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 3: Severe12.9 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 21: Mild4.2 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 3: Very mild3.2 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 21: Very mild12.5 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 8: None6.1 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 3: Moderate64.5 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 14: Very mild13.3 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 21: None83.3 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeBaseline: Moderate55.6 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 8: Very severe0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 8: Very mild45.5 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 5: Moderate43.8 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 14: Very severe0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeBaseline: Mild22.2 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 14: Severe0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 14: None63.3 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 8: Mild27.3 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 21: Very severe0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeBaseline: None0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 14: Moderate6.7 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 21: Severe0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 5: Very mild12.5 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 8: Severe0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 5: Severe0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 5: None0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 3: None0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeBaseline: Very mild7.4 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 5: Mild43.8 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 21: Moderate0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 3: Very severe0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 3: Mild19.4 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeBaseline: Severe14.8 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 8: Moderate21.2 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeBaseline: Very severe0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 14: Mild16.7 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeBaseline: Very severe0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeBaseline: Mild19.2 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 8: Moderate14.8 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 3: None0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeBaseline: Very mild3.8 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 3: Very mild0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeBaseline: None0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 3: Severe10.7 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 14: Very mild17.9 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 3: Mild25.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 3: Moderate64.3 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 21: Very severe0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 5: Moderate46.4 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 21: Severe0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 5: Severe7.1 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 21: Moderate0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 21: Mild9.1 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 8: Severe0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 5: Very severe0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 21: Very mild4.5 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 8: None7.4 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 21: None86.4 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 14: Very severe0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 14: None67.9 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 8: Very mild25.9 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 14: Severe3.6 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 8: Mild48.1 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 14: Moderate0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 14: Mild10.7 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 5: Very mild10.7 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 5: None3.6 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 3: Very severe0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 8: Very severe3.7 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeDay 5: Mild32.1 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeBaseline: Severe30.8 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over TimeBaseline: Moderate46.2 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Required (re)Hospitalization During Treatment and Follow-up

Percentage of participants who required (re)hospitalization during treatment and follow-up was assessed. Percentage of participants requiring re-hospitalization following the initial hospital discharge was assessed in Cohort 1 participants (hospitalized cohort) whilst percentage of participants requiring hospitalization after first dose of study drug was assessed in Cohort 2 participants (outpatient cohort).

Time frame: Up to Day 28

Population: ITT-i analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and who had centrally confirmed RSV RNA viral load of \>=1 log10 copies/mL above the LLOQ of the RSV RT-qPCR assay at baseline. Analyses on ITT-i set were performed as randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Required (re)Hospitalization During Treatment and Follow-up6.4 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants Who Required (re)Hospitalization During Treatment and Follow-up4.3 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants Who Required (re)Hospitalization During Treatment and Follow-up2.3 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Required (re)Hospitalization During Treatment and Follow-up6.3 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants Who Required (re)Hospitalization During Treatment and Follow-up6.1 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants Who Required (re)Hospitalization During Treatment and Follow-up14.3 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Findings

Percentage of participants with abnormal ECG (PR interval \[for age 0 to 2 years: \>150 msec is abnormally high, for age group 2 to \<3.5 years: \<100 msec is abnormally low and \>150 msec is abnormally high\]; QRS interval \[for 0 to 2 years: \>79 msec is abnormally high, for age group 2 to \<3.5 years: \<40 msec is abnormally low and \>79 msec is abnormally high\]; QT interval \[for age 0 to 2 years: \>500 msec is abnormally high, for age group 2 to \<18 years: \<320 msec is abnormally low and \>450 msec is abnormally high\]; RR interval \[for age 0 to 3 months: \<333 msec is abnormally low and \>750 msec is abnormally high; for age group 3 to 12 months: \<400 msec is abnormally low and \>860 msec is abnormally high; for age 1 to 2 years: \<430 msec is abnormally low and \>1000 msec is abnormally high; for age group 2 to \<18 years: \<600 msec is abnormally low and \>1200 msec is abnormally high\]) findings were assessed.

Time frame: Up to Day 28

Population: The Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, and were analyzed as treated, regardless of the randomized treatment group assigned. Here, 'n' (number analyzed) represents number of participants who were evaluable for specified categories (per ECG parameters).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs) FindingsQRS Duration: Abnormally High4.1 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs) FindingsRR Interval: Abnormally Low12.2 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs) FindingsPR Interval: Abnormally Low0 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs) FindingsQT Interval: Abnormally Low2.0 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs) FindingsPR Interval: Abnormally Low2.1 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs) FindingsRR Interval: Abnormally Low8.3 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs) FindingsQRS Duration: Abnormally High4.2 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs) FindingsQT Interval: Abnormally Low4.2 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs) FindingsQT Interval: Abnormally Low2.1 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs) FindingsPR Interval: Abnormally Low2.1 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs) FindingsRR Interval: Abnormally Low12.5 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs) FindingsQRS Duration: Abnormally High4.2 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs) FindingsQRS Duration: Abnormally High6.1 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs) FindingsQT Interval: Abnormally Low3.0 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs) FindingsRR Interval: Abnormally Low21.2 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs) FindingsPR Interval: Abnormally Low0 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs) FindingsPR Interval: Abnormally Low3.0 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs) FindingsQT Interval: Abnormally Low9.1 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs) FindingsRR Interval: Abnormally Low15.2 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs) FindingsQRS Duration: Abnormally High6.1 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs) FindingsRR Interval: Abnormally Low9.7 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs) FindingsPR Interval: Abnormally Low0 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs) FindingsQT Interval: Abnormally Low3.2 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs) FindingsQRS Duration: Abnormally High9.7 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings

Percentage of participants with abnormal laboratory findings (chemistry and hematology) worst toxicity grade was assessed based on Division of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (DMID) toxicity grading scale. DMID toxicity grades range from 1 to 4. Grade 1 = mild: transient or mild discomfort (\<48 hours); no medical intervention/therapy required. Grade 2 = moderate: mild to moderate limitation in activity - some assistance may be needed; no or minimal medical intervention/therapy required. Grade 3 = severe: marked limitation in activity, some assistance usually required; medical intervention/therapy required, hospitalizations possible. Grade 4 = life-threatening or death: Extreme limitation in activity, significant assistance required; significant medical intervention/therapy required, hospitalization or hospice care probable.

Time frame: Up to Day 28

Population: The Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, and were analyzed as treated, regardless of the randomized treatment group assigned. Here, 'n' (number analyzed) represents number of participants who were evaluable for the specified categories.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Hyperkalemia: Grade 40 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Hyperkalemia: Grade 20 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Hyperkalemia: Grade 159.1 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Hyperglycemia: Grade 113.6 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Hyperbilirubinemia: Grade 22.7 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsHematology: Hemoglobin: Grade 22.6 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: ALT: Grade 20 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Hyperglycemia: Grade 20 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsHematology: Hemoglobin: Grade 17.9 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsHematology: Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time: Grade 111.1 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsHematology: Absolute Neutrophil Count: Grade 30 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsHematology: Absolute Neutrophil Count: Grade 113.5 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: ALT: Grade 34.5 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsHematology: Prothrombin Time: Grade 311.1 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Hyponatremia: Grade 24.5 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Hypomagnesemia: Grade 30 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Hypomagnesemia: Grade 20 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Hypomagnesemia: Grade 10 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST): Grade 10 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Alanine Transaminase (ALT): Grade 113.6 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Hypoglycemia: Grade 14.5 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Hyperuricemia: Grade 10 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Hypernatremia: Grade 34.5 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Hypernatremia: Grade 24.5 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: AST: Grade 34.5 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsHematology: Prothrombin Time: Grade 10 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST): Grade 10 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Alanine Transaminase (ALT): Grade 10 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: ALT: Grade 20 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: ALT: Grade 30 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: AST: Grade 30 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Hyperbilirubinemia: Grade 20 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Hyperglycemia: Grade 10 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Hyperkalemia: Grade 122.2 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Hyperkalemia: Grade 20 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Hyperkalemia: Grade 40 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Hypernatremia: Grade 23.7 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Hypernatremia: Grade 30 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Hyperuricemia: Grade 10 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Hypoglycemia: Grade 10 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Hypomagnesemia: Grade 13.7 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Hypomagnesemia: Grade 20 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Hypomagnesemia: Grade 30 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Hyponatremia: Grade 23.7 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsHematology: Absolute Neutrophil Count: Grade 111.4 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsHematology: Absolute Neutrophil Count: Grade 32.9 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsHematology: Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time: Grade 10 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsHematology: Hemoglobin: Grade 15.6 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsHematology: Hemoglobin: Grade 22.8 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsHematology: Prothrombin Time: Grade 110.0 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsHematology: Prothrombin Time: Grade 30 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Hyperglycemia: Grade 20 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST): Grade 14.5 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Hyponatremia: Grade 20 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Hypoglycemia: Grade 14.3 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Hyperbilirubinemia: Grade 20 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: ALT: Grade 30 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Hypomagnesemia: Grade 34.3 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsHematology: Prothrombin Time: Grade 36.7 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsHematology: Prothrombin Time: Grade 10 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Hypomagnesemia: Grade 14.3 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Hypernatremia: Grade 20 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Hypomagnesemia: Grade 24.3 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Hyperkalemia: Grade 24.3 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsHematology: Hemoglobin: Grade 20 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Hyperglycemia: Grade 20 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsHematology: Hemoglobin: Grade 12.9 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Hyperkalemia: Grade 48.7 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Hypernatremia: Grade 30 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: AST: Grade 30 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: ALT: Grade 24.5 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsHematology: Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time: Grade 10 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Hyperkalemia: Grade 139.1 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Alanine Transaminase (ALT): Grade 10 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Hyperuricemia: Grade 14.3 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Hyperglycemia: Grade 14.3 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsHematology: Absolute Neutrophil Count: Grade 30 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsHematology: Absolute Neutrophil Count: Grade 12.8 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Hyperkalemia: Grade 23.1 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Hyperglycemia: Grade 20 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Hyperkalemia: Grade 40 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Hypernatremia: Grade 23.1 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsHematology: Prothrombin Time: Grade 10 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Hypernatremia: Grade 30 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST): Grade 10 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Hyperuricemia: Grade 10 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Hypoglycemia: Grade 16.3 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Alanine Transaminase (ALT): Grade 10 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Hypomagnesemia: Grade 13.1 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Hypomagnesemia: Grade 20 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: ALT: Grade 30 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Hypomagnesemia: Grade 30 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsHematology: Prothrombin Time: Grade 30 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Hyponatremia: Grade 20 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsHematology: Absolute Neutrophil Count: Grade 13.0 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsHematology: Absolute Neutrophil Count: Grade 30 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: ALT: Grade 20 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsHematology: Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time: Grade 10 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsHematology: Hemoglobin: Grade 10 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsHematology: Hemoglobin: Grade 20 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Hyperbilirubinemia: Grade 20 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Hyperglycemia: Grade 16.3 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Hyperkalemia: Grade 121.9 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: AST: Grade 30 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Hyperglycemia: Grade 20 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Hyponatremia: Grade 20 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsHematology: Prothrombin Time: Grade 30 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: AST: Grade 30 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsHematology: Absolute Neutrophil Count: Grade 19.1 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: ALT: Grade 20 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Hyperuricemia: Grade 10 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsHematology: Absolute Neutrophil Count: Grade 30 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Hyperkalemia: Grade 40 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsHematology: Prothrombin Time: Grade 10 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsHematology: Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time: Grade 10 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Hypernatremia: Grade 30 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST): Grade 10 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Hyperkalemia: Grade 155.2 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsHematology: Hemoglobin: Grade 10 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Hypernatremia: Grade 23.4 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Hyperkalemia: Grade 23.4 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Hyperbilirubinemia: Grade 20 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: ALT: Grade 30 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Hypomagnesemia: Grade 10 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsHematology: Hemoglobin: Grade 20 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Hypomagnesemia: Grade 20 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Alanine Transaminase (ALT): Grade 13.6 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Hypomagnesemia: Grade 30 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Hypoglycemia: Grade 13.4 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Hyperglycemia: Grade 13.4 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: ALT: Grade 30 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Hyperglycemia: Grade 110.0 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsHematology: Hemoglobin: Grade 10 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Hyponatremia: Grade 210.0 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: ALT: Grade 20 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Alanine Transaminase (ALT): Grade 13.4 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Hyperuricemia: Grade 10 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Hypernatremia: Grade 23.3 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Hypoglycemia: Grade 10 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsHematology: Absolute Neutrophil Count: Grade 10 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Hyperkalemia: Grade 136.7 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsHematology: Prothrombin Time: Grade 30 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST): Grade 13.3 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsHematology: Hemoglobin: Grade 20 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Hypomagnesemia: Grade 30 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsHematology: Absolute Neutrophil Count: Grade 30 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Hypomagnesemia: Grade 20 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Hyperbilirubinemia: Grade 20 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Hypernatremia: Grade 30 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Hyperkalemia: Grade 23.3 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: AST: Grade 30 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsHematology: Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time: Grade 133.3 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Hypomagnesemia: Grade 10 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Hyperglycemia: Grade 23.3 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Hyperkalemia: Grade 40 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsHematology: Prothrombin Time: Grade 10 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Acceptability and Palatability of the JNJ-53718678 Formulation as Assessed by Parent(s)/Caregiver(s)

Percentage of participants with acceptability and palatability of the JNJ-53718678 formulation was assessed through a questionnaire asking about the child's reaction when given the medicine, completed by parent(s)/caregiver(s) after last dosing that categorized as 1) child took medicine easily, 2) disgusted expressions after tasting medicine, 3) cried after tasting medicine, 4) would not open mouth or turned head away to avoid medicine, 5) spit out or coughed out medicine, 6) gagged, and 7) vomited (within 2 minutes of swallowing medicine). Below results are based on response to child took medicine easily.

Time frame: Day 8

Population: ITT-i analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and who had centrally confirmed RSV RNA viral load of \>=1 log10 copies/mL above the LLOQ of the RSV RT-qPCR assay at baseline. Analyses on ITT-i set were performed as randomized. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Acceptability and Palatability of the JNJ-53718678 Formulation as Assessed by Parent(s)/Caregiver(s)67.6 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Acceptability and Palatability of the JNJ-53718678 Formulation as Assessed by Parent(s)/Caregiver(s)84.4 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Acceptability and Palatability of the JNJ-53718678 Formulation as Assessed by Parent(s)/Caregiver(s)73.0 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Acceptability and Palatability of the JNJ-53718678 Formulation as Assessed by Parent(s)/Caregiver(s)70.8 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Acceptability and Palatability of the JNJ-53718678 Formulation as Assessed by Parent(s)/Caregiver(s)90.5 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Acceptability and Palatability of the JNJ-53718678 Formulation as Assessed by Parent(s)/Caregiver(s)85.7 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events

Percentage of participants with adverse events was assessed. An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in clinical study participants administered a medicinal (investigational or non-investigational) product. An adverse event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the intervention.

Time frame: Up to Day 28

Population: The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, and were analyzed as treated, regardless of the randomized treatment group assigned.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events58.0 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Adverse Events59.2 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Adverse Events64.6 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events47.1 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Adverse Events58.8 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Adverse Events41.9 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF)

Percentage of participants with categorized change from Baseline in ECG parameters (QT/ QTcB/ QTcF interval) was assessed. Abnormal ECG change from baseline in QTc and QTcB Interval is categorized as borderline QTc change: 30 ms (milliseconds) to \<60 ms, and abnormally high QTc change: greater than \[\>\] 60 ms), and QTcF Interval is categorized as borderline QTc change: 30 ms to \<60 ms, and abnormally high QTc change: \>60 ms.

Time frame: Baseline to Day 28

Population: The Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, and were analyzed as treated, regardless of the randomized treatment group assigned. Here, 'n' (number analyzed) represents number of participants who were evaluable per ECG parameter.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF)QTcF Interval: Borderline QTc change16.7 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF)QTcF Interval: Abnormally high QTc change2.1 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF)QT Interval: Abnormally high QT change4.2 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF)QTcB Interval: Abnormally high QTc change2.1 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF)QTcF Interval: Normal QTc change81.3 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF)QTcB Interval: Borderline QTc change14.6 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF)QT Interval: Borderline QT change29.2 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF)QT Interval: Normal QT change66.7 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF)QTcB Interval: Normal QTc change83.8 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF)QTcF Interval: Abnormally high QTc change0 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF)QTcB Interval: Abnormally high QTc change0 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF)QT Interval: Borderline QT change25.0 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF)QT Interval: Abnormally high QT change4.2 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF)QT Interval: Normal QT change70.8 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF)QTcF Interval: Borderline QTc change16.7 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF)QTcB Interval: Normal QTc change87.5 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF)QTcF Interval: Normal QTc change83.3 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF)QTcB Interval: Borderline QTc change12.5 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF)QT Interval: Borderline QT change27.1 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF)QTcB Interval: Abnormally high QTc change0 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF)QTcB Interval: Normal QTc change93.8 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF)QTcF Interval: Borderline QTc change16.7 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF)QTcF Interval: Abnormally high QTc change0 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF)QT Interval: Abnormally high QT change4.2 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF)QTcF Interval: Normal QTc change83.3 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF)QTcB Interval: Borderline QTc change6.3 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF)QT Interval: Normal QT change68.8 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF)QTcB Interval: Abnormally high QTc change0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF)QT Interval: Normal QT change66.7 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF)QT Interval: Borderline QT change27.3 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF)QT Interval: Abnormally high QT change6.1 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF)QTcB Interval: Normal QTc change90.9 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF)QTcB Interval: Borderline QTc change9.1 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF)QTcF Interval: Normal QTc change90.9 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF)QTcF Interval: Borderline QTc change9.1 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF)QTcF Interval: Abnormally high QTc change0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF)QTcB Interval: Borderline QTc change9.1 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF)QTcB Interval: Normal QTc change90.9 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF)QTcF Interval: Normal QTc change78.8 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF)QT Interval: Abnormally high QT change9.1 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF)QTcF Interval: Abnormally high QTc change0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF)QTcF Interval: Borderline QTc change21.2 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF)QT Interval: Borderline QT change33.3 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF)QT Interval: Normal QT change57.6 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF)QTcB Interval: Abnormally high QTc change0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF)QT Interval: Normal QT change58.6 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF)QTcB Interval: Normal QTc change93.1 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF)QTcB Interval: Abnormally high QTc change0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF)QTcF Interval: Abnormally high QTc change0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF)QTcF Interval: Borderline QTc change13.8 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF)QTcF Interval: Normal QTc change86.3 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF)QT Interval: Abnormally high QT change3.4 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF)QTcB Interval: Borderline QTc change6.9 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF)QT Interval: Borderline QT change37.9 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Medical Resource Utilization (MRU)

Percentage of participants with MRU (any medical care encounters) was reported.

Time frame: Up to Day 28

Population: ITT-i analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and who had centrally confirmed RSV RNA viral load of \>=1 log10 copies/mL above the LLOQ of the RSV RT-qPCR assay at baseline. Analyses on ITT-i set were performed as randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Medical Resource Utilization (MRU)100.0 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Medical Resource Utilization (MRU)100.0 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Medical Resource Utilization (MRU)100.0 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Medical Resource Utilization (MRU)9.4 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Medical Resource Utilization (MRU)15.2 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Medical Resource Utilization (MRU)25.0 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Undetectable RSV Viral Load at Each Timepoint Throughout the Study

Percentage of participants with undetectable RSV viral load (as measured by qRT-PCR) at each timepoint throughout the study was reported. As planned, combined data for both the cohorts were collected, analyzed and reported for this outcome measure.

Time frame: Baseline, Days 3, 5, 8, 14 and 21

Population: ITT-i analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and who had centrally confirmed RSV RNA viral load of \>=1 log10 copies/mL above the LLOQ of the RSV RT-qPCR assay at baseline. Analyses on ITT-i set were performed as randomized. Here, 'n' (number analyzed) represents number of participants who were evaluable at specified timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Undetectable RSV Viral Load at Each Timepoint Throughout the StudyBaseline0 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Undetectable RSV Viral Load at Each Timepoint Throughout the StudyDay 31.3 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Undetectable RSV Viral Load at Each Timepoint Throughout the StudyDay 57.8 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Undetectable RSV Viral Load at Each Timepoint Throughout the StudyDay 833.3 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Undetectable RSV Viral Load at Each Timepoint Throughout the StudyDay 1454.8 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Undetectable RSV Viral Load at Each Timepoint Throughout the StudyDay 2167.6 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Undetectable RSV Viral Load at Each Timepoint Throughout the StudyDay 2176.9 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Undetectable RSV Viral Load at Each Timepoint Throughout the StudyBaseline0 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Undetectable RSV Viral Load at Each Timepoint Throughout the StudyDay 838.4 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Undetectable RSV Viral Load at Each Timepoint Throughout the StudyDay 1458.1 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Undetectable RSV Viral Load at Each Timepoint Throughout the StudyDay 33.8 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Undetectable RSV Viral Load at Each Timepoint Throughout the StudyDay 59.1 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Undetectable RSV Viral Load at Each Timepoint Throughout the StudyDay 32.8 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Undetectable RSV Viral Load at Each Timepoint Throughout the StudyDay 511.1 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Undetectable RSV Viral Load at Each Timepoint Throughout the StudyDay 2177.9 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Undetectable RSV Viral Load at Each Timepoint Throughout the StudyDay 838.6 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Undetectable RSV Viral Load at Each Timepoint Throughout the StudyBaseline0 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Undetectable RSV Viral Load at Each Timepoint Throughout the StudyDay 1458.2 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Vital Signs Abnormalities

Percentage of participants with vital signs (SBP,DBP, pulse rate, respiratory rate, body temperature and SpO2) abnormalities (abnormally low \[ABL\] and abnormally high \[ABH\]) were reported. DBP: ABL: \<35 mmHg:0-3 months (mths), \<40 mmHg:3 mths- \<3.5 years,ABH: \>65 mmHg:0-3 mths, \>85 mmHg:3-12 mths, \>90 mmHg:1-2 years, \>70 mmHg: 2- \<3.5 years; SBP:ABL: \<60 mmHg:0-12 mths,\<75 mmHg:1-2 years, \<80:2- \<3.5 years,ABH: \>110:0-12 mths, \>120 mmHg:1-2 years, \>10 mmHg:2- \<3.5 years; Pulse rate:ABL: \<80 bpm:0-3 mths, \<70 bpm:3 mths-12 mth,\<60 bpm:1-2 years, \<90 bpm:2- \<3.5 years,ABH: \>180 bpm:0-3 mths, \>150 bpm:3 mths-12 mths, \>140 bpm:1-2 years, \>130:2- \<3.5 years; Respiratory rate:ABL: \<25 bpm:0-3 mths, \<20 bpm: 3 mths-12 mths,\<18 bpm:1-2 years, \<20 bpm:2- \<3.5 years, ABH:\>70 bpm:0-3 mths, \>60 bpm:3 mths-12 mths, \>50 bpm:1-2 years, \>35 bpm:2- \<3.5 years; SpO2: ABL: \<92%: 0-\<3.5 years; Temperature (Celsius): ABH:\>37.8:Tympanic, \>38.0:forehead, oral, axillary, \>37.2:rectal.

Time frame: Up to Day 28

Population: The Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, and were analyzed as treated, regardless of the randomized treatment group assigned. Here, 'n' (number analyzed) represents number of participants evaluable per vital sign parameter. As per change in planned analysis, the upper limit for the last age group was 3.5 years instead of 3 years.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Vital Signs AbnormalitiesDBP: Abnormally High28.6 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Vital Signs AbnormalitiesDiastolic Blood Pressure (DBP): Abnormally Low8.2 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Vital Signs AbnormalitiesOxygen saturation: Abnormally Low8.2 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Vital Signs AbnormalitiesTemperature: Abnormally High30.6 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Vital Signs AbnormalitiesRespiratory rate: Abnormally Low12.2 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Vital Signs AbnormalitiesRespiratory rate: Abnormally High4.1 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Vital Signs AbnormalitiesSBP: Abnormally High42.9 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Vital Signs AbnormalitiesSystolic Blood Pressure (SBP): Abnormally Low2.0 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Vital Signs AbnormalitiesPulse rate: Abnormally Low0.0 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Vital Signs AbnormalitiesPulse rate: Abnormally High30.6 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Vital Signs AbnormalitiesSBP: Abnormally High45.8 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Vital Signs AbnormalitiesSystolic Blood Pressure (SBP): Abnormally Low2.1 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Vital Signs AbnormalitiesDiastolic Blood Pressure (DBP): Abnormally Low18.8 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Vital Signs AbnormalitiesDBP: Abnormally High35.4 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Vital Signs AbnormalitiesPulse rate: Abnormally High27.1 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Vital Signs AbnormalitiesPulse rate: Abnormally Low2.1 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Vital Signs AbnormalitiesRespiratory rate: Abnormally High12.5 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Vital Signs AbnormalitiesRespiratory rate: Abnormally Low10.4 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Vital Signs AbnormalitiesTemperature: Abnormally High41.7 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Vital Signs AbnormalitiesOxygen saturation: Abnormally Low12.5 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Vital Signs AbnormalitiesDBP: Abnormally High27.1 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Vital Signs AbnormalitiesRespiratory rate: Abnormally Low0.0 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Vital Signs AbnormalitiesSystolic Blood Pressure (SBP): Abnormally Low8.3 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Vital Signs AbnormalitiesPulse rate: Abnormally High27.1 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Vital Signs AbnormalitiesDiastolic Blood Pressure (DBP): Abnormally Low25.0 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Vital Signs AbnormalitiesSBP: Abnormally High35.4 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Vital Signs AbnormalitiesPulse rate: Abnormally Low0 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Vital Signs AbnormalitiesTemperature: Abnormally High22.9 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Vital Signs AbnormalitiesOxygen saturation: Abnormally Low6.3 Percentage of Participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Vital Signs AbnormalitiesRespiratory rate: Abnormally High18.8 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Vital Signs AbnormalitiesRespiratory rate: Abnormally High3.1 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Vital Signs AbnormalitiesRespiratory rate: Abnormally Low0 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Vital Signs AbnormalitiesSBP: Abnormally High18.2 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Vital Signs AbnormalitiesOxygen saturation: Abnormally Low3.1 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Vital Signs AbnormalitiesTemperature: Abnormally High50.0 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Vital Signs AbnormalitiesSystolic Blood Pressure (SBP): Abnormally Low12.1 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Vital Signs AbnormalitiesPulse rate: Abnormally Low6.1 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Vital Signs AbnormalitiesPulse rate: Abnormally High12.1 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Vital Signs AbnormalitiesDBP: Abnormally High9.1 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Vital Signs AbnormalitiesDiastolic Blood Pressure (DBP): Abnormally Low15.2 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Vital Signs AbnormalitiesRespiratory rate: Abnormally High2.9 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Vital Signs AbnormalitiesDBP: Abnormally High17.6 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Vital Signs AbnormalitiesPulse rate: Abnormally High20.6 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Vital Signs AbnormalitiesPulse rate: Abnormally Low5.9 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Vital Signs AbnormalitiesSystolic Blood Pressure (SBP): Abnormally Low8.8 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Vital Signs AbnormalitiesRespiratory rate: Abnormally Low0 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Vital Signs AbnormalitiesOxygen saturation: Abnormally Low9.4 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Vital Signs AbnormalitiesTemperature: Abnormally High52.9 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Vital Signs AbnormalitiesDiastolic Blood Pressure (DBP): Abnormally Low2.9 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Vital Signs AbnormalitiesSBP: Abnormally High17.6 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Vital Signs AbnormalitiesPulse rate: Abnormally Low16.1 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Vital Signs AbnormalitiesOxygen saturation: Abnormally Low0 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Vital Signs AbnormalitiesSBP: Abnormally High12.9 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Vital Signs AbnormalitiesDiastolic Blood Pressure (DBP): Abnormally Low0 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Vital Signs AbnormalitiesPulse rate: Abnormally High16.1 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Vital Signs AbnormalitiesRespiratory rate: Abnormally High6.5 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Vital Signs AbnormalitiesDBP: Abnormally High6.5 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Vital Signs AbnormalitiesRespiratory rate: Abnormally Low0 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Vital Signs AbnormalitiesSystolic Blood Pressure (SBP): Abnormally Low9.7 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Vital Signs AbnormalitiesTemperature: Abnormally High54.8 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV Disease

Percentage of participants with worsening or improvement of RSV disease based on general questions of overall health was assessed. Improvement or worsening was assessed by a question 'Would you say the child's RSV symptoms have improved, are about the same or are worse than when the child entered the study' and responses were categorized as: 1) very much improved, 2) much improved, 3) a little improved, 4) about the same, 5) a little worse, 6) much worse, and 7) very much worse.

Time frame: Days 14 and 21

Population: ITT-i analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and who had centrally confirmed RSV RNA viral load of \>=1 log10 copies/mL above the LLOQ of the RSV RT-qPCR assay at baseline. Analyses on ITT-i set were performed as randomized. Here, 'n' (number analyzed) represents number of participants who were evaluable at specified timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV DiseaseDay 14: Very much worse0 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV DiseaseDay 21: About the same3.7 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV DiseaseDay 14: Much worse0 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV DiseaseDay 21: Much worse0 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV DiseaseDay 14: Much improved34.1 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV DiseaseDay 14: Very much improved58.5 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV DiseaseDay 21: A little improved3.7 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV DiseaseDay 14: A little improved7.3 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV DiseaseDay 21: Much improved14.8 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV DiseaseDay 14: About the same0 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV DiseaseDay 21: A little worse0 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV DiseaseDay 21: Very much worse0 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV DiseaseDay 21: Very much improved77.8 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV DiseaseDay 14: A little worse0 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV DiseaseDay 21: Very much worse0 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV DiseaseDay 21: A little worse0 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV DiseaseDay 14: Very much improved57.5 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV DiseaseDay 14: Much worse0 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV DiseaseDay 14: A little worse0 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV DiseaseDay 21: Much worse0 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV DiseaseDay 21: Very much improved63.9 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV DiseaseDay 14: A little improved2.5 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV DiseaseDay 21: About the same2.8 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV DiseaseDay 14: Much improved40.0 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV DiseaseDay 14: About the same0 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV DiseaseDay 21: A little improved2.8 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV DiseaseDay 14: Very much worse0 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV DiseaseDay 21: Much improved30.6 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV DiseaseDay 21: A little improved3.1 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV DiseaseDay 14: Very much improved67.5 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV DiseaseDay 14: Much improved30.0 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV DiseaseDay 14: A little improved2.5 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV DiseaseDay 14: About the same0 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV DiseaseDay 14: A little worse0 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV DiseaseDay 21: A little worse0 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV DiseaseDay 21: Much worse0 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV DiseaseDay 14: Much worse0 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV DiseaseDay 14: Very much worse0 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV DiseaseDay 21: Very much worse0 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV DiseaseDay 21: Very much improved56.3 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV DiseaseDay 21: Much improved37.5 Percentage of participants
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV DiseaseDay 21: About the same3.1 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV DiseaseDay 21: About the same0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV DiseaseDay 21: Very much worse0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV DiseaseDay 14: A little worse0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV DiseaseDay 21: Much worse0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV DiseaseDay 21: Much improved24.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV DiseaseDay 14: Very much worse0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV DiseaseDay 21: Very much improved76.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV DiseaseDay 21: A little worse0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV DiseaseDay 14: A little improved0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV DiseaseDay 14: Very much improved76.7 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV DiseaseDay 21: A little improved0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV DiseaseDay 14: Much improved20.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV DiseaseDay 14: Much worse0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV DiseaseDay 14: About the same3.3 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV DiseaseDay 14: Very much improved51.7 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV DiseaseDay 14: Much worse0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV DiseaseDay 14: A little worse3.4 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV DiseaseDay 14: Very much worse0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV DiseaseDay 14: About the same3.4 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV DiseaseDay 14: A little improved3.4 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV DiseaseDay 21: Very much worse0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV DiseaseDay 21: About the same0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV DiseaseDay 21: Very much improved78.3 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV DiseaseDay 21: Much improved21.7 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV DiseaseDay 14: Much improved37.9 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV DiseaseDay 21: A little improved0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV DiseaseDay 21: Much worse0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV DiseaseDay 21: A little worse0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV DiseaseDay 21: Much improved13.6 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV DiseaseDay 14: Much worse0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV DiseaseDay 21: Much worse0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV DiseaseDay 14: Very much improved64.3 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV DiseaseDay 14: About the same3.6 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV DiseaseDay 14: A little worse0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV DiseaseDay 21: A little improved0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV DiseaseDay 21: A little worse9.1 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV DiseaseDay 14: Very much worse0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV DiseaseDay 21: Very much improved77.3 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV DiseaseDay 14: Much improved32.1 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV DiseaseDay 21: About the same0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV DiseaseDay 21: Very much worse0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePercentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV DiseaseDay 14: A little improved0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Peripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) Over Time

Peripheral capillary oxygen saturation was measured by the investigator over time.

Time frame: Baseline, Days 3, 5, 8, 14 and 21

Population: The Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, and were analyzed as treated, regardless of the randomized treatment group assigned. Here, 'n' (number analyzed) represents number of participants who were evaluable at specified timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPeripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) Over TimeBaseline97.3 Percentage of SpO2Standard Deviation 2.47
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPeripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) Over TimeDay 396.8 Percentage of SpO2Standard Deviation 2.46
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPeripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) Over TimeDay 597.3 Percentage of SpO2Standard Deviation 1.67
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPeripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) Over TimeDay 897.3 Percentage of SpO2Standard Deviation 1.99
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPeripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) Over TimeDay 1498.1 Percentage of SpO2Standard Deviation 1.42
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboPeripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) Over TimeDay 2198.4 Percentage of SpO2Standard Deviation 1.47
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePeripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) Over TimeDay 396.3 Percentage of SpO2Standard Deviation 2.72
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePeripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) Over TimeDay 897.3 Percentage of SpO2Standard Deviation 2.47
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePeripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) Over TimeDay 2198.2 Percentage of SpO2Standard Deviation 1.8
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePeripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) Over TimeBaseline96.5 Percentage of SpO2Standard Deviation 3.44
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePeripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) Over TimeDay 596.8 Percentage of SpO2Standard Deviation 3.74
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePeripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) Over TimeDay 1498.3 Percentage of SpO2Standard Deviation 1.84
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePeripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) Over TimeDay 2198.0 Percentage of SpO2Standard Deviation 2.12
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePeripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) Over TimeDay 1498.1 Percentage of SpO2Standard Deviation 1.64
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePeripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) Over TimeDay 897.5 Percentage of SpO2Standard Deviation 1.74
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePeripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) Over TimeDay 596.7 Percentage of SpO2Standard Deviation 2.25
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePeripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) Over TimeBaseline96.6 Percentage of SpO2Standard Deviation 2.1
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePeripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) Over TimeDay 396.0 Percentage of SpO2Standard Deviation 2.43
Cohort 2: PlaceboPeripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) Over TimeDay 897.8 Percentage of SpO2Standard Deviation 1.48
Cohort 2: PlaceboPeripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) Over TimeDay 396.9 Percentage of SpO2Standard Deviation 1.77
Cohort 2: PlaceboPeripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) Over TimeDay 596.9 Percentage of SpO2Standard Deviation 1.68
Cohort 2: PlaceboPeripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) Over TimeDay 2198.5 Percentage of SpO2Standard Deviation 1.74
Cohort 2: PlaceboPeripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) Over TimeDay 1498.6 Percentage of SpO2Standard Deviation 2.03
Cohort 2: PlaceboPeripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) Over TimeBaseline96.8 Percentage of SpO2Standard Deviation 2.07
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePeripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) Over TimeBaseline96.7 Percentage of SpO2Standard Deviation 1.91
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePeripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) Over TimeDay 1498.6 Percentage of SpO2Standard Deviation 1.53
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePeripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) Over TimeDay 396.3 Percentage of SpO2Standard Deviation 3.12
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePeripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) Over TimeDay 597.1 Percentage of SpO2Standard Deviation 2.12
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePeripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) Over TimeDay 897.4 Percentage of SpO2Standard Deviation 2.69
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DosePeripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) Over TimeDay 2198.7 Percentage of SpO2Standard Deviation 1.36
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePeripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) Over TimeDay 897.9 Percentage of SpO2Standard Deviation 1.83
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePeripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) Over TimeDay 597.1 Percentage of SpO2Standard Deviation 2.43
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePeripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) Over TimeDay 1498.4 Percentage of SpO2Standard Deviation 1.73
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePeripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) Over TimeDay 2198.9 Percentage of SpO2Standard Deviation 1.25
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePeripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) Over TimeDay 396.5 Percentage of SpO2Standard Deviation 2.96
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DosePeripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) Over TimeBaseline95.9 Percentage of SpO2Standard Deviation 2.92
Secondary

Respiratory Rate (RR) Over Time

Respiratory rate (RR) was measured by the investigator over time.

Time frame: Baseline, Days 3, 5, 8, 14 and 21

Population: The Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, and were analyzed as treated, regardless of the randomized treatment group assigned. Here, 'n' (number analyzed) represents number of participants who were evaluable at specified timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboRespiratory Rate (RR) Over TimeDay 835.5 Breaths/minuteStandard Deviation 7.9
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboRespiratory Rate (RR) Over TimeDay 1435.6 Breaths/minuteStandard Deviation 7.13
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboRespiratory Rate (RR) Over TimeDay 344.1 Breaths/minuteStandard Deviation 11.44
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboRespiratory Rate (RR) Over TimeDay 538.3 Breaths/minuteStandard Deviation 9.36
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboRespiratory Rate (RR) Over TimeBaseline45.0 Breaths/minuteStandard Deviation 10.6
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboRespiratory Rate (RR) Over TimeDay 2136.07 Breaths/minuteStandard Deviation 10.21
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseRespiratory Rate (RR) Over TimeBaseline45.6 Breaths/minuteStandard Deviation 11.82
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseRespiratory Rate (RR) Over TimeDay 834.4 Breaths/minuteStandard Deviation 7.87
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseRespiratory Rate (RR) Over TimeDay 1434.9 Breaths/minuteStandard Deviation 8.89
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseRespiratory Rate (RR) Over TimeDay 341.8 Breaths/minuteStandard Deviation 10.13
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseRespiratory Rate (RR) Over TimeDay 538.1 Breaths/minuteStandard Deviation 9.57
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseRespiratory Rate (RR) Over TimeDay 2134.9 Breaths/minuteStandard Deviation 8.96
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseRespiratory Rate (RR) Over TimeDay 539.1 Breaths/minuteStandard Deviation 8.81
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseRespiratory Rate (RR) Over TimeDay 1435.2 Breaths/minuteStandard Deviation 7.45
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseRespiratory Rate (RR) Over TimeDay 839.2 Breaths/minuteStandard Deviation 9.45
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseRespiratory Rate (RR) Over TimeBaseline45.7 Breaths/minuteStandard Deviation 10.85
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseRespiratory Rate (RR) Over TimeDay 342.7 Breaths/minuteStandard Deviation 10.04
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseRespiratory Rate (RR) Over TimeDay 2136.6 Breaths/minuteStandard Deviation 7.43
Cohort 2: PlaceboRespiratory Rate (RR) Over TimeBaseline41.3 Breaths/minuteStandard Deviation 13.66
Cohort 2: PlaceboRespiratory Rate (RR) Over TimeDay 2136.4 Breaths/minuteStandard Deviation 9.61
Cohort 2: PlaceboRespiratory Rate (RR) Over TimeDay 337.9 Breaths/minuteStandard Deviation 10.16
Cohort 2: PlaceboRespiratory Rate (RR) Over TimeDay 538.2 Breaths/minuteStandard Deviation 13.37
Cohort 2: PlaceboRespiratory Rate (RR) Over TimeDay 837.4 Breaths/minuteStandard Deviation 11.7
Cohort 2: PlaceboRespiratory Rate (RR) Over TimeDay 1435.7 Breaths/minuteStandard Deviation 9.27
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseRespiratory Rate (RR) Over TimeDay 538.1 Breaths/minuteStandard Deviation 8.89
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseRespiratory Rate (RR) Over TimeDay 337.3 Breaths/minuteStandard Deviation 9.54
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseRespiratory Rate (RR) Over TimeBaseline41.3 Breaths/minuteStandard Deviation 11.76
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseRespiratory Rate (RR) Over TimeDay 2135.5 Breaths/minuteStandard Deviation 9.65
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseRespiratory Rate (RR) Over TimeDay 1435.6 Breaths/minuteStandard Deviation 10.53
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseRespiratory Rate (RR) Over TimeDay 836.9 Breaths/minuteStandard Deviation 9.75
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseRespiratory Rate (RR) Over TimeDay 2134.7 Breaths/minuteStandard Deviation 11.09
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseRespiratory Rate (RR) Over TimeBaseline37.0 Breaths/minuteStandard Deviation 8.77
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseRespiratory Rate (RR) Over TimeDay 334.4 Breaths/minuteStandard Deviation 9.19
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseRespiratory Rate (RR) Over TimeDay 535.4 Breaths/minuteStandard Deviation 9.53
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseRespiratory Rate (RR) Over TimeDay 834.0 Breaths/minuteStandard Deviation 10.54
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseRespiratory Rate (RR) Over TimeDay 1432.6 Breaths/minuteStandard Deviation 8.38
Secondary

RSV Viral Load Over Time

RSV viral load actual values over time were measured by qRT-PCR in the nasal swab specimens collected at the clinic visits and at home. As planned, combined data for both the cohorts was collected, analyzed and reported for this outcome measure.

Time frame: Baseline, Days 3, 5, 8, 14, and 21

Population: ITT-i analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and who had centrally confirmed RSV RNA viral load of \>=1 log10 copies/mL above the LLOQ of the RSV RT-qPCR assay at baseline. Analyses on ITT-i set were performed as randomized. Here, 'n' (number analyzed) represents number of participants who were evaluable at specified timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboRSV Viral Load Over TimeBaseline6.913 log10 copies/mLStandard Deviation 1.3449
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboRSV Viral Load Over TimeDay 35.398 log10 copies/mLStandard Deviation 1.5834
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboRSV Viral Load Over TimeDay 54.146 log10 copies/mLStandard Deviation 1.8508
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboRSV Viral Load Over TimeDay 82.604 log10 copies/mLStandard Deviation 2.0857
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboRSV Viral Load Over TimeDay 141.640 log10 copies/mLStandard Deviation 1.9515
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboRSV Viral Load Over TimeDay 211.150 log10 copies/mLStandard Deviation 1.7752
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseRSV Viral Load Over TimeDay 210.817 log10 copies/mLStandard Deviation 1.5347
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseRSV Viral Load Over TimeBaseline7.113 log10 copies/mLStandard Deviation 1.3667
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseRSV Viral Load Over TimeDay 82.108 log10 copies/mLStandard Deviation 1.8538
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseRSV Viral Load Over TimeDay 141.636 log10 copies/mLStandard Deviation 2.2221
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseRSV Viral Load Over TimeDay 35.432 log10 copies/mLStandard Deviation 1.8952
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseRSV Viral Load Over TimeDay 54.079 log10 copies/mLStandard Deviation 1.876
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseRSV Viral Load Over TimeDay 35.271 log10 copies/mLStandard Deviation 1.771
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseRSV Viral Load Over TimeDay 53.883 log10 copies/mLStandard Deviation 1.9815
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseRSV Viral Load Over TimeDay 210.810 log10 copies/mLStandard Deviation 1.6699
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseRSV Viral Load Over TimeDay 82.078 log10 copies/mLStandard Deviation 1.8319
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseRSV Viral Load Over TimeBaseline7.004 log10 copies/mLStandard Deviation 1.4709
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseRSV Viral Load Over TimeDay 141.440 log10 copies/mLStandard Deviation 1.8768
Secondary

Time to Improvement on Overall Health

Time to improvement based on general questions on overall health was assessed. Time from first dose of study drug until first time status of improvement of RSV symptoms reported as very much improved or much improved based on response to question 'Would you say the child's RSV symptoms have improved, are about the same or are worse than when the child entered the study'.

Time frame: Up to Day 21

Population: ITT-i analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and who had centrally confirmed RSV RNA viral load of \>=1 log10 copies/mL above the LLOQ of the RSV RT-qPCR assay at baseline. Analyses on ITT-i set were performed as randomized. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboTime to Improvement on Overall Health189.6 Hours
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseTime to Improvement on Overall Health190.2 Hours
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseTime to Improvement on Overall Health189.1 Hours
Cohort 2: PlaceboTime to Improvement on Overall Health186.8 Hours
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseTime to Improvement on Overall Health198.2 Hours
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseTime to Improvement on Overall Health187.9 Hours
Secondary

Time to Resolution of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO)

Time to resolution is defined as time from first dose of study drug until the first time of resolution of all RSV symptoms (breathing problems, retractions, tachypnea, breathing sounds, cough, tachycardia, nasal secretions, sleep disturbance, crying, illness behavior, feeding problems, and dehydration). Resolution occurs when all symptoms from the caregiver reported outcomes (ObsRO) are scored as none or mild (score of 0 or 1, respectively) for at least 24 hours.

Time frame: Up to Day 21

Population: ITT-i analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and who had centrally confirmed RSV RNA viral load of \>=1 log10 copies/mL above the LLOQ of the RSV RT-qPCR assay at baseline. Analyses on ITT-i set were performed as randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboTime to Resolution of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO)193.5 Hours
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseTime to Resolution of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO)163.6 Hours
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseTime to Resolution of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO)151.8 Hours
Cohort 2: PlaceboTime to Resolution of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO)166.6 Hours
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseTime to Resolution of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO)206.1 Hours
Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseTime to Resolution of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO)176.9 Hours
Secondary

Time to Undetectable RSV Viral Load

Time to undetectable RSV viral load (as measured by qRT-PCR) was defined as the time in hours from first dose of study drug to first post-baseline timepoint at which the virus was undetectable and after which there were no more detectable virus assessments. As planned, combined data for both the cohorts was collected, analyzed and reported for this outcome measure.

Time frame: Up to Day 21

Population: ITT-i analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and who had centrally confirmed RSV RNA viral load of \>=1 log10 copies/mL above the LLOQ of the RSV RT-qPCR assay at baseline. Analyses on ITT-i set were performed as randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Cohorts 1 and 2: PlaceboTime to Undetectable RSV Viral Load467.0 Hours
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low DoseTime to Undetectable RSV Viral Load428.3 Hours
Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High DoseTime to Undetectable RSV Viral Load330.7 Hours

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 25, 2026