Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections
Conditions
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the antiviral activity, clinical outcomes, safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationships of different oral dose levels of JNJ-53718678 in children greater than or equal to 28 days and less than or equal to 3 years of age with respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) disease (hospitalized participants \[Cohort 1\] or outpatients \[Cohort 2\]).
Detailed description
JNJ-53718678 is an investigational respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) specific fusion inhibitor and is under development for the treatment of RSV infection, which results in an upper and/or lower respiratory tract illness. The primary hypothesis of this study is that JNJ-53718678 has antiviral activity against RSV (that is, results in a decrease in RSV nasal viral load from immediately prior to first dose of study drug until Day 5). This will be assessed by a positive dose-response relationship of JNJ-53718678 compared to placebo. Besides the RSV nasal viral load through day 5, other timepoints will also be evaluated as well as other nasal viral load related parameters. In addition, the evolution of signs and symptoms of RSV disease will be evaluated. Participants' safety will be monitored throughout the study by evaluating the occurrence and severity of adverse events and by laboratory and electrocardiogram measurements. Study participants will be identified when they are hospitalized or expected to be hospitalized within 24 hours after presentation to the hospital (Cohort 1) or present for medical care as outpatients (Cohort 2) with symptoms of an acute respiratory illness supporting a diagnosis of RSV infection. Eligible participants will be randomized 1:1:1 to receive either a low or a high dose of JNJ 53718678 or placebo and will be receiving study treatment for 7 days. They will be followed up for 3 weeks after the last dose. The total study duration for each participant will be approximately 29 days.
Interventions
Participants will receive JNJ-53718678 (high dose or low dose) orally twice daily for 7 days.
Participants will receive matching placebo (high volume or low volume) orally twice daily for 7 days.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Informed consent form (ICF) must be given * Laboratory diagnosis of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection * The participant has an acute respiratory illness * The time of onset of RSV symptoms to the anticipated time of randomization must be less than or equal to (\<=) 5 days * Except for the RSV-related illness, the Participant must be medically stable in case of allowed co-morbid conditions * The participant must have been assessed per local public health practice and considered not to have Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection during this respiratory infection
Exclusion criteria
* The participant is less than (\<) 3 months postnatal age at screening and was born prematurely (i.e, \<37 weeks and 0 days of gestation) OR if the participant weighs \<2.4 kilogram (kg) or greater than (\>) 16.8 kg * Participant is considered by the investigator to be immunocompromised within the past 12 months * Participant unwilling or unable to undergo mid-turbinate nasal swab procedures * Participant is receiving chronic home oxygen therapy at screening * Participant has other clinically significant abnormal electrocardiogram (ECG) findings not consistent with the present risk factor for severe RSV disease (if applicable) in the study population, as judged by the investigator based on the machine read ECG results at screening * The participant has a QTcF interval greater than (\>)450 millisecond (ms) per the machine read (mean of triplicate) parameter result confirmed by repeat triplicate ECG recording during screening
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) Viral Load Area Under Curve (AUC) From Immediately Prior to First Dose of Study Drug (Baseline) Through Day 5 (AUC[Day 5]) | Baseline through Day 5 | RSV viral load AUC from immediately prior to first dose of study drug through Day 5 was determined. The RSV viral load was measured by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) assay in mid-turbinate nasal swab specimens. As planned, combined data for both the cohorts was collected, analyzed and reported for this outcome measure. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in Body Temperature | Baseline to Days 3, 5, 8, 14 and 21 | Change from baseline in body temperature (either investigator or caregiver measured) was assessed. |
| Peripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) Over Time | Baseline, Days 3, 5, 8, 14 and 21 | Peripheral capillary oxygen saturation was measured by the investigator over time. |
| RSV Viral Load Over Time | Baseline, Days 3, 5, 8, 14, and 21 | RSV viral load actual values over time were measured by qRT-PCR in the nasal swab specimens collected at the clinic visits and at home. As planned, combined data for both the cohorts was collected, analyzed and reported for this outcome measure. |
| Change From Baseline in RSV Viral Load Over Time | Baseline up to Days 3, 5, 8, 14, and 21 | Change from baseline in RSV viral load over time was measured by qRT-PCR in the nasal swab specimens collected at the clinic visits and at home. As planned, combined data for both the cohorts was collected, analyzed and reported for this outcome measure. |
| Change From Baseline in Peripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) | Baseline to Days 3, 5, 8, 14, and 21 | Change from baseline in peripheral capillary oxygen saturation levels was derived based on reported values over time. |
| Least Squares (LS) Mean RSV Viral Load on Days 3, 8 and 14 | Baseline through Days 3, 8, and 14 | LS mean RSV viral load on Days 3, 8, and 14 was reported. LS mean viral load (log10 copies/mL) was estimated per time point. The difference in RSV viral Load AUC (log10 copies\*day/mL) from immediately prior to first dose of study drug (baseline) through Day 3, 8 and 14 was determined from the model estimating the LS Mean Viral Load per time point, and is presented in the statistical analysis. The RSV viral load was measured by qRT-PCR assay in mid-turbinate nasal swab specimens. As planned, combined data for both the cohorts was collected, and analyzed for this outcome measure at Days 3 and 8, however combined Cohort 1 and Cohort 2 data were not analyzed for this outcome measure at Day 14, due to the premature study termination. |
| Time to Undetectable RSV Viral Load | Up to Day 21 | Time to undetectable RSV viral load (as measured by qRT-PCR) was defined as the time in hours from first dose of study drug to first post-baseline timepoint at which the virus was undetectable and after which there were no more detectable virus assessments. As planned, combined data for both the cohorts was collected, analyzed and reported for this outcome measure. |
| Percentage of Participants With Undetectable RSV Viral Load at Each Timepoint Throughout the Study | Baseline, Days 3, 5, 8, 14 and 21 | Percentage of participants with undetectable RSV viral load (as measured by qRT-PCR) at each timepoint throughout the study was reported. As planned, combined data for both the cohorts were collected, analyzed and reported for this outcome measure. |
| Change From Baseline in Parent(s)/Caregiver(s) Pediatric RSV Electronic Severity and Outcomes Rating System (PRESORS) Scores | Baseline up to Days 3, 5, 8, 14 and 21 | PRESORS is a questionnaire recording presence and severity of signs and symptoms of RSV disease (fever, cough, sputum, wheezing, difficulty breathing, nasal congestion, and feeding issues). PRESORS overall RSV symptoms summary parameter consisted of 12-items, each item score ranges from 0 to 3. A summary score was derived (mean of the item scores) which also ranges from 0 to 3. The higher the score, the worse the symptom. |
| Change From Baseline in Clinician PRESORS Score | Baseline, up to Days 3, 5, 8, 14 and 21 | Change from baseline in clinician PRESORS scores (for concepts: activity level, sleep disturbance, breathing problems, retractions, tachypnea, feeding problem, cough, nasal secretions, wheezing, dehydration) was assessed. Clinician PRESORS is a questionnaire recording presence and severity of signs and symptoms of RSV disease and consisted of 10-items, each item score ranges from 0 to 3. Overall RSV symptoms summary parameter was derived (mean of the item scores) which also ranges from 0 to 3. The higher the score, the worse the symptom. |
| Time to Resolution of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) | Up to Day 21 | Time to resolution is defined as time from first dose of study drug until the first time of resolution of all RSV symptoms (breathing problems, retractions, tachypnea, breathing sounds, cough, tachycardia, nasal secretions, sleep disturbance, crying, illness behavior, feeding problems, and dehydration). Resolution occurs when all symptoms from the caregiver reported outcomes (ObsRO) are scored as none or mild (score of 0 or 1, respectively) for at least 24 hours. |
| Time to Improvement on Overall Health | Up to Day 21 | Time to improvement based on general questions on overall health was assessed. Time from first dose of study drug until first time status of improvement of RSV symptoms reported as very much improved or much improved based on response to question 'Would you say the child's RSV symptoms have improved, are about the same or are worse than when the child entered the study'. |
| Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Baseline, Days 3, 5, 8, 14, and 21 | Percentage of participants by status of RSV symptoms based on PRESORS caregiver (ObsRO) general question over time was assessed. PRESORS is a questionnaire recording presence and severity of signs and symptoms of RSV disease (fever, cough, sputum, wheezing, difficulty breathing, nasal congestion, and feeding issues). Status of RSV symptoms was assessed by a question (how would you rate the child's RSV symptoms now?) of PRESORS questionnaire and responses were categorized as: 1) none, 2) very mild, 3) mild, 4) moderate, 5) severe, and 6) very severe. |
| Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Baseline, Days 3, 5, 8, 14, and 21 | Percentage of participants by health status assessment based on PRESORS caregiver (ObsRO) general question over time was assessed. PRESORS is a questionnaire recording presence and severity of signs and symptoms of RSV disease (fever, cough, sputum, wheezing, difficulty breathing, nasal congestion, and feeding issues). Health status was assessed by a question (how is the child's health now) of PRESORS questionnaire and responses were categorized as: 1) excellent, 2) very good, 3) good, 4) fair, 5) poor, and 6) very poor. |
| Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV Disease | Days 14 and 21 | Percentage of participants with worsening or improvement of RSV disease based on general questions of overall health was assessed. Improvement or worsening was assessed by a question 'Would you say the child's RSV symptoms have improved, are about the same or are worse than when the child entered the study' and responses were categorized as: 1) very much improved, 2) much improved, 3) a little improved, 4) about the same, 5) a little worse, 6) much worse, and 7) very much worse. |
| Percentage of Participants by Return to Pre-RSV Disease Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Baseline, Days 3, 5, 8, 14, and 21 | Percentage of participants by return to pre-RSV disease health status assessment based on PRESORS caregiver (ObsRO) general question over time was assessed by a question (Has the child's health returned to normal \[how it was before RSV?\]) of PRESORS questionnaire and responses were categorized as: 1) No, and 2) Yes. PRESORS is a questionnaire recording presence and severity of signs and symptoms of RSV disease (fever, cough, sputum, wheezing, difficulty breathing, nasal congestion, and feeding issues). Below results are reported for category 'Yes'. |
| Respiratory Rate (RR) Over Time | Baseline, Days 3, 5, 8, 14 and 21 | Respiratory rate (RR) was measured by the investigator over time. |
| Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate | Baseline to Days 3, 5, 8, 14 and 21 | Change from baseline in respiratory rate was derived based on the reported measurements of respiratory rate over time. The respiratory rate over time was reported by the investigator. |
| Heart Rate Over Time | Baseline, Days 3, 5, 8, 14 and 21 | Heart rate was measured by the investigator over time. |
| Change From Baseline in Heart Rate | Baseline to Days 3, 5, 8, 14 and 21 | Change from baseline in heart rate was assessed. |
| Percentage of Participants Who Required (re)Hospitalization During Treatment and Follow-up | Up to Day 28 | Percentage of participants who required (re)hospitalization during treatment and follow-up was assessed. Percentage of participants requiring re-hospitalization following the initial hospital discharge was assessed in Cohort 1 participants (hospitalized cohort) whilst percentage of participants requiring hospitalization after first dose of study drug was assessed in Cohort 2 participants (outpatient cohort). |
| Cohort 1: Time to Return to Age-adjusted Normal Values for Vital Signs | Up to Day 28 | Time to return to age-adjusted normal values from first dose of study drug based on the reported vital signs (respiratory rate, heart rate, SpO2 \>=92%, and SpO2 \>=95%) values was assessed. As per the study protocol and study design, this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for participants who were hospitalized only. Only participants in Cohort 1 were hospitalized, hence this outcome measure is only reported for Cohort 1. |
| Cohort 1: Time to Discharge From Hospital | Up to Day 28 | Time to discharge from hospital was derived from the reported discharge date/time and from first dose date/time. As per the study protocol and study design, this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for participants who were hospitalized only. Only participants in Cohort 1 were hospitalized, hence this outcome measure is only reported for Cohort 1. |
| Cohort 1: Percentage of Participants Who Required Admission to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) | Up to Day 21 | Percentage of participants who required admission to the ICU was assessed. This outcome measure was applicable for those participants that were not in ICU before first dose of study drug. As per the study protocol and study design, this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for participants who were hospitalized only. Only participants in Cohort 1 were hospitalized, hence this outcome measure is only reported for Cohort 1. |
| Cohort 1: Duration of ICU Stay | Up to Day 21 | Duration of ICU stay was derived based on the reported admission/discharge date/time for ICU. Duration defined as total number of hours a participant was in ICU from first dose of study drug until study termination. As per the study protocol and study design, this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for participants who were hospitalized only. Only participants in Cohort 1 were hospitalized, hence this outcome measure is only reported for Cohort 1. |
| Cohort 1: Time to Clinical Stability Evaluated by the Investigator | Up to Day 21 | Time to clinical stability was derived based on vital signs(SpO2 \>= 92%, SpO2 \>=95% on room air) assessments and supplementation end dates as collected. Time to clinical stability=time from initiation of study treatment until time at which following criteria were met: Time to return to age-adjusted normal value for otherwise healthy, pre-RSV infection status for participant with risk factor for severe RSV disease,no more oxygen supplementation in otherwise healthy participant, participant with risk factor for severe RSV disease and no more IV administered/nasogastric tube feeding/hydration supplementation in otherwise healthy participant or pre-RSV status of IV/nasogastric tube feeding/hydration in participant with risk factor for severe RSV disease. As per protocol and study design,this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for participants who were hospitalized only. Only participants in Cohort 1 were hospitalized, hence this outcome measure is only reported for Cohort 1. |
| Cohort 1: Percentage of Participants Who Required Supplemental Oxygen | Up to Day 21 | Percentage of participants who required supplemental oxygen after first dose of study drug was reported. This parameter was only for participants that did not require oxygen supplementation before first dose of study drug. As per the study protocol and study design, this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for participants who were hospitalized only. Only participants in Cohort 1 were hospitalized, hence this outcome measure is only reported for Cohort 1. |
| Cohort 1: Duration of Supplemental Oxygen | Up to Day 28 | Duration of supplemental oxygen was assessed. Duration was defined as total number of hours a participant used supplemental oxygen from first dose of study drug until study termination. As per the study protocol and study design, this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for participants who were hospitalized only. Only participants in Cohort 1 were hospitalized, hence this outcome measure is only reported for Cohort 1. |
| Cohort 1: Percentage of Participants Who Required Non-invasive Mechanical Ventilation Support | Up to Day 21 | Percentage of participants who required non-invasive mechanical ventilation support (example: continuous positive airway pressure) after first dose of study drug was assessed. This parameter was only for participants who did not require non-invasive mechanical ventilation support before first dose of study drug. As per the study protocol and study design, this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for participants who were hospitalized only. Only participants in Cohort 1 were hospitalized, hence this outcome measure is only reported for Cohort 1. |
| Cohort 1: Percentage of Participants Who Required Invasive Mechanical Ventilation Support | Up to Day 21 | Percentage of participants who required invasive mechanical ventilation support (example: endotracheal-mechanical ventilation) after first dose of study drug was assessed. This parameter was only for participants who did not require invasive mechanical ventilation support before first dose of study drug. As per the study protocol and study design, this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for participants who were hospitalized only. Only participants in Cohort 1 were hospitalized, hence this outcome measure is only reported for Cohort 1. |
| Cohort 1: Percentage of Participants Who Required Non-invasive Non-mechanical Ventilation Support | Up to Day 21 | Percentage of participants who required non-invasive non-mechanical ventilation support (example: nasal cannula) after first dose of study drug was assessed. This parameter was only for participants who did not require non-invasive non-mechanical ventilation support before first dose of study drug. As per the study protocol and study design, this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for participants who were hospitalized only. Only participants in Cohort 1 were hospitalized, hence this outcome measure is only reported for Cohort 1. |
| Cohort 1: Duration of Non-invasive Ventilation Support | Up to Day 21 | For the subset of participants who received non-invasive ventilation post dose, duration for non-invasive ventilation could not be derived by individual type as start/end dates and times were not collected in full to allow breakdown of duration derivation by ventilation type and only overall duration of oxygen supplementation (overall ventilation support) could be derived which is reported in the outcome measure Duration of Supplemental Oxygen. As per the study protocol and study design, this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for participants who were hospitalized only. Only participants in Cohort 1 were hospitalized, hence this outcome measure could only have been reported for Cohort 1. |
| Cohort 1: Duration of Invasive Ventilation Support | Up to Day 21 | For the subset of participants who received invasive ventilation post dose, duration for invasive ventilation could not be derived by individual type as start/end dates and times were not collected in full to allow breakdown of duration derivation by ventilation type and only overall duration of oxygen supplementation (overall ventilation support) could be derived which is reported in the outcome measure Duration of Supplemental Oxygen. As per the study protocol and study design, this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for participants who were hospitalized only. Only participants in Cohort 1 were hospitalized, hence this outcome measure could only have been reported for Cohort 1. |
| Cohort 1: Time to End of Supplemental Oxygen up to 72 Hours From First Hospital Discharge | Up to end of supplemental oxygen including supplemental oxygen within 72 hours after first hospital discharge (up to Day 28) | Time to end of supplemental oxygen up to 72 hours from first hospital discharge was assessed. Time to end of supplemental oxygen was defined as time (hours) from first dose of study drug to last end date/time of any oxygen supplementation received, but within 72 hours following first hospital discharge. As per the study protocol and study design, this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for participants who were hospitalized only. Only participants in Cohort 1 were hospitalized, hence this outcome measure is only reported for Cohort 1. |
| Cohort 1: Percentage of Participants Who Needed Hydration and/or Feeding by Intravenous (IV) Administration or Nasogastric Tube | Up to Day 28 | Percentage of participants who needed hydration and/or feeding by IV Administration or nasogastric tube after the first dose of study drug was assessed. This parameter was only for participants who didn't require supplemental feeding/hydration before first dose of study drug. As per the study protocol and study design, this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for participants who were hospitalized only. Only participants in Cohort 1 were hospitalized, hence this outcome measure is only reported for Cohort 1. |
| Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events | Up to Day 28 | Percentage of participants with adverse events was assessed. An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in clinical study participants administered a medicinal (investigational or non-investigational) product. An adverse event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the intervention. |
| Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Up to Day 28 | Percentage of participants with abnormal laboratory findings (chemistry and hematology) worst toxicity grade was assessed based on Division of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (DMID) toxicity grading scale. DMID toxicity grades range from 1 to 4. Grade 1 = mild: transient or mild discomfort (\<48 hours); no medical intervention/therapy required. Grade 2 = moderate: mild to moderate limitation in activity - some assistance may be needed; no or minimal medical intervention/therapy required. Grade 3 = severe: marked limitation in activity, some assistance usually required; medical intervention/therapy required, hospitalizations possible. Grade 4 = life-threatening or death: Extreme limitation in activity, significant assistance required; significant medical intervention/therapy required, hospitalization or hospice care probable. |
| Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Findings | Up to Day 28 | Percentage of participants with abnormal ECG (PR interval \[for age 0 to 2 years: \>150 msec is abnormally high, for age group 2 to \<3.5 years: \<100 msec is abnormally low and \>150 msec is abnormally high\]; QRS interval \[for 0 to 2 years: \>79 msec is abnormally high, for age group 2 to \<3.5 years: \<40 msec is abnormally low and \>79 msec is abnormally high\]; QT interval \[for age 0 to 2 years: \>500 msec is abnormally high, for age group 2 to \<18 years: \<320 msec is abnormally low and \>450 msec is abnormally high\]; RR interval \[for age 0 to 3 months: \<333 msec is abnormally low and \>750 msec is abnormally high; for age group 3 to 12 months: \<400 msec is abnormally low and \>860 msec is abnormally high; for age 1 to 2 years: \<430 msec is abnormally low and \>1000 msec is abnormally high; for age group 2 to \<18 years: \<600 msec is abnormally low and \>1200 msec is abnormally high\]) findings were assessed. |
| Percentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF) | Baseline to Day 28 | Percentage of participants with categorized change from Baseline in ECG parameters (QT/ QTcB/ QTcF interval) was assessed. Abnormal ECG change from baseline in QTc and QTcB Interval is categorized as borderline QTc change: 30 ms (milliseconds) to \<60 ms, and abnormally high QTc change: greater than \[\>\] 60 ms), and QTcF Interval is categorized as borderline QTc change: 30 ms to \<60 ms, and abnormally high QTc change: \>60 ms. |
| Percentage of Participants With Vital Signs Abnormalities | Up to Day 28 | Percentage of participants with vital signs (SBP,DBP, pulse rate, respiratory rate, body temperature and SpO2) abnormalities (abnormally low \[ABL\] and abnormally high \[ABH\]) were reported. DBP: ABL: \<35 mmHg:0-3 months (mths), \<40 mmHg:3 mths- \<3.5 years,ABH: \>65 mmHg:0-3 mths, \>85 mmHg:3-12 mths, \>90 mmHg:1-2 years, \>70 mmHg: 2- \<3.5 years; SBP:ABL: \<60 mmHg:0-12 mths,\<75 mmHg:1-2 years, \<80:2- \<3.5 years,ABH: \>110:0-12 mths, \>120 mmHg:1-2 years, \>10 mmHg:2- \<3.5 years; Pulse rate:ABL: \<80 bpm:0-3 mths, \<70 bpm:3 mths-12 mth,\<60 bpm:1-2 years, \<90 bpm:2- \<3.5 years,ABH: \>180 bpm:0-3 mths, \>150 bpm:3 mths-12 mths, \>140 bpm:1-2 years, \>130:2- \<3.5 years; Respiratory rate:ABL: \<25 bpm:0-3 mths, \<20 bpm: 3 mths-12 mths,\<18 bpm:1-2 years, \<20 bpm:2- \<3.5 years, ABH:\>70 bpm:0-3 mths, \>60 bpm:3 mths-12 mths, \>50 bpm:1-2 years, \>35 bpm:2- \<3.5 years; SpO2: ABL: \<92%: 0-\<3.5 years; Temperature (Celsius): ABH:\>37.8:Tympanic, \>38.0:forehead, oral, axillary, \>37.2:rectal. |
| Cohort 1: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Timepoint 0 Hours Until 24 Hours Post Dose (AUC[0-24 Hours]) | 0 to 24 hours post dose on Days 1 and 7 | AUC (0-24) is defined as area under the plasma concentration-time curve from timepoint 0 hours until 24 hours post dose estimated by population PK model. |
| Body Temperature Over Time | Baseline, Days 3, 5, 8, 14 and 21 | Body temperature was reported over time (either investigator or caregiver measured). |
| Cohort 1: Trough Plasma Concentration (Ctrough) of JNJ-53718678 | Days 1 and 7 | Ctrough is the trough plasma concentration of JNJ-53718678 estimated by population PK model. |
| Cohort 2: Plasma Concentration of JNJ-53718678 | Once daily dosing: Day 3 and Day 8 pre- or post-dose. Twice daily dosing: Day 1 at least 1 hour post-dose, and Days 3 or 5 (combined in one timepoint) at least 4 hours after morning dose but prior to evening dose | Plasma concentration of JNJ-53718678 was measured for Cohort-2. As per planned analysis in the protocol, PK sampling was performed on either Day 3 or Day 5 for participants receiving twice daily dosing, resulting in one combined timepoint of Day 3 or Day 5. Hence, the data collected on either Day 3 or Day 5 was pooled and is reported here collectively. |
| Percentage of Participants With Medical Resource Utilization (MRU) | Up to Day 28 | Percentage of participants with MRU (any medical care encounters) was reported. |
| Percentage of Participants With Acceptability and Palatability of the JNJ-53718678 Formulation as Assessed by Parent(s)/Caregiver(s) | Day 8 | Percentage of participants with acceptability and palatability of the JNJ-53718678 formulation was assessed through a questionnaire asking about the child's reaction when given the medicine, completed by parent(s)/caregiver(s) after last dosing that categorized as 1) child took medicine easily, 2) disgusted expressions after tasting medicine, 3) cried after tasting medicine, 4) would not open mouth or turned head away to avoid medicine, 5) spit out or coughed out medicine, 6) gagged, and 7) vomited (within 2 minutes of swallowing medicine). Below results are based on response to child took medicine easily. |
| Number of Participants With Emerging Variations in the Viral Genome Potentially Associated With Resistance to JNJ-53718678 | Up to Day 21 | Number of participants with emerging variations in the viral genome potentially associated with resistance to JNJ-53718678 was reported. Number of participants with F gene sequencing data available and with emerging genetic variations post-baseline as compared to baseline, considering 24 RSV F protein positions of interest (positions 127, 137, 138, 140, 141, 143, 144, 323, 338, 339, 392, 394, 396, 397, 398, 399, 400, 401, 474, 486, 487, 488, 489, and 517) was reported. |
| Cohort 1: Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of JNJ-53718678 | Days 1 and 7 | Cmax is the maximum plasma concentration of JNJ-53718678 estimated by population PK model. |
Countries
Argentina, Belgium, Brazil, Bulgaria, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, Poland, Russia, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Taiwan, Thailand, Turkey (Türkiye), United Kingdom, United States
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Cohort 1: Placebo Participants of age groups (age group 1: greater than or equal to \[\>=\] 28 days to less than \[\<\] 3 months, age group 2: \>=3 months to \<6 months, and age group 3: \>=6 months to less than or equal to \[\<=\] 3 years), who were hospitalized or expected to be hospitalized within 24 hours after presentation to the hospital received placebo matching to JNJ-53718678 (high volume placebo or low volume placebo to match the calculated volume of the JNJ-53718678 for the high dose or low dose, respectively) orally once daily for 7 days. | 50 |
| Cohort 1: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose Participants who were hospitalized or expected to be hospitalized within 24 hours after presentation to the hospital received JNJ-53718678 1.7 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) for age group 1: \>=28 days to \<3 months; 2 mg/kg for age group 2: \>=3 months to \<6 months; and 3 mg/kg for age group 3: \>=6 months to \<=3 years, orally once daily for 7 days. | 49 |
| Cohort 1: JNJ-53718678 High Dose Participants who were hospitalized or expected to be hospitalized within 24 hours after presentation to the hospital received JNJ-53718678 5 mg/kg for age group 1: \>=28 days to \<3 months; 6 mg/kg for age group 2: \>=3 months to \<6 months; and 9 mg/kg for age group 3: \>=6 months to \<=3 years, orally once daily for 7 days. | 48 |
| Cohort 2: Placebo As per the original dosing, outpatients of age groups (age group 1: \>=28 days to \<3 months, age group 2: \>=3 months to \<6 months, and age group 3: \>=6 months to \<=3 years) were randomized to receive placebo matching to JNJ-53718678 (high volume placebo or low volume placebo to match the calculated volume of the JNJ-53718678 for the high dose or low dose, respectively) orally once daily for 7 days. After protocol amendment 4, participants received placebo matching to JNJ-53718678 (high dose or low dose) orally twice daily for 7 days. | 34 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose As per the original dosing, outpatients were randomized to receive JNJ-53718678 1.7 mg/kg for age group 1: \>=28 days to \<3 months; 2 mg/kg for age group 2: \>=3 months to \<6 months; and 3 mg/kg for age group 3: \>=6 months to \<=3 years, orally once daily for 7 days. After protocol amendment 4, participants were randomized to receive JNJ-53718678 0.85 mg/kg for age group 1, JNJ-53718678 1.0 mg/kg for age group 2, and JNJ-53718678 1.5 mg/kg for age group 3, orally twice daily for 7 days. | 34 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose As per the original dosing, outpatients were randomized to receive JNJ-53718678 5 mg/kg for age group 1: \>=28 days to \<3 months; 6 mg/kg for age group 2: \>=3 months to \<6 months; and 9 mg/kg for age group 3: \>=6 months to \<=3 years, orally once daily for 7 days. After protocol amendment 4, participants were randomized to receive JNJ-53718678 2.5 mg/kg for age group 1, JNJ-53718678 3.0 mg/kg for age group 2, and JNJ-53718678 4.5 mg/kg for age group 3, orally twice daily for 7 days. | 31 |
| Total | 246 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 | FG002 | FG003 | FG004 | FG005 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Cohort 1: Placebo | Cohort 1: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Cohort 2: Placebo | Cohort 1: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 8.4 months STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.59 | 8.5 months STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.21 | 13.8 months STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.31 | 8.6 months STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.74 | 14.8 months STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.9 | 17.2 months STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.81 | 11.2 months STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.71 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 18 Participants | 21 Participants | 10 Participants | 19 Participants | 9 Participants | 10 Participants | 87 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 29 Participants | 24 Participants | 24 Participants | 28 Participants | 25 Participants | 21 Participants | 151 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 3 Participants | 3 Participants | 0 Participants | 2 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 8 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 3 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 5 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 15 Participants | 11 Participants | 11 Participants | 14 Participants | 14 Participants | 13 Participants | 78 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 4 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 5 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 4 Participants | 4 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 10 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 28 Participants | 31 Participants | 22 Participants | 29 Participants | 19 Participants | 18 Participants | 147 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment ARGENTINA | 5 Participants | 6 Participants | 0 Participants | 5 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 16 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment BRAZIL | 1 Participants | 3 Participants | 7 Participants | 5 Participants | 5 Participants | 5 Participants | 26 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment BULGARIA | 3 Participants | 2 Participants | 6 Participants | 0 Participants | 6 Participants | 7 Participants | 24 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment GERMANY | 0 Participants | 2 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment HUNGARY | 2 Participants | 4 Participants | 3 Participants | 2 Participants | 2 Participants | 0 Participants | 13 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment ITALY | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment JAPAN | 5 Participants | 4 Participants | 8 Participants | 3 Participants | 12 Participants | 7 Participants | 39 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment MALAYSIA | 4 Participants | 4 Participants | 1 Participants | 2 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 12 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment MEXICO | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 2 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment POLAND | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment RUSSIAN FEDERATION | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment SOUTH AFRICA | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment SOUTH KOREA | 2 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment SPAIN | 17 Participants | 20 Participants | 5 Participants | 17 Participants | 3 Participants | 3 Participants | 65 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment SWEDEN | 2 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment TAIWAN | 3 Participants | 2 Participants | 0 Participants | 5 Participants | 0 Participants | 2 Participants | 12 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment THAILAND | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 2 Participants | 3 Participants | 2 Participants | 2 Participants | 10 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment TURKEY | 3 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 4 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment UNITED KINGDOM | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 2 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment UNITED STATES | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 2 Participants | 2 Participants | 4 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 23 Participants | 23 Participants | 13 Participants | 20 Participants | 8 Participants | 14 Participants | 101 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 27 Participants | 25 Participants | 21 Participants | 29 Participants | 26 Participants | 17 Participants | 145 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk | EG003 affected / at risk | EG004 affected / at risk | EG005 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 50 | 0 / 49 | 0 / 48 | 0 / 34 | 0 / 34 | 0 / 31 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 28 / 50 | 29 / 49 | 30 / 48 | 14 / 34 | 20 / 34 | 13 / 31 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 4 / 50 | 5 / 49 | 2 / 48 | 2 / 34 | 2 / 34 | 3 / 31 |
Outcome results
Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) Viral Load Area Under Curve (AUC) From Immediately Prior to First Dose of Study Drug (Baseline) Through Day 5 (AUC[Day 5])
RSV viral load AUC from immediately prior to first dose of study drug through Day 5 was determined. The RSV viral load was measured by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) assay in mid-turbinate nasal swab specimens. As planned, combined data for both the cohorts was collected, analyzed and reported for this outcome measure.
Time frame: Baseline through Day 5
Population: Intent-to-Treat-infected (ITT-i) analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and who had a centrally confirmed RSV RNA viral load of greater than or equal to (\>=) 1 log10 copies/mL above the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) of the RSV RT-qPCR assay at baseline. Analyses on the ITT-i set were performed as randomized.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) Viral Load Area Under Curve (AUC) From Immediately Prior to First Dose of Study Drug (Baseline) Through Day 5 (AUC[Day 5]) | 22.74 log10 copies*day per milliliter (mL) |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) Viral Load Area Under Curve (AUC) From Immediately Prior to First Dose of Study Drug (Baseline) Through Day 5 (AUC[Day 5]) | 21.48 log10 copies*day per milliliter (mL) |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) Viral Load Area Under Curve (AUC) From Immediately Prior to First Dose of Study Drug (Baseline) Through Day 5 (AUC[Day 5]) | 21.51 log10 copies*day per milliliter (mL) |
Body Temperature Over Time
Body temperature was reported over time (either investigator or caregiver measured).
Time frame: Baseline, Days 3, 5, 8, 14 and 21
Population: The Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, and were analyzed as treated, regardless of the randomized treatment group assigned. Here, 'n' (number analyzed) represents number of participants who were evaluable at specified timepoints.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Body Temperature Over Time | Baseline | 36.84 Degrees celsius | Standard Deviation 0.635 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Body Temperature Over Time | Day 3 | 36.77 Degrees celsius | Standard Deviation 0.464 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Body Temperature Over Time | Day 5 | 36.75 Degrees celsius | Standard Deviation 0.407 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Body Temperature Over Time | Day 8 | 36.70 Degrees celsius | Standard Deviation 0.416 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Body Temperature Over Time | Day 14 | 36.86 Degrees celsius | Standard Deviation 0.315 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Body Temperature Over Time | Day 21 | 36.76 Degrees celsius | Standard Deviation 0.577 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Body Temperature Over Time | Day 3 | 36.87 Degrees celsius | Standard Deviation 0.524 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Body Temperature Over Time | Day 8 | 36.73 Degrees celsius | Standard Deviation 0.513 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Body Temperature Over Time | Day 21 | 36.67 Degrees celsius | Standard Deviation 0.407 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Body Temperature Over Time | Baseline | 36.64 Degrees celsius | Standard Deviation 0.468 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Body Temperature Over Time | Day 5 | 36.54 Degrees celsius | Standard Deviation 0.557 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Body Temperature Over Time | Day 14 | 36.68 Degrees celsius | Standard Deviation 0.44 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Body Temperature Over Time | Day 21 | 36.66 Degrees celsius | Standard Deviation 0.573 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Body Temperature Over Time | Day 14 | 36.60 Degrees celsius | Standard Deviation 0.396 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Body Temperature Over Time | Day 8 | 36.65 Degrees celsius | Standard Deviation 0.441 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Body Temperature Over Time | Day 5 | 36.70 Degrees celsius | Standard Deviation 0.408 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Body Temperature Over Time | Baseline | 36.82 Degrees celsius | Standard Deviation 0.623 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Body Temperature Over Time | Day 3 | 36.80 Degrees celsius | Standard Deviation 0.601 |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Body Temperature Over Time | Day 8 | 36.67 Degrees celsius | Standard Deviation 0.369 |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Body Temperature Over Time | Day 3 | 37.14 Degrees celsius | Standard Deviation 0.725 |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Body Temperature Over Time | Day 5 | 36.87 Degrees celsius | Standard Deviation 0.567 |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Body Temperature Over Time | Day 21 | 36.74 Degrees celsius | Standard Deviation 0.615 |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Body Temperature Over Time | Day 14 | 36.63 Degrees celsius | Standard Deviation 0.357 |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Body Temperature Over Time | Baseline | 36.84 Degrees celsius | Standard Deviation 0.613 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Body Temperature Over Time | Baseline | 36.94 Degrees celsius | Standard Deviation 0.845 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Body Temperature Over Time | Day 14 | 36.72 Degrees celsius | Standard Deviation 0.364 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Body Temperature Over Time | Day 3 | 37.20 Degrees celsius | Standard Deviation 0.694 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Body Temperature Over Time | Day 5 | 36.71 Degrees celsius | Standard Deviation 0.348 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Body Temperature Over Time | Day 8 | 36.76 Degrees celsius | Standard Deviation 0.536 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Body Temperature Over Time | Day 21 | 36.64 Degrees celsius | Standard Deviation 0.292 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Body Temperature Over Time | Day 8 | 36.74 Degrees celsius | Standard Deviation 0.559 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Body Temperature Over Time | Day 5 | 36.84 Degrees celsius | Standard Deviation 0.718 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Body Temperature Over Time | Day 14 | 36.59 Degrees celsius | Standard Deviation 0.377 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Body Temperature Over Time | Day 21 | 36.62 Degrees celsius | Standard Deviation 0.418 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Body Temperature Over Time | Day 3 | 36.98 Degrees celsius | Standard Deviation 0.817 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Body Temperature Over Time | Baseline | 36.79 Degrees celsius | Standard Deviation 0.785 |
Change From Baseline in Body Temperature
Change from baseline in body temperature (either investigator or caregiver measured) was assessed.
Time frame: Baseline to Days 3, 5, 8, 14 and 21
Population: The Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, and were analyzed as treated, regardless of the randomized treatment group assigned. Here, 'n' (number analyzed) represents number of participants who were evaluable at specified timepoints.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Change From Baseline in Body Temperature | Day 14 | 0.01 Degrees celsius | Standard Deviation 0.594 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Change From Baseline in Body Temperature | Day 5 | -0.10 Degrees celsius | Standard Deviation 0.713 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Change From Baseline in Body Temperature | Day 3 | -0.08 Degrees celsius | Standard Deviation 0.697 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Change From Baseline in Body Temperature | Day 21 | -0.09 Degrees celsius | Standard Deviation 0.758 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Change From Baseline in Body Temperature | Day 8 | -0.13 Degrees celsius | Standard Deviation 0.659 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Change From Baseline in Body Temperature | Day 5 | -0.09 Degrees celsius | Standard Deviation 0.532 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Change From Baseline in Body Temperature | Day 14 | 0.04 Degrees celsius | Standard Deviation 0.528 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Change From Baseline in Body Temperature | Day 3 | 0.23 Degrees celsius | Standard Deviation 0.541 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Change From Baseline in Body Temperature | Day 21 | 0.03 Degrees celsius | Standard Deviation 0.519 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Change From Baseline in Body Temperature | Day 8 | 0.10 Degrees celsius | Standard Deviation 0.6 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Change From Baseline in Body Temperature | Day 5 | -0.12 Degrees celsius | Standard Deviation 0.627 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Change From Baseline in Body Temperature | Day 14 | -0.21 Degrees celsius | Standard Deviation 0.609 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Change From Baseline in Body Temperature | Day 21 | -0.17 Degrees celsius | Standard Deviation 0.724 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Change From Baseline in Body Temperature | Day 8 | -0.17 Degrees celsius | Standard Deviation 0.596 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Change From Baseline in Body Temperature | Day 3 | -0.02 Degrees celsius | Standard Deviation 0.629 |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Change From Baseline in Body Temperature | Day 8 | -0.13 Degrees celsius | Standard Deviation 0.588 |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Change From Baseline in Body Temperature | Day 3 | 0.33 Degrees celsius | Standard Deviation 0.768 |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Change From Baseline in Body Temperature | Day 5 | 0.07 Degrees celsius | Standard Deviation 0.7 |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Change From Baseline in Body Temperature | Day 14 | -0.17 Degrees celsius | Standard Deviation 0.687 |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Change From Baseline in Body Temperature | Day 21 | -0.06 Degrees celsius | Standard Deviation 0.704 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Change From Baseline in Body Temperature | Day 14 | -0.21 Degrees celsius | Standard Deviation 0.866 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Change From Baseline in Body Temperature | Day 3 | 0.26 Degrees celsius | Standard Deviation 0.835 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Change From Baseline in Body Temperature | Day 21 | -0.30 Degrees celsius | Standard Deviation 0.826 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Change From Baseline in Body Temperature | Day 5 | -0.22 Degrees celsius | Standard Deviation 0.767 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Change From Baseline in Body Temperature | Day 8 | -0.17 Degrees celsius | Standard Deviation 1.016 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Change From Baseline in Body Temperature | Day 3 | 0.21 Degrees celsius | Standard Deviation 0.724 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Change From Baseline in Body Temperature | Day 14 | -0.19 Degrees celsius | Standard Deviation 0.843 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Change From Baseline in Body Temperature | Day 5 | -0.04 Degrees celsius | Standard Deviation 0.627 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Change From Baseline in Body Temperature | Day 21 | -0.18 Degrees celsius | Standard Deviation 0.913 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Change From Baseline in Body Temperature | Day 8 | -0.11 Degrees celsius | Standard Deviation 0.772 |
Change From Baseline in Clinician PRESORS Score
Change from baseline in clinician PRESORS scores (for concepts: activity level, sleep disturbance, breathing problems, retractions, tachypnea, feeding problem, cough, nasal secretions, wheezing, dehydration) was assessed. Clinician PRESORS is a questionnaire recording presence and severity of signs and symptoms of RSV disease and consisted of 10-items, each item score ranges from 0 to 3. Overall RSV symptoms summary parameter was derived (mean of the item scores) which also ranges from 0 to 3. The higher the score, the worse the symptom.
Time frame: Baseline, up to Days 3, 5, 8, 14 and 21
Population: ITT-i analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and who had centrally confirmed RSV RNA viral load of \>=1 log10 copies/mL above the LLOQ of the RSV RT-qPCR assay at baseline. Analyses on ITT-i set were performed as randomized. Here, 'n' (number analyzed) represents number of participants who were evaluable at specified timepoints.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Change From Baseline in Clinician PRESORS Score | Day 14 | -1.10 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.466 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Change From Baseline in Clinician PRESORS Score | Day 5 | -0.73 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.582 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Change From Baseline in Clinician PRESORS Score | Day 3 | -0.45 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.441 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Change From Baseline in Clinician PRESORS Score | Day 21 | -1.13 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.424 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Change From Baseline in Clinician PRESORS Score | Day 8 | -0.92 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.461 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Change From Baseline in Clinician PRESORS Score | Day 5 | -0.71 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.424 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Change From Baseline in Clinician PRESORS Score | Day 14 | -1.11 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.428 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Change From Baseline in Clinician PRESORS Score | Day 3 | -0.45 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.517 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Change From Baseline in Clinician PRESORS Score | Day 21 | -1.12 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.433 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Change From Baseline in Clinician PRESORS Score | Day 8 | -1.04 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.396 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Change From Baseline in Clinician PRESORS Score | Day 5 | -0.83 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.483 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Change From Baseline in Clinician PRESORS Score | Day 14 | -1.14 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.369 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Change From Baseline in Clinician PRESORS Score | Day 21 | -1.17 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.336 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Change From Baseline in Clinician PRESORS Score | Day 8 | -1.04 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.449 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Change From Baseline in Clinician PRESORS Score | Day 3 | -0.48 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.469 |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Change From Baseline in Clinician PRESORS Score | Day 8 | -0.71 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.529 |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Change From Baseline in Clinician PRESORS Score | Day 3 | -0.25 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.424 |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Change From Baseline in Clinician PRESORS Score | Day 5 | -0.38 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.415 |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Change From Baseline in Clinician PRESORS Score | Day 14 | -0.81 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.497 |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Change From Baseline in Clinician PRESORS Score | Day 21 | -0.87 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.455 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Change From Baseline in Clinician PRESORS Score | Day 14 | -0.77 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.436 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Change From Baseline in Clinician PRESORS Score | Day 3 | -0.21 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.378 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Change From Baseline in Clinician PRESORS Score | Day 21 | -0.81 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.411 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Change From Baseline in Clinician PRESORS Score | Day 5 | -0.37 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.462 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Change From Baseline in Clinician PRESORS Score | Day 8 | -0.63 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.423 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Change From Baseline in Clinician PRESORS Score | Day 3 | -0.29 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.338 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Change From Baseline in Clinician PRESORS Score | Day 14 | -0.91 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.541 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Change From Baseline in Clinician PRESORS Score | Day 5 | -0.60 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.516 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Change From Baseline in Clinician PRESORS Score | Day 21 | -0.93 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.524 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Change From Baseline in Clinician PRESORS Score | Day 8 | -0.85 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.552 |
Change From Baseline in Heart Rate
Change from baseline in heart rate was assessed.
Time frame: Baseline to Days 3, 5, 8, 14 and 21
Population: The Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, and were analyzed as treated, regardless of the randomized treatment group assigned. Here, 'n' (number analyzed) represents number of participants who were evaluable at specified timepoints.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Change From Baseline in Heart Rate | Day 3 | -4.9 Beats/minute | Standard Deviation 19.36 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Change From Baseline in Heart Rate | Day 14 | -12.0 Beats/minute | Standard Deviation 21.79 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Change From Baseline in Heart Rate | Day 21 | -15.0 Beats/minute | Standard Deviation 23.8 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Change From Baseline in Heart Rate | Day 8 | -10.4 Beats/minute | Standard Deviation 18.45 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Change From Baseline in Heart Rate | Day 5 | -7.9 Beats/minute | Standard Deviation 20.31 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Change From Baseline in Heart Rate | Day 14 | -6.5 Beats/minute | Standard Deviation 23.99 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Change From Baseline in Heart Rate | Day 3 | -1.6 Beats/minute | Standard Deviation 19.82 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Change From Baseline in Heart Rate | Day 8 | -12.2 Beats/minute | Standard Deviation 23.2 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Change From Baseline in Heart Rate | Day 5 | -5.8 Beats/minute | Standard Deviation 22.94 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Change From Baseline in Heart Rate | Day 21 | -7.7 Beats/minute | Standard Deviation 25.88 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Change From Baseline in Heart Rate | Day 21 | -6.5 Beats/minute | Standard Deviation 19.52 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Change From Baseline in Heart Rate | Day 5 | -2.9 Beats/minute | Standard Deviation 20.56 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Change From Baseline in Heart Rate | Day 14 | -5.1 Beats/minute | Standard Deviation 22.44 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Change From Baseline in Heart Rate | Day 3 | -0.6 Beats/minute | Standard Deviation 18.84 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Change From Baseline in Heart Rate | Day 8 | -5.2 Beats/minute | Standard Deviation 22.02 |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Change From Baseline in Heart Rate | Day 8 | -12.7 Beats/minute | Standard Deviation 26.09 |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Change From Baseline in Heart Rate | Day 21 | -14.0 Beats/minute | Standard Deviation 25.38 |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Change From Baseline in Heart Rate | Day 14 | -14.4 Beats/minute | Standard Deviation 24.62 |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Change From Baseline in Heart Rate | Day 3 | -3.0 Beats/minute | Standard Deviation 24.71 |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Change From Baseline in Heart Rate | Day 5 | -11.6 Beats/minute | Standard Deviation 18.55 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Change From Baseline in Heart Rate | Day 5 | -13.0 Beats/minute | Standard Deviation 17.11 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Change From Baseline in Heart Rate | Day 3 | -7.4 Beats/minute | Standard Deviation 16.83 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Change From Baseline in Heart Rate | Day 8 | -15.6 Beats/minute | Standard Deviation 20.67 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Change From Baseline in Heart Rate | Day 14 | -17.7 Beats/minute | Standard Deviation 17.69 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Change From Baseline in Heart Rate | Day 21 | -10.4 Beats/minute | Standard Deviation 21.02 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Change From Baseline in Heart Rate | Day 8 | -7.2 Beats/minute | Standard Deviation 35.9 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Change From Baseline in Heart Rate | Day 5 | -5.6 Beats/minute | Standard Deviation 28.53 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Change From Baseline in Heart Rate | Day 3 | -7.3 Beats/minute | Standard Deviation 28.39 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Change From Baseline in Heart Rate | Day 21 | -10.9 Beats/minute | Standard Deviation 28.63 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Change From Baseline in Heart Rate | Day 14 | -10.1 Beats/minute | Standard Deviation 28.02 |
Change From Baseline in Parent(s)/Caregiver(s) Pediatric RSV Electronic Severity and Outcomes Rating System (PRESORS) Scores
PRESORS is a questionnaire recording presence and severity of signs and symptoms of RSV disease (fever, cough, sputum, wheezing, difficulty breathing, nasal congestion, and feeding issues). PRESORS overall RSV symptoms summary parameter consisted of 12-items, each item score ranges from 0 to 3. A summary score was derived (mean of the item scores) which also ranges from 0 to 3. The higher the score, the worse the symptom.
Time frame: Baseline up to Days 3, 5, 8, 14 and 21
Population: ITT-i analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and who had centrally confirmed RSV RNA viral load of \>=1 log10 copies/mL above the LLOQ of the RSV RT-qPCR assay at baseline. Analyses on ITT-i set were performed as randomized. Here, 'n' (number analyzed) represents number of participants who were evaluable at specified timepoints.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Change From Baseline in Parent(s)/Caregiver(s) Pediatric RSV Electronic Severity and Outcomes Rating System (PRESORS) Scores | Day 8 | -1.15 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.581 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Change From Baseline in Parent(s)/Caregiver(s) Pediatric RSV Electronic Severity and Outcomes Rating System (PRESORS) Scores | Day 14 | -1.40 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.591 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Change From Baseline in Parent(s)/Caregiver(s) Pediatric RSV Electronic Severity and Outcomes Rating System (PRESORS) Scores | Day 5 | -0.91 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.585 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Change From Baseline in Parent(s)/Caregiver(s) Pediatric RSV Electronic Severity and Outcomes Rating System (PRESORS) Scores | Day 3 | -0.51 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.571 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Change From Baseline in Parent(s)/Caregiver(s) Pediatric RSV Electronic Severity and Outcomes Rating System (PRESORS) Scores | Day 21 | -1.41 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.637 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Change From Baseline in Parent(s)/Caregiver(s) Pediatric RSV Electronic Severity and Outcomes Rating System (PRESORS) Scores | Day 3 | -0.55 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.618 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Change From Baseline in Parent(s)/Caregiver(s) Pediatric RSV Electronic Severity and Outcomes Rating System (PRESORS) Scores | Day 8 | -1.25 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.537 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Change From Baseline in Parent(s)/Caregiver(s) Pediatric RSV Electronic Severity and Outcomes Rating System (PRESORS) Scores | Day 14 | -1.39 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.582 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Change From Baseline in Parent(s)/Caregiver(s) Pediatric RSV Electronic Severity and Outcomes Rating System (PRESORS) Scores | Day 5 | -0.88 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.542 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Change From Baseline in Parent(s)/Caregiver(s) Pediatric RSV Electronic Severity and Outcomes Rating System (PRESORS) Scores | Day 21 | -1.33 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.559 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Change From Baseline in Parent(s)/Caregiver(s) Pediatric RSV Electronic Severity and Outcomes Rating System (PRESORS) Scores | Day 8 | -1.39 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.514 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Change From Baseline in Parent(s)/Caregiver(s) Pediatric RSV Electronic Severity and Outcomes Rating System (PRESORS) Scores | Day 3 | -0.70 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.594 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Change From Baseline in Parent(s)/Caregiver(s) Pediatric RSV Electronic Severity and Outcomes Rating System (PRESORS) Scores | Day 5 | -1.11 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.581 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Change From Baseline in Parent(s)/Caregiver(s) Pediatric RSV Electronic Severity and Outcomes Rating System (PRESORS) Scores | Day 14 | -1.59 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.458 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Change From Baseline in Parent(s)/Caregiver(s) Pediatric RSV Electronic Severity and Outcomes Rating System (PRESORS) Scores | Day 21 | -1.56 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.468 |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Change From Baseline in Parent(s)/Caregiver(s) Pediatric RSV Electronic Severity and Outcomes Rating System (PRESORS) Scores | Day 5 | -0.48 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.572 |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Change From Baseline in Parent(s)/Caregiver(s) Pediatric RSV Electronic Severity and Outcomes Rating System (PRESORS) Scores | Day 8 | -0.85 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.526 |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Change From Baseline in Parent(s)/Caregiver(s) Pediatric RSV Electronic Severity and Outcomes Rating System (PRESORS) Scores | Day 14 | -1.06 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.529 |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Change From Baseline in Parent(s)/Caregiver(s) Pediatric RSV Electronic Severity and Outcomes Rating System (PRESORS) Scores | Day 3 | -0.25 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.576 |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Change From Baseline in Parent(s)/Caregiver(s) Pediatric RSV Electronic Severity and Outcomes Rating System (PRESORS) Scores | Day 21 | -1.12 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.529 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Change From Baseline in Parent(s)/Caregiver(s) Pediatric RSV Electronic Severity and Outcomes Rating System (PRESORS) Scores | Day 5 | -0.52 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.558 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Change From Baseline in Parent(s)/Caregiver(s) Pediatric RSV Electronic Severity and Outcomes Rating System (PRESORS) Scores | Day 14 | -1.08 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.568 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Change From Baseline in Parent(s)/Caregiver(s) Pediatric RSV Electronic Severity and Outcomes Rating System (PRESORS) Scores | Day 8 | -0.83 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.582 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Change From Baseline in Parent(s)/Caregiver(s) Pediatric RSV Electronic Severity and Outcomes Rating System (PRESORS) Scores | Day 21 | -1.15 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.496 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Change From Baseline in Parent(s)/Caregiver(s) Pediatric RSV Electronic Severity and Outcomes Rating System (PRESORS) Scores | Day 3 | -0.15 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.427 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Change From Baseline in Parent(s)/Caregiver(s) Pediatric RSV Electronic Severity and Outcomes Rating System (PRESORS) Scores | Day 3 | -0.21 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.537 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Change From Baseline in Parent(s)/Caregiver(s) Pediatric RSV Electronic Severity and Outcomes Rating System (PRESORS) Scores | Day 14 | -1.24 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.681 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Change From Baseline in Parent(s)/Caregiver(s) Pediatric RSV Electronic Severity and Outcomes Rating System (PRESORS) Scores | Day 5 | -0.58 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.644 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Change From Baseline in Parent(s)/Caregiver(s) Pediatric RSV Electronic Severity and Outcomes Rating System (PRESORS) Scores | Day 21 | -1.29 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.596 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Change From Baseline in Parent(s)/Caregiver(s) Pediatric RSV Electronic Severity and Outcomes Rating System (PRESORS) Scores | Day 8 | -1.04 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.628 |
Change From Baseline in Peripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2)
Change from baseline in peripheral capillary oxygen saturation levels was derived based on reported values over time.
Time frame: Baseline to Days 3, 5, 8, 14, and 21
Population: The Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, and were analyzed as treated, regardless of the randomized treatment group assigned. Here, 'n' (number analyzed) represents number of participants who were evaluable at specified timepoints.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Change From Baseline in Peripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) | Day 14 | 1.0 Percentage of SpO2 | Standard Deviation 2.28 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Change From Baseline in Peripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) | Day 5 | 0.0 Percentage of SpO2 | Standard Deviation 2.92 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Change From Baseline in Peripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) | Day 3 | -0.5 Percentage of SpO2 | Standard Deviation 2.93 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Change From Baseline in Peripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) | Day 21 | 1.1 Percentage of SpO2 | Standard Deviation 2.45 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Change From Baseline in Peripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) | Day 8 | 0.1 Percentage of SpO2 | Standard Deviation 3.02 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Change From Baseline in Peripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) | Day 5 | 0.4 Percentage of SpO2 | Standard Deviation 2.93 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Change From Baseline in Peripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) | Day 14 | 1.7 Percentage of SpO2 | Standard Deviation 3.08 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Change From Baseline in Peripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) | Day 3 | -0.2 Percentage of SpO2 | Standard Deviation 3.09 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Change From Baseline in Peripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) | Day 21 | 1.7 Percentage of SpO2 | Standard Deviation 3.38 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Change From Baseline in Peripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) | Day 8 | 0.9 Percentage of SpO2 | Standard Deviation 3.53 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Change From Baseline in Peripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) | Day 5 | 0.1 Percentage of SpO2 | Standard Deviation 2.38 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Change From Baseline in Peripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) | Day 14 | 1.4 Percentage of SpO2 | Standard Deviation 2.32 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Change From Baseline in Peripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) | Day 21 | 1.3 Percentage of SpO2 | Standard Deviation 2.4 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Change From Baseline in Peripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) | Day 8 | 0.8 Percentage of SpO2 | Standard Deviation 2.47 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Change From Baseline in Peripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) | Day 3 | -0.6 Percentage of SpO2 | Standard Deviation 2.72 |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Change From Baseline in Peripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) | Day 8 | 0.9 Percentage of SpO2 | Standard Deviation 2.59 |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Change From Baseline in Peripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) | Day 3 | 0.2 Percentage of SpO2 | Standard Deviation 2.31 |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Change From Baseline in Peripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) | Day 5 | 0.1 Percentage of SpO2 | Standard Deviation 2.49 |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Change From Baseline in Peripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) | Day 14 | 2.0 Percentage of SpO2 | Standard Deviation 2.72 |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Change From Baseline in Peripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) | Day 21 | 1.8 Percentage of SpO2 | Standard Deviation 2.57 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Change From Baseline in Peripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) | Day 14 | 1.8 Percentage of SpO2 | Standard Deviation 2.05 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Change From Baseline in Peripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) | Day 3 | -0.4 Percentage of SpO2 | Standard Deviation 2.45 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Change From Baseline in Peripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) | Day 21 | 2.0 Percentage of SpO2 | Standard Deviation 2.12 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Change From Baseline in Peripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) | Day 5 | 0.4 Percentage of SpO2 | Standard Deviation 2.41 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Change From Baseline in Peripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) | Day 8 | 0.8 Percentage of SpO2 | Standard Deviation 2.86 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Change From Baseline in Peripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) | Day 3 | 0.7 Percentage of SpO2 | Standard Deviation 1.63 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Change From Baseline in Peripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) | Day 14 | 2.6 Percentage of SpO2 | Standard Deviation 3.06 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Change From Baseline in Peripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) | Day 5 | 1.2 Percentage of SpO2 | Standard Deviation 2.54 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Change From Baseline in Peripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) | Day 21 | 3.0 Percentage of SpO2 | Standard Deviation 2.8 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Change From Baseline in Peripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) | Day 8 | 2.0 Percentage of SpO2 | Standard Deviation 3.36 |
Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate
Change from baseline in respiratory rate was derived based on the reported measurements of respiratory rate over time. The respiratory rate over time was reported by the investigator.
Time frame: Baseline to Days 3, 5, 8, 14 and 21
Population: The Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, and were analyzed as treated, regardless of the randomized treatment group assigned. Here, 'n' (number analyzed) represents number of participants who were evaluable at specified timepoints.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate | Day 5 | -6.5 Breaths/minute | Standard Deviation 9.41 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate | Day 21 | -8.4 Breaths/minute | Standard Deviation 10.84 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate | Day 14 | -9.3 Breaths/minute | Standard Deviation 9.96 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate | Day 8 | -9.4 Breaths/minute | Standard Deviation 9.19 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate | Day 3 | -0.8 Breaths/minute | Standard Deviation 10.88 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate | Day 21 | -10.4 Breaths/minute | Standard Deviation 13.01 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate | Day 8 | -11.4 Breaths/minute | Standard Deviation 12.96 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate | Day 5 | -7.1 Breaths/minute | Standard Deviation 11.13 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate | Day 14 | -10.3 Breaths/minute | Standard Deviation 12.59 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate | Day 3 | -3.5 Breaths/minute | Standard Deviation 11.99 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate | Day 8 | -6.3 Breaths/minute | Standard Deviation 12.69 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate | Day 5 | -7.0 Breaths/minute | Standard Deviation 11.94 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate | Day 3 | -3.0 Breaths/minute | Standard Deviation 12.43 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate | Day 21 | -9.8 Breaths/minute | Standard Deviation 12.36 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate | Day 14 | -10.2 Breaths/minute | Standard Deviation 10.92 |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate | Day 8 | -4.4 Breaths/minute | Standard Deviation 11.56 |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate | Day 3 | -3.7 Breaths/minute | Standard Deviation 12.47 |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate | Day 5 | -3.4 Breaths/minute | Standard Deviation 8.59 |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate | Day 21 | -5.5 Breaths/minute | Standard Deviation 14.15 |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate | Day 14 | -6.4 Breaths/minute | Standard Deviation 3.13 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate | Day 3 | -4.0 Breaths/minute | Standard Deviation 9.54 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate | Day 5 | -3.3 Breaths/minute | Standard Deviation 8.4 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate | Day 8 | -4.4 Breaths/minute | Standard Deviation 10.39 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate | Day 14 | -5.8 Breaths/minute | Standard Deviation 12.82 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate | Day 21 | -5.8 Breaths/minute | Standard Deviation 11.95 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate | Day 21 | -2.3 Breaths/minute | Standard Deviation 13.25 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate | Day 14 | -4.0 Breaths/minute | Standard Deviation 9.92 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate | Day 8 | -2.9 Breaths/minute | Standard Deviation 10.54 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate | Day 5 | -1.5 Breaths/minute | Standard Deviation 9.62 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate | Day 3 | -2.6 Breaths/minute | Standard Deviation 9.2 |
Change From Baseline in RSV Viral Load Over Time
Change from baseline in RSV viral load over time was measured by qRT-PCR in the nasal swab specimens collected at the clinic visits and at home. As planned, combined data for both the cohorts was collected, analyzed and reported for this outcome measure.
Time frame: Baseline up to Days 3, 5, 8, 14, and 21
Population: ITT-i analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and who had centrally confirmed RSV RNA viral load of \>=1 log10 copies/mL above the LLOQ of the RSV RT-qPCR assay at baseline. Analyses on ITT-i set were performed as randomized. Here, 'n' (number analyzed) represents number of participants who were evaluable at specified timepoints.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Change From Baseline in RSV Viral Load Over Time | Day 14 | -5.292 log10 copies/mL | Standard Deviation 2.2968 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Change From Baseline in RSV Viral Load Over Time | Day 8 | -4.308 log10 copies/mL | Standard Deviation 2.2435 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Change From Baseline in RSV Viral Load Over Time | Day 3 | -1.502 log10 copies/mL | Standard Deviation 1.329 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Change From Baseline in RSV Viral Load Over Time | Day 5 | -2.754 log10 copies/mL | Standard Deviation 1.7699 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Change From Baseline in RSV Viral Load Over Time | Day 21 | -5.801 log10 copies/mL | Standard Deviation 2.1652 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Change From Baseline in RSV Viral Load Over Time | Day 8 | -5.017 log10 copies/mL | Standard Deviation 1.8563 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Change From Baseline in RSV Viral Load Over Time | Day 3 | -1.690 log10 copies/mL | Standard Deviation 1.6225 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Change From Baseline in RSV Viral Load Over Time | Day 5 | -3.049 log10 copies/mL | Standard Deviation 1.6493 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Change From Baseline in RSV Viral Load Over Time | Day 14 | -5.471 log10 copies/mL | Standard Deviation 2.4289 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Change From Baseline in RSV Viral Load Over Time | Day 21 | -6.302 log10 copies/mL | Standard Deviation 2.0439 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Change From Baseline in RSV Viral Load Over Time | Day 21 | -6.268 log10 copies/mL | Standard Deviation 1.9394 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Change From Baseline in RSV Viral Load Over Time | Day 14 | -5.578 log10 copies/mL | Standard Deviation 2.2707 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Change From Baseline in RSV Viral Load Over Time | Day 3 | -1.694 log10 copies/mL | Standard Deviation 1.5134 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Change From Baseline in RSV Viral Load Over Time | Day 8 | -4.948 log10 copies/mL | Standard Deviation 1.8428 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Change From Baseline in RSV Viral Load Over Time | Day 5 | -3.121 log10 copies/mL | Standard Deviation 1.8453 |
Cohort 1: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Timepoint 0 Hours Until 24 Hours Post Dose (AUC[0-24 Hours])
AUC (0-24) is defined as area under the plasma concentration-time curve from timepoint 0 hours until 24 hours post dose estimated by population PK model.
Time frame: 0 to 24 hours post dose on Days 1 and 7
Population: PK analysis set included all participants from Cohort-1 who received JNJ-53718678 and for whom at least one PK concentration was reported. Here, 'n' (number analyzed) represents number of participants who were evaluable for specified timepoints.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Cohort 1: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Timepoint 0 Hours Until 24 Hours Post Dose (AUC[0-24 Hours]) | >=28 days to <3 months: Day 1 | 6690 Nanograms*hours per milliliter (ng*h/mL) | Standard Deviation 1950 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Cohort 1: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Timepoint 0 Hours Until 24 Hours Post Dose (AUC[0-24 Hours]) | >=28 days to<3 months: Day 7 | 11400 Nanograms*hours per milliliter (ng*h/mL) | Standard Deviation 3930 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Cohort 1: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Timepoint 0 Hours Until 24 Hours Post Dose (AUC[0-24 Hours]) | >=3 months to <6 months: Day 1 | 5340 Nanograms*hours per milliliter (ng*h/mL) | Standard Deviation 2670 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Cohort 1: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Timepoint 0 Hours Until 24 Hours Post Dose (AUC[0-24 Hours]) | >=3 months to <6 months: Day 7 | 7370 Nanograms*hours per milliliter (ng*h/mL) | Standard Deviation 4270 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Cohort 1: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Timepoint 0 Hours Until 24 Hours Post Dose (AUC[0-24 Hours]) | >=6 months to <=3 years: Day 1 | 6910 Nanograms*hours per milliliter (ng*h/mL) | Standard Deviation 2900 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Cohort 1: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Timepoint 0 Hours Until 24 Hours Post Dose (AUC[0-24 Hours]) | >=6 months to <=3 years: Day 7 | 8160 Nanograms*hours per milliliter (ng*h/mL) | Standard Deviation 3950 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Cohort 1: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Timepoint 0 Hours Until 24 Hours Post Dose (AUC[0-24 Hours]) | >=6 months to <=3 years: Day 1 | 25000 Nanograms*hours per milliliter (ng*h/mL) | Standard Deviation 11600 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Cohort 1: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Timepoint 0 Hours Until 24 Hours Post Dose (AUC[0-24 Hours]) | >=28 days to <3 months: Day 1 | 20600 Nanograms*hours per milliliter (ng*h/mL) | Standard Deviation 3990 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Cohort 1: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Timepoint 0 Hours Until 24 Hours Post Dose (AUC[0-24 Hours]) | >=3 months to <6 months: Day 7 | 35000 Nanograms*hours per milliliter (ng*h/mL) | Standard Deviation 20100 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Cohort 1: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Timepoint 0 Hours Until 24 Hours Post Dose (AUC[0-24 Hours]) | >=28 days to<3 months: Day 7 | 36000 Nanograms*hours per milliliter (ng*h/mL) | Standard Deviation 8140 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Cohort 1: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Timepoint 0 Hours Until 24 Hours Post Dose (AUC[0-24 Hours]) | >=6 months to <=3 years: Day 7 | 31000 Nanograms*hours per milliliter (ng*h/mL) | Standard Deviation 16300 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Cohort 1: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Timepoint 0 Hours Until 24 Hours Post Dose (AUC[0-24 Hours]) | >=3 months to <6 months: Day 1 | 23600 Nanograms*hours per milliliter (ng*h/mL) | Standard Deviation 12500 |
Cohort 1: Duration of ICU Stay
Duration of ICU stay was derived based on the reported admission/discharge date/time for ICU. Duration defined as total number of hours a participant was in ICU from first dose of study drug until study termination. As per the study protocol and study design, this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for participants who were hospitalized only. Only participants in Cohort 1 were hospitalized, hence this outcome measure is only reported for Cohort 1.
Time frame: Up to Day 21
Population: ITT-i analysis set included all randomized participants who were admitted to ICU and received at least one dose of study drug and who had centrally confirmed RSV RNA viral load of \>=1 log10 copies/mL above the LLOQ of the RSV RT-qPCR assay at baseline. Analyses on ITT-i set were performed as randomized. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Cohort 1: Duration of ICU Stay | 238.22 Hours | Standard Deviation 70.57 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Cohort 1: Duration of ICU Stay | 206.94 Hours | Standard Deviation 204.94 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Cohort 1: Duration of ICU Stay | 127.72 Hours | Standard Deviation 89.389 |
Cohort 1: Duration of Invasive Ventilation Support
For the subset of participants who received invasive ventilation post dose, duration for invasive ventilation could not be derived by individual type as start/end dates and times were not collected in full to allow breakdown of duration derivation by ventilation type and only overall duration of oxygen supplementation (overall ventilation support) could be derived which is reported in the outcome measure Duration of Supplemental Oxygen. As per the study protocol and study design, this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for participants who were hospitalized only. Only participants in Cohort 1 were hospitalized, hence this outcome measure could only have been reported for Cohort 1.
Time frame: Up to Day 21
Population: ITT-i analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and who had centrally confirmed RSV RNA viral load of \>=1 log10 copies/mL above LLOQ of RSV RT-qPCR assay at baseline. Analyses on ITT-i set were performed as randomized.
Cohort 1: Duration of Non-invasive Ventilation Support
For the subset of participants who received non-invasive ventilation post dose, duration for non-invasive ventilation could not be derived by individual type as start/end dates and times were not collected in full to allow breakdown of duration derivation by ventilation type and only overall duration of oxygen supplementation (overall ventilation support) could be derived which is reported in the outcome measure Duration of Supplemental Oxygen. As per the study protocol and study design, this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for participants who were hospitalized only. Only participants in Cohort 1 were hospitalized, hence this outcome measure could only have been reported for Cohort 1.
Time frame: Up to Day 21
Population: ITT-i analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and who had centrally confirmed RSV RNA viral load of \>=1 log10 copies/mL above LLOQ of RSV RT-qPCR assay at baseline. Analyses on ITT-i set were performed as randomized. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure and 'n' (number analyzed) represents number of participants who were evaluable at specified categories.
Cohort 1: Duration of Supplemental Oxygen
Duration of supplemental oxygen was assessed. Duration was defined as total number of hours a participant used supplemental oxygen from first dose of study drug until study termination. As per the study protocol and study design, this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for participants who were hospitalized only. Only participants in Cohort 1 were hospitalized, hence this outcome measure is only reported for Cohort 1.
Time frame: Up to Day 28
Population: ITT-i analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and who had centrally confirmed RSV RNA viral load of \>=1 log10 copies/mL above the LLOQ of the RSV RT-qPCR assay at baseline. Analyses on ITT-i set were performed as randomized. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Cohort 1: Duration of Supplemental Oxygen | 74.25 Hours |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Cohort 1: Duration of Supplemental Oxygen | 74.60 Hours |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Cohort 1: Duration of Supplemental Oxygen | 68.05 Hours |
Cohort 1: Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of JNJ-53718678
Cmax is the maximum plasma concentration of JNJ-53718678 estimated by population PK model.
Time frame: Days 1 and 7
Population: PK analysis set included all participants from Cohort-1 who received JNJ-53718678 and for whom at least one PK concentration was reported. Here, 'n' (number analyzed) represents number of participants who were evaluable for specified timepoints.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Cohort 1: Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of JNJ-53718678 | >=28 days to <3 months: Day 1 | 531 Nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL) | Standard Deviation 193 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Cohort 1: Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of JNJ-53718678 | >=28 days to <3 months: Day 7 | 843 Nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL) | Standard Deviation 255 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Cohort 1: Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of JNJ-53718678 | >=3 months to <6 months: Day 1 | 497 Nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL) | Standard Deviation 256 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Cohort 1: Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of JNJ-53718678 | >=3 months to <6 months: Day 7 | 691 Nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL) | Standard Deviation 306 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Cohort 1: Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of JNJ-53718678 | >=6 months to <=3 years: Day 1 | 846 Nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL) | Standard Deviation 268 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Cohort 1: Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of JNJ-53718678 | >=6 months to <=3 years: Day 7 | 1030 Nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL) | Standard Deviation 310 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Cohort 1: Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of JNJ-53718678 | >=6 months to <=3 years: Day 1 | 2720 Nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL) | Standard Deviation 1040 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Cohort 1: Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of JNJ-53718678 | >=28 days to <3 months: Day 1 | 1590 Nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL) | Standard Deviation 345 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Cohort 1: Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of JNJ-53718678 | >=3 months to <6 months: Day 7 | 2920 Nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL) | Standard Deviation 1500 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Cohort 1: Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of JNJ-53718678 | >=28 days to <3 months: Day 7 | 2550 Nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL) | Standard Deviation 550 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Cohort 1: Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of JNJ-53718678 | >=6 months to <=3 years: Day 7 | 3560 Nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL) | Standard Deviation 1330 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Cohort 1: Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of JNJ-53718678 | >=3 months to <6 months: Day 1 | 2070 Nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL) | Standard Deviation 1200 |
Cohort 1: Percentage of Participants Who Needed Hydration and/or Feeding by Intravenous (IV) Administration or Nasogastric Tube
Percentage of participants who needed hydration and/or feeding by IV Administration or nasogastric tube after the first dose of study drug was assessed. This parameter was only for participants who didn't require supplemental feeding/hydration before first dose of study drug. As per the study protocol and study design, this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for participants who were hospitalized only. Only participants in Cohort 1 were hospitalized, hence this outcome measure is only reported for Cohort 1.
Time frame: Up to Day 28
Population: ITT-i analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and who had centrally confirmed RSV RNA viral load of \>=1 log10 copies/mL above the LLOQ of the RSV RT-qPCR assay at baseline. Analyses on ITT-i set were performed as randomized. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Cohort 1: Percentage of Participants Who Needed Hydration and/or Feeding by Intravenous (IV) Administration or Nasogastric Tube | 6.3 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Cohort 1: Percentage of Participants Who Needed Hydration and/or Feeding by Intravenous (IV) Administration or Nasogastric Tube | 15.6 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Cohort 1: Percentage of Participants Who Needed Hydration and/or Feeding by Intravenous (IV) Administration or Nasogastric Tube | 19.2 Percentage of participants |
Cohort 1: Percentage of Participants Who Required Admission to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU)
Percentage of participants who required admission to the ICU was assessed. This outcome measure was applicable for those participants that were not in ICU before first dose of study drug. As per the study protocol and study design, this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for participants who were hospitalized only. Only participants in Cohort 1 were hospitalized, hence this outcome measure is only reported for Cohort 1.
Time frame: Up to Day 21
Population: ITT-i analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and who had centrally confirmed RSV RNA viral load of \>=1 log10 copies/mL above the LLOQ of the RSV RT-qPCR assay at baseline. Analyses on ITT-i set were performed as randomized. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Cohort 1: Percentage of Participants Who Required Admission to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) | 2.4 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Cohort 1: Percentage of Participants Who Required Admission to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) | 4.5 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Cohort 1: Percentage of Participants Who Required Admission to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) | 2.6 Percentage of participants |
Cohort 1: Percentage of Participants Who Required Invasive Mechanical Ventilation Support
Percentage of participants who required invasive mechanical ventilation support (example: endotracheal-mechanical ventilation) after first dose of study drug was assessed. This parameter was only for participants who did not require invasive mechanical ventilation support before first dose of study drug. As per the study protocol and study design, this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for participants who were hospitalized only. Only participants in Cohort 1 were hospitalized, hence this outcome measure is only reported for Cohort 1.
Time frame: Up to Day 21
Population: ITT-i analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and who had centrally confirmed RSV RNA viral load of \>=1 log10 copies/mL above the LLOQ of the RSV RT-qPCR assay at baseline. Analyses on ITT-i set were performed as randomized.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Cohort 1: Percentage of Participants Who Required Invasive Mechanical Ventilation Support | 4.3 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Cohort 1: Percentage of Participants Who Required Invasive Mechanical Ventilation Support | 2.1 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Cohort 1: Percentage of Participants Who Required Invasive Mechanical Ventilation Support | 2.3 Percentage of participants |
Cohort 1: Percentage of Participants Who Required Non-invasive Mechanical Ventilation Support
Percentage of participants who required non-invasive mechanical ventilation support (example: continuous positive airway pressure) after first dose of study drug was assessed. This parameter was only for participants who did not require non-invasive mechanical ventilation support before first dose of study drug. As per the study protocol and study design, this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for participants who were hospitalized only. Only participants in Cohort 1 were hospitalized, hence this outcome measure is only reported for Cohort 1.
Time frame: Up to Day 21
Population: ITT-i analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and who had centrally confirmed RSV RNA viral load of \>=1 log10 copies/mL above the LLOQ of the RSV RT-qPCR assay at baseline. Analyses on ITT-i set were performed as randomized. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Cohort 1: Percentage of Participants Who Required Non-invasive Mechanical Ventilation Support | 2.2 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Cohort 1: Percentage of Participants Who Required Non-invasive Mechanical Ventilation Support | 6.8 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Cohort 1: Percentage of Participants Who Required Non-invasive Mechanical Ventilation Support | 2.6 Percentage of participants |
Cohort 1: Percentage of Participants Who Required Non-invasive Non-mechanical Ventilation Support
Percentage of participants who required non-invasive non-mechanical ventilation support (example: nasal cannula) after first dose of study drug was assessed. This parameter was only for participants who did not require non-invasive non-mechanical ventilation support before first dose of study drug. As per the study protocol and study design, this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for participants who were hospitalized only. Only participants in Cohort 1 were hospitalized, hence this outcome measure is only reported for Cohort 1.
Time frame: Up to Day 21
Population: ITT-i analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and who had centrally confirmed RSV RNA viral load of \>=1 log10 copies/mL above the LLOQ of the RSV RT-qPCR assay at baseline. Analyses on ITT-i set were performed as randomized. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Cohort 1: Percentage of Participants Who Required Non-invasive Non-mechanical Ventilation Support | 31.3 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Cohort 1: Percentage of Participants Who Required Non-invasive Non-mechanical Ventilation Support | 35.7 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Cohort 1: Percentage of Participants Who Required Non-invasive Non-mechanical Ventilation Support | 45.5 Percentage of participants |
Cohort 1: Percentage of Participants Who Required Supplemental Oxygen
Percentage of participants who required supplemental oxygen after first dose of study drug was reported. This parameter was only for participants that did not require oxygen supplementation before first dose of study drug. As per the study protocol and study design, this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for participants who were hospitalized only. Only participants in Cohort 1 were hospitalized, hence this outcome measure is only reported for Cohort 1.
Time frame: Up to Day 21
Population: ITT-i analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and who had centrally confirmed RSV RNA viral load of \>=1 log10 copies/mL above the LLOQ of the RSV RT-qPCR assay at baseline. Analyses on ITT-i set were performed as randomized. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Cohort 1: Percentage of Participants Who Required Supplemental Oxygen | 21.4 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Cohort 1: Percentage of Participants Who Required Supplemental Oxygen | 25.0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Cohort 1: Percentage of Participants Who Required Supplemental Oxygen | 28.6 Percentage of participants |
Cohort 1: Time to Clinical Stability Evaluated by the Investigator
Time to clinical stability was derived based on vital signs(SpO2 \>= 92%, SpO2 \>=95% on room air) assessments and supplementation end dates as collected. Time to clinical stability=time from initiation of study treatment until time at which following criteria were met: Time to return to age-adjusted normal value for otherwise healthy, pre-RSV infection status for participant with risk factor for severe RSV disease,no more oxygen supplementation in otherwise healthy participant, participant with risk factor for severe RSV disease and no more IV administered/nasogastric tube feeding/hydration supplementation in otherwise healthy participant or pre-RSV status of IV/nasogastric tube feeding/hydration in participant with risk factor for severe RSV disease. As per protocol and study design,this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for participants who were hospitalized only. Only participants in Cohort 1 were hospitalized, hence this outcome measure is only reported for Cohort 1.
Time frame: Up to Day 21
Population: ITT-i analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and who had centrally confirmed RSV RNA viral load of \>=1 log10 copies/mL above the LLOQ of the RSV RT-qPCR assay at baseline. Analyses on ITT-i set were performed as randomized.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Cohort 1: Time to Clinical Stability Evaluated by the Investigator | SpO2 >=92% on Room Air | 95.8 Hours |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Cohort 1: Time to Clinical Stability Evaluated by the Investigator | SpO2 >=95% on Room Air | 95.8 Hours |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Cohort 1: Time to Clinical Stability Evaluated by the Investigator | SpO2 >=92% on Room Air | 123.3 Hours |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Cohort 1: Time to Clinical Stability Evaluated by the Investigator | SpO2 >=95% on Room Air | 134.8 Hours |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Cohort 1: Time to Clinical Stability Evaluated by the Investigator | SpO2 >=92% on Room Air | 176.5 Hours |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Cohort 1: Time to Clinical Stability Evaluated by the Investigator | SpO2 >=95% on Room Air | 180.5 Hours |
Cohort 1: Time to Discharge From Hospital
Time to discharge from hospital was derived from the reported discharge date/time and from first dose date/time. As per the study protocol and study design, this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for participants who were hospitalized only. Only participants in Cohort 1 were hospitalized, hence this outcome measure is only reported for Cohort 1.
Time frame: Up to Day 28
Population: ITT-i analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and who had centrally confirmed RSV RNA viral load of \>=1 log10 copies/mL above the LLOQ of the RSV RT-qPCR assay at baseline. Analyses on ITT-i set were performed as randomized.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Cohort 1: Time to Discharge From Hospital | 96.2 Hours |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Cohort 1: Time to Discharge From Hospital | 95.3 Hours |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Cohort 1: Time to Discharge From Hospital | 96.2 Hours |
Cohort 1: Time to End of Supplemental Oxygen up to 72 Hours From First Hospital Discharge
Time to end of supplemental oxygen up to 72 hours from first hospital discharge was assessed. Time to end of supplemental oxygen was defined as time (hours) from first dose of study drug to last end date/time of any oxygen supplementation received, but within 72 hours following first hospital discharge. As per the study protocol and study design, this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for participants who were hospitalized only. Only participants in Cohort 1 were hospitalized, hence this outcome measure is only reported for Cohort 1.
Time frame: Up to end of supplemental oxygen including supplemental oxygen within 72 hours after first hospital discharge (up to Day 28)
Population: ITT-i analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and who had centrally confirmed RSV RNA viral load of \>=1 log10 copies/mL above the LLOQ of the RSV RT-qPCR assay at baseline. Analyses on ITT-i set were performed as randomized.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Cohort 1: Time to End of Supplemental Oxygen up to 72 Hours From First Hospital Discharge | 58.1 Hours |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Cohort 1: Time to End of Supplemental Oxygen up to 72 Hours From First Hospital Discharge | 57.9 Hours |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Cohort 1: Time to End of Supplemental Oxygen up to 72 Hours From First Hospital Discharge | 63.0 Hours |
Cohort 1: Time to Return to Age-adjusted Normal Values for Vital Signs
Time to return to age-adjusted normal values from first dose of study drug based on the reported vital signs (respiratory rate, heart rate, SpO2 \>=92%, and SpO2 \>=95%) values was assessed. As per the study protocol and study design, this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for participants who were hospitalized only. Only participants in Cohort 1 were hospitalized, hence this outcome measure is only reported for Cohort 1.
Time frame: Up to Day 28
Population: ITT-i analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and who had centrally confirmed RSV RNA viral load of \>=1 log10 copies/mL above the LLOQ of the RSV RT-qPCR assay at baseline. Analyses on ITT-i set were performed as randomized.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Cohort 1: Time to Return to Age-adjusted Normal Values for Vital Signs | Respiratory Rate | 13.6 Hours |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Cohort 1: Time to Return to Age-adjusted Normal Values for Vital Signs | Heart Rate | 37.3 Hours |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Cohort 1: Time to Return to Age-adjusted Normal Values for Vital Signs | SpO2 >=92% on Room Air | 65.4 Hours |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Cohort 1: Time to Return to Age-adjusted Normal Values for Vital Signs | SpO2 >=95% on Room Air | 71.3 Hours |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Cohort 1: Time to Return to Age-adjusted Normal Values for Vital Signs | SpO2 >=95% on Room Air | 87.0 Hours |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Cohort 1: Time to Return to Age-adjusted Normal Values for Vital Signs | Respiratory Rate | 20.0 Hours |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Cohort 1: Time to Return to Age-adjusted Normal Values for Vital Signs | SpO2 >=92% on Room Air | 86.6 Hours |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Cohort 1: Time to Return to Age-adjusted Normal Values for Vital Signs | Heart Rate | 17.0 Hours |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Cohort 1: Time to Return to Age-adjusted Normal Values for Vital Signs | SpO2 >=95% on Room Air | 92.5 Hours |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Cohort 1: Time to Return to Age-adjusted Normal Values for Vital Signs | Heart Rate | 10.2 Hours |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Cohort 1: Time to Return to Age-adjusted Normal Values for Vital Signs | SpO2 >=92% on Room Air | 68.9 Hours |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Cohort 1: Time to Return to Age-adjusted Normal Values for Vital Signs | Respiratory Rate | 30.2 Hours |
Cohort 1: Trough Plasma Concentration (Ctrough) of JNJ-53718678
Ctrough is the trough plasma concentration of JNJ-53718678 estimated by population PK model.
Time frame: Days 1 and 7
Population: PK analysis set included all participants from Cohort-1 who received JNJ-53718678 and for whom at least one PK concentration was reported. Here, 'n' (number analyzed) represents number of participants who were evaluable for specified timepoints.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Cohort 1: Trough Plasma Concentration (Ctrough) of JNJ-53718678 | >=28 days to <3 months: Day 7 | 267 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 111 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Cohort 1: Trough Plasma Concentration (Ctrough) of JNJ-53718678 | >=28 days to <3 months: Day 1 | 64 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 31.3 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Cohort 1: Trough Plasma Concentration (Ctrough) of JNJ-53718678 | >=6 months to <=3 years: Day 1 | 59.9 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 43 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Cohort 1: Trough Plasma Concentration (Ctrough) of JNJ-53718678 | >=3 months to <6 months: Day 1 | 55.5 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 33.5 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Cohort 1: Trough Plasma Concentration (Ctrough) of JNJ-53718678 | >=6 months to <=3 years: Day 7 | 89 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 73.6 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Cohort 1: Trough Plasma Concentration (Ctrough) of JNJ-53718678 | >=3 months to <6 months: Day 7 | 126 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 103 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Cohort 1: Trough Plasma Concentration (Ctrough) of JNJ-53718678 | >=6 months to <=3 years: Day 7 | 386 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 331 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Cohort 1: Trough Plasma Concentration (Ctrough) of JNJ-53718678 | >=28 days to <3 months: Day 1 | 167 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 147 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Cohort 1: Trough Plasma Concentration (Ctrough) of JNJ-53718678 | >=28 days to <3 months: Day 7 | 885 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 239 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Cohort 1: Trough Plasma Concentration (Ctrough) of JNJ-53718678 | >=3 months to <6 months: Day 1 | 204 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 58.5 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Cohort 1: Trough Plasma Concentration (Ctrough) of JNJ-53718678 | >=3 months to <6 months: Day 7 | 702 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 487 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Cohort 1: Trough Plasma Concentration (Ctrough) of JNJ-53718678 | >=6 months to <=3 years: Day 1 | 227 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 149 |
Cohort 2: Plasma Concentration of JNJ-53718678
Plasma concentration of JNJ-53718678 was measured for Cohort-2. As per planned analysis in the protocol, PK sampling was performed on either Day 3 or Day 5 for participants receiving twice daily dosing, resulting in one combined timepoint of Day 3 or Day 5. Hence, the data collected on either Day 3 or Day 5 was pooled and is reported here collectively.
Time frame: Once daily dosing: Day 3 and Day 8 pre- or post-dose. Twice daily dosing: Day 1 at least 1 hour post-dose, and Days 3 or 5 (combined in one timepoint) at least 4 hours after morning dose but prior to evening dose
Population: PK analysis set included all participants from Cohort-2 who received JNJ-53718678 and for whom at least one PK concentration was reported. Here, 'n' (number analyzed) represents number of participants who were evaluable at specified timepoints.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Cohort 2: Plasma Concentration of JNJ-53718678 | Day 3 (Once daily) | 392.97 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 638.253 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Cohort 2: Plasma Concentration of JNJ-53718678 | Day 8 (Once daily) | 59.05 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 84.552 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Cohort 2: Plasma Concentration of JNJ-53718678 | Day 1 (Twice daily) | 394.58 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 297.539 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Cohort 2: Plasma Concentration of JNJ-53718678 | Day 3 or Day 5 (Twice daily) | 441.13 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 305.45 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Cohort 2: Plasma Concentration of JNJ-53718678 | Day 3 or Day 5 (Twice daily) | 1050.44 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 663.166 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Cohort 2: Plasma Concentration of JNJ-53718678 | Day 3 (Once daily) | 931.66 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 1757.958 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Cohort 2: Plasma Concentration of JNJ-53718678 | Day 1 (Twice daily) | 1539.43 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 602.591 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Cohort 2: Plasma Concentration of JNJ-53718678 | Day 8 (Once daily) | 364.73 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 951.896 |
Heart Rate Over Time
Heart rate was measured by the investigator over time.
Time frame: Baseline, Days 3, 5, 8, 14 and 21
Population: The Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, and were analyzed as treated, regardless of the randomized treatment group assigned. Here, 'n' (number analyzed) represents number of participants who were evaluable at specified timepoints.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Heart Rate Over Time | Baseline | 143.2 Beats/minute | Standard Deviation 17.4 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Heart Rate Over Time | Day 3 | 138.8 Beats/minute | Standard Deviation 16.82 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Heart Rate Over Time | Day 5 | 136.0 Beats/minute | Standard Deviation 15.81 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Heart Rate Over Time | Day 8 | 133.3 Beats/minute | Standard Deviation 17.59 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Heart Rate Over Time | Day 14 | 131.7 Beats/minute | Standard Deviation 19.81 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Heart Rate Over Time | Day 21 | 128.2 Beats/minute | Standard Deviation 20.27 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Heart Rate Over Time | Day 3 | 137.5 Beats/minute | Standard Deviation 18.25 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Heart Rate Over Time | Day 8 | 127.9 Beats/minute | Standard Deviation 18.13 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Heart Rate Over Time | Day 21 | 131.5 Beats/minute | Standard Deviation 15.74 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Heart Rate Over Time | Baseline | 138.9 Beats/minute | Standard Deviation 17.57 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Heart Rate Over Time | Day 5 | 132.7 Beats/minute | Standard Deviation 18.28 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Heart Rate Over Time | Day 14 | 132.4 Beats/minute | Standard Deviation 19.33 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Heart Rate Over Time | Day 21 | 132.5 Beats/minute | Standard Deviation 19.14 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Heart Rate Over Time | Day 14 | 134.4 Beats/minute | Standard Deviation 20.7 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Heart Rate Over Time | Day 8 | 134.0 Beats/minute | Standard Deviation 19.14 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Heart Rate Over Time | Day 5 | 16.1 Beats/minute | Standard Deviation 19.68 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Heart Rate Over Time | Baseline | 139.0 Beats/minute | Standard Deviation 18.57 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Heart Rate Over Time | Day 3 | 138.5 Beats/minute | Standard Deviation 17.06 |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Heart Rate Over Time | Day 8 | 118.7 Beats/minute | Standard Deviation 20.25 |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Heart Rate Over Time | Day 3 | 127.8 Beats/minute | Standard Deviation 20.99 |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Heart Rate Over Time | Day 5 | 119.2 Beats/minute | Standard Deviation 14.75 |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Heart Rate Over Time | Day 21 | 117.2 Beats/minute | Standard Deviation 22.56 |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Heart Rate Over Time | Day 14 | 117.4 Beats/minute | Standard Deviation 18.17 |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Heart Rate Over Time | Baseline | 131.2 Beats/minute | Standard Deviation 24.28 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Heart Rate Over Time | Baseline | 135.6 Beats/minute | Standard Deviation 19.35 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Heart Rate Over Time | Day 14 | 118.0 Beats/minute | Standard Deviation 19.17 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Heart Rate Over Time | Day 3 | 128.3 Beats/minute | Standard Deviation 17.97 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Heart Rate Over Time | Day 5 | 122.6 Beats/minute | Standard Deviation 19.85 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Heart Rate Over Time | Day 8 | 120.0 Beats/minute | Standard Deviation 19.61 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Heart Rate Over Time | Day 21 | 125.3 Beats/minute | Standard Deviation 20.95 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Heart Rate Over Time | Day 8 | 118.9 Beats/minute | Standard Deviation 27.04 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Heart Rate Over Time | Day 5 | 120.4 Beats/minute | Standard Deviation 23.31 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Heart Rate Over Time | Day 14 | 115.2 Beats/minute | Standard Deviation 18.82 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Heart Rate Over Time | Day 21 | 115.2 Beats/minute | Standard Deviation 19.78 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Heart Rate Over Time | Day 3 | 118.8 Beats/minute | Standard Deviation 28.1 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Heart Rate Over Time | Baseline | 126.1 Beats/minute | Standard Deviation 22.55 |
Least Squares (LS) Mean RSV Viral Load on Days 3, 8 and 14
LS mean RSV viral load on Days 3, 8, and 14 was reported. LS mean viral load (log10 copies/mL) was estimated per time point. The difference in RSV viral Load AUC (log10 copies\*day/mL) from immediately prior to first dose of study drug (baseline) through Day 3, 8 and 14 was determined from the model estimating the LS Mean Viral Load per time point, and is presented in the statistical analysis. The RSV viral load was measured by qRT-PCR assay in mid-turbinate nasal swab specimens. As planned, combined data for both the cohorts was collected, and analyzed for this outcome measure at Days 3 and 8, however combined Cohort 1 and Cohort 2 data were not analyzed for this outcome measure at Day 14, due to the premature study termination.
Time frame: Baseline through Days 3, 8, and 14
Population: ITT-i analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and who had centrally confirmed RSV RNA viral load of \>=1 log10 copies/mL above the LLOQ of the RSV RT-qPCR assay at baseline. Analyses on ITT-i set were performed as randomized. Here, 'n' (number analyzed) represents number of participants who were evaluable at specified timepoints.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Least Squares (LS) Mean RSV Viral Load on Days 3, 8 and 14 | Day 3: LS means RSV Viral Load | 5.48 log10 copies*day/mL |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Least Squares (LS) Mean RSV Viral Load on Days 3, 8 and 14 | Day 8: LS means RSV Viral Load | 2.66 log10 copies*day/mL |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Least Squares (LS) Mean RSV Viral Load on Days 3, 8 and 14 | Day 3: LS means RSV Viral Load | 5.36 log10 copies*day/mL |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Least Squares (LS) Mean RSV Viral Load on Days 3, 8 and 14 | Day 8: LS means RSV Viral Load | 2.08 log10 copies*day/mL |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Least Squares (LS) Mean RSV Viral Load on Days 3, 8 and 14 | Day 3: LS means RSV Viral Load | 5.32 log10 copies*day/mL |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Least Squares (LS) Mean RSV Viral Load on Days 3, 8 and 14 | Day 8: LS means RSV Viral Load | 2.08 log10 copies*day/mL |
Number of Participants With Emerging Variations in the Viral Genome Potentially Associated With Resistance to JNJ-53718678
Number of participants with emerging variations in the viral genome potentially associated with resistance to JNJ-53718678 was reported. Number of participants with F gene sequencing data available and with emerging genetic variations post-baseline as compared to baseline, considering 24 RSV F protein positions of interest (positions 127, 137, 138, 140, 141, 143, 144, 323, 338, 339, 392, 394, 396, 397, 398, 399, 400, 401, 474, 486, 487, 488, 489, and 517) was reported.
Time frame: Up to Day 21
Population: ITT-i analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and who had centrally confirmed RSV RNA viral load of \>=1 log10 copies/mL above the LLOQ of the RSV RT-qPCR assay at baseline. Analyses on ITT-i set were performed as randomized. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Number of Participants With Emerging Variations in the Viral Genome Potentially Associated With Resistance to JNJ-53718678 | 0 Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Number of Participants With Emerging Variations in the Viral Genome Potentially Associated With Resistance to JNJ-53718678 | 0 Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Number of Participants With Emerging Variations in the Viral Genome Potentially Associated With Resistance to JNJ-53718678 | 2 Participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Number of Participants With Emerging Variations in the Viral Genome Potentially Associated With Resistance to JNJ-53718678 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Number of Participants With Emerging Variations in the Viral Genome Potentially Associated With Resistance to JNJ-53718678 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Number of Participants With Emerging Variations in the Viral Genome Potentially Associated With Resistance to JNJ-53718678 | 2 Participants |
Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time
Percentage of participants by health status assessment based on PRESORS caregiver (ObsRO) general question over time was assessed. PRESORS is a questionnaire recording presence and severity of signs and symptoms of RSV disease (fever, cough, sputum, wheezing, difficulty breathing, nasal congestion, and feeding issues). Health status was assessed by a question (how is the child's health now) of PRESORS questionnaire and responses were categorized as: 1) excellent, 2) very good, 3) good, 4) fair, 5) poor, and 6) very poor.
Time frame: Baseline, Days 3, 5, 8, 14, and 21
Population: ITT-i analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and who had centrally confirmed RSV RNA viral load of \>=1 log10 copies/mL above LLOQ of RSV RT-qPCR assay at baseline. Analyses on ITT-i set were performed as randomized. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure and 'n' (number analyzed) represents number of participants who were evaluable at specified timepoints.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 5: Very good | 19.1 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 14: Good | 19.5 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 14: Poor | 2.4 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 14: Very poor | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 21: Good | 11.1 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 5: Fair | 36.2 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 8: Good | 32.6 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Baseline: Excellent | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Baseline: Fair | 42.2 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 21: Fair | 11.1 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 3: Very good | 8.5 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Baseline: Poor | 48.9 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Baseline: Very good | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 14: Very good | 43.9 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 21: Very good | 22.2 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 3: Good | 23.4 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 5: Poor | 12.8 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 21: Very poor | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 8: Poor | 4.3 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 5: Excellent | 2.1 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 21: Excellent | 55.6 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 3: Fair | 38.3 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Baseline: Good | 4.4 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 8: Very good | 23.9 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 8: Fair | 23.9 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 14: Fair | 9.8 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 5: Very poor | 6.4 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 3: Poor | 21.3 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 5: Good | 23.4 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 8: Very poor | 2.2 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Baseline: Very poor | 4.4 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 3: Excellent | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 8: Excellent | 13.0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 3: Very poor | 8.5 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 14: Excellent | 24.4 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 21: Poor | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 14: Very poor | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 8: Very good | 32.6 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 5: Excellent | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 14: Fair | 5.0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 5: Very good | 9.3 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Baseline: Fair | 51.2 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 8: Excellent | 9.3 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 14: Good | 5.0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 5: Good | 41.9 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Baseline: Very good | 4.7 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 21: Fair | 5.4 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 5: Fair | 39.5 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 14: Very good | 47.5 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 5: Poor | 9.3 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Baseline: Poor | 30.2 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 14: Excellent | 42.5 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 5: Very poor | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 21: Good | 13.5 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Baseline: Very poor | 4.7 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 8: Poor | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 3: Excellent | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 8: Good | 32.6 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 21: Very good | 32.4 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 3: Very good | 9.3 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 21: Poor | 2.7 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Baseline: Excellent | 2.3 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 3: Good | 20.9 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Baseline: Good | 7.0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 21: Excellent | 45.9 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 3: Fair | 46.5 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 8: Very poor | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 8: Fair | 25.6 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 21: Very poor | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 3: Poor | 23.3 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 14: Poor | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 3: Very poor | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 21: Poor | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 8: Very poor | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 8: Excellent | 16.7 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 8: Very good | 21.4 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 8: Poor | 2.4 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 8: Good | 38.1 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 8: Fair | 21.4 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Baseline: Good | 7.3 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 21: Fair | 6.1 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Baseline: Fair | 43.9 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Baseline: Poor | 48.8 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 21: Good | 15.2 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Baseline: Very poor | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 3: Excellent | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 21: Very good | 33.3 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 3: Very good | 2.3 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 3: Good | 34.1 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 21: Excellent | 45.5 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 3: Fair | 45.5 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Baseline: Excellent | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 14: Very poor | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 3: Poor | 13.6 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 14: Poor | 2.4 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 3: Very poor | 4.5 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 14: Fair | 7.3 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 5: Excellent | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 5: Very good | 20.9 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 14: Good | 9.8 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 5: Good | 37.2 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 14: Very good | 36.6 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 5: Fair | 34.9 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Baseline: Very good | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 5: Poor | 7.0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 21: Very poor | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 14: Excellent | 43.9 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 5: Very poor | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 3: Good | 17.2 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Baseline: Excellent | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Baseline: Very good | 3.6 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Baseline: Good | 14.3 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Baseline: Fair | 57.1 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Baseline: Poor | 25.0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Baseline: Very poor | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 3: Excellent | 3.4 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 3: Very good | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 3: Fair | 58.6 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 3: Poor | 20.7 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 3: Very poor | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 5: Excellent | 6.7 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 5: Very good | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 5: Good | 26.7 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 5: Fair | 63.3 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 5: Poor | 3.3 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 5: Very poor | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 8: Excellent | 6.5 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 8: Very good | 19.4 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 8: Good | 48.4 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 8: Fair | 22.6 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 8: Poor | 3.2 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 8: Very poor | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 14: Excellent | 50.0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 14: Very good | 23.3 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 14: Good | 20.0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 14: Fair | 6.7 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 14: Poor | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 14: Very poor | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 21: Excellent | 60.0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 21: Very good | 28.0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 21: Good | 8.0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 21: Fair | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 21: Poor | 4.0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 21: Very poor | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 14: Good | 16.7 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 3: Good | 12.9 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 5: Fair | 40.6 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Baseline: Good | 11.1 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 21: Excellent | 79.2 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 5: Excellent | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 3: Very good | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 14: Excellent | 56.7 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 3: Excellent | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Baseline: Excellent | 3.7 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 21: Very good | 12.5 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 21: Very poor | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Baseline: Very poor | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 14: Fair | 6.7 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Baseline: Poor | 44.4 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 14: Very good | 16.7 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 21: Good | 4.2 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 3: Very poor | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 5: Very poor | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Baseline: Fair | 40.7 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 3: Poor | 45.2 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 21: Poor | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 14: Poor | 3.3 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 8: Fair | 36.4 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 5: Good | 31.3 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 8: Good | 36.4 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 5: Poor | 21.9 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 8: Very good | 21.2 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 21: Fair | 4.2 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 8: Poor | 3.0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 3: Fair | 41.9 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 5: Very good | 6.3 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 8: Excellent | 3.0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 14: Very poor | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Baseline: Very good | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 8: Very poor | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 8: Very good | 22.2 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 5: Poor | 25.0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 14: Excellent | 53.6 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 5: Fair | 42.9 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 5: Good | 28.6 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Baseline: Very good | 7.7 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 14: Very good | 28.6 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 5: Very good | 3.6 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 14: Good | 7.1 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 5: Excellent | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 3: Very poor | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 14: Fair | 3.6 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 3: Poor | 35.7 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 14: Poor | 3.6 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 3: Fair | 53.6 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 21: Poor | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 14: Very poor | 3.6 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 3: Good | 10.7 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 3: Very good | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Baseline: Excellent | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 21: Excellent | 68.2 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 3: Excellent | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 21: Very good | 9.1 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Baseline: Poor | 65.4 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Baseline: Very poor | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 21: Good | 13.6 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Baseline: Fair | 23.1 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Baseline: Good | 3.8 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 8: Good | 33.3 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 21: Very poor | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 8: Fair | 33.3 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 8: Very poor | 3.7 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 8: Poor | 3.7 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 8: Excellent | 3.7 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 5: Very poor | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 21: Fair | 9.1 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants by Return to Pre-RSV Disease Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time
Percentage of participants by return to pre-RSV disease health status assessment based on PRESORS caregiver (ObsRO) general question over time was assessed by a question (Has the child's health returned to normal \[how it was before RSV?\]) of PRESORS questionnaire and responses were categorized as: 1) No, and 2) Yes. PRESORS is a questionnaire recording presence and severity of signs and symptoms of RSV disease (fever, cough, sputum, wheezing, difficulty breathing, nasal congestion, and feeding issues). Below results are reported for category 'Yes'.
Time frame: Baseline, Days 3, 5, 8, 14, and 21
Population: ITT-i analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and who had centrally confirmed RSV RNA viral load of \>=1 log10 copies/mL above the LLOQ of the RSV RT-qPCR assay at baseline. Analyses on ITT-i set were performed as randomized. Here, 'n' (number analyzed) represents number of participants who were evaluable at specified timepoints.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Return to Pre-RSV Disease Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 14 | 72.4 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Return to Pre-RSV Disease Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 5 | 23.8 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Return to Pre-RSV Disease Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 8 | 37.5 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Return to Pre-RSV Disease Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 21 | 81.5 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Return to Pre-RSV Disease Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Baseline | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Return to Pre-RSV Disease Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 3 | 15.4 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Return to Pre-RSV Disease Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Baseline | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Return to Pre-RSV Disease Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 8 | 44.7 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Return to Pre-RSV Disease Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 21 | 86.1 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Return to Pre-RSV Disease Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 3 | 8.6 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Return to Pre-RSV Disease Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 14 | 77.8 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Return to Pre-RSV Disease Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 5 | 16.2 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Return to Pre-RSV Disease Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 5 | 25.6 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Return to Pre-RSV Disease Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Baseline | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Return to Pre-RSV Disease Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 3 | 28.1 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Return to Pre-RSV Disease Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 21 | 84.4 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Return to Pre-RSV Disease Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 8 | 58.8 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Return to Pre-RSV Disease Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 14 | 84.4 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Return to Pre-RSV Disease Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Baseline | 22.2 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Return to Pre-RSV Disease Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 14 | 81.5 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Return to Pre-RSV Disease Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 3 | 12.0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Return to Pre-RSV Disease Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 8 | 51.9 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Return to Pre-RSV Disease Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 21 | 92.0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Return to Pre-RSV Disease Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 5 | 16.0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Return to Pre-RSV Disease Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 21 | 95.7 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Return to Pre-RSV Disease Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 5 | 4.3 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Return to Pre-RSV Disease Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 14 | 85.7 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Return to Pre-RSV Disease Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 3 | 12.0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Return to Pre-RSV Disease Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Baseline | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Return to Pre-RSV Disease Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 8 | 36.0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Return to Pre-RSV Disease Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 8 | 10.0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Return to Pre-RSV Disease Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 14 | 73.1 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Return to Pre-RSV Disease Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 5 | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Return to Pre-RSV Disease Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Baseline | 12.5 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Return to Pre-RSV Disease Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 21 | 95.5 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Return to Pre-RSV Disease Health Status Assessment Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 3 | 4.3 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time
Percentage of participants by status of RSV symptoms based on PRESORS caregiver (ObsRO) general question over time was assessed. PRESORS is a questionnaire recording presence and severity of signs and symptoms of RSV disease (fever, cough, sputum, wheezing, difficulty breathing, nasal congestion, and feeding issues). Status of RSV symptoms was assessed by a question (how would you rate the child's RSV symptoms now?) of PRESORS questionnaire and responses were categorized as: 1) none, 2) very mild, 3) mild, 4) moderate, 5) severe, and 6) very severe.
Time frame: Baseline, Days 3, 5, 8, 14, and 21
Population: ITT-i analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and who had centrally confirmed RSV RNA viral load of \>=1 log10 copies/mL above LLOQ of RSV RT-qPCR assay at baseline. Analyses on ITT-i set were performed as randomized. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure and 'n' (number analyzed) represents number of participants who were evaluable at specified timepoints.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 21: Very mild | 18.5 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 8: Mild | 34.8 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 5: Severe | 10.6 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 21: None | 66.7 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Baseline: Severe | 37.8 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 21: Very severe | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Baseline: Mild | 6.7 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 14: Mild | 12.2 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 8: Very mild | 30.4 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Baseline: Very severe | 4.4 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 21: Severe | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 8: Very severe | 2.2 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 5: Very severe | 4.3 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 5: Mild | 38.3 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 21: Mild | 11.1 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 5: Very mild | 23.4 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 21: Moderate | 3.7 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 14: Very mild | 36.6 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 8: None | 13.0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 14: None | 48.8 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Baseline: Very mild | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 14: Moderate | 2.4 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 3: None | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 3: Mild | 23.4 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Baseline: Moderate | 51.1 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 8: Severe | 2.2 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 8: Moderate | 17.4 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 14: Severe | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 5: Moderate | 21.3 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Baseline: None | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 3: Very severe | 6.4 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 3: Moderate | 46.8 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 3: Very mild | 6.4 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 14: Very severe | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 5: None | 2.1 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 3: Severe | 17.0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 3: Very mild | 9.3 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 5: Moderate | 39.5 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Baseline: Very severe | 9.3 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 3: Very severe | 2.3 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 5: None | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 5: Mild | 27.9 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 5: Very mild | 23.3 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 14: Moderate | 10.0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 14: None | 55.0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 8: Moderate | 23.3 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 14: Severe | 2.5 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 8: Mild | 23.3 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 14: Very severe | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 21: None | 67.6 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 8: Very severe | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 8: Very mild | 37.2 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 21: Very mild | 18.9 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 8: None | 16.3 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 21: Mild | 2.7 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 21: Moderate | 8.1 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 14: Very mild | 30.0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 5: Very severe | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 21: Severe | 2.7 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 5: Severe | 9.3 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 21: Very severe | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 3: Moderate | 48.8 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 3: Severe | 18.6 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Baseline: None | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 8: Severe | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 3: Mild | 18.6 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Baseline: Very mild | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Baseline: Severe | 27.9 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Baseline: Mild | 7.0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 14: Mild | 2.5 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Baseline: Moderate | 55.8 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 3: None | 2.3 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 8: Very mild | 28.6 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 5: Moderate | 41.9 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 3: Moderate | 43.2 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Baseline: Mild | 4.9 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 14: Very severe | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Baseline: Severe | 41.5 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 3: Severe | 9.1 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 8: Severe | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 8: Mild | 28.6 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 3: Mild | 36.4 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 14: None | 58.5 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 14: Severe | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 5: Mild | 32.6 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Baseline: None | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 3: None | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 3: Very severe | 4.5 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 14: Moderate | 7.3 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 5: Very mild | 16.3 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Baseline: Very severe | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 5: Very severe | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 21: Mild | 12.1 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Baseline: Very mild | 2.4 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 21: Moderate | 6.1 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 8: Moderate | 16.7 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 3: Very mild | 6.8 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 8: None | 26.2 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 21: Very mild | 24.2 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Baseline: Moderate | 51.2 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 21: Severe | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 14: Very mild | 26.8 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 5: Severe | 2.3 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 5: None | 7.0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 21: None | 57.6 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 14: Mild | 7.3 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 21: Very severe | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 8: Very severe | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 8: None | 12.9 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 14: None | 70.0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 14: Very mild | 20.0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 14: Mild | 6.7 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 14: Moderate | 3.3 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 14: Severe | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 14: Very severe | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 21: None | 84.0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 21: Very mild | 8.0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 21: Mild | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 21: Moderate | 8.0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 21: Severe | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 21: Very severe | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 3: Severe | 6.9 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Baseline: None | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Baseline: Very mild | 7.1 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Baseline: Mild | 32.1 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Baseline: Moderate | 53.6 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Baseline: Severe | 7.1 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 3: Very severe | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 5: None | 3.3 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 5: Very mild | 10.0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 5: Mild | 36.7 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Baseline: Very severe | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 3: None | 3.4 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 3: Very mild | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 3: Mild | 27.6 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 3: Moderate | 62.1 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 5: Moderate | 46.7 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 5: Severe | 3.3 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 5: Very severe | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 8: Very mild | 35.5 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 8: Mild | 38.7 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 8: Moderate | 12.9 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 8: Severe | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 8: Very severe | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 5: Very severe | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 3: Severe | 12.9 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 21: Mild | 4.2 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 3: Very mild | 3.2 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 21: Very mild | 12.5 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 8: None | 6.1 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 3: Moderate | 64.5 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 14: Very mild | 13.3 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 21: None | 83.3 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Baseline: Moderate | 55.6 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 8: Very severe | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 8: Very mild | 45.5 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 5: Moderate | 43.8 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 14: Very severe | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Baseline: Mild | 22.2 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 14: Severe | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 14: None | 63.3 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 8: Mild | 27.3 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 21: Very severe | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Baseline: None | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 14: Moderate | 6.7 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 21: Severe | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 5: Very mild | 12.5 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 8: Severe | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 5: Severe | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 5: None | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 3: None | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Baseline: Very mild | 7.4 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 5: Mild | 43.8 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 21: Moderate | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 3: Very severe | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 3: Mild | 19.4 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Baseline: Severe | 14.8 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 8: Moderate | 21.2 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Baseline: Very severe | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 14: Mild | 16.7 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Baseline: Very severe | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Baseline: Mild | 19.2 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 8: Moderate | 14.8 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 3: None | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Baseline: Very mild | 3.8 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 3: Very mild | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Baseline: None | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 3: Severe | 10.7 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 14: Very mild | 17.9 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 3: Mild | 25.0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 3: Moderate | 64.3 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 21: Very severe | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 5: Moderate | 46.4 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 21: Severe | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 5: Severe | 7.1 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 21: Moderate | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 21: Mild | 9.1 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 8: Severe | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 5: Very severe | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 21: Very mild | 4.5 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 8: None | 7.4 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 21: None | 86.4 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 14: Very severe | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 14: None | 67.9 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 8: Very mild | 25.9 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 14: Severe | 3.6 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 8: Mild | 48.1 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 14: Moderate | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 14: Mild | 10.7 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 5: Very mild | 10.7 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 5: None | 3.6 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 3: Very severe | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 8: Very severe | 3.7 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Day 5: Mild | 32.1 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Baseline: Severe | 30.8 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants by Status of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) General Question Over Time | Baseline: Moderate | 46.2 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants Who Required (re)Hospitalization During Treatment and Follow-up
Percentage of participants who required (re)hospitalization during treatment and follow-up was assessed. Percentage of participants requiring re-hospitalization following the initial hospital discharge was assessed in Cohort 1 participants (hospitalized cohort) whilst percentage of participants requiring hospitalization after first dose of study drug was assessed in Cohort 2 participants (outpatient cohort).
Time frame: Up to Day 28
Population: ITT-i analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and who had centrally confirmed RSV RNA viral load of \>=1 log10 copies/mL above the LLOQ of the RSV RT-qPCR assay at baseline. Analyses on ITT-i set were performed as randomized.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants Who Required (re)Hospitalization During Treatment and Follow-up | 6.4 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants Who Required (re)Hospitalization During Treatment and Follow-up | 4.3 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants Who Required (re)Hospitalization During Treatment and Follow-up | 2.3 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants Who Required (re)Hospitalization During Treatment and Follow-up | 6.3 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants Who Required (re)Hospitalization During Treatment and Follow-up | 6.1 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants Who Required (re)Hospitalization During Treatment and Follow-up | 14.3 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Findings
Percentage of participants with abnormal ECG (PR interval \[for age 0 to 2 years: \>150 msec is abnormally high, for age group 2 to \<3.5 years: \<100 msec is abnormally low and \>150 msec is abnormally high\]; QRS interval \[for 0 to 2 years: \>79 msec is abnormally high, for age group 2 to \<3.5 years: \<40 msec is abnormally low and \>79 msec is abnormally high\]; QT interval \[for age 0 to 2 years: \>500 msec is abnormally high, for age group 2 to \<18 years: \<320 msec is abnormally low and \>450 msec is abnormally high\]; RR interval \[for age 0 to 3 months: \<333 msec is abnormally low and \>750 msec is abnormally high; for age group 3 to 12 months: \<400 msec is abnormally low and \>860 msec is abnormally high; for age 1 to 2 years: \<430 msec is abnormally low and \>1000 msec is abnormally high; for age group 2 to \<18 years: \<600 msec is abnormally low and \>1200 msec is abnormally high\]) findings were assessed.
Time frame: Up to Day 28
Population: The Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, and were analyzed as treated, regardless of the randomized treatment group assigned. Here, 'n' (number analyzed) represents number of participants who were evaluable for specified categories (per ECG parameters).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Findings | QRS Duration: Abnormally High | 4.1 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Findings | RR Interval: Abnormally Low | 12.2 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Findings | PR Interval: Abnormally Low | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Findings | QT Interval: Abnormally Low | 2.0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Findings | PR Interval: Abnormally Low | 2.1 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Findings | RR Interval: Abnormally Low | 8.3 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Findings | QRS Duration: Abnormally High | 4.2 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Findings | QT Interval: Abnormally Low | 4.2 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Findings | QT Interval: Abnormally Low | 2.1 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Findings | PR Interval: Abnormally Low | 2.1 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Findings | RR Interval: Abnormally Low | 12.5 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Findings | QRS Duration: Abnormally High | 4.2 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Findings | QRS Duration: Abnormally High | 6.1 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Findings | QT Interval: Abnormally Low | 3.0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Findings | RR Interval: Abnormally Low | 21.2 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Findings | PR Interval: Abnormally Low | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Findings | PR Interval: Abnormally Low | 3.0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Findings | QT Interval: Abnormally Low | 9.1 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Findings | RR Interval: Abnormally Low | 15.2 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Findings | QRS Duration: Abnormally High | 6.1 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Findings | RR Interval: Abnormally Low | 9.7 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Findings | PR Interval: Abnormally Low | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Findings | QT Interval: Abnormally Low | 3.2 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Findings | QRS Duration: Abnormally High | 9.7 Percentage of Participants |
Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings
Percentage of participants with abnormal laboratory findings (chemistry and hematology) worst toxicity grade was assessed based on Division of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (DMID) toxicity grading scale. DMID toxicity grades range from 1 to 4. Grade 1 = mild: transient or mild discomfort (\<48 hours); no medical intervention/therapy required. Grade 2 = moderate: mild to moderate limitation in activity - some assistance may be needed; no or minimal medical intervention/therapy required. Grade 3 = severe: marked limitation in activity, some assistance usually required; medical intervention/therapy required, hospitalizations possible. Grade 4 = life-threatening or death: Extreme limitation in activity, significant assistance required; significant medical intervention/therapy required, hospitalization or hospice care probable.
Time frame: Up to Day 28
Population: The Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, and were analyzed as treated, regardless of the randomized treatment group assigned. Here, 'n' (number analyzed) represents number of participants who were evaluable for the specified categories.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: Hyperkalemia: Grade 4 | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: Hyperkalemia: Grade 2 | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: Hyperkalemia: Grade 1 | 59.1 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: Hyperglycemia: Grade 1 | 13.6 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: Hyperbilirubinemia: Grade 2 | 2.7 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Hematology: Hemoglobin: Grade 2 | 2.6 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: ALT: Grade 2 | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: Hyperglycemia: Grade 2 | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Hematology: Hemoglobin: Grade 1 | 7.9 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Hematology: Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time: Grade 1 | 11.1 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Hematology: Absolute Neutrophil Count: Grade 3 | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Hematology: Absolute Neutrophil Count: Grade 1 | 13.5 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: ALT: Grade 3 | 4.5 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Hematology: Prothrombin Time: Grade 3 | 11.1 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: Hyponatremia: Grade 2 | 4.5 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: Hypomagnesemia: Grade 3 | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: Hypomagnesemia: Grade 2 | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: Hypomagnesemia: Grade 1 | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST): Grade 1 | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: Alanine Transaminase (ALT): Grade 1 | 13.6 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: Hypoglycemia: Grade 1 | 4.5 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: Hyperuricemia: Grade 1 | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: Hypernatremia: Grade 3 | 4.5 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: Hypernatremia: Grade 2 | 4.5 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: AST: Grade 3 | 4.5 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Hematology: Prothrombin Time: Grade 1 | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST): Grade 1 | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: Alanine Transaminase (ALT): Grade 1 | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: ALT: Grade 2 | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: ALT: Grade 3 | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: AST: Grade 3 | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: Hyperbilirubinemia: Grade 2 | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: Hyperglycemia: Grade 1 | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: Hyperkalemia: Grade 1 | 22.2 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: Hyperkalemia: Grade 2 | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: Hyperkalemia: Grade 4 | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: Hypernatremia: Grade 2 | 3.7 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: Hypernatremia: Grade 3 | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: Hyperuricemia: Grade 1 | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: Hypoglycemia: Grade 1 | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: Hypomagnesemia: Grade 1 | 3.7 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: Hypomagnesemia: Grade 2 | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: Hypomagnesemia: Grade 3 | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: Hyponatremia: Grade 2 | 3.7 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Hematology: Absolute Neutrophil Count: Grade 1 | 11.4 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Hematology: Absolute Neutrophil Count: Grade 3 | 2.9 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Hematology: Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time: Grade 1 | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Hematology: Hemoglobin: Grade 1 | 5.6 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Hematology: Hemoglobin: Grade 2 | 2.8 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Hematology: Prothrombin Time: Grade 1 | 10.0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Hematology: Prothrombin Time: Grade 3 | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: Hyperglycemia: Grade 2 | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST): Grade 1 | 4.5 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: Hyponatremia: Grade 2 | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: Hypoglycemia: Grade 1 | 4.3 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: Hyperbilirubinemia: Grade 2 | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: ALT: Grade 3 | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: Hypomagnesemia: Grade 3 | 4.3 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Hematology: Prothrombin Time: Grade 3 | 6.7 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Hematology: Prothrombin Time: Grade 1 | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: Hypomagnesemia: Grade 1 | 4.3 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: Hypernatremia: Grade 2 | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: Hypomagnesemia: Grade 2 | 4.3 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: Hyperkalemia: Grade 2 | 4.3 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Hematology: Hemoglobin: Grade 2 | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: Hyperglycemia: Grade 2 | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Hematology: Hemoglobin: Grade 1 | 2.9 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: Hyperkalemia: Grade 4 | 8.7 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: Hypernatremia: Grade 3 | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: AST: Grade 3 | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: ALT: Grade 2 | 4.5 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Hematology: Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time: Grade 1 | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: Hyperkalemia: Grade 1 | 39.1 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: Alanine Transaminase (ALT): Grade 1 | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: Hyperuricemia: Grade 1 | 4.3 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: Hyperglycemia: Grade 1 | 4.3 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Hematology: Absolute Neutrophil Count: Grade 3 | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Hematology: Absolute Neutrophil Count: Grade 1 | 2.8 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: Hyperkalemia: Grade 2 | 3.1 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: Hyperglycemia: Grade 2 | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: Hyperkalemia: Grade 4 | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: Hypernatremia: Grade 2 | 3.1 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Hematology: Prothrombin Time: Grade 1 | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: Hypernatremia: Grade 3 | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST): Grade 1 | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: Hyperuricemia: Grade 1 | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: Hypoglycemia: Grade 1 | 6.3 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: Alanine Transaminase (ALT): Grade 1 | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: Hypomagnesemia: Grade 1 | 3.1 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: Hypomagnesemia: Grade 2 | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: ALT: Grade 3 | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: Hypomagnesemia: Grade 3 | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Hematology: Prothrombin Time: Grade 3 | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: Hyponatremia: Grade 2 | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Hematology: Absolute Neutrophil Count: Grade 1 | 3.0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Hematology: Absolute Neutrophil Count: Grade 3 | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: ALT: Grade 2 | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Hematology: Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time: Grade 1 | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Hematology: Hemoglobin: Grade 1 | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Hematology: Hemoglobin: Grade 2 | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: Hyperbilirubinemia: Grade 2 | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: Hyperglycemia: Grade 1 | 6.3 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: Hyperkalemia: Grade 1 | 21.9 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: AST: Grade 3 | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: Hyperglycemia: Grade 2 | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: Hyponatremia: Grade 2 | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Hematology: Prothrombin Time: Grade 3 | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: AST: Grade 3 | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Hematology: Absolute Neutrophil Count: Grade 1 | 9.1 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: ALT: Grade 2 | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: Hyperuricemia: Grade 1 | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Hematology: Absolute Neutrophil Count: Grade 3 | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: Hyperkalemia: Grade 4 | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Hematology: Prothrombin Time: Grade 1 | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Hematology: Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time: Grade 1 | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: Hypernatremia: Grade 3 | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST): Grade 1 | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: Hyperkalemia: Grade 1 | 55.2 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Hematology: Hemoglobin: Grade 1 | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: Hypernatremia: Grade 2 | 3.4 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: Hyperkalemia: Grade 2 | 3.4 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: Hyperbilirubinemia: Grade 2 | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: ALT: Grade 3 | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: Hypomagnesemia: Grade 1 | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Hematology: Hemoglobin: Grade 2 | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: Hypomagnesemia: Grade 2 | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: Alanine Transaminase (ALT): Grade 1 | 3.6 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: Hypomagnesemia: Grade 3 | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: Hypoglycemia: Grade 1 | 3.4 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: Hyperglycemia: Grade 1 | 3.4 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: ALT: Grade 3 | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: Hyperglycemia: Grade 1 | 10.0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Hematology: Hemoglobin: Grade 1 | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: Hyponatremia: Grade 2 | 10.0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: ALT: Grade 2 | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: Alanine Transaminase (ALT): Grade 1 | 3.4 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: Hyperuricemia: Grade 1 | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: Hypernatremia: Grade 2 | 3.3 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: Hypoglycemia: Grade 1 | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Hematology: Absolute Neutrophil Count: Grade 1 | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: Hyperkalemia: Grade 1 | 36.7 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Hematology: Prothrombin Time: Grade 3 | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST): Grade 1 | 3.3 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Hematology: Hemoglobin: Grade 2 | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: Hypomagnesemia: Grade 3 | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Hematology: Absolute Neutrophil Count: Grade 3 | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: Hypomagnesemia: Grade 2 | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: Hyperbilirubinemia: Grade 2 | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: Hypernatremia: Grade 3 | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: Hyperkalemia: Grade 2 | 3.3 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: AST: Grade 3 | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Hematology: Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time: Grade 1 | 33.3 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: Hypomagnesemia: Grade 1 | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: Hyperglycemia: Grade 2 | 3.3 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Chemistry: Hyperkalemia: Grade 4 | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | Hematology: Prothrombin Time: Grade 1 | 0 Percentage of Participants |
Percentage of Participants With Acceptability and Palatability of the JNJ-53718678 Formulation as Assessed by Parent(s)/Caregiver(s)
Percentage of participants with acceptability and palatability of the JNJ-53718678 formulation was assessed through a questionnaire asking about the child's reaction when given the medicine, completed by parent(s)/caregiver(s) after last dosing that categorized as 1) child took medicine easily, 2) disgusted expressions after tasting medicine, 3) cried after tasting medicine, 4) would not open mouth or turned head away to avoid medicine, 5) spit out or coughed out medicine, 6) gagged, and 7) vomited (within 2 minutes of swallowing medicine). Below results are based on response to child took medicine easily.
Time frame: Day 8
Population: ITT-i analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and who had centrally confirmed RSV RNA viral load of \>=1 log10 copies/mL above the LLOQ of the RSV RT-qPCR assay at baseline. Analyses on ITT-i set were performed as randomized. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Acceptability and Palatability of the JNJ-53718678 Formulation as Assessed by Parent(s)/Caregiver(s) | 67.6 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Acceptability and Palatability of the JNJ-53718678 Formulation as Assessed by Parent(s)/Caregiver(s) | 84.4 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Acceptability and Palatability of the JNJ-53718678 Formulation as Assessed by Parent(s)/Caregiver(s) | 73.0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Acceptability and Palatability of the JNJ-53718678 Formulation as Assessed by Parent(s)/Caregiver(s) | 70.8 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Acceptability and Palatability of the JNJ-53718678 Formulation as Assessed by Parent(s)/Caregiver(s) | 90.5 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Acceptability and Palatability of the JNJ-53718678 Formulation as Assessed by Parent(s)/Caregiver(s) | 85.7 Percentage of Participants |
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events
Percentage of participants with adverse events was assessed. An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in clinical study participants administered a medicinal (investigational or non-investigational) product. An adverse event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the intervention.
Time frame: Up to Day 28
Population: The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, and were analyzed as treated, regardless of the randomized treatment group assigned.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events | 58.0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events | 59.2 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events | 64.6 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events | 47.1 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events | 58.8 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events | 41.9 Percentage of Participants |
Percentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF)
Percentage of participants with categorized change from Baseline in ECG parameters (QT/ QTcB/ QTcF interval) was assessed. Abnormal ECG change from baseline in QTc and QTcB Interval is categorized as borderline QTc change: 30 ms (milliseconds) to \<60 ms, and abnormally high QTc change: greater than \[\>\] 60 ms), and QTcF Interval is categorized as borderline QTc change: 30 ms to \<60 ms, and abnormally high QTc change: \>60 ms.
Time frame: Baseline to Day 28
Population: The Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, and were analyzed as treated, regardless of the randomized treatment group assigned. Here, 'n' (number analyzed) represents number of participants who were evaluable per ECG parameter.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF) | QTcF Interval: Borderline QTc change | 16.7 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF) | QTcF Interval: Abnormally high QTc change | 2.1 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF) | QT Interval: Abnormally high QT change | 4.2 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF) | QTcB Interval: Abnormally high QTc change | 2.1 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF) | QTcF Interval: Normal QTc change | 81.3 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF) | QTcB Interval: Borderline QTc change | 14.6 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF) | QT Interval: Borderline QT change | 29.2 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF) | QT Interval: Normal QT change | 66.7 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF) | QTcB Interval: Normal QTc change | 83.8 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF) | QTcF Interval: Abnormally high QTc change | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF) | QTcB Interval: Abnormally high QTc change | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF) | QT Interval: Borderline QT change | 25.0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF) | QT Interval: Abnormally high QT change | 4.2 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF) | QT Interval: Normal QT change | 70.8 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF) | QTcF Interval: Borderline QTc change | 16.7 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF) | QTcB Interval: Normal QTc change | 87.5 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF) | QTcF Interval: Normal QTc change | 83.3 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF) | QTcB Interval: Borderline QTc change | 12.5 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF) | QT Interval: Borderline QT change | 27.1 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF) | QTcB Interval: Abnormally high QTc change | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF) | QTcB Interval: Normal QTc change | 93.8 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF) | QTcF Interval: Borderline QTc change | 16.7 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF) | QTcF Interval: Abnormally high QTc change | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF) | QT Interval: Abnormally high QT change | 4.2 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF) | QTcF Interval: Normal QTc change | 83.3 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF) | QTcB Interval: Borderline QTc change | 6.3 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF) | QT Interval: Normal QT change | 68.8 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF) | QTcB Interval: Abnormally high QTc change | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF) | QT Interval: Normal QT change | 66.7 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF) | QT Interval: Borderline QT change | 27.3 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF) | QT Interval: Abnormally high QT change | 6.1 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF) | QTcB Interval: Normal QTc change | 90.9 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF) | QTcB Interval: Borderline QTc change | 9.1 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF) | QTcF Interval: Normal QTc change | 90.9 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF) | QTcF Interval: Borderline QTc change | 9.1 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF) | QTcF Interval: Abnormally high QTc change | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF) | QTcB Interval: Borderline QTc change | 9.1 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF) | QTcB Interval: Normal QTc change | 90.9 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF) | QTcF Interval: Normal QTc change | 78.8 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF) | QT Interval: Abnormally high QT change | 9.1 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF) | QTcF Interval: Abnormally high QTc change | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF) | QTcF Interval: Borderline QTc change | 21.2 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF) | QT Interval: Borderline QT change | 33.3 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF) | QT Interval: Normal QT change | 57.6 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF) | QTcB Interval: Abnormally high QTc change | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF) | QT Interval: Normal QT change | 58.6 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF) | QTcB Interval: Normal QTc change | 93.1 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF) | QTcB Interval: Abnormally high QTc change | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF) | QTcF Interval: Abnormally high QTc change | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF) | QTcF Interval: Borderline QTc change | 13.8 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF) | QTcF Interval: Normal QTc change | 86.3 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF) | QT Interval: Abnormally high QT change | 3.4 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF) | QTcB Interval: Borderline QTc change | 6.9 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Categorized Change From Baseline in ECG Parameters (QT, QTcB, QTcF) | QT Interval: Borderline QT change | 37.9 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Medical Resource Utilization (MRU)
Percentage of participants with MRU (any medical care encounters) was reported.
Time frame: Up to Day 28
Population: ITT-i analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and who had centrally confirmed RSV RNA viral load of \>=1 log10 copies/mL above the LLOQ of the RSV RT-qPCR assay at baseline. Analyses on ITT-i set were performed as randomized.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Medical Resource Utilization (MRU) | 100.0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Medical Resource Utilization (MRU) | 100.0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Medical Resource Utilization (MRU) | 100.0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Medical Resource Utilization (MRU) | 9.4 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Medical Resource Utilization (MRU) | 15.2 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Medical Resource Utilization (MRU) | 25.0 Percentage of Participants |
Percentage of Participants With Undetectable RSV Viral Load at Each Timepoint Throughout the Study
Percentage of participants with undetectable RSV viral load (as measured by qRT-PCR) at each timepoint throughout the study was reported. As planned, combined data for both the cohorts were collected, analyzed and reported for this outcome measure.
Time frame: Baseline, Days 3, 5, 8, 14 and 21
Population: ITT-i analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and who had centrally confirmed RSV RNA viral load of \>=1 log10 copies/mL above the LLOQ of the RSV RT-qPCR assay at baseline. Analyses on ITT-i set were performed as randomized. Here, 'n' (number analyzed) represents number of participants who were evaluable at specified timepoints.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Undetectable RSV Viral Load at Each Timepoint Throughout the Study | Baseline | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Undetectable RSV Viral Load at Each Timepoint Throughout the Study | Day 3 | 1.3 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Undetectable RSV Viral Load at Each Timepoint Throughout the Study | Day 5 | 7.8 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Undetectable RSV Viral Load at Each Timepoint Throughout the Study | Day 8 | 33.3 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Undetectable RSV Viral Load at Each Timepoint Throughout the Study | Day 14 | 54.8 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Undetectable RSV Viral Load at Each Timepoint Throughout the Study | Day 21 | 67.6 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Undetectable RSV Viral Load at Each Timepoint Throughout the Study | Day 21 | 76.9 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Undetectable RSV Viral Load at Each Timepoint Throughout the Study | Baseline | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Undetectable RSV Viral Load at Each Timepoint Throughout the Study | Day 8 | 38.4 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Undetectable RSV Viral Load at Each Timepoint Throughout the Study | Day 14 | 58.1 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Undetectable RSV Viral Load at Each Timepoint Throughout the Study | Day 3 | 3.8 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Undetectable RSV Viral Load at Each Timepoint Throughout the Study | Day 5 | 9.1 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Undetectable RSV Viral Load at Each Timepoint Throughout the Study | Day 3 | 2.8 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Undetectable RSV Viral Load at Each Timepoint Throughout the Study | Day 5 | 11.1 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Undetectable RSV Viral Load at Each Timepoint Throughout the Study | Day 21 | 77.9 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Undetectable RSV Viral Load at Each Timepoint Throughout the Study | Day 8 | 38.6 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Undetectable RSV Viral Load at Each Timepoint Throughout the Study | Baseline | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Undetectable RSV Viral Load at Each Timepoint Throughout the Study | Day 14 | 58.2 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Vital Signs Abnormalities
Percentage of participants with vital signs (SBP,DBP, pulse rate, respiratory rate, body temperature and SpO2) abnormalities (abnormally low \[ABL\] and abnormally high \[ABH\]) were reported. DBP: ABL: \<35 mmHg:0-3 months (mths), \<40 mmHg:3 mths- \<3.5 years,ABH: \>65 mmHg:0-3 mths, \>85 mmHg:3-12 mths, \>90 mmHg:1-2 years, \>70 mmHg: 2- \<3.5 years; SBP:ABL: \<60 mmHg:0-12 mths,\<75 mmHg:1-2 years, \<80:2- \<3.5 years,ABH: \>110:0-12 mths, \>120 mmHg:1-2 years, \>10 mmHg:2- \<3.5 years; Pulse rate:ABL: \<80 bpm:0-3 mths, \<70 bpm:3 mths-12 mth,\<60 bpm:1-2 years, \<90 bpm:2- \<3.5 years,ABH: \>180 bpm:0-3 mths, \>150 bpm:3 mths-12 mths, \>140 bpm:1-2 years, \>130:2- \<3.5 years; Respiratory rate:ABL: \<25 bpm:0-3 mths, \<20 bpm: 3 mths-12 mths,\<18 bpm:1-2 years, \<20 bpm:2- \<3.5 years, ABH:\>70 bpm:0-3 mths, \>60 bpm:3 mths-12 mths, \>50 bpm:1-2 years, \>35 bpm:2- \<3.5 years; SpO2: ABL: \<92%: 0-\<3.5 years; Temperature (Celsius): ABH:\>37.8:Tympanic, \>38.0:forehead, oral, axillary, \>37.2:rectal.
Time frame: Up to Day 28
Population: The Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, and were analyzed as treated, regardless of the randomized treatment group assigned. Here, 'n' (number analyzed) represents number of participants evaluable per vital sign parameter. As per change in planned analysis, the upper limit for the last age group was 3.5 years instead of 3 years.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Vital Signs Abnormalities | DBP: Abnormally High | 28.6 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Vital Signs Abnormalities | Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP): Abnormally Low | 8.2 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Vital Signs Abnormalities | Oxygen saturation: Abnormally Low | 8.2 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Vital Signs Abnormalities | Temperature: Abnormally High | 30.6 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Vital Signs Abnormalities | Respiratory rate: Abnormally Low | 12.2 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Vital Signs Abnormalities | Respiratory rate: Abnormally High | 4.1 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Vital Signs Abnormalities | SBP: Abnormally High | 42.9 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Vital Signs Abnormalities | Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP): Abnormally Low | 2.0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Vital Signs Abnormalities | Pulse rate: Abnormally Low | 0.0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Vital Signs Abnormalities | Pulse rate: Abnormally High | 30.6 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Vital Signs Abnormalities | SBP: Abnormally High | 45.8 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Vital Signs Abnormalities | Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP): Abnormally Low | 2.1 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Vital Signs Abnormalities | Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP): Abnormally Low | 18.8 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Vital Signs Abnormalities | DBP: Abnormally High | 35.4 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Vital Signs Abnormalities | Pulse rate: Abnormally High | 27.1 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Vital Signs Abnormalities | Pulse rate: Abnormally Low | 2.1 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Vital Signs Abnormalities | Respiratory rate: Abnormally High | 12.5 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Vital Signs Abnormalities | Respiratory rate: Abnormally Low | 10.4 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Vital Signs Abnormalities | Temperature: Abnormally High | 41.7 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Vital Signs Abnormalities | Oxygen saturation: Abnormally Low | 12.5 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Vital Signs Abnormalities | DBP: Abnormally High | 27.1 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Vital Signs Abnormalities | Respiratory rate: Abnormally Low | 0.0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Vital Signs Abnormalities | Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP): Abnormally Low | 8.3 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Vital Signs Abnormalities | Pulse rate: Abnormally High | 27.1 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Vital Signs Abnormalities | Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP): Abnormally Low | 25.0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Vital Signs Abnormalities | SBP: Abnormally High | 35.4 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Vital Signs Abnormalities | Pulse rate: Abnormally Low | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Vital Signs Abnormalities | Temperature: Abnormally High | 22.9 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Vital Signs Abnormalities | Oxygen saturation: Abnormally Low | 6.3 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Vital Signs Abnormalities | Respiratory rate: Abnormally High | 18.8 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Vital Signs Abnormalities | Respiratory rate: Abnormally High | 3.1 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Vital Signs Abnormalities | Respiratory rate: Abnormally Low | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Vital Signs Abnormalities | SBP: Abnormally High | 18.2 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Vital Signs Abnormalities | Oxygen saturation: Abnormally Low | 3.1 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Vital Signs Abnormalities | Temperature: Abnormally High | 50.0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Vital Signs Abnormalities | Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP): Abnormally Low | 12.1 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Vital Signs Abnormalities | Pulse rate: Abnormally Low | 6.1 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Vital Signs Abnormalities | Pulse rate: Abnormally High | 12.1 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Vital Signs Abnormalities | DBP: Abnormally High | 9.1 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Vital Signs Abnormalities | Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP): Abnormally Low | 15.2 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Vital Signs Abnormalities | Respiratory rate: Abnormally High | 2.9 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Vital Signs Abnormalities | DBP: Abnormally High | 17.6 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Vital Signs Abnormalities | Pulse rate: Abnormally High | 20.6 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Vital Signs Abnormalities | Pulse rate: Abnormally Low | 5.9 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Vital Signs Abnormalities | Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP): Abnormally Low | 8.8 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Vital Signs Abnormalities | Respiratory rate: Abnormally Low | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Vital Signs Abnormalities | Oxygen saturation: Abnormally Low | 9.4 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Vital Signs Abnormalities | Temperature: Abnormally High | 52.9 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Vital Signs Abnormalities | Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP): Abnormally Low | 2.9 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Vital Signs Abnormalities | SBP: Abnormally High | 17.6 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Vital Signs Abnormalities | Pulse rate: Abnormally Low | 16.1 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Vital Signs Abnormalities | Oxygen saturation: Abnormally Low | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Vital Signs Abnormalities | SBP: Abnormally High | 12.9 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Vital Signs Abnormalities | Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP): Abnormally Low | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Vital Signs Abnormalities | Pulse rate: Abnormally High | 16.1 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Vital Signs Abnormalities | Respiratory rate: Abnormally High | 6.5 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Vital Signs Abnormalities | DBP: Abnormally High | 6.5 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Vital Signs Abnormalities | Respiratory rate: Abnormally Low | 0 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Vital Signs Abnormalities | Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP): Abnormally Low | 9.7 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Vital Signs Abnormalities | Temperature: Abnormally High | 54.8 Percentage of Participants |
Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV Disease
Percentage of participants with worsening or improvement of RSV disease based on general questions of overall health was assessed. Improvement or worsening was assessed by a question 'Would you say the child's RSV symptoms have improved, are about the same or are worse than when the child entered the study' and responses were categorized as: 1) very much improved, 2) much improved, 3) a little improved, 4) about the same, 5) a little worse, 6) much worse, and 7) very much worse.
Time frame: Days 14 and 21
Population: ITT-i analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and who had centrally confirmed RSV RNA viral load of \>=1 log10 copies/mL above the LLOQ of the RSV RT-qPCR assay at baseline. Analyses on ITT-i set were performed as randomized. Here, 'n' (number analyzed) represents number of participants who were evaluable at specified timepoints.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV Disease | Day 14: Very much worse | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV Disease | Day 21: About the same | 3.7 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV Disease | Day 14: Much worse | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV Disease | Day 21: Much worse | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV Disease | Day 14: Much improved | 34.1 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV Disease | Day 14: Very much improved | 58.5 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV Disease | Day 21: A little improved | 3.7 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV Disease | Day 14: A little improved | 7.3 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV Disease | Day 21: Much improved | 14.8 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV Disease | Day 14: About the same | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV Disease | Day 21: A little worse | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV Disease | Day 21: Very much worse | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV Disease | Day 21: Very much improved | 77.8 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV Disease | Day 14: A little worse | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV Disease | Day 21: Very much worse | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV Disease | Day 21: A little worse | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV Disease | Day 14: Very much improved | 57.5 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV Disease | Day 14: Much worse | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV Disease | Day 14: A little worse | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV Disease | Day 21: Much worse | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV Disease | Day 21: Very much improved | 63.9 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV Disease | Day 14: A little improved | 2.5 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV Disease | Day 21: About the same | 2.8 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV Disease | Day 14: Much improved | 40.0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV Disease | Day 14: About the same | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV Disease | Day 21: A little improved | 2.8 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV Disease | Day 14: Very much worse | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV Disease | Day 21: Much improved | 30.6 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV Disease | Day 21: A little improved | 3.1 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV Disease | Day 14: Very much improved | 67.5 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV Disease | Day 14: Much improved | 30.0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV Disease | Day 14: A little improved | 2.5 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV Disease | Day 14: About the same | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV Disease | Day 14: A little worse | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV Disease | Day 21: A little worse | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV Disease | Day 21: Much worse | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV Disease | Day 14: Much worse | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV Disease | Day 14: Very much worse | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV Disease | Day 21: Very much worse | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV Disease | Day 21: Very much improved | 56.3 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV Disease | Day 21: Much improved | 37.5 Percentage of participants |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV Disease | Day 21: About the same | 3.1 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV Disease | Day 21: About the same | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV Disease | Day 21: Very much worse | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV Disease | Day 14: A little worse | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV Disease | Day 21: Much worse | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV Disease | Day 21: Much improved | 24.0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV Disease | Day 14: Very much worse | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV Disease | Day 21: Very much improved | 76.0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV Disease | Day 21: A little worse | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV Disease | Day 14: A little improved | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV Disease | Day 14: Very much improved | 76.7 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV Disease | Day 21: A little improved | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV Disease | Day 14: Much improved | 20.0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV Disease | Day 14: Much worse | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV Disease | Day 14: About the same | 3.3 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV Disease | Day 14: Very much improved | 51.7 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV Disease | Day 14: Much worse | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV Disease | Day 14: A little worse | 3.4 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV Disease | Day 14: Very much worse | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV Disease | Day 14: About the same | 3.4 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV Disease | Day 14: A little improved | 3.4 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV Disease | Day 21: Very much worse | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV Disease | Day 21: About the same | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV Disease | Day 21: Very much improved | 78.3 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV Disease | Day 21: Much improved | 21.7 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV Disease | Day 14: Much improved | 37.9 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV Disease | Day 21: A little improved | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV Disease | Day 21: Much worse | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV Disease | Day 21: A little worse | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV Disease | Day 21: Much improved | 13.6 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV Disease | Day 14: Much worse | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV Disease | Day 21: Much worse | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV Disease | Day 14: Very much improved | 64.3 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV Disease | Day 14: About the same | 3.6 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV Disease | Day 14: A little worse | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV Disease | Day 21: A little improved | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV Disease | Day 21: A little worse | 9.1 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV Disease | Day 14: Very much worse | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV Disease | Day 21: Very much improved | 77.3 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV Disease | Day 14: Much improved | 32.1 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV Disease | Day 21: About the same | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV Disease | Day 21: Very much worse | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Percentage of Participants With Worsening or Improvement Status of RSV Disease | Day 14: A little improved | 0 Percentage of participants |
Peripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) Over Time
Peripheral capillary oxygen saturation was measured by the investigator over time.
Time frame: Baseline, Days 3, 5, 8, 14 and 21
Population: The Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, and were analyzed as treated, regardless of the randomized treatment group assigned. Here, 'n' (number analyzed) represents number of participants who were evaluable at specified timepoints.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Peripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) Over Time | Baseline | 97.3 Percentage of SpO2 | Standard Deviation 2.47 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Peripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) Over Time | Day 3 | 96.8 Percentage of SpO2 | Standard Deviation 2.46 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Peripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) Over Time | Day 5 | 97.3 Percentage of SpO2 | Standard Deviation 1.67 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Peripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) Over Time | Day 8 | 97.3 Percentage of SpO2 | Standard Deviation 1.99 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Peripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) Over Time | Day 14 | 98.1 Percentage of SpO2 | Standard Deviation 1.42 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Peripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) Over Time | Day 21 | 98.4 Percentage of SpO2 | Standard Deviation 1.47 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Peripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) Over Time | Day 3 | 96.3 Percentage of SpO2 | Standard Deviation 2.72 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Peripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) Over Time | Day 8 | 97.3 Percentage of SpO2 | Standard Deviation 2.47 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Peripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) Over Time | Day 21 | 98.2 Percentage of SpO2 | Standard Deviation 1.8 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Peripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) Over Time | Baseline | 96.5 Percentage of SpO2 | Standard Deviation 3.44 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Peripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) Over Time | Day 5 | 96.8 Percentage of SpO2 | Standard Deviation 3.74 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Peripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) Over Time | Day 14 | 98.3 Percentage of SpO2 | Standard Deviation 1.84 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Peripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) Over Time | Day 21 | 98.0 Percentage of SpO2 | Standard Deviation 2.12 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Peripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) Over Time | Day 14 | 98.1 Percentage of SpO2 | Standard Deviation 1.64 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Peripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) Over Time | Day 8 | 97.5 Percentage of SpO2 | Standard Deviation 1.74 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Peripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) Over Time | Day 5 | 96.7 Percentage of SpO2 | Standard Deviation 2.25 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Peripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) Over Time | Baseline | 96.6 Percentage of SpO2 | Standard Deviation 2.1 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Peripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) Over Time | Day 3 | 96.0 Percentage of SpO2 | Standard Deviation 2.43 |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Peripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) Over Time | Day 8 | 97.8 Percentage of SpO2 | Standard Deviation 1.48 |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Peripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) Over Time | Day 3 | 96.9 Percentage of SpO2 | Standard Deviation 1.77 |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Peripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) Over Time | Day 5 | 96.9 Percentage of SpO2 | Standard Deviation 1.68 |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Peripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) Over Time | Day 21 | 98.5 Percentage of SpO2 | Standard Deviation 1.74 |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Peripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) Over Time | Day 14 | 98.6 Percentage of SpO2 | Standard Deviation 2.03 |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Peripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) Over Time | Baseline | 96.8 Percentage of SpO2 | Standard Deviation 2.07 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Peripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) Over Time | Baseline | 96.7 Percentage of SpO2 | Standard Deviation 1.91 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Peripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) Over Time | Day 14 | 98.6 Percentage of SpO2 | Standard Deviation 1.53 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Peripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) Over Time | Day 3 | 96.3 Percentage of SpO2 | Standard Deviation 3.12 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Peripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) Over Time | Day 5 | 97.1 Percentage of SpO2 | Standard Deviation 2.12 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Peripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) Over Time | Day 8 | 97.4 Percentage of SpO2 | Standard Deviation 2.69 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Peripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) Over Time | Day 21 | 98.7 Percentage of SpO2 | Standard Deviation 1.36 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Peripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) Over Time | Day 8 | 97.9 Percentage of SpO2 | Standard Deviation 1.83 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Peripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) Over Time | Day 5 | 97.1 Percentage of SpO2 | Standard Deviation 2.43 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Peripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) Over Time | Day 14 | 98.4 Percentage of SpO2 | Standard Deviation 1.73 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Peripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) Over Time | Day 21 | 98.9 Percentage of SpO2 | Standard Deviation 1.25 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Peripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) Over Time | Day 3 | 96.5 Percentage of SpO2 | Standard Deviation 2.96 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Peripheral Capillary Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) Over Time | Baseline | 95.9 Percentage of SpO2 | Standard Deviation 2.92 |
Respiratory Rate (RR) Over Time
Respiratory rate (RR) was measured by the investigator over time.
Time frame: Baseline, Days 3, 5, 8, 14 and 21
Population: The Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study agent, and were analyzed as treated, regardless of the randomized treatment group assigned. Here, 'n' (number analyzed) represents number of participants who were evaluable at specified timepoints.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Respiratory Rate (RR) Over Time | Day 8 | 35.5 Breaths/minute | Standard Deviation 7.9 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Respiratory Rate (RR) Over Time | Day 14 | 35.6 Breaths/minute | Standard Deviation 7.13 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Respiratory Rate (RR) Over Time | Day 3 | 44.1 Breaths/minute | Standard Deviation 11.44 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Respiratory Rate (RR) Over Time | Day 5 | 38.3 Breaths/minute | Standard Deviation 9.36 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Respiratory Rate (RR) Over Time | Baseline | 45.0 Breaths/minute | Standard Deviation 10.6 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Respiratory Rate (RR) Over Time | Day 21 | 36.07 Breaths/minute | Standard Deviation 10.21 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Respiratory Rate (RR) Over Time | Baseline | 45.6 Breaths/minute | Standard Deviation 11.82 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Respiratory Rate (RR) Over Time | Day 8 | 34.4 Breaths/minute | Standard Deviation 7.87 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Respiratory Rate (RR) Over Time | Day 14 | 34.9 Breaths/minute | Standard Deviation 8.89 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Respiratory Rate (RR) Over Time | Day 3 | 41.8 Breaths/minute | Standard Deviation 10.13 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Respiratory Rate (RR) Over Time | Day 5 | 38.1 Breaths/minute | Standard Deviation 9.57 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Respiratory Rate (RR) Over Time | Day 21 | 34.9 Breaths/minute | Standard Deviation 8.96 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Respiratory Rate (RR) Over Time | Day 5 | 39.1 Breaths/minute | Standard Deviation 8.81 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Respiratory Rate (RR) Over Time | Day 14 | 35.2 Breaths/minute | Standard Deviation 7.45 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Respiratory Rate (RR) Over Time | Day 8 | 39.2 Breaths/minute | Standard Deviation 9.45 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Respiratory Rate (RR) Over Time | Baseline | 45.7 Breaths/minute | Standard Deviation 10.85 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Respiratory Rate (RR) Over Time | Day 3 | 42.7 Breaths/minute | Standard Deviation 10.04 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Respiratory Rate (RR) Over Time | Day 21 | 36.6 Breaths/minute | Standard Deviation 7.43 |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Respiratory Rate (RR) Over Time | Baseline | 41.3 Breaths/minute | Standard Deviation 13.66 |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Respiratory Rate (RR) Over Time | Day 21 | 36.4 Breaths/minute | Standard Deviation 9.61 |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Respiratory Rate (RR) Over Time | Day 3 | 37.9 Breaths/minute | Standard Deviation 10.16 |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Respiratory Rate (RR) Over Time | Day 5 | 38.2 Breaths/minute | Standard Deviation 13.37 |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Respiratory Rate (RR) Over Time | Day 8 | 37.4 Breaths/minute | Standard Deviation 11.7 |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Respiratory Rate (RR) Over Time | Day 14 | 35.7 Breaths/minute | Standard Deviation 9.27 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Respiratory Rate (RR) Over Time | Day 5 | 38.1 Breaths/minute | Standard Deviation 8.89 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Respiratory Rate (RR) Over Time | Day 3 | 37.3 Breaths/minute | Standard Deviation 9.54 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Respiratory Rate (RR) Over Time | Baseline | 41.3 Breaths/minute | Standard Deviation 11.76 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Respiratory Rate (RR) Over Time | Day 21 | 35.5 Breaths/minute | Standard Deviation 9.65 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Respiratory Rate (RR) Over Time | Day 14 | 35.6 Breaths/minute | Standard Deviation 10.53 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Respiratory Rate (RR) Over Time | Day 8 | 36.9 Breaths/minute | Standard Deviation 9.75 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Respiratory Rate (RR) Over Time | Day 21 | 34.7 Breaths/minute | Standard Deviation 11.09 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Respiratory Rate (RR) Over Time | Baseline | 37.0 Breaths/minute | Standard Deviation 8.77 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Respiratory Rate (RR) Over Time | Day 3 | 34.4 Breaths/minute | Standard Deviation 9.19 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Respiratory Rate (RR) Over Time | Day 5 | 35.4 Breaths/minute | Standard Deviation 9.53 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Respiratory Rate (RR) Over Time | Day 8 | 34.0 Breaths/minute | Standard Deviation 10.54 |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Respiratory Rate (RR) Over Time | Day 14 | 32.6 Breaths/minute | Standard Deviation 8.38 |
RSV Viral Load Over Time
RSV viral load actual values over time were measured by qRT-PCR in the nasal swab specimens collected at the clinic visits and at home. As planned, combined data for both the cohorts was collected, analyzed and reported for this outcome measure.
Time frame: Baseline, Days 3, 5, 8, 14, and 21
Population: ITT-i analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and who had centrally confirmed RSV RNA viral load of \>=1 log10 copies/mL above the LLOQ of the RSV RT-qPCR assay at baseline. Analyses on ITT-i set were performed as randomized. Here, 'n' (number analyzed) represents number of participants who were evaluable at specified timepoints.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | RSV Viral Load Over Time | Baseline | 6.913 log10 copies/mL | Standard Deviation 1.3449 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | RSV Viral Load Over Time | Day 3 | 5.398 log10 copies/mL | Standard Deviation 1.5834 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | RSV Viral Load Over Time | Day 5 | 4.146 log10 copies/mL | Standard Deviation 1.8508 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | RSV Viral Load Over Time | Day 8 | 2.604 log10 copies/mL | Standard Deviation 2.0857 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | RSV Viral Load Over Time | Day 14 | 1.640 log10 copies/mL | Standard Deviation 1.9515 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | RSV Viral Load Over Time | Day 21 | 1.150 log10 copies/mL | Standard Deviation 1.7752 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | RSV Viral Load Over Time | Day 21 | 0.817 log10 copies/mL | Standard Deviation 1.5347 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | RSV Viral Load Over Time | Baseline | 7.113 log10 copies/mL | Standard Deviation 1.3667 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | RSV Viral Load Over Time | Day 8 | 2.108 log10 copies/mL | Standard Deviation 1.8538 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | RSV Viral Load Over Time | Day 14 | 1.636 log10 copies/mL | Standard Deviation 2.2221 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | RSV Viral Load Over Time | Day 3 | 5.432 log10 copies/mL | Standard Deviation 1.8952 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | RSV Viral Load Over Time | Day 5 | 4.079 log10 copies/mL | Standard Deviation 1.876 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | RSV Viral Load Over Time | Day 3 | 5.271 log10 copies/mL | Standard Deviation 1.771 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | RSV Viral Load Over Time | Day 5 | 3.883 log10 copies/mL | Standard Deviation 1.9815 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | RSV Viral Load Over Time | Day 21 | 0.810 log10 copies/mL | Standard Deviation 1.6699 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | RSV Viral Load Over Time | Day 8 | 2.078 log10 copies/mL | Standard Deviation 1.8319 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | RSV Viral Load Over Time | Baseline | 7.004 log10 copies/mL | Standard Deviation 1.4709 |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | RSV Viral Load Over Time | Day 14 | 1.440 log10 copies/mL | Standard Deviation 1.8768 |
Time to Improvement on Overall Health
Time to improvement based on general questions on overall health was assessed. Time from first dose of study drug until first time status of improvement of RSV symptoms reported as very much improved or much improved based on response to question 'Would you say the child's RSV symptoms have improved, are about the same or are worse than when the child entered the study'.
Time frame: Up to Day 21
Population: ITT-i analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and who had centrally confirmed RSV RNA viral load of \>=1 log10 copies/mL above the LLOQ of the RSV RT-qPCR assay at baseline. Analyses on ITT-i set were performed as randomized. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Time to Improvement on Overall Health | 189.6 Hours |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Time to Improvement on Overall Health | 190.2 Hours |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Time to Improvement on Overall Health | 189.1 Hours |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Time to Improvement on Overall Health | 186.8 Hours |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Time to Improvement on Overall Health | 198.2 Hours |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Time to Improvement on Overall Health | 187.9 Hours |
Time to Resolution of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO)
Time to resolution is defined as time from first dose of study drug until the first time of resolution of all RSV symptoms (breathing problems, retractions, tachypnea, breathing sounds, cough, tachycardia, nasal secretions, sleep disturbance, crying, illness behavior, feeding problems, and dehydration). Resolution occurs when all symptoms from the caregiver reported outcomes (ObsRO) are scored as none or mild (score of 0 or 1, respectively) for at least 24 hours.
Time frame: Up to Day 21
Population: ITT-i analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and who had centrally confirmed RSV RNA viral load of \>=1 log10 copies/mL above the LLOQ of the RSV RT-qPCR assay at baseline. Analyses on ITT-i set were performed as randomized.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Time to Resolution of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) | 193.5 Hours |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Time to Resolution of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) | 163.6 Hours |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Time to Resolution of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) | 151.8 Hours |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Time to Resolution of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) | 166.6 Hours |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Time to Resolution of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) | 206.1 Hours |
| Cohort 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Time to Resolution of RSV Symptoms Based on PRESORS Caregiver (ObsRO) | 176.9 Hours |
Time to Undetectable RSV Viral Load
Time to undetectable RSV viral load (as measured by qRT-PCR) was defined as the time in hours from first dose of study drug to first post-baseline timepoint at which the virus was undetectable and after which there were no more detectable virus assessments. As planned, combined data for both the cohorts was collected, analyzed and reported for this outcome measure.
Time frame: Up to Day 21
Population: ITT-i analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and who had centrally confirmed RSV RNA viral load of \>=1 log10 copies/mL above the LLOQ of the RSV RT-qPCR assay at baseline. Analyses on ITT-i set were performed as randomized.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Cohorts 1 and 2: Placebo | Time to Undetectable RSV Viral Load | 467.0 Hours |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 Low Dose | Time to Undetectable RSV Viral Load | 428.3 Hours |
| Cohorts 1 and 2: JNJ-53718678 High Dose | Time to Undetectable RSV Viral Load | 330.7 Hours |